Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/17/2005 1:31:10 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sabrejack

Sometimes the reason you need to drop multiple smoke grenades relates to height. I think (but am not 100% sure) if the other unit is on a higher elevation you need 2 (or more) smoke grenades (from an infantry unit) to block LOS.

Also, if a unit runs into trouble, drops smoke and retreats one hex from something with a big gun (like a SU152 or big SP gun), 'z' firing into the smoke hex can still cause casualties, and possibly reflects 'random' fire without actually being able to see the enemy.

We can argue about the realism of one unit being able to block an entire 50 yard hex with smoke, but then firing into it with small arms would be equally difficult to actually hit anything... dropping mortar shells or firing big guns into the area can be quite effective (at least against infantry).



Consider this when it comes to the smoke isssue in SPWAW

The artificial intelligence makes smoke, when retreating, if it passes an
experience check and has some smoke. Troops sometimes do this in real war.
It would not be so important, if the game had micro-terrain and the squads
could spread out over half a hex or so, as they ran away. Open terrain
seldom looks like a pool table top, but usually cover and concealment which
allows troops to disappear behind wells, bushes, ditches, ground undulations
and the like. There is no provision for this in the game. Retreating
troops stay in the same, small clump they used for concentrated fire, when
retreating. If the game allowed troops to change from concentrated
formation to dispersed formation, it would be much more difficult for one
hand grenade or machine gun burst to kill several of them, at once.

Although a machine gun can fire through smoke, they do not, in real life, as
the machine gunner does not have the top view of a concentrated formation
that the player has. He just knows they made smoke. He does not know if
they went to ground, ran to the right or left or spread out, crawled away or
found micro-terrain cover.

The game tries to make up for the lack or micro-terrain and formation
density rules by using smoke, when retreating. Has been that way, since
Steel Panthers I and is an integral part of the game.




_____________________________



(in reply to sabrejack)
Post #: 31
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/17/2005 1:52:14 AM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline 		Alby forgot to mention that the explanation on why smoke works the way it does came straight from Michael Wood. We thank you, Mike!

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 32
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/17/2005 2:44:15 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		damn...I wanted to sound like I knew something!!
LOL


_____________________________



(in reply to KG Erwin)
Post #: 33
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/17/2005 12:37:17 PM   
soldier

 

Posts: 199
Joined: 5/24/2005
Status: offline 		Actually its very very difficult to hit troops that are retreating behind smoke with small arms fire. The area fire feature does not bring any bad elements to the SP CAMO games, in fact it reduces gamey play like driving up to the front line unloading troops and dropping smoke. Try that in MBT and your in for a rude shock.

-passengers take casualties (the only good feature of 8.4, all other changes for the worse)
-unloading near enemy draws op fire
-troops hiding behind smoke in good status are vunerable at close range to sufficient firepower.
-troops cannot reload and drive away because loading costs movement points

The feature is actually a big improvement to WW2/MBT. It is only bad in your mind because progressive change is often feared. Try MBT and you wll see


< Message edited by soldier -- 11/17/2005 1:39:30 PM >

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 34
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/17/2005 3:27:01 PM   
VikingNo2


Posts: 2918
Joined: 1/26/2002
From: NC
Status: offline 		I have been trying MBT for a while, I like that it cost shots for loading and unloading. What I don't like is infantry is very very strong, it should be named Modern Infantry Fighting instaed of MBT.

The accuracy of RPGs and Bazookas are very high.

It has some very good qualities, but it is a different engine

(in reply to soldier)
Post #: 35
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/18/2005 12:16:38 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VikingNo2

I have been trying MBT for a while, I like that it cost shots for loading and unloading. What I don't like is infantry is very very strong, it should be named Modern Infantry Fighting instaed of MBT.

The accuracy of RPGs and Bazookas are very high.

It has some very good qualities, but it is a different engine



I currently have an Email game going in SPMBT and My Milans are so deadly its ridiculous...
I dont even need tanks!!

I dont remember them being so deadly in SP3
LOL


< Message edited by Alby -- 11/18/2005 12:46:02 AM >

_____________________________



(in reply to VikingNo2)
Post #: 36
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/16/2008 11:35:02 AM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		Are there any plans to write further patches?

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 37
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/16/2008 9:30:14 PM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

Are there any plans to write further patches?

'Enhanced' will be updated for 2009, as for the mech.exe.....I kinda doubt it.


_____________________________



(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 38
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/16/2008 9:41:37 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		Although I am impressed with enhanced, it seems a crying shame not to farm out this game as open source with some suitable not for profit license agreement so that some of the problems could be ironed out. Something like that might actually increase the chance that such things as Mega Campaigns would be more popular from Matrix's point of view and might even spin off some good titles for Matrix to benefit from as budding developers learn some lessons from the code. It is hard to see how an open source approach would be damaging given the age of the title.

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 39
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/16/2008 9:52:36 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Alby

The game tries to make up for the lack or micro-terrain and formation
density rules by using smoke, when retreating. Has been that way, since
Steel Panthers I and is an integral part of the game.



Although you present a rational argument for keeping smoke, and suggest a good alternative, I cannot help but wonder why it would be such a big thing for an additional option to be added for reducing the amount of infantry smoke in game, or adjusting its longevity.

Also, I am struck by how relatively hard it is to kill 'pinned' infantry, which seems to model the situation you mention without turning to smoke (i.e. infantry first retreat and then go to cover with a pinned status).

I can handle short-lived smoke intended to provide cover, which would not need to block vision and could instead modify to hit values (a trivial coding exercise), but the large scale smoke popped by retreated units that seems to hang around for an eternity ruins things for me.


< Message edited by idwilson66 -- 11/16/2008 9:53:00 PM >

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 40
RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe - 11/16/2008 11:05:13 PM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline 		SPWaW is a "legacy" game, and further changes will be done by the players.  We are fortunate in that programmer Michael Wood tweaked the game for 8.403, and contributed to the "enhanced" version.  I do not foresee any major rewrites, so the game , apart from OOB changes, is what it is.

As for the "smoke shield", hell, I just don't use it.  Yeah, let the AI employ it, as it needs all the help it can get. There are several "house rules" that can be employed, and this helps even out the game. Arty effectiveness set to 120% is a good one.   

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 41
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/16/2008 11:27:25 PM   
Arctic Blast


Posts: 1168
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

Although I am impressed with enhanced, it seems a crying shame not to farm out this game as open source with some suitable not for profit license agreement so that some of the problems could be ironed out. Something like that might actually increase the chance that such things as Mega Campaigns would be more popular from Matrix's point of view and might even spin off some good titles for Matrix to benefit from as budding developers learn some lessons from the code. It is hard to see how an open source approach would be damaging given the age of the title.


Keep in mind that, so far as I know, Matrix does not 100% OWN the Steel Panthers game code, so it's not just up to them to make it open source, but also up to whoever does have ownership rights of SSI's back catalogue.

_____________________________

Meditation on inevitable death should be performed daily.

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 42
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 4:02:48 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		Ah, yes, I'm not exactly sure who owns those rights but was living in hope. :)

(in reply to Arctic Blast)
Post #: 43
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 6:24:46 PM   
tracer


Posts: 1865
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: New Smyrna Beach, FL USA
Status: offline 		Of course for PBEM and generated battles you're stuck with the 'default' smoke loadout, but when designing a scenario you can easily reduce or even eliminate it. In AI-defend battles I normally remove all smoke ammo for the defenders to prevent them from popping it while retreating, which more often than not only aids the attacker.

_____________________________

Jim NSB

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 44
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 8:52:06 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		I am one of those who likes the linked campaign, and even name unit leaders (sad I know).

(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 45
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 10:00:19 PM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

I am one of those who likes the linked campaign, and even name unit leaders (sad I know).

I like campaigns as well


_____________________________



(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 46
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 10:27:44 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		As a somewhat weathered grognard, I would go as far as to say that this is my favourite all time computer game - it is certainly the game I keep coming back to.


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 47
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 10:44:08 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
In AI-defend battles I normally remove all smoke ammo for the defenders to prevent them from popping it while retreating, which more often than not only aids the attacker.


Which bit of the editor allows for smoke to be changed? I can find morale, weapon, name, experience and so on, but not smoke.

(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 48
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/17/2008 11:42:29 PM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66


quote:

ORIGINAL: tracer
In AI-defend battles I normally remove all smoke ammo for the defenders to prevent them from popping it while retreating, which more often than not only aids the attacker.


Which bit of the editor allows for smoke to be changed? I can find morale, weapon, name, experience and so on, but not smoke.

when you assign a weapon to a unit it goes thru a list of stuff...he ammo, ap, smoke, heat....



_____________________________



(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 49
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/18/2008 5:31:53 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		Ah, thanks for that - quite a lot of effort then.

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 50
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/19/2008 3:23:20 PM   
tracer


Posts: 1865
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: New Smyrna Beach, FL USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

Ah, thanks for that - quite a lot of effort then.


When you change/re-assign a weapon, you are prompted for an amount of each ammo type. If you enter zero for smoke (for a single weapon), it removes all smoke rounds from the unit. So long as you don't enter a positive value for smoke during any subsequent weapon changes, the unit will remain 'smoke-free'.

Yes its time-consuming ...but its all we got.

_____________________________

Jim NSB

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 51
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/19/2008 4:04:15 PM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		I've tried to work out the structure of the save file, and with the work done by Fred I can almost write a small program that would remove smoke from all or selected units, but cannot quite get my head around the variable number of units within the file (in other words, how many unit records to read in before the next part of the file is reached).

It would be very little work for me to write the program, if I can get past this particular problem.

(in reply to tracer)
Post #: 52
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/22/2008 6:09:59 AM   
A Steve Too Many

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 11/22/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

Which bit of the editor allows for smoke to be changed? I can find morale, weapon, name, experience and so on, but not smoke.

You can also use the World at War Game Editor. Load the scenario, select "Unit Data": There is a field for "Smoke" that you can set to zero. You will still have to go unit-by-unit to make a force-wide change, but using the Game Editor is faster than SP's own weapons/unit editor (where you will have to set the weapon type AND other ammo).

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 53
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/22/2008 6:16:56 AM   
A Steve Too Many

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 11/22/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: idwilson66

I've tried to work out the structure of the save file, and with the work done by Fred I can almost write a small program that would remove smoke from all or selected units, but cannot quite get my head around the variable number of units within the file (in other words, how many unit records to read in before the next part of the file is reached).

It would be very little work for me to write the program, if I can get past this particular problem.

Can you read the unit ID tag (A0, B0, B1, B2, ..., AB3)? Possibly you could count units that way? Or read to a blank (I think it's "--"), or if you could start reading at the "end" of the file and read back until you get to "A0" (the first unit)?

< Message edited by A Steve Too Many -- 11/22/2008 8:30:11 AM >

(in reply to chopper66)
Post #: 54
RE: Release Timeframe? - 11/22/2008 8:51:12 AM   
chopper66

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 6/3/2006
Status: offline 		I haven't been able to identify a record field that corresponds with a unit ID.

(in reply to A Steve Too Many)
Post #: 55
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> RE: The Upcoming Changes to the Mech.exe Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.281