Marauders
Posts: 4428
Joined: 3/17/2005 From: Minnesota Status: offline
|
I understand, but it isn't even the same within the one year's release. One playbook calls a formation the Ace and another calls the same formation the Deuce. Another one changes out the player positions, but the name is the same. With the use of the Ace interchanged with the Single Back formation, there shouldn't be a problem, but the Madden 2009 playbooks already designate the Single Back as the formation, so the Ace becomes the package. The Ace, used as a package, most often makes reference to the H-back package with either two tight ends or a big full back playing up. Even if they decided that they wouldn't use that nomenclature, they don't even use the same terms from playbook to playbook of the same release and sometimes within the playbook. I see some new playbooks that call the single back formation the Ace on all counts. I see that in some of the playbooks created here. There is really nothing wrong with that except if the nomenclature changes from playbook to playbook. That is one of the reasons I lobbied hard for updated playbooks for 2.0 and 2.2 and wanted the base tools available to keep all playbooks on the same page. As you have stated, Go, Fly, Streak, and even Up routes are used almost interchangeably, as are Drag, In, and Dig routes. I actually don't treat them all the same, but most coaches do. My point is that the Madden playbooks use a lot of the terms, but they are not applied consistantly.
|