Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

More G4m's.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> More G4m's. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:25:07 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		1.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:26:26 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		2.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 2
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:27:37 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		3.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 3
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:47:48 AM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		4.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 4
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:49:35 AM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		5.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 5
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:01:58 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		6.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 6
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:03:15 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline 		7.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________




(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 7
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:11:56 AM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		8.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 8
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:16:28 AM   
rjopel

 

Posts: 614
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Status: offline 		I like 4, 5, and 8.

The others also look nice.

(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 9
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:21:33 AM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		The nicest shot is #7, is that real or from a game?

_____________________________


(in reply to rjopel)
Post #: 10
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:26:27 AM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		9.
And since I played as the Japs once, my laser guided Betty's did do well.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 11
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 6:33:32 AM   
Xavier5733


Posts: 65
Joined: 3/28/2004
From: France
Status: offline 		The last one is unbelievable.

As US player, I prefer the No 4 and 8


(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 12
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 7:38:23 AM   
rjopel

 

Posts: 614
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Status: offline 		I think that 4 and 8 are the same plane. 

Notice the same popped open top hatch.

They are both missing the tail section.

(in reply to Xavier5733)
Post #: 13
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 8:07:43 AM   
Raver508

 

Posts: 208
Joined: 3/26/2006
Status: offline 		Hell, look how low they are flying in 9!

(in reply to rjopel)
Post #: 14
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 9:20:05 AM   
bbbf

 

Posts: 493
Joined: 7/16/2000
From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Status: offline 		Yep, no doubting these pilots didn't lack for guts.

_____________________________

Robert Lee

(in reply to Raver508)
Post #: 15
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 10:04:47 AM   
Long Lance


Posts: 274
Joined: 7/31/2002
From: Ebbelwoi Country
Status: offline 		What level are they flying? I guess 5, perhaps 10 m maximum (16-33 ft.)?
Is this a fake? It looks real, but it's hardly believable...

(in reply to bbbf)
Post #: 16
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 10:07:34 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline 		Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Long Lance

What level are they flying? I guess 5, perhaps 10 m maximum (16-33 ft.)?
Is this a fake? It looks real, but it's hardly believable...


That picture is not a fake... they really did fly that low...




Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Long Lance)
Post #: 17
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 12:14:35 PM   
Tomo


Posts: 66
Joined: 4/10/2004
From: JAPAN
Status: offline 		#9
I have ever read that center higher G4M is decoy to protect right and left lower G4Ms from aamg.
I'm not sure if it's true or not though.


_____________________________

Japanese wargamer. Will post from "the other side" .

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 18
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 12:16:31 PM   
lolz

 

Posts: 149
Joined: 11/22/2004
Status: offline 		awesome! thanks for sharing.

_____________________________


(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 19
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 12:19:12 PM   
cantona2


Posts: 3749
Joined: 5/21/2007
From: Gibraltar
Status: offline 		That is one of the coolest images in these forums!

_____________________________

1966 was a great year for English Football...Eric was born


(in reply to lolz)
Post #: 20
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 12:36:01 PM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline 		That's low, below the flak but subject to torpedo attack.

(in reply to cantona2)
Post #: 21
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 1:33:09 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline 		Assuming a length of 20m for the Betty, the lower-right plane would not be higher than 5-6m above the water... and maybe as low as 4m depending on the relative angle.  It'd just take a little wave to transform it in a submarine aircraft.

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 22
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 2:14:05 PM   
wwengr


Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Status: offline 		The wingspan of the Betty is 25 meters and the length is 20 m, so by some simple visual metrics, you can conclude that the aircraft are flying in "Ground Effect". This occurs when the aircraft is less than a Wing Span from the surface. Look at the water and it is clear that the air is near calm. The surface is smooth.

In ground effect, the aircraft gets additional lift as the wingtip vortices are disrupted, making the wing more effective. As a pilot, I can assure you that over a level surface, it is quite easy to fly in ground effect without hitting the ground. Typically, if the aircraft is not trimmed well, the flying response in ground effect is to rise away from the surface, if the pilot were to stop control inputs. At torpedo release, the aircraft becomes lighter, so it will tend to rise.

It may seem counter-intuitive, but these aircraft are flying fairly clean at high speed. It would take deliberate control inputs to get the aircraft to hit the surface (either that or a serious compromise to the integrity of the wings or airframe). All of the pilot's concentration has to be spent keeping the aircraft from rising.

_____________________________

I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 23
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:39:44 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wwengr

The wingspan of the Betty is 25 meters and the length is 20 m, so by some simple visual metrics, you can conclude that the aircraft are flying in "Ground Effect". This occurs when the aircraft is less than a Wing Span from the surface. Look at the water and it is clear that the air is near calm. The surface is smooth.

In ground effect, the aircraft gets additional lift as the wingtip vortices are disrupted, making the wing more effective. As a pilot, I can assure you that over a level surface, it is quite easy to fly in ground effect without hitting the ground. Typically, if the aircraft is not trimmed well, the flying response in ground effect is to rise away from the surface, if the pilot were to stop control inputs. At torpedo release, the aircraft becomes lighter, so it will tend to rise.

It may seem counter-intuitive, but these aircraft are flying fairly clean at high speed. It would take deliberate control inputs to get the aircraft to hit the surface (either that or a serious compromise to the integrity of the wings or airframe). All of the pilot's concentration has to be spent keeping the aircraft from rising.


Yes..there are several amazing things about that pic. The flak bursts are right down on the deck. Some of the rounds are even going into the water. Plus there had to be a ship in that position to take the pic (unless it was taken from another bomber)

I don't even think they could release the torp safely at that altitude. The splash would damage the aircraft, I think.

(in reply to wwengr)
Post #: 24
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:40:55 PM   
wwengr


Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Status: offline 		I would be concerned that the torp would skip back up into the airplane.

< Message edited by wwengr -- 1/25/2009 4:41:04 PM >

_____________________________

I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 25
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 4:50:48 PM   
wwengr


Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Status: offline 		I suspect that the Pic is taken from another aircraft. From the camera point of view, the Betty's are well below the horizon. Look at the lead Betty. The distant Destroyer is shorter than the aircraft and higher than the aircraft (in perspective). Figure the aircraft is 20 m length, the destroyer is 95 m. A little trigonometry supported by numerous unsupportable assumptions and I am guessing that the camera is about 30 to 50 meters in above the surface.

_____________________________

I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 26
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 5:07:01 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline 		Those are amazing photos. Thanks for posting them.

_____________________________


(in reply to wwengr)
Post #: 27
RE: More G4m's. - 1/25/2009 10:24:15 PM   
1275psi

 

Posts: 7979
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline 		remember reading about this some time ago on the hyperwar web site-photo taken from ship
result of attack -i think i remember only 1 transport hit - the bettie may have crashed into it? -anyway I do remember that all but one of those planes were shot down.

Wish i could be more precise, sorry

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 28
RE: More G4m's. - 1/26/2009 1:50:24 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		#9 shows aircraft of the 4th or Misawa Ku.  One a/c crashed into AP-13 George F. Elliott (sp?).  For the expenditure of most of the planes in the strike (?5 out of 17 returned), the Rikkos secured just one torpedo hit on DD Jervis, which was sunk later whilst proceeding independently from Guadalcanal to a base with better repair facilities (?Espiritu Santo).

_____________________________




(in reply to 1275psi)
Post #: 29
RE: More G4m's. - 1/26/2009 8:40:33 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
quote:

This interrogation is concerned with the operations of the Japanese naval land-based aircraft during the occupation of British MALAYA. Captain SONOKAWA was commanding officer of the Genzan Air Group and has furnished a detailed and interesting account of the sinking of HMS REPULSE and HMS PRINCE OF WALES.


http://j-aircraft.com/research/interrogation_of_captain_sonokaw.htm

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> More G4m's. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.641