Jimmer
Posts: 1968
Joined: 12/5/2007 Status: offline
|
jimmerseia at comcast dot net Winter Land Movement no Guard Commit yes Econ Manip yes Leader Casuality no Privateers no Maximum bid no. Which implies no GAP, either. I have a tool to evaluate bids, though. I still object to house rule 5 (can't use minor forces against a non-declaring major power enemy), but I can live with it. 5a is OK. ------------------------------- The problem I refer to is where someone declares war on a multi-district minor (only Denmark and Sweden are confirmed, though), the war does not include the other "half" of the country. However, it can be different for the controller and for the declarer. For example, in an AI game where I played France, Russia declares war on Sweden. Russia appears to be at war with Finland as well, and moves in and conquers it. However, as France, I'm not allowed to play any troops in Finland, or defend it in any way. It is NOT the second district of Sweden-Finland, from France's perspective. Interestingly, war does not lapse between Russia and Sweden while he is conquering Sweden. This led me to believe that Finland really IS at war with Russia (as if the dropping of factors into Finland's capital weren't enough). So, I played as Russia. Sure enough, Russia sees both nations as being at war with Russia. Of course, conveniently enough for Russia, France or Great Britain (the two nations which got control the two times I tried it) seemed to do nothing to defend Finland. Others have reported the same bug applies to Denmark-Norway. I tried this once as GB, and found I could not place troops in Norway's capital (as the attacker). So, it clearly wasn't at war with me. It's a heavy-duty bug. In games which are already going, it's not a big deal (because these nations get conquered pretty early). But, in a new game, it's not going to work very well.
_____________________________
At LAST! The greatest campaign board game of all time is finally available for the PC. Can my old heart stand the strain?
|