RussianSteelDar
Posts: 51
Joined: 3/25/2002 Status: offline
|
Mark Ezra: We suggest combined arms with a strong tank core. On paper, in June 1941, the Soviets were actually heading away from pure armored units....the Mech Corps had two tank and one Motorized Rifle Divisions...there just wasn't enough time to complete the transition... I rationalize my selection of a core force as the sort of thing that would be detached from a 1941 Mechanized Corps for special assignment. A company or two of tanks and attached infantry. Admittedly, this kind of command flexibility would have been very rare in Stalinist Russia but it maximizes the armored action The 1942-5 USSR Tank Battalion was a fairly well-rounded combined arms unit (on paper) - 3 companies of Tanks, 1 company SMG inf, platoons of recce, ATG, AAMG, and Field Guns. The SP ARty Regt had 12-16 SP Guns and much the same kind of auxiliary troops (SMGs, ATGs, Mortars, Recce)... Either of these units are targets to evolve towards as you progress through the battles.. The key to most battles is mobility and maneuver - a motorized Rifle Company could pull off many of the missions - especially if a couple of infantry support tanks were allowed... Foot infantry just will not be able to carry out most of the missions because they never reach the battlefield. But the playtesting generally used: 15-20 AFVs, 15-20 Inf Squads, 12-16 various guns (AA, ATG, Mortar).... Good Luck! Brad
|