hermanhum
Posts: 2209
Joined: 9/21/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: incredibletwo I asked because I've been collecting images for my private use, and I have quite a few that aren't supported by the current set-up, i.e. for platfroms that currently don't have their own folder. This means that the DB editor/s will have to add new folders/PicID for the platforms that don't already have them. I understand the part about dropping images into the respective folders. What I was referring to was if there isn't already a folder/PicID, and I added it using the database editor, the synchronisation gets screwed up. I'd like to tweak the databases I have but in doing so I have to re-synch all the scenarios. Will the requirement to synchronise databases to scenarios (or vice-versa) be necessary in the future? quote:
ORIGINAL: hermanhum I think that having each database only use the default Resource folder is a mistake as each database editor/user might want to have a separate set of images and numbering scheme for his production. It might be wise to include a DBPics sub-folder under each database folder not unlike the current Text folder. Only if no folder is found does the game go to the default Resource folder. This seems like a good idea. That way, anyone can their own pics and not worry about database editors and whatnot. The entire point of having an editor is for the editor to be able to do it his way. Not ANWDB's numbering system, not HUD's numbering system, but HIS numbering system (whatever that may be). No one wants to be submitting anything (pic#s, images, etc) for someone else's approval before using them. Someone who decides to make a WW2 database will not be using any of the images provided by AGSI. Instead, he will likely want to start his own numbering system (probably at 1,2,3...) If those numbers are already used in the default Resource folder, it's going to present problems to him or to anyone who might want to use his db/image combination. Even if he tries to avoid those numbers already in use by ANWDB/ODB, there's nothing to stop AGSI from releasing additional images that will eventually conflict with his personal numbering system. For example, if there are currently 100 images for ANWDB and the user decides to start numbering his images at 101, AGSI could easily release some more images starting at 101 thereby causing problems for his database. The best solution is still to make the signature function optional. However, since that will never happen, the only possible solution that allows for database personalization is to have the images stored with each individual database.
_____________________________
|