Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Tora, Tora, Tora!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 4:21:32 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

3) They can perform their av support functions in any mode


Will this change in a patch?

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 121
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:12:08 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

3) They can perform their av support functions in any mode


Will this change in a patch?


Thats kind of like asking what next weeks lottery numbers will be. God only knows.

The next step I take is to gather my ships. I have several "pre-formed" TFs that I use. For example, my 1st battle division consists of (and location):
BB Nagato (Hiroshima)
BB Mutsu (Tokyo)
CA Mogami (TF 11)
CA Aoba (TF 6)
DD Kagero (TF1)
DD Isokaze (TF1)
DD Shiranu (TF1)
DD Urakaze (TF1)
DD Hamakaze (TF1)
DD Tanikaze (TF1)

After I know what ships I want in a given TF, I find all those ships and then pick a centralized, but unlikely, assembly point where all the units can meet up (like Satawal for example). I only use a given location for a single TF. Any TF that is heading to a certain location will form into a single TF. Thats just the way I personally do things. Some of my "pre-formed" TFs are already formed (I have 7 "invasion escort groups" that consist of 2 CLs and 4 Mutsuki or Minekaze class DDs for example) at start but most of my fleet takes a little time to form up. The CL groups are fine vs smaller forces (like PTs) but when I expect heavier resistance (like on a run to Rabul for example) I take a BB division or 2 and supporting carriers.

I click on the "display ships" tab on the top, and go through them 1 type of ship at a time (starting with CVs) and send them where I want. Tedious, but I get the fleet organized the way I want it within a short amount of time. This is also why my first turn takes so long. After the fleet is set up the way I want, I can go from operation to operation seemlessly because I know what I need to do what, and I know where it is.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 5:27:13 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 122
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:29:03 AM   
Flying Tiger

 

Posts: 496
Joined: 3/11/2008
From: ummmm... i HATE that question!
Status: offline
24 hours for one turn!!! Are you kidding?

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 123
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:37:56 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
Once I get through the combat ships (including subs and auxiliaries but not merchies or patrol boats or minelayers), then I start going through ground units. The way I do this is I start at Osaka, and step through the bases 1 at a time (using the buttons circled) and change any ground units prep location, and order it to move or change mode based on where I want it to go. If there is a ground unit there that I plan to move by ship (like the 4th div in this example) I will form the TF to carry it at this time. If the necessary ships arent physically in the hex, I will form the TF elsewhere and send it here.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 124
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:38:37 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Flying Tiger

24 hours for one turn!!! Are you kidding?


For the first turn, no Im not. My first turn in WitP takes 12 to 16 hours.

When I get to an area that has troops that arent in a base, I will grab these at that time (so I dont forget later) and do the same with them. Ie assigning modes and movement orders.

I could make factory changes at this time if I wanted to, but I prefer to do that in a 2nd pass later.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 5:44:01 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Flying Tiger)
Post #: 125
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:40:06 AM   
Roughtor


Posts: 57
Joined: 11/19/2004
From: Toronto/Gdynia
Status: offline
As much as I'm excited about AE, my greatest fear is (and it's just a personal fear, not a complaint), that it will be "out of reach" for casual gamers, read non-retired, with kids, limited to 3 hours a day kind of player, who doesn't want to spend time away on WITP while the real deal is out... that it will be out of reach for PBEM, unless some kind of 3 vs 3, take care of your theater only kind of setup can be achieved... password deposited to a third party in case of inevitable player replacements. I suppose that's up to players to figure it out. Glad AI got a boost. Still, potentially the most fascinating gaming experience out there.

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 126
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:47:02 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Akitsuki

As much as I'm excited about AE, my greatest fear is (and it's just a personal fear, not a complaint), that it will be "out of reach" for casual gamers, read non-retired, with kids, limited to 3 hours a day kind of player, who doesn't want to spend time away on WITP while the real deal is out... that it will be out of reach for PBEM, unless some kind of 3 vs 3, take care of your theater only kind of setup can be achieved... password deposited to a third party in case of inevitable player replacements. I suppose that's up to players to figure it out. Glad AI got a boost. Still, potentially the most fascinating gaming experience out there.


Well, you can always leave areas under computer control. I dont, but if a person wanted to they could and that would certainly speed up the process.

_____________________________


(in reply to Roughtor)
Post #: 127
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 6:22:30 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
To load a unit, one of the ways I do it is this (there are 2):

Step 1, I form a TF (amphib in this case) with a single ship, and then dock it (new TFs start undocked). I do this so when I add ships later, I know I wont exceed my docking space at the loading port. You CAN load a TF that isnt docked, but its slllllooooooowwwwwwwww. Then click "load troops" on the right. Note if you are loading a transport TF the ground unit must be in strategic mode and if loading an amphib the ground unit must be in combat mode. If it isnt or if the unit is in a restricted command, it will not show up on the list as choices for loading.

Step 2, select the unit and hit "verify load". You can adjust if you want supplies/fuel loaded as well at this time. Sometimes I turn it off (default is on), but not often. I load 1 unit per TF. If you have more than 1, firstly you need more than 1 ship in the initial TF (you need minimum 1 ship per ground/air unit you are trying to load) and secondly when you get to step 3 bad things can happen as I will explain shortly.

Step 3, Click "add a ship" 1 at a time until you get to 100%. If you want additional supplies you can either exit this screen and add ships to the TF, or you can hit this "add a ship" a time or 2 (depending on how much you want to add). Now if you are loading more than 1 unit at the same time (say a division and a base force for example), the division will need more ships than the base will (like say 9 ships for the division and 2 for the base force. The way this routine works is as you add ships to the TF, it will allocate them to each unit. That is to say the 3rd ship will load part of the division and the 4th will load the base, and the 5th the division and the 6th the base (even though there are already enough ships to load the base already) so what you will end up with in the end is a division on 9 ships and a base unit on 8 or 9 ships. Thats why I load a single unit per TF.

Step 4, hit "accept". Now you will NOT be able to merge 2 amphibs together the first turn of their loading, so dont worry about that. You CAN merge them the 2nd turn. This is so you can go back and undo your move if you want. Note, when you order a TF to load, instead of fully loading like it does in WitP, in AE it only loads 1 squad or device as a placeholder. The actual loading takes place during the turn.




Now, as an alternate method to the above (using the above, you have no control over what ships the computer will add to a TF) you CAN pick all the ships you want (say 5 ships of the same class for example), and load the unit. I often do this. In fact I probably do it more than with the method above. Now the way I do this is pretty much the same initially as above, I pick 1 ship and dock it, and select the unit to load (to see how much space it takes up).

Then (if you look at the 2nd pic) instead of hitting "verify load", I hit the "loading" on the unit to deselect it and hit back (if you dont hit the "loading" and just hit back, it will load the unit. You can go back and reset it if you make an error though (I think I drove Don nuts making this work. He couldnt figure out how I screwed it up so badly ). After you hit "back" you can add ships as you see fit, hit load troops again, see how much more you need to add, ect. Takes more time, but YOU control what ships get put in the TF.

The computer will make no distinction for speed of the TF or the remaining size of a unit when you hit add ships (I have seen the computer select a large AP for a few squads and I have seen it select a damaged AK when undamaged ships were available. Word to the wise.

After I have the TF the way I want it and loading, I add escorts after. I dont do that right off to insure I have enough port room to load. I can always assign escorts to follow this TF or I can hold it in port for a turn if I feel they have to have their escorts right away and I dont have enough dock space to add them.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 6:32:32 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 128
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 8:43:17 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Flying Tiger

24 hours for one turn!!! Are you kidding?


For the first turn, no Im not. My first turn in WitP takes 12 to 16 hours.

When I get to an area that has troops that arent in a base, I will grab these at that time (so I dont forget later) and do the same with them. Ie assigning modes and movement orders.

I could make factory changes at this time if I wanted to, but I prefer to do that in a 2nd pass later.






Speaking of first turn settings Ive always thought a good way to create a more challenging AI for this game would be to give it similiar turn settings that most humans use such as 100% search (for floatplanes) or 100% naval attack (for bombers/torpedo planes) etc... Was this ever considered in improving the AI or does the AI still have the same old settings?

< Message edited by Tanaka -- 5/16/2009 8:44:01 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 129
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 9:31:19 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
Very interesting, thanks for taking the time to walk through like this.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Tanaka)
Post #: 130
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 9:54:44 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

Very interesting, thanks for taking the time to walk through like this.


No problem.

As for AI questions, I cant answer that. I have nothing to do with the AI development or testing.

Thought I would include this. This is one of my ASW patrols. It is based at Takao, it will proceed up to Shanghai (refueling there), then to Samah on Hainan (SE of Haiphong), and then back to the Pescadores. Basically patrolling the south and south eastern China coastal waters. I have around a dozen of these patrols in various areas.




ASW TFs are limited in size to 4 ships. This patrol will go on forever if I never change its orders. The "linger" time is useful for similar sub patrols.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 9:59:35 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 131
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 10:22:54 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

Note, when you order a TF to load, instead of fully loading like it does in WitP, in AE it only loads 1 squad or device as a placeholder. The actual loading takes place during the turn.



My apologies if I have got the wrong end of the stick here, but this suggests to me that the loading arrangements in AE will be, in certain respects, a great deal less flexible than those of the existing game.

As the game now stands, you can commit yourself to loading troops and take the immediate expenditure of ops points. This may or may not have the effect of loading the entire unit. In any case, you can then cancel the loading operation and configure the task force to go on its way, confident that it will make some progress away from the port of embarkation, and carrying a respectable contingent of troops.

In AE it appears that whilst your ships load they are obliged to remain in port for a full turn at least - during which they may be exposed to enemy air attack, probably whilst docked and therefore all the more vulnerable. It looks as though this will be the case unless you have committed sufficient ships to the TF to load the unit and make their getaway in under a turn's duration.

I appreciate that the retort may be that the kind of partial loading operation I've described is wholly unrealistic, given the nature of the embarkation operation itself and, often, the limitations imposed by the port's cargo handling facilities. But what I've described amounts to an evacuation operation that may have to be accomplished under the threat of hostile airpower - "We sail tonight, regardless of what we've managed to load." I can do this now in WitP. Will I still be able to do so in AE?

_____________________________




(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 132
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 10:27:01 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Not less flexible, but more realistic. You're not going to load a division of troops in a single day anyway.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 133
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 11:18:22 AM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
Well in the case of these 2 ships (granted I am using extremes here) the first ship may take days to load, the 2nd probably hours (or minutes depending on port size). Loading times are all about port size and how much nav support you have there. The 2 ships shown below will not sit in port for the full day if they take less than a day to load. They will move based on how many op points they chewed up loading.

Now if the question is "can I tell ship X to only load for 4 hours and leave" then the answer is no, you cant. If at the start of a turn you are still sitting there loading, then at that point you can say "stop loading and leave".

AE isnt terribly friendly to evacuations under fire. And I for 1 certainly am not going to try to defend that position




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 11:20:44 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 134
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 12:11:09 PM   
Dili

 

Posts: 4708
Joined: 9/10/2004
Status: offline
quote:

As much as I'm excited about AE, my greatest fear is (and it's just a personal fear, not a complaint), that it will be "out of reach" for casual gamers, read non-retired, with kids, limited to 3 hours a day kind of player, who doesn't want to spend time away on WITP while the real deal is out... that it will be out of reach for PBEM, unless some kind of 3 vs 3, take care of your theater only kind of setup can be achieved... password deposited to a third party in case of inevitable player replacements. I suppose that's up to players to figure it out. Glad AI got a boost. Still, potentially the most fascinating gaming experience out there.



I could play a turn in 1 hour or less, except when there were invasions and combats and if the automatic supply was reliable even less. With AE i think the first turn will be bigger because you start setting up waypoints for submarines and patrol ships and search sectors for airplanes but with advantage that you don't need to manage so much the ships in future.

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 135
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 12:13:26 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Correct.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Dili)
Post #: 136
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 12:22:19 PM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

Now if the question is "can I tell ship X to only load for 4 hours and leave" then the answer is no, you cant. If at the start of a turn you are still sitting there loading, then at that point you can say "stop loading and leave".

AE isnt terribly friendly to evacuations under fire. And I for 1 certainly am not going to try to defend that position



Much as I feared . An evacuation within range of enemy bombers is, and should be, a hazardous operation. In the game as it stands your ships will be exposed to air attack during the turn on which they arrive in the pick-up port. They can part-load and get away during the following turn. Evidently in AE they must be exposed to two days' air attacks. An unwarranted reduction in your tactical options?

<edit>
Just to put this in context, take a look at the Lancastria disaster. Lancastria dropped anchor at about 0600 on 17 June 1940 in the Charpentier Roads, about 3 miles offshore from St Nazaire. Between that time and the 1545 strike by I/KG 30 that sank her (9.75 hours), it is estimated that perhaps as many as 9000 souls were embarked in her by smaller ships acting as ferries from the port.

Two hours earlier, at 1348, the Luftwaffe had bombed and hit nearby liner Oronsay, and this gave rise to discussions amongst Lancastria's officers as to whether they should take this as their cue to leave. Unable to obtain a response to signals to nearby destroyers that might potentially have escorted Lancastria, her captain's decision was to wait with a view to remaining in company with Oronsay.

My point is that in desperate circumstances you can get a lot of people aboard a ship in a matter of hours, even without being tied up alongside a wharf. Lancastria was already heavily laden with troops two hours before she was attacked, and had different decisions been made might have got under way (albeit with a lesser load) within a few hours of her arrival. I have no quarrel with an improvised evacuation task force being exposed to air attack for at least one turn, but stretching that exposure to a second day strikes me as being artificial.

In any case, thank you for the explanation of the loading procedure!
</edit>

< Message edited by Local Yokel -- 5/16/2009 12:59:49 PM >


_____________________________




(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 137
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 12:50:00 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
No, that's not correct. For an evacuation, you use the Evacuation TF, which doesn't work the same way.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 138
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 1:05:05 PM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline
Well, in the game as it exists you can only give a Fast Transport TF orders to evacuate. Only a limited range of ship types can go into such a TF. In AE, can you put whatever ships you like into this kind of TF? If not, your options may be unduly limited.

_____________________________




(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 139
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 4:53:42 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline
Great AAR, YH! A couple questions of my own.

1. In WITP, it's often advantageous to use many more ships than are strictly speaking required to carry, say, a division. I typically choose 3-4x the "load cost". So I might use 40+ transports, with say a total of 100,000 capacity, to carry a division with load cost of 25,000. Doing that allows one to load/unload in a day. Concededly this is unrealistic. In AE, having "extra" ships won't make the TF load any faster?

2. Earlier you were asked about your ground units sitting in trains in Malaya. Why aren't you worried that the enemy will bomb your guys sitting in trains? Do you routinely set CAP over each such collection of vulnerable troops?

< Message edited by Grotius -- 5/16/2009 4:54:28 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 140
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:34:24 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
1. You can do it I think but you don't really have as many ships available - the logisitcs constraints on both sides until mid 44 allies are tough.
2. Early in the war you can take more risks with this allied and even JAAF aren't that great or experienced so what would be suicide for an LCU in 44 PI is an acceptable and low probability risk in 41/42

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 141
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:44:57 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

The computer will make no distinction for speed of the TF or the remaining size of a unit when you hit add ships (I have seen the computer select a large AP for a few squads and I have seen it select a damaged AK when undamaged ships were available. Word to the wise.


The ship selected by Add Ships will be at least as fast as the slowest ship alread in the TF if possible. But if you have a 20 knot TF and only 10 knot ships in port - you'll get a slow one.

The program's recognition of "operational and available for service" includes accepting a few points of damage. Whenever you use any type of Automatic ship selection, you might get a dinged ship - but not a seriously damaged one.


(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 142
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:45:00 PM   
SuluSea


Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline
Enjoying the reading from the testers and pics offered by Yamato. Looking forward to seeing more.

_____________________________

"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 143
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:47:42 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Local Yokel

Well, in the game as it exists you can only give a Fast Transport TF orders to evacuate. Only a limited range of ship types can go into such a TF. In AE, can you put whatever ships you like into this kind of TF? If not, your options may be unduly limited.


AE has added Amphibious TF, which can do evacuations.


(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 144
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 5:50:54 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

Great AAR, YH! A couple questions of my own.

1. In WITP, it's often advantageous to use many more ships than are strictly speaking required to carry, say, a division. I typically choose 3-4x the "load cost". So I might use 40+ transports, with say a total of 100,000 capacity, to carry a division with load cost of 25,000. Doing that allows one to load/unload in a day. Concededly this is unrealistic. In AE, having "extra" ships won't make the TF load any faster?

2. Earlier you were asked about your ground units sitting in trains in Malaya. Why aren't you worried that the enemy will bomb your guys sitting in trains? Do you routinely set CAP over each such collection of vulnerable troops?


1) Well as Ive said, the limit isnt on numbers of ships, its port size. Truk for example is a level 6 port. A level 6 port can only dock 84,000 tons of ships in a day. Thats it. Thats not per TF, thats all TFs - total - docked at the same time. And there again, how much can be put on ships is a factor of the port size and nav support. They can only move so much stuff in a day. In WitP you didnt have these limits. You could load 10 - 100 ship TFs at any port, any day. In AE you cant do that. You are limited by dock space. Frankly the first time the KB put into port it took 3 days to refuel and rearm them before going back out. This also counts against the amount of available op points a base has to load stuff. Yes Virginia, bases have op points now too.

2) Well 2 reasons. First, I have played more than a dozen games against Tree, and I know his tactics. Secondly here is a screenshot that pretty much shows the limit of the allied air force in Malaya. This is at start. In this first days attacks he lost about 2 dozen destroyed and I dont know how many damaged (of the ones in Malaya that is, he lost nearly 400 map-wide). Damaged planes take several days to be repaired and can be written off as losses during the repair process. Also I hit his airfields every day damaging and destroying more. PI units cant leave the PI for the most part (the B-17s can after PPs) and the AVG can only go to China without PPs. Same with the Dutch and Indian airforces as well. So bottom line, this is what he has to fight with in Malaya.

Oh, and the PPs to change command of an air unit is based on its TO&E strength now, so this means it doesnt matter if you have 1 plane or 25 in that fighter squadron, its still going to cost you 100PPs to release.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 6:00:29 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 145
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 6:00:03 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grotius

Great AAR, YH! A couple questions of my own.

1. In WITP, it's often advantageous to use many more ships than are strictly speaking required to carry, say, a division. I typically choose 3-4x the "load cost". So I might use 40+ transports, with say a total of 100,000 capacity, to carry a division with load cost of 25,000. Doing that allows one to load/unload in a day. Concededly this is unrealistic. In AE, having "extra" ships won't make the TF load any faster?


There are two types of troop transport TFs in AE - regular transport and amphibious.

Amphibious - which Yammy is showing - is meant to load combat-ready troops in combat mode and use them to invade an enemy base. Combat mode is less efficient than "regular" load and also requires the TFs load a miniumum 3-days supply for the troops (even if you select Load Troops Only). Amphibious TFs can also perform other missions that you would expect - they can unload at non-port or poor-port locations better than regular transports** and they do a better job of evacuations - includding loading troops from non-port hexes.

Regular Transport is intended for pier-to-pier transport between friendly bases. You would NOT want to use one of them for an invasion. There are two options for Regular Transport - use all ships and use minimum ships. Minimum says cram them in into minimum number of ships, with as little unused space as possible. Use all will spread the unit(s) as best as possible among all ships. Any remaining capacity will be used by supply (depending on Load Troop only switch and supply availability).

** Note that the ability of Amphibious TFs to unload a small ports is primarily based on amphibious capability of the ships in the TF, not the TF mission. APAs, with lots of embarked landing craft, will greatly speed up unloading at the dinky little port that Yammy always wants to use. A civilian freighter not so much.

You'll get used to all this. As mentioned somewhere up in the thread, loading and unloading is much more realistic in AE. That means it's harder, slower, and you have to do more planning. You especially have to make sure you are using the right ships for the right task.

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 146
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 6:14:19 PM   
Yamato hugger

 

Posts: 5475
Joined: 10/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

** Note that the ability of Amphibious TFs to unload a small ports is primarily based on amphibious capability of the ships in the TF, not the TF mission. APAs, with lots of embarked landing craft, will greatly speed up unloading at the dinky little port that Yammy always wants to use. A civilian freighter not so much.



Well, Japan only starts with 7 ports that are larger than size 4 outside the home islands and they dont get APAs, so it isnt like I WANT to use "the dinky little ports", its I have no choice . Heres a list of at start Jap bases sorted by port size:




Ooops, 8 larger than 4. I missed Port Arthur, not that its terribly useful to the war effort

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Yamato hugger -- 5/16/2009 6:23:47 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 147
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 6:37:54 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

** Note that the ability of Amphibious TFs to unload a small ports is primarily based on amphibious capability of the ships in the TF, not the TF mission. APAs, with lots of embarked landing craft, will greatly speed up unloading at the dinky little port that Yammy always wants to use. A civilian freighter not so much.



Well, Japan only starts with 7 ports that are larger than size 4 outside the home islands and they dont get APAs, so it isnt like I WANT to use "the dinky little ports", its I have no choice .


True, but Japan has some goodies for early operations. There is a special bonus for the first few months of the war to give near-amphbious ships benefits to non-amphib ships in amphib TFs. After a few months this bonus ends but is replaced with another (smaller) bonus for the rest of the war. This represents the extensive use of freighters as army and navy transports on-and-off during the war.

Japan gets a number of "naval" transport/cargo ships at the start of the war and can convert more later on. Naval Transport types (AP/AK) are in between true Amphibs (APA/AKA, etc) and merchants (xAP/xAK) in ability.

There is also the Japanese-only "convert cargo space to carry troops". Japanese freighters (with some size limits) can have (some of their) cargo spaces converted to troop space in a few days - then coverted back to full cargo when desired. This makes Japanese freighters much more useful as troop transports.

Japan does get a few interesting amphibious ships - the Army landing ships. Classed as LSD, with Shinshu Maru available on the first day.

All in all, the limitations of both sides in amphibious operations are well represented. Until the allies start getting plenty of everything in the last half of the war, they are in equally poor shape.

(in reply to Yamato hugger)
Post #: 148
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 10:57:00 PM   
Grotius


Posts: 5798
Joined: 10/18/2002
From: The Imperial Palace.
Status: offline
Thanks for the quick replies, guys. It all sounds great.

quote:

Frankly the first time the KB put into port it took 3 days to refuel and rearm them before going back out.

Cool - sounds much more realistic.

quote:

Secondly here is a screenshot that pretty much shows the limit of the allied air force in Malaya.

Heh, I get the picture. Interesting.

quote:

Combat mode is less efficient than "regular" load and also requires the TFs load a miniumum 3-days supply for the troops (even if you select Load Troops Only).

I'd never even thought about this, but it sounds like a sensible fix. Right now, I routinely load up troops and deprive them of food and water for 2-week voyages over open ocean.

quote:

You'll get used to all this. As mentioned somewhere up in the thread, loading and unloading is much more realistic in AE. That means it's harder, slower, and you have to do more planning. You especially have to make sure you are using the right ships for the right task.

Sounds terrific to me.

_____________________________


(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 149
RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! - 5/16/2009 11:33:41 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
I have a feeling I may play the first two months of the war a few times over and over again to learn from my mistakes.  The AI may have a few lessons to teach me.

Will there be a 6 month scenario like in stock that just covers the SRA region?? It would be a good learning tool.

(in reply to Grotius)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Tora, Tora, Tora! Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.547