Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Carrier Loading

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Carrier Loading Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 10:13:30 AM   
TommyBoy84

 

Posts: 105
Joined: 2/22/2008
Status: offline
Hey guys,

So you can supposedly load a carrier to 110% of its capacity and still have it fly normal operations, right?

Is it that you can load a carrier to 110% and still have it function normally, or once you hit 110% you start seeing bad things?

More specifically.... If I put exactly 99 planes on one of the allied CV's that has capacity of 90, will they fly normally, or will I see negative effects?
Post #: 1
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 10:48:55 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TommyBoy84

Hey guys,

So you can supposedly load a carrier to 110% of its capacity and still have it fly normal operations, right?

Is it that you can load a carrier to 110% and still have it function normally, or once you hit 110% you start seeing bad things?

More specifically.... If I put exactly 99 planes on one of the allied CV's that has capacity of 90, will they fly normally, or will I see negative effects?



IIRC it´s 115%. 99 aircraft on a 90 aircraft CV shouldn´t be a problem

_____________________________


(in reply to TommyBoy84)
Post #: 2
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 11:48:31 AM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
Beyond the capacity limitation, the runway will no longer allow take-offs..This becomes important if you lose a a flat-top and her planes land on a remaining carrier..
When that happens, ya' gotta get outta Dodge!

_____________________________




(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 3
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 12:15:26 PM   
RUPD3658


Posts: 6922
Joined: 8/28/2002
From: East Brunswick, NJ
Status: offline
Don't forget the max of 5 groups regardless of total #

If you are in the orange they will fly. Red will not

_____________________________

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke


(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 4
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 12:15:54 PM   
TommyBoy84

 

Posts: 105
Joined: 2/22/2008
Status: offline
So up to 115%, my planes will fly normally, but beyond 115%, there won't be any take-offs?

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 5
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 1:13:37 PM   
Misconduct


Posts: 1864
Joined: 2/18/2009
From: Cape Canaveral, Florida
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TommyBoy84

So up to 115%, my planes will fly normally, but beyond 115%, there won't be any take-offs?


Correct. I've done it and it works quite well, either you get extra cap/bombs or whatever.
Make sure you split a 24 plane squadron up and use no more then 8 aircraft on the CV, or it will go in the red.

(in reply to TommyBoy84)
Post #: 6
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 3:40:48 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
The only real danger of overloading your carriers to 115% is that, if you lose a (different) carrier in a battle, the squadron fragments from the stricken carrier may divert to your over-loaded one, which will then shut-down your over-loaded carrier.

-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Misconduct)
Post #: 7
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 3:52:35 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

The only real danger of overloading your carriers to 115% is that, if you lose a (different) carrier in a battle, the squadron fragments from the stricken carrier may divert to your over-loaded one, which will then shut-down your over-loaded carrier.

-F-


Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 8
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 4:08:55 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
quote:

Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?


I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...



-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 9
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 4:38:01 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?


I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...



-F-

Maybe you'll find it in some weeks...
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.

What does that mean?

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 10
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 4:45:35 PM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
quote:

I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.

What does that mean?


Oh boy. There's a can o' worms...

I'll let some of the JFBs chime in on that one to start things off...



-F-

_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 11
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 5:58:09 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Historiker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

Wasn't that what the jettison ramp was for?


I haven't found the "jettison aircraft" button on the CV panel in WitP yet...



-F-

Maybe you'll find it in some weeks...
I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.

What does that mean?



you just don´t want to ask what that silly number is for...

_____________________________


(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 12
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/28/2009 7:26:58 PM   
marky


Posts: 5780
Joined: 3/8/2004
From: Wisconsin
Status: offline
speaking of overloaded carriers, the planes should either divert to the nearest land base, or if unavailable, should land on the closest carrier with the most room, or split between carriers. especially as with most carrier engagements carriers lose a portion of their planes.

but i suppose that would be too hard to program

as for the pilots, i dont think they should commit metaphorical hari kari when their carrier goes down. they should be on another ship or carrier somehow. or at least a portion of them, i mean cmon some have to be rescued right?

i mean what happens? do they crash and just float there saying *Help help!* as the destroyers just cruise on by while meanwhile everyone says, *sorry, you lost your carrier, automatic fail and death sentence in shark infested waters!*

that should be fixed




< Message edited by marky -- 5/28/2009 7:27:23 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 13
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 1:25:23 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

quote:

I've just realized - after two years of playing - that in the "pop-up" window showed while haveing the mouse over a base there's a "air bal " with a number.

What does that mean?


Oh boy. There's a can o' worms...

I'll let some of the JFBs chime in on that one to start things off...



-F-


ok, now I am curious. What does that number mean ? Inquiring minds want to know.

ok, just found this thread ( geez, I never thought about this ) :
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=851446&mpage=1&key=air%2Cbalance󏺘


< Message edited by stuman -- 5/29/2009 1:31:06 AM >


_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 14
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 2:00:08 AM   
Feinder


Posts: 6589
Joined: 9/4/2002
From: Land o' Lakes, FL
Status: offline
Airbal is the relative air strength at given location.  Postive is favorable to you.  Negative is favorable to the enemy.  All types of AC project airbal.  Some type project more than others (per plan).  All project at range: so squadron of PBYs project a smaller total airbal for a longer range than a squadron of F4Fs which only project their airbal to a range of 4.  That airbal number is the composite of every AC within range of the hex.  Which is a LOT of AC, when you consider that Bettys project airbal out to 20 or whatever their max range is.  Now those Bettys probably won't ever do anything at a range of 20, but they still project their airbal.

There's a big squawk over whether it's "fair" or not.  I'm of the opinion of "fair" because it's available to both players, and frankly, it's a lot of work to make it useful.  If there is any advantage for the Allies, if they so choose to be anal enough to worry about airbal, it perhaps gives some help toward the woefully inadaquate SigInt reports.

Either way, it's completely moot, because it's going away in AE (as I understand it).

You'll have to take my word for it, that I tested airbal extensively, and that I that I figured out the algorithm.  Frankly, it was an amusing evening, and even when you know all the 11 herbs and spices, I have better things to do with my PBEM game than to get all knotted up over air-bal (even in my rare game as Japan).

My old Post about the "feel" of airbal (I rather liked it's metaphore, so I'll share it again) -

Airbal, is just like any other intel. The more you put into, the more you get out of it. Furthermore, AirBal is not a bug or an exploit. The exact same data is available to both players, if they so choose to do anythign with it.
A good example is Sigint. It's usually just a bunch of coords. If you look at it once a week, it tells you nothing. But if you take the time (and effort) to keep up with it, it's useful.
(* raises "wanker" hand *)
I equate airbal to noise. It's also a lot more "realistic" than many other things in this game. Tampa International is a busy airport, much more so than Trinity Corporate near my home. There's a lot more noise at TIA (both litterally, and more applicably, in air-traffic chatter).
An example, if you're hosting a party, the noise level in the room is fairly static. It might be loud, but it's constant. Maybe Fred with his big mouth shows up at the party. You can tell about where he is, because he's got a bigger mouth than anybody else. Maybe he brings his girlfriend, who also has a big mouth. If they're together, they make so much noise it's hard to tell them apart, but you know where they are. You can tell when the go outside, altho it's impossible to tell exactly where they are outside; but you know they're -not- in the room with you, because it's -not- loud.
You hear a loud crash in the kitchen, so somebody goes in to clean it up. The kitchen stays louder for a while. You don't necessarily know what dropped, or who specifically is in the kitchen. But you can hear the voices talking as long as they're there. Fred & girlfriend enter the kitchen, and now the kitchen is REALLY loud. One of them leaves. You don't know WHO left, but you know the kitchen is a little quieter. But you also know that whoever it was, went outside, because the noise in your room is still "normal".
If you stay at the party all night, you see where people like to stand. One couch is comfortable, another is not. You can tell who likes to play together. You see that nobody likes Fred, so he roams around constantly, increasing the volume of whatever room he's in. His girlfriend is angry, and as been making out with Bill out on the porch since since the crash in the kitchen. Fred discovers his GF with Bill, so he chases Bill with a stapler (Fred is also drunk). You're surprised and don't know what's coming, but it's loud and you have one second to get out of the way.
But if you just walk into the party an look around, all you see is somebody passed out on a couch, a drunk guy waving a stapler at another, and a couple smooching on the porch. You don't know the whole story, and everything almost seems normal.
It's not voo-doo magic. It's an algorithm.
-F-


_____________________________

"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me


(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 15
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 2:04:35 AM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1526
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
the one thing i do enjoy about reading old posts is the avatars and names of people youve never seen before - where do they go? whats happened to the 'disappeared'?

(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 16
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 2:04:59 AM   
Japan


Posts: 754
Joined: 10/26/2007
From: Heaven on Earth (Scandinavia of course)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: m10bob

Beyond the capacity limitation, the runway will no longer allow take-offs..This becomes important if you lose a a flat-top and her planes land on a remaining carrier..
When that happens, ya' gotta get outta Dodge!




I think this is sad, WITP / AE shoild allow you to dump the planes into the sea, like was done in real life in a few battles.




-

_____________________________

AAR VIDEO
THE FIRST YEAR + THE SECOND YEAR
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2133035&mpage=1&key=&

(in reply to m10bob)
Post #: 17
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 3:56:39 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Thank you VERY much, Feinder!

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Japan)
Post #: 18
RE: Carrier Loading - 5/29/2009 4:19:18 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feinder

Airbal is the relative air strength at given location.  Postive is favorable to you.  Negative is favorable to the enemy.  All types of AC project airbal.  Some type project more than others (per plan).  All project at range: so squadron of PBYs project a smaller total airbal for a longer range than a squadron of F4Fs which only project their airbal to a range of 4.  That airbal number is the composite of every AC within range of the hex.  Which is a LOT of AC, when you consider that Bettys project airbal out to 20 or whatever their max range is.  Now those Bettys probably won't ever do anything at a range of 20, but they still project their airbal.

There's a big squawk over whether it's "fair" or not.  I'm of the opinion of "fair" because it's available to both players, and frankly, it's a lot of work to make it useful.  If there is any advantage for the Allies, if they so choose to be anal enough to worry about airbal, it perhaps gives some help toward the woefully inadaquate SigInt reports.

Either way, it's completely moot, because it's going away in AE (as I understand it).

You'll have to take my word for it, that I tested airbal extensively, and that I that I figured out the algorithm.  Frankly, it was an amusing evening, and even when you know all the 11 herbs and spices, I have better things to do with my PBEM game than to get all knotted up over air-bal (even in my rare game as Japan).

My old Post about the "feel" of airbal (I rather liked it's metaphore, so I'll share it again) -

Airbal, is just like any other intel. The more you put into, the more you get out of it. Furthermore, AirBal is not a bug or an exploit. The exact same data is available to both players, if they so choose to do anythign with it.
A good example is Sigint. It's usually just a bunch of coords. If you look at it once a week, it tells you nothing. But if you take the time (and effort) to keep up with it, it's useful.
(* raises "wanker" hand *)
I equate airbal to noise. It's also a lot more "realistic" than many other things in this game. Tampa International is a busy airport, much more so than Trinity Corporate near my home. There's a lot more noise at TIA (both litterally, and more applicably, in air-traffic chatter).
An example, if you're hosting a party, the noise level in the room is fairly static. It might be loud, but it's constant. Maybe Fred with his big mouth shows up at the party. You can tell about where he is, because he's got a bigger mouth than anybody else. Maybe he brings his girlfriend, who also has a big mouth. If they're together, they make so much noise it's hard to tell them apart, but you know where they are. You can tell when the go outside, altho it's impossible to tell exactly where they are outside; but you know they're -not- in the room with you, because it's -not- loud.
You hear a loud crash in the kitchen, so somebody goes in to clean it up. The kitchen stays louder for a while. You don't necessarily know what dropped, or who specifically is in the kitchen. But you can hear the voices talking as long as they're there. Fred & girlfriend enter the kitchen, and now the kitchen is REALLY loud. One of them leaves. You don't know WHO left, but you know the kitchen is a little quieter. But you also know that whoever it was, went outside, because the noise in your room is still "normal".
If you stay at the party all night, you see where people like to stand. One couch is comfortable, another is not. You can tell who likes to play together. You see that nobody likes Fred, so he roams around constantly, increasing the volume of whatever room he's in. His girlfriend is angry, and as been making out with Bill out on the porch since since the crash in the kitchen. Fred discovers his GF with Bill, so he chases Bill with a stapler (Fred is also drunk). You're surprised and don't know what's coming, but it's loud and you have one second to get out of the way.
But if you just walk into the party an look around, all you see is somebody passed out on a couch, a drunk guy waving a stapler at another, and a couple smooching on the porch. You don't know the whole story, and everything almost seems normal.
It's not voo-doo magic. It's an algorithm.
-F-




if airbalance number would be fair then the world would be flat... the reason why it´s not fair is the fact that the Allied player always is one round ahead the Japanese, no matter if airbalance numbers or in fact getting recon of aircraft transfers just done during the Japanese´s orders phase. So it can´t be anymore unfair as this has nothing to do with the better Allied intel they had in real life, it was just bad design or programming. It´s changed in AE though.

_____________________________


(in reply to Feinder)
Post #: 19
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Carrier Loading Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.563