Confederation of the Rhine

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Confederation of the Rhine

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [Napoleonics] >> Crown of Glory: Emperor's Edition >> Tech Support >> Confederation of the Rhine

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Confederation of the Rhine - 7/1/2009 7:34:05 PM

lenin

Posts: 349
Joined: 1/19/2005
Status: offline

My background. pbem British. pbem Prussian.

I have posession of the Confedration of the Rhine

Pre-patch, they raised 80k troops of all sort, corps containers etc. Too much. Every year.

Post-patch. Raised nothing, even though the Rhinish staes were collectively richer than me. I have a 400k army, they have nothing. Gone from the sublime to the ridiculous. What else do they spend their hundreds of gold on? If nothing else, why don't they give it to me?

We need something inbetween, and something we can plan for?

_____________________________

"Imperialism is the eve of the proletarian social revolution"

Post #: 1

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/1/2009 8:38:38 PM

Kingmaker

Posts: 1678
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

HiHi

Ditto above for Spain & England, pre 1.09 patch fudal levies coming up regular, post patch not a thing.

All the Best
Peter

(in reply to lenin)

Post #: 2

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 4:54:23 AM

Dab

Posts: 35
Joined: 5/9/2009
Status: offline

I tested this playing Spain against the AI and Kingdom of Naples did still levy their normal troops in April. I'll run it through and see if mob limit has any effect.

Were you are over your mobilization limit? As Spain in that first years turn I wasn't, maybe that is the problem. They nerfed where they should have tweaked.

(in reply to Kingmaker)

Post #: 3

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 4:57:40 AM

Mus

Posts: 1759
Joined: 11/13/2005
Status: offline

IMO they "fixed" something that wasnt ever really a problem because of complaints (never understood the problem with free units, if you dont want them disband them) and now the Feudal levvy just doesnt happen. So whatever the fix was is a little overdone.

Noticed the same thing in the new PBEM 109 game, no levvy at all, in "Another PBEM" Im already over the mob limit so didnt think anything when I didnt get any, but saw that most other people were not having them as well.

< Message edited by Mus -- 7/3/2009 5:03:03 AM >

_____________________________

Mindset, Tactics, Skill, Equipment
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

(in reply to Dab)

Post #: 4

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 6:08:02 AM

IronWarrior

Posts: 801
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: Beaverton, OR
Status: offline

lenin, I checked the "Another PBEM" game and the reason you didn't get a spring levy for the Rhine is that one of the provinces is conquered and not protectorate. This was fixed in the patch, the listed territories need to all be protectorates in order to get the spring levy. Seems like you should still have received one for Bavaria though.

I haven't noticed the same as everyone else, just had a levy in pbem 109...

_____________________________

(in reply to Mus)

Post #: 5

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 6:08:15 AM

Dab

Posts: 35
Joined: 5/9/2009
Status: offline

I just played the Spain and Kingdom of Naples scenario out a bit again and it turns out the units built by them don't even count against the mob limit although I didn't get up to the mob limit yet to see if they stopped coming.

I was playing a game as Prussia agaisnt the AI earlier and I was getting fuedal levy with the popup asking if I wanted to accept them. It was 1796 scenario and it built me a cavalry in Masovia and an infantry in Posen which are conquered nations with capitals in that scenario.

It could be something wrong with the PBEM games. ?

(in reply to Mus)

Post #: 6

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 7:18:34 AM

IronWarrior

Posts: 801
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: Beaverton, OR
Status: offline

Actually come to think of it, my example is different from feudal levy... I haven't seen that happen for a while in any of the games.

_____________________________

(in reply to Dab)

Post #: 7

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 8:28:34 AM

Mus

Posts: 1759
Joined: 11/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dab

I was playing a game as Prussia agaisnt the AI earlier and I was getting fuedal levy with the popup asking if I wanted to accept them.�It was 1796 scenario and it built me a cavalry in Masovia and an infantry in Posen which�are conquered nations with capitals in that scenario.

It�could be something wrong with the PBEM games.� ?

I wonder if the game could be automatically rejecting them.

We had some issues in our PBEM game where the merging player has to be told whether or not people want to evacuate their troops on surrender, even though that feature wasnt suppose to be implemented for PBEM games.

Could be same issue here or could be the game is autorejecting them in PBEM.

Or just an overcorrection as mentioned earlier

_____________________________

Mindset, Tactics, Skill, Equipment
Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

(in reply to Dab)

Post #: 8

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/3/2009 8:58:40 PM

lenin

Posts: 349
Joined: 1/19/2005
Status: offline

My own theory is that it's an overcorrection. The Germans aren't improving their provinces either. Still, will now make less difference if I lose any of them now. I have had the time to build and maintain an ass-whipping army as Prussia!

_____________________________

"Imperialism is the eve of the proletarian social revolution"

(in reply to Mus)

Post #: 9

RE: Confederation of the Rhine - 7/4/2009 4:34:50 PM

ericbabe