Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

First Action at Pearl Harbor

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> First Action at Pearl Harbor Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 5:48:45 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Gents,

I've just downloaded, installed, and started a Grand Campaign against the Jap AE without a hitch (a minor miracle since I'm computer illiterate).

As I begin running the first turn, the first communiques I receive are that midget subs are sighted at Pearl Harbor, undergo depth charging (by, among other ships, DM Preble), and one midget puts a TT into BB Maryland!

Wow! Fun stuff!

Canoe "I'm Still Celibate" Rebel
Post #: 1
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 6:02:53 PM   
TheTomDude


Posts: 372
Joined: 3/3/2006
From: Switzerland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
Canoe "I'm Still Celibate" Rebel


No you're not.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 2
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 6:06:04 PM   
kfmiller41


Posts: 1063
Joined: 3/25/2003
From: Saint Marys, Ga
Status: offline
Played my first turn as allies using 2 day turns and the AI stayed at pearl for a second day and beat the tar out of my ships in and around pearl. all I can say is WOW. Map is awesome, could scroll around it all day (but I have to work)




_____________________________

You have the ability to arouse various emotions in me: please select carefully.

(in reply to TheTomDude)
Post #: 3
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 6:23:08 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
Jealous...I am SOOOOOOOOOO jealous....


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to kfmiller41)
Post #: 4
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 7:06:29 PM   
jwxspoon


Posts: 167
Joined: 3/21/2006
From: Myrtle Beach, SC USA
Status: offline
It's a damned bloody business. First turn is absolutely crushing to the allies.  180 aircraft destroyed on the ground, another 11 shot down or lost to ops. 

Oklahoma, Arizona, Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk, along with 14 other assorted ships...

Now to plot my revenge...

jw



(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 5
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 7:10:59 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jwxspoon

It's a damned bloody business. First turn is absolutely crushing to the allies.  180 aircraft destroyed on the ground, another 11 shot down or lost to ops. 

Oklahoma, Arizona, Repulse and Prince of Wales sunk, along with 14 other assorted ships...

Now to plot my revenge...

jw





Heh, you're probably going to be the only guy who lives in Myrtle Beach who's pasty white...........unless someone else around there bought AE, of course.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to jwxspoon)
Post #: 6
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 8:10:03 PM   
Ketza


Posts: 2227
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Columbia, Maryland
Status: offline
First turn was brutal for allies.

4 Bbs in PH sunk. Every CA in the Harbor damaged and 8 DDS damaged or sunk.

Repulse gone. POW limping badly. Danae sunk.

200+ aircraft destroyed.

My usual defence of Java will not be happening is my initial thought.


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 7
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 8:59:50 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Wow, my first turn against the AI was tough - much different than WitP:

BBs sunk- West Virginia, Tennessee, Prince of Wales.
BBs damaged moderate to severe - all others, including BC Repulse

Other ships sunk:
DDs Shaw, Hull, Ralph Talbot
AVD William Preston
PC Tiger
AM Rail (what the heck is an AM? A mail ship?)

(in reply to Ketza)
Post #: 8
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 9:02:16 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Wow, my first turn against the AI was tough - much different than WitP:

BBs sunk- West Virginia, Tennessee, Prince of Wales.
BBs damaged moderate to severe - all others, including BC Repulse

Other ships sunk:
DDs Shaw, Hull, Ralph Talbot
AVD William Preston
PC Tiger
AM Rail (what the heck is an AM? A mail ship?)



AM and AMc = minsweepers (c = coastal)

CM and CMc = Mine layers

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 9
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 9:04:36 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Some first impressions:

After running the historic first turn, it's the Allies turn....

WHAT THE HECK DO I DO NEXT?

After shaking feeling of being overwhelmed, I enjoy scrolling the map, noticing a few things:

1. Diego Garcia is on the map. I GUARANTEE that John 3rd will see that and immediately identify it as an invasion target.
2. Free French city near Pakhoi, China. What's up with THAT?!
3. Free French-controlled Tahiti. I GUARANTEE that's where LargeSlowTarget took that photo of his....
4. Nome is occupied by company of U.S. Infantry. Cool!
5. The name of the game box moved from the right hand corner to the left hand corner. Shoot! That means I can't use it to camoflauge desperation convoys making for Auckland from Panama City....
6. No box for Southern USA. Durn, the Confederacy aint represented in the game!

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 10
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 9:49:27 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
My first turn as Allies I lost all of my BBs except 3 that are very heavily damaged (will probably lose 2). Also lost PoW and Repulse. Looks like only the West Virginia might surive. Not to shappy for an AI start compared to WiTP.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 11
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:01:24 PM   
helldiver


Posts: 86
Joined: 5/21/2008
From: SRA
Status: offline
Lord.

   I was looking in the manual and trying to internalize the damage repair (irony) routines while the first test turn as Allies was running:

BBs  Tennessee, Maryland, West Virginia, Oklahoma, California, Arizona, Pennsylvania sunk

DDs  Hull, Cassin, Patterson, Litchfield gone

PoW and Repulse sunk in third LBA raid of the turn

The AI seems pretty capable....


(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 12
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:06:16 PM   
captskillet


Posts: 2493
Joined: 3/1/2003
From: Louisiana & the 2007 Nat Champ LSU Fightin' Tigers
Status: offline
Guess I was lucky only lost the California and 2 DD's.................Tennessee is still got over 50 fires and bunches of ships got serious sys and flt damage...........right now POW and Repulse are trying to limp back to Singapore dunno if I can get them out before its too late later or not.............WHAT A GAME!!!

_____________________________

"Git thar fust with the most men" - Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest


(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 13
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:11:48 PM   
Vladd


Posts: 69
Joined: 10/24/2004
Status: offline
Jeez, I got off lightly. 1 BB lost at Pearl (another in dire straits), but PoW and Repulse survived with only 1 torp hit on Prince and another dud. Buffaloes from Singapore got involved, which may have been the difference.

(in reply to captskillet)
Post #: 14
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:18:52 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

Random, random, random. We went to a lot of trouble to sure the game didn't get too predictable.

With the AI too.....

(in reply to Vladd)
Post #: 15
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:43:34 PM   
morganbj


Posts: 3634
Joined: 8/12/2007
From: Mosquito Bite, Texas
Status: offline
I lost 5 BB's and 8 other ships at PH. I BB is at 97% float and other has 63 fires!

Repulse is not going to make it to Singapore.

Good grief.


(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 16
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:55:44 PM   
terje439


Posts: 6813
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
Lost Maryland, Oklahoma, Nevada and CA San Fransisco at PH, around 20 other ships damaged with damage running from 12-56 sys.
Lost 61 planes at PH.
Lost Repulse and PoW.
BUT placed a torp and 3x500lb bombs in the Kongo.

And now I have to go to work!? Knew I should have taken out some vacation








_____________________________

"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen

("She is to be torpedoed!")

(in reply to morganbj)
Post #: 17
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 10:57:30 PM   
Norden_slith


Posts: 166
Joined: 8/27/2003
From: expatriate german
Status: offline
Wow, just wow!
Sounds fantastic, but i dont dare to buy and try this monster.
Sooo, back to A&A Iron Blitz...



_____________________________

Norden
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hexagonally challenged

(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 18
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/27/2009 11:46:40 PM   
morganbj


Posts: 3634
Joined: 8/12/2007
From: Mosquito Bite, Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Norden

Wow, just wow!
Sounds fantastic, but i dont dare to buy and try this monster.
Sooo, back to A&A Iron Blitz...



Come on. You want it! You know you do. Take the plunge. No guts, no glory.

(in reply to Norden_slith)
Post #: 19
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 6:48:45 AM   
byron13


Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001
Status: offline
Yeah, same for me. Lost 4 BB at Pearl and Prince of Wales. A fifth BB a likely gonner since it wouldn't appear that I can dock it with fires raging; sinking is probably the only way to put out the fires. Haven't moved on to day 2 since I thought I'd take a tour of things. If KB comes back to dance on Dec 8, it'll be a tough start. Well, just wait until I get the SNJ's into the fight. Anyone notice that the P39s look very capable down low, and the P40s really stink - at least until the N model. Funny how low the manueverability of all top U.S. model fighters are . . . hope that airspeed thing really works.

Oh, and Oahu also sank . . .

(in reply to morganbj)
Post #: 20
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 9:22:42 AM   
Droop21


Posts: 115
Joined: 7/19/2002
Status: offline
I had a lucky first turn for the ships: only 1 BB and 7 DD sunk in Pearl. Repulse took a series of torps and I'm not sure she'll be able to limp back to Singapour. Oahu airport does not exist anymore, I have less than 10 planes capable of flying. The question is: will the KB give Pearl another serving? All my capital ships got badly pasted (including 2 torps by those wretched mini-subs) and a second raid would spell disaster for my navy.
I got surprised by the landings, some of the usual landings did not occur, which makes me even more nervous: where will these troops land ?
Got to find an excuse to leave the office early, to have some time before the wife arrives

(in reply to byron13)
Post #: 21
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 12:38:42 PM   
John Lansford

 

Posts: 2662
Joined: 4/29/2002
Status: offline
There may be something wrong with your damage outcome resolution; the Pearl Harbor damage reports are of two types; devastating destruction or barely anything at all.  Where's the historical results?  Shouldn't that be the most likely outcome?

My first turn ended up with 58 out of 74 torpedoes finding a target; of the ones that missed, I remember perhaps 3 being duds.  Oklahoma, WV (also hit by a midget sub), California and Maryland sunk, the rest are heavily damaged but probably saveable.  Arizona took 6 torpedoes and is barely floating; Tennessee got hit by 4 and is in similar shape.  Only one cruiser (Minneapolis) undamaged.  About half a dozen destroyers sunk or damaged, plus a similar number of auxiliaries hit.  Oh, and a sub too.

The British fared much better, mainly because a squadron of Buffaloes from Singapore made an appearance and broke up a couple of attacks on PoW and Repulse.  PoW made it back to Singapore with just bomb damage, but Repulse is still limping back with 3 torpedoes in her.  To add insult to injury, in my turn phase a DD heading for Manila hit a sneaky little minefield laid off of Bataan and is now stuck in harbor getting fixed.

Has anyone had results of the Pearl Harbor attack more closely resemble the actual event?  Oh, and mine was done with "Allied surprise" turned off, so the damage should have been less.

(in reply to Droop21)
Post #: 22
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 12:51:01 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Your PH result is at the far end of a VERY wide spectrum, John. I'm not saying that you don't have a valid viewpoint, but there has to be room for extreme outcomes as well.

< Message edited by Terminus -- 7/28/2009 12:55:20 PM >


_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to John Lansford)
Post #: 23
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 12:56:22 PM   
m10bob


Posts: 8622
Joined: 11/3/2002
From: Dismal Seepage Indiana
Status: offline
I just fired this baby up..At Pearl, a midget sub hit a BB with a torp and 6 BB's were sunk on 1 day turns..This GAME just got a WHOLE LOT BETTER!!!!!!

_____________________________




(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 24
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:03:53 PM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus
I'm not saying that you don't have a valid viewpoint, but there has to be room for extreme outcomes as well.



Agreed. But when you look at the results being posted it looks as if the "extreme" is coming up a lot more frequently than the "average". Like the "bell curve" has been turned upside down...

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 25
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:09:06 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
I don't agree. Looks to me like we have a spread, and also that we don't have enough data yet to form an opinion.

Not saying there's nothing to tweak, but that the game's only a day old.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 26
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:11:00 PM   
Yakface


Posts: 846
Joined: 8/5/2006
Status: offline
Am I the only one to have sunk nothing at PH after the first day?

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 27
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:41:53 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yakface

Am I the only one to have sunk nothing at PH after the first day?



Nope I only sank 1 BB and scored nary a hit on PoW and Repulse.



_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to Yakface)
Post #: 28
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:44:14 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
You can't really create an analysis of PH results from occasional forum posts. The people most likely to post are those who got the more extreme results and were surprised enough to mention them. In pre-release testing, we saw a very nice bell curve centered around the roughly historical results (2-4 BBs). Let's give this a few weeks to shake out, if there's a consensus at that point that things are off (and having some occasional extreme results is not a bad thing) then we can make adjustments.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to treespider)
Post #: 29
RE: First Action at Pearl Harbor - 7/28/2009 1:45:50 PM   
treespider


Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

You can't create an analysis of PH results from forum posts guys. The people most likely to post are those who got the more extreme results and were surprised enough to mention them. In pre-release testing, we saw a very nice bell curve centered around the roughly historical results (2-4 BBs).



Yes we did...in fact I was one of the foot draggers because I kept getting killed at PH....then I ran off a hundred or more first days ... and realized I was simply having bad luck...there is a bell curve.

< Message edited by treespider -- 7/28/2009 1:47:22 PM >


_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> First Action at Pearl Harbor Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.328