Historical vs. non-Historical

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Historical vs. non-Historical

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Historical vs. non-Historical

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Historical vs. non-Historical - 7/29/2009 7:29:48 PM

wgs_explorer

Posts: 81
Joined: 10/31/2002
From: Miami, Florida
Status: offline

I'm curious. How many of you play (or start) historical or non-historical games? And if you play non-historical campaigns, how many get your BBs out of Pearl? Is getting your BBs out gamey?

Bill

Post #: 1

RE: Historical vs. non-Historical - 7/29/2009 7:31:19 PM

Mistmatz

Posts: 1399
Joined: 10/16/2005
Status: offline

It's not gamey if you feed your CVs to KB instead.

(in reply to wgs_explorer)

Post #: 2

RE: Historical vs. non-Historical - 7/29/2009 8:04:16 PM

Sheytan

Posts: 863
Joined: 11/28/2006
Status: offline

I started both, but reverted back to historical. As far as the non historical, I will eventually continue it just to see what happens. I do plan on leaving my fleet assets in Pearl however. As far as moving them bieng gamey, well its basically a what if situation. So whatever makes you happy...

(in reply to wgs_explorer)

Post #: 3