EUBanana
Posts: 4552
Joined: 9/30/2003 From: Little England Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CraigDeaton Agree that a win on pure points, while it can be a challenge, is probably not terribly uncommon. I should have clarified that I was talking about an outright win, per the game's victory conditions. Well, the victory conditions include auto-victory on January 1st 1943. Thats what I mean by 'on points'. If the Japs have 4 times as many points as the Allies on that date, by the victory conditions, game over, Japs win. Of course almost always people would keep playing anyway, and then often, though by no means always, the Allies would go on to win. I think in AE, as it's more realistic again, while I dont think I'd count out Japanese outright wins completely, I think they'll be much rarer than they were in WITP. Ground combat is a hell of lot bloodier than it was in WITP from what I've seen, and given how throttled the Allies are in infantry squads I wouldn't be surprised if the Japs can capitalise on that little change against India and Australia. I suspect it'll be harder for them to win on points as well, but from the WITP AARs I saw I think, if anything, Japanese auto-victory in 1943 was the most likely outcome, so thats probably not amiss. I don't think it's really about winning anyway, as someone on here said, you don't play to win the war but to experience it. Besides, I dont think of a pbem as one long game anyway, it's really a set of discrete and more comprehendable campaigns (Malaya, Java, Burma, Guadalcanal, etc), each of which is interesting in its own right, and may have a winner or a loser.
_____________________________
|