Wirraway aircraft

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Wirraway aircraft

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Wirraway aircraft

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 3:12:10 PM

jgsIII

Posts: 67
Joined: 8/25/2009
From: Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.A.
Status: offline

OK, still digesting all the differences between WitP Classic and WitP AE.

The Wirraway aircraft used to be classified as a Fighter-Bomber but is now listed as a Light Level Bomber. Can anybody explain the change?

If it is really just a bomber, does that mean Australia doesn't have any fighter aircraft in Australia or even the surrounding islands at the beginning of the war? That seems kind of odd the homeland wouldn't have any fighters. It's especially odd compared to the restricted headquarters rules in the game that force a play to keep the 'home guard' in place.

Does anybody care?

Post #: 1

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 3:29:48 PM

jhdeerslayer

Posts: 1194
Joined: 5/25/2002
From: Michigan
Status: offline

I wondered the same thing so I care.

A bunch of poorly trained P40's arrive I think in January but then are withdrawn in March. By then planes are being shipped there from the US or at least in my game anyway.

_____________________________

(in reply to jgsIII)

Post #: 2

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 3:36:56 PM

pad152

Posts: 2871
Joined: 4/23/2000
Status: offline

The Wirraway was designed as a trainer but, was used in just about every role because they didn't have anything else at the start of the war.

(in reply to jhdeerslayer)

Post #: 3

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 3:59:17 PM

herwin

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pad152

The Wirraway was designed as a trainer but, was used in just about every role because they didn't have anything else at the start of the war.

HISTORY

The Wirraway evolved from the North American NA-16 basic trainer. A closely related aircraft was the SNJ/T-6/Harvard advanced trainer. You don't want trainers to be sensitive to their controls, and you most definitely want fighter aircraft to be sensitive. On the other hand, stability is useful in a light bomber--it gives you good bombing accuracy. Using a trainer-derivative in fighter combat was a last resort option, and so I think classifying the Wirraway as a light bomber is better.

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to pad152)

Post #: 4

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 4:45:30 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

I sure care! I've got Jap carriers attacking Brisbane in late December '41 and there is not a single Allied fighter available to defend the port within 1000 miles. This can't be right.

< Message edited by tbridges -- 9/16/2009 4:46:38 PM >

(in reply to jgsIII)

Post #: 5

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/16/2009 4:57:33 PM

herwin

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tbridges

I sure care! I've got Jap carriers attacking Brisbane in late December '41 and there is not a single Allied fighter available to defend the port within 1000 miles. This can't be right.

HISTORY

That was right. Only one Wirraway ever shot down an aircraft. SBDs were better fighters.

_____________________________

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 6

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/17/2009 12:33:02 AM

wdolson

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

The Australians saw that the UK was not going to be able to provide them with enough aircraft when war looked likely with Japan. They saw they needed to develop a domestic aircraft industry and licensed the trainer from North American as their first project. The Wirraway was fairly maneuverable for a bomber, but it was really intended as a stop gap and a training project for the fledgling Australian aircraft industry.

It was pushed into the fighter role a few times early on, usually with disastrous results. As far as maneuverability went, it was probably about the same as the SBD, but had less protection, I think it was lighter armed, and the crews were not as experienced. Before the war, the USN rotated their pilots from one plane type to another, so a lot of the more experienced SBD pilots had experience flying fighters and had some clue about fighter tactics. The Wirraway pilots didn't have any such benefits.

It is a little weird that Australia doesn't have any fighters at start, but the Wirraway wasn't really a fighter and it was all that was available. The Australian fighter pilots were all flying with the RAF in Europe and the Med. Australia had been stripped of their most experienced pilots for the war on the other side of the world.

The Australian government managed to get a Wing of Australians back, but by the time they arrived, the tide had turned and they saw little action. They tried to get into action with the 5th AF, but the Americans tended to exclude non-American units to rear area action by late 43. This short sightedness denied the Allies of some very good units on the front lines.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to herwin)

Post #: 7

RE: Wirraway aircraft - 9/17/2009 5:28:19 AM

afspret

Posts: 851
Joined: 2/19/2004
From: Hanahan, SC
Status: offline

Don't know about ya'll, but when I used them as CAP in WitP they got slaughtered, so I would only use them for ground or naval attack. I was also initially curious about the change in AE at the beginning as well and in created my own scenerio with them as fighter-bombers, but they got slaughtered again, so maybe leaving them as light bombers ain't such a bad idea.

(in reply to wdolson)

Post #: 8