Slitherine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Streptokok

Im just so pissed off at this:

quote:

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 37
Ki-27b Nate x 143
Ki-43-Ib Oscar x 14

Allied aircraft
I-153 x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-27b Nate: 2 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
I-153: 1 destroyed

Even if you didnt bring those 143x Nates, 51x Zeros and Oscars would so overwhelm 12x I-153 they would just be wiped out.

IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

quote:

ORIGINAL: seydlitz

Up north, my forces are marching from Hailar towards Borzya. However, I have noticed that they do not want to take the shortest path in terms of hexes. Instead, they want to take a long and winding road through the woods. I clicked on the roads, and I think the problem might be this pink stretch of road. Does anyone know what that signifies?

quote:



I am still operating the Glen factory for a couple of months to make sure that I will have enough Glens for my submarines during the war. The subs tend to lose their Glens a lot and having them on there is important to recon.

I did convert a couple of other factories from planes that I didn't need to planes that I did, but a prime consideration was lack of engines to support additional factories that needed HA-35 engines at start. Even if had found the factory space, it would have been to expand zero production instead of Oscars. The zeroes are far more important since they have better firepower and more importantly, equip the carriers. If the IJAAF loses, it can simply pull back and hide. If the IJNAF loses, then Japan won't be doing too much conquering.
zero production instead of Oscars

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ketza

Are you coordinating the same flotillas and air divisions from individual bases? I typically do not have the problem of unescorted bombers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: seydlitz

Defending force 1738 troops, 103 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 19

Allied ground losses:
1649 casualties reported
Squads: 68 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 214 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 20 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 71 (71 destroyed, 0 disabled)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rattovolante

Apart from 157 to 1, I think it's more relevant that if your report is approximately accurate all that's left in the hex is about 100 troops and 35 guns, about 5-10% of the original unit. And with 90% losses (in just 3 days of combat, if I understand correctly) still they didn't retire nor surrender. This looks unlikely.

Also note that all his losses are destroyed devices, no disablements, this is unusual and might be a bug hint:

quote:

ORIGINAL: seydlitz

Defending force 1738 troops, 103 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 19

Allied ground losses:
1649 casualties reported
Squads: 68 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 214 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 20 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 71 (71 destroyed, 0 disabled)

This looks quite suspect.
I wonder if all that's left in the unit are any static devices, and everything else surrendered this turn (thus the destroyed units).
I think you should ask the devs if this is WAD on the support or feedback forums, and/or ask your opponent if he saw anything strange on his side of the FOW.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Smeulders

Thought you said a few turns back that your opponent sent in an infantry division to support the fort, did it get pulled back already or was it FOW ?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

If it's static unit, it cannot retreat, only surrender or get annihilated. If it passes experience and leadership checks against surrender, you'll have to attack until it does not or is annihilated.