Wrathchild
Posts: 817
Joined: 10/12/2007 From: Reading, PA Status: offline
|
Not necessarily feedback, but what I think may be a related question. My understanding is that this patch was to fix the draft when financials were turned off. Has something been changed recently with the way that the computer teams look at their players in general, whether finances are on or not? At the end of my last season, and after spring turning in my current, the computer teams dropped en masse quality, star players. The only thing that I could see in common was that these players all had Potential of 1, even though they may have had 4 out of 6, or more, ratings at 70 or above. We're talking All Star players, pitchers with winning records, players hitting consistently over .300, etc. If I posted the stats and ratings of these players I think there would be a number of surprised people. In many cases these players are habitual starters and are being released and replaced by draft picks. I'm sure there's some logic behind it but it is just shocking. It'd be like the Yankees releasing Ruth while he's still performing and replacing him with DiMaggio. Sure, the potential for stardom might be there, but are you really going to drop the sure thing in favor of the unknown. After all of this I have a couple of questions: 1) Has something changed that is giving more weight to the Potential rating over other criteria? 2) I thought one change, and maybe I'm not remembering correctly, was to make a team less likely to drop players that had played with the team for a long time. The players I'm seeing dropped have been staples of the team roster for 7 seasons and are being dropped like a crack whore with an open sore on her face.
< Message edited by Wrathchild -- 10/2/2009 2:59:12 PM >
_____________________________
J.G. Wrathchild, Manager, St. Louis Cardinals (1900-1906), Brooklyn Superbas (1907, 1908)
|