Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

ETO-scenario is here!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> WW2: Time of Wrath >> Scenarios and Mods >> ETO-scenario is here! Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 5:24:43 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
I have decided to release the ETO-scenario a little earlier than I first thought I would. The reasons are partly that several people have "voiced" a desire to give it a try; partly that the 1.70 patch coming up in a month or two might make it obsolete.

It’s in many ways a beta-scenario, for players to try new ideas and solutions to game issues; maybe take some of these to their own scenarios. I haven’t played it against the AI since I don’t play the game that way, only made calculations based on analysis and scrutiny of the game files. It should be okay to try against the AI, though, since no changes should be of the kind to distract the basic system.

In this download I have added my own graphics, those that we use in our PBEM-games here in Sweden. They are not necessary to play the game. Without them some oddities may occur on the map, however, such as cities disappearing or Eiffel towers showing up at impropriate places. Another effect is that the symbols showing the locations of Axis' trade and also the general resources will not come out on the map.

Finally, remember – this scenario is just a brainchild of mine, not an official product. Wastelands, therefore, have no obligations whatsoever to help with issues occuring when playing ETO. I myself will listen to any problems, but can’t promise to help either, since in most cases it will probably be beyond my capacity to do so. It will be good to ponder upon this before starting any longer games.

Hope you like it!

ETO

Current version is 1.3 and exist in two versions, standard and a special PBEM. It is possible to play the standard version as PBEM too, only the special scenario includes rules and units for HQs and corps-upgrade limitation. It needs a little more management.

Just click on "Ladda ner".



Changes made to the standard 1939-scenario.



1. LWD-effect has been raised to 40 and the time when each country raise it’s level have been re-worked. Now, for most of the war, German units are the undisputed kings of the battlefield and only Germany will ever reach level 5. UK and USA will both reach level 4. Between the Polish campaign and the attack on France, the German army will however see a major reorganization, manifesting itself in two steps of raised LWD. An attack on France prior to May 1940, will thus have to be made with a much less competent German army (this is a game balancing measure, to make a haphazard early German attack less likely to succeed).

2. The general likelyhood of retreats have been raised.

3. The former combat modifications for attacking from different hexsides have been reversed. It is now no modification when attacking from several directions. The exceptions is 2-1 and 6-1 (defender encircled) that is more effective (x1.2 and x2.0 respectively). The reason for this change is not to be found in comparisons with reality, but to avoid certain game problems inherent in the system itself.

4. Moved part of German economy outside of Germany proper. Thus certain hexes in Norway/Sweden (iron ore), Finland (nickel), Yugoslavia (rail-transit country for most Balkan and Turkish imports) and Romania (crude oil and refined fuel) are German ”territory” from the start. Germany needs to make sure her opponents doesn’t get these areas, lest she will lose some of her resources.

5. Moved part of British economy outside of UK. Thus certain hexes in Palestine, Kuwait, Iraq and Iran hold British resources. This is supposed to symbolise UK’s oil reserves in the Middel East. UK need to protect these areas lest she will lose some of her resources.

6. Lowered German, British and Soviet initial war economy. These countries need to be very restrictive with spending PP’s the first year of the war. This is especially true for Germany, which already have a large army with a large upkeep to pay.

7. Losses to attacker is generally more severe now, so a superior attacker should not expect to walk over anything weak in his path. There’s always some losses regardless of odds.

8. Attacks at 2-1 and 3-1 is more favourable than before. It is now possible for an economically strong, but operationally weak nation to wear an opponent down by limited attacks all along the front.

9. Winter move and combat penalties raised even a bit further.

10. The cost of buying units, upgrading and replenishing have been raised with approximately 50 %.

11. Paratroopers have a very low AP-allocation at low LWD-levels (Land Warfare Doctrine).

12. Changed the orientation of Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Spain to Comintern and fixed their political strength to 50. It is now prohibited to do any action with these countries except declaring war on them. The reason is (A) now both the Allies and the Axis can declare war on these countries, and (B) to emphasize that the chance of any Scandinavian country joining the war by itself borders on the ludicrous, and (C) Franco was firmly determined to stay out of the war. Germany can declare war at any time at the Axis player’s desire. Allied players can only declare war if they have at least 50 DPs.

There is one side effect of having Scandinavia Comintern. When any of the above mentioned countries goes to war, they will fall under the leadership of the USSR player. Once this happens, the countries.csv should be altered to instead make them either Allied or Axis partners. If not, the play sequence in PBEM-games will be more complicated with more mails sent for each turn.

13. The cost for coup d’etats have been lessened considerably. As a house rule, only Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Greece, Turkey, Iraq and Persia should ever be subjected to a coup d’etat. The object of this paragraph is to re-create the uproar of the Balkan and Middle East politics in the early stage of the war. As part of the same house rule, no diplomatic activity should be allowed at all, once all major countries are at war.

14. The orientation of Romania has been changed to pro-Allied and Yugoslavia and Greece to pro-Axis to better reflect the pre-war situation. This is especially bothering for Germany with her economy (oil supplies) thus threatened by an early entry of Romania on the Allied side. Hopefully, this change, in addition to 16. above, will make for a rather tense political situation.

15. To add a little spice to the political part of the game, and with the termination of DP activity after total war (#16), the allotment of DPs has been slightly raised for the fractional leaders.

16. Slovakia is no longer a playable nation. All Slovakian units are gone and the Slovakian territory belongs to Germany.

17. The initial German PP-level has been raised to some extent. The Axis player should be very careful husbanding this pool. Initially he will have a negative production.

18. Have added a vast number of impassable hexes, foremost in North Africa, but also in certain mountain passes. The reason for the North African area inhibitions is to better portray the difficulty of fighting inland from the Via Balbia coast road. A number of desert lanes have been created to the south. The player should see this area as laying closer to the coast than the scale of the game suggests. Instead of just a vast open space, these lanes will add a number of interesting choices, made even more exciting by the existence of supply problems, movement penalties and aerial reconnaisance.

19. Each country have a number of units with tech levels in advance of the present setting. These are to be seen as the core of the peace-time armies and serve basically as a mean to give the players more choices.

20. Due to inability to create a workable solution for the North African supply problems, an Italian DAK contingent will now replace the German one. No German units are allowed in North Africa, save air units.

21. Iraq is now neutral at start.

22. Have added a number of new cities in Sweden and Norway to enable operations in Scandinavia. The earlier changes for motorized movement have therefore been reversed.

23. Trade between Germany, Italy, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Romania, Bulgaria and Greece now possible by using a ”convoy” between Chemnitz and Milan. SMP have to be used. It is thus possible for Germany to either bolster these countries with PP, or to arrange import from them, adding PP to Germany’s PP-pool. The cities that are involved in this trade have a white $-sign on a blue circular plate in their city symbols. The Hungarian city of Csongrad and, especially, Yugoslavian city of Nis, is a prerequisite for some of the trade between Germany and the Balkans. This is because of the high importance of the railroad running through these countries.

24a. Oslo can now be reached from the Baltic Sea rather than from the North Sea. Despite this being a bit unrealistic, it will enable the Germans a chance to invade Norway as they did historically. Have added Trondheim as a port that can be accessed from the North Sea and Norwegian Sea. The expectation is that there now can be a land campaign between Germany and UK, with Oslo and Trondheim as principal bases. Of course, the Axis player can always try to take Trondheim and Narvik as Germany did historically, but then he has to pass the North Sea coastal waters, the North Sea and (in the Narvik case) the Norwegian Sea.

24b. A prerequisite for 27a above, is that the city of Aarhus is owned by Germany. This is to simulate the fear of German air power that would keep the Western Allies from intervening in the Skagerack. No German unit actually have to be in Aarhus; it will suffice that the hex is owned by Germany. Historically, Denmark and Norwegen was attacked in a different way. I have included this variant, however, to potrait the fact that Germany probably wouldn’t have had the power to protect a German-Norwegian supply line without the possesion of Denmark.

25. UK now have a number of BEF-units at start. These have tech levels higher than the present setting and symbolize the core of the proffesional British army. Once lost, these units can be re-created only when UK reach these tech levels. The UK player should therefore guard them jealously.

26. Changed Edinburgh to normal city and added Scapa Flow. It is now possible to access the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea coastal waters from Scapa Flow.

27. Made Batumi and Samsun into ports. It is now possible for the Russians to fully supply or reinforce Sevastopol by sea, even if the Axis has cut it’s land communication. They may even continue basing naval units if Sevastopol is lost. Hopefully, this change may lead to some action in the Black Sea.

28. Added the North Sea coastal waters. This area replaces in most regards the North Sea, which has been moved further north. It is therefore now possible for the Royal Navy to guard the exit from the Baltic Sea, without having to expose itself to German air power. To influence the North Sea with air units, one now has to have control of either Scotland or the southern part of the Norwegian west coast.

29. ZoC is now generally stronger than before. This is to lessen the possibility to penetrate long frontlines where some countries will have problem covering their borders.

30. Lowered the air losses in ground attacks sligthly.

31. Lowered the effect of fortifications with one third.

32. Broke up some of the continous fortification lines, forcing the player to defend more heavily the gaps between the hexes.

33. Removed some negative effect of multi-hex combat. This alters paragraph 3. above (the text in that have been altered as well).

34. Added 1 SMP for all Balkan neutrals.

35. Air attack effectivness in deserts have been raised, stressing the importance of air superiority in this theater.

36. Re-worked the production locations in the Caucasus slightly, placing more resources close to Baku.

37. Raised the defensive capabilities of Belgium and Netherlands slightly.

38. Added eight 20 % strength, level-3 armour corps to the USSR OOB. They will remain locked south or Orel until autumn 1941 and constitute Siberian reinforcements otherwise lost in the disbandment rule.

39. Re-worked the rail transport costs (lowering) to better reflect actual differencies between infantry and motorized/armour.

40. (Only concerns ETO PBEM-scenario). Replaced level-1 motorized divisions and corps with special logistics units and depots in order to achieve 40a and 40b below. These units are bought as ordinary motorized units, but have specific functions in the game. They are very weak in combat.

40a. (Only concerns ETO PBEM-scenario) A logistics unit (LU) has a dual function. First, it serves as a ”conversion unit” for upgrading a divisional unit to a corps as of house rule 10 below. By expending the LU, disbanding it in certain circumstances, it creates the allowance for a corps upgrade. Secondly, LUs serve as carriers of HQs.

40b. (Only concerns ETO PBEM-scenario) A depot has the same function in all regards as 40a above, save for the fact that it has a higher combat value and are thus more resistant to ground and air attacks. It is slower, however, and have a higher upkeep cost. A player can upgrade a LU to a depot at any time as he wants to.

41. (Only concerns ETO PBEM-scenario) Changed commanders into HQs. These function as a combination of planning, artillery support, gathering of ammunition and similar things. They may only be attached to LU or depot units, and, as such, will have a low combat value.





House rules for those testing this game as an PBEM-game:

1. Only Hungary, Romania, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Iran and Iraq may ever be subjected for a coup d'etat attempt. This, on the other hand may happen as many times as possible up to the actual time when the country concerned joins an alliance. The results of these machinations are not necessarily to be seen as government overthrows, but rapid fluctuations in government sentiment.

2. Norway, Sweden, Denmark and Spain may never be subjeted to diplomatic activity. They may only be delared war upon.

3. Once USA joins the war, all diplomatic activity must cease, the only exception being declarations of war and activities concerning the countries given in case 1., that may be subjected to diplomacy up to the end of the game.

4. Each first week of January, April, July and October, the Game Master opens all major countries PP-pools via F11. If the amount of PP’s is less than 300, he does nothing. If the amount is higher than 300, the Game Master should reduce that excess with 50 %. This is to prevent players from unreasonable savings.

5. No more than 10 % of a majors current PP-production may be sent as subsidies to any other country. There’s no such limitation for minors that send PPs.

6. All production of ground units must be with a divisional, level-1 unit at first. This may later be upgraded to higher levels and corps. All air units must be produced at the lowest level also. This is to simulate actual time in production.

7. All newly built units must be placed withing the country’s original home territory. The only exception is British infantry or motorized reinforcements. These may be placed in Kuwait and symbolize Commenwealth reinforcments.

8. All non-naval units given to the player as an effect of events, must upon placement be immediately disbanded. There’s no exception! The player is of course free to use the 50 % thus regained in PP for any spending of his desire.

9. There’s an upper limit to the level of SMP a major nation may have. This is as follows: Germany = 20; USSR = 16; UK = 10; France = 7; Italy = 8; USA = 12 (note change 39. above).

10. In order to create a corps, the player must disband either a logistics unit (a level-1 motorized division) or a depot (a level-1 motorized corps) which have the following criteria: (1) I must be located no more than two hexes (one intervening) from the unit to be upgraded, and (2) it must have had the ability to move before disbandment, even if it didn’t do this in order to fulfil criteria 1.

11. Commanders have been replaced with HQs. These work in a similar fashion to commanders, but have a better range and also have a more prominent influence on the units surrounding them. Logistics units (LUs) and depots are the only units that may have HQs attached. LUs and depots may not be involved in combat apart from defending (see 40 and 41 above). HQs have a year shown after their names. If it says ”39” or if there’s no record, it means that the HQ is available to use from the beginning to the end of the scenario. If it has a later date, like ”41” after their names, it means that the HQ is available with the beginning of that year. Some HQs, finally, have a period, like ”41-44”, which means that the HQ can be used from the first year in the designation up to the last, when it must be removed. Thus the HQ in the example can be used from the beginning of 1941 up to the end of 1944.

12. Minor nations may not build paratroopers.



< Message edited by Uxbridge -- 11/11/2009 10:50:02 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 6:21:50 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Downloading. I'll put some playtime into this as a Sov.

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 2
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 8:41:29 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Yes, do. Tell me what you think of things.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 3
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 10:10:20 PM   
gwgardner

 

Posts: 6722
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline
I'm game if anyone wants to challenge me to a PBEM with this mod.

_____________________________



(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 4
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 10:23:53 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Well, I might just give it a go myself. If we can get at least 5 players.

(in reply to gwgardner)
Post #: 5
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/28/2009 10:43:30 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
I'd be glad to join the fun.

Chuck

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 6
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 12:56:33 AM   
Hairog


Posts: 1645
Joined: 7/11/2000
From: Cornucopia, WI
Status: offline
You can count me in for a minor role say...Italy or France.

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 7
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 2:34:31 AM   
Harbinger


Posts: 144
Joined: 12/20/2008
From: Ohio
Status: offline
Okay...i'll give it a go, perhaps as a minor role such as Italy or France......but I'll leave that up to whoever makes these decisions.

_____________________________

Assume nothing.

(in reply to Hairog)
Post #: 8
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 5:22:25 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
If you need somebody to play the Sovs, I'd be game.

Started a solo Soviet game, am now in Oct 1941. German AI had a real tough time in France, not sure why, the French held out till March of 1941. Worse yet, the British managed to turn Romania allied (!) This totally threw the Axis for a loop, and even though they declared war on Russia in July, they didn't get very far.

From the Soviet standpoint, the economy is very tight and it looks like the upkeep costs are double that in 1.6. But given the overall strategic and diplomatic situation, the Sovs are very much in the drivers seat here. As usual, I knocked out Finland in winter 1939-40 and then poured most of my income into tech with not much left over for builds. No screen of ants in this game on the border, couldn't afford them.

But it didn't matter due to the Romanian distraction and the extended French resistance. Axis stopped short of Riga, Minsk and Odessa, and already being pushed back some. Axis did eventually conquer Romania, at least.

The British swept the Axis from NA. Indeed, the Italian DAK unit is on the Eastern Front.

Upgrading units is pretty expensive. On the other hand, the land warfare doctrine upgrades are seriously beefy. Level 1 lwd + tech 3 infantry corps are 8-9 strong, divisions are at 3. (I poured a ton of PP into infantry reasearch.) That's pretty darn strong for a single level of lwd. The economic model of this mod seems to reward quality over quantity in terms of force structure, even as a Russian player.

The odd thing about the diplomatic situation is that Germany has well over 200 dps saved up. No idea how they lost Romania to the Allies. The German AI, in my estimation, is not pursuing diplomatic opportunities aggressively.

(in reply to Harbinger)
Post #: 9
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 7:12:48 AM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
The scenario uses the original 1939-setting, with Yugoslavia and Greece being on the Axis "side" and Romania more inclined towards the Western Allies. That's how the Axis "lost" Romania. In the Vanilla those roles are reversed to give the situation of spring 1941. I opted for the former, leaving it to the players to decide the political outcome in the Balkans.

When you play the Russians, the AI is set against itself on the main fronts of 1939-40 and it doesn't handle that very great. I played Romania just to see whether I could hold out against a hostile USSR. From time to time I popped over to have a look at the Western front. Was no pretty sight.

The LDW is rather dramatic now. I like it that way. Handled with care (watching the economy), Germany makes for a really powerfull country and will continue being so for the entire game.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 10
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 7:18:19 AM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Then we have at least six players. Maybe we can get more.

Let's move over to the opponents wanted forum and continue the discussion there, leaving this thread open for general interest.

ETO - PBEM games

Everybody who likes a try, head for the thread above.



< Message edited by Uxbridge -- 10/29/2009 7:30:50 AM >

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 11
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 12:19:07 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Update: game crashes on Feb 9 1942. Even backing up to old saves and playing forward repeats the crash.

I suspect it's related to US entry somehow.

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 12
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 1:55:51 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
Could you please post a game folder, and the ConsoleOut.txt from just after the crash. Maybe we can fix the problem.

Thanks,

Chuck

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 13
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 8:09:02 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Back from work!

This crashing wasn't good. If it's in the events I'm rather at a loss. Haven't changed anything in them, apart from disabling the Malta event by giving it a very short duration, and changing names on some reinforcements.

Have you been working with the events files CP?

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 14
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 11:35:08 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
I can read them a bit, and have a good XML editor, but since the events folder is not in your scenario can we modify them without affecting all games played? How did you set a short duration for the Malta event?

I have not yet seen a data folder or ConsoleOut file.

Chuck

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 15
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/29/2009 11:51:03 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
You're right. The scenario only "points" towards the main events collection, so it would be dangerous to do anything with them. Hopefully, events are not the issue. Maybe it has something to do with US convoys. If a convoy is set up for a special route, my altering the Atlantic might confuse the system.

The Malta event starts at a certain, early date, and is active for the duration of the game (or maybe till some situation occurs, blocking it). I changed the end date to something very early.

I would very much like to remove a number of events. The reinforcements, for instance. Ships are good, but ground units should be bought solely by the players.

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 16
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 12:00:25 AM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
I looked at the events for the USA (53) and could not see anything glaring.

There is a file in your scenario folder which points to xml files, and should allow you to specify where you want to put them. This may allow you to place an edited set of events in a location within your scenario folder. The file is event_files.txt and here is an excerpt :

quote:

; File names to load events from
;
;Technology upgrade events
;
data\events\AI_axis_minors_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_france_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_germany_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_italy_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_soviets_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_uk_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_usa_prepare_to_attack.xml
data\events\AI_sea_zones_movement.xml
data\events\AI_soviet_garrison.xml
data\events\atlantic_card_pact.xml
data\events\breaking_peace.xml
data\events\capital_falls.xml
data\events\commissioned_ships.xml
data\events\events_01_poland.xml
data\events\events_02_germany.xml
data\events\events_03_soviets.xml
data\events\events_05_norway.xml
data\events\events_06_sweden.xml


I look forward to the ConsoleOut, as I am sure you do.

Chuck

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 17
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 12:03:23 AM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Yes, let's wait for that.

Also, there's a event called "data\events\AI_sea_zones_movement.xml" there. Maybe we can remove that. No need for it if all majors are controlled, I think.

I'm off for six hours now (sleep).

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 18
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 2:40:43 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cpdeyoung

Could you please post a game folder, and the ConsoleOut.txt from just after the crash. Maybe we can fix the problem.

Thanks,

Chuck


I'll happily do this, but how do I exactly do it? Do I just take a saved game and include it as an attachment in a post?



(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 19
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 4:12:33 AM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
Yes, unless the saved file is too big to post.

1. Select the Autosave, captured in the phase before the crash, or a saved game just before.
2. Compress it into a single zip, or rar, folder.
3. Add the ConsoleOut.Txt from the moment of the crash to the zip file.
4. If small enough, attach the file to a post here.

or

Contact me using a private forum message, and I will give you an address to post it to.

We hope to determine what change caused the CTD and make some mod to avoid it.

Thanks so much.

Chuck

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 20
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 7:08:41 AM   
parusski


Posts: 4804
Joined: 5/8/2000
From: Jackson Tn
Status: offline
Uxbridge I love it so far. The units and map are fabulous. The colors are gorgeous and I love the little animation during combat. Kudos my friend.

_____________________________

"I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast."- W.T. Sherman

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 21
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 7:19:50 AM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Thanks, parusski!

(in reply to parusski)
Post #: 22
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 3:35:49 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Ok, I've attached the zip file.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 23
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 6:51:54 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
Dear Uxbridge,

Well, as you expected the ConsoleOut does show many fleets trying to move from node to node but not finding a path. However these are only warnings, and ones I am sure you will address. The actual stop comes in the "poorly defended front" routine, when the processor cannot find all the units. Here are the last lines.

quote:

Wroga 8 TAC Wezel Le Havre. Dod.PS 8. Silawezla=34
Wroga 9 TAC Wezel Caen. Dod.PS 8. Silawezla=20
Wroga 10 TAC Wezel Le Havre. Dod.PS 6. Silawezla=40
Wroga 11 TAC Wezel Iasi. Dod.PS 6. Silawezla=26
Wroga 12 TAC Wezel Lviv. Dod.PS 7. Silawezla=18
Wroga 2 TAC Wezel Palermo. Dod.PS 8. Silawezla=15
Wroga 30 TAC Wezel Kaunas. Dod.PS 10. Silawezla=10
Cannot find other units. Ending saving poorly defended front procedure.


Surely this routine has run often to this point, so one wonders what has happened to cause units to go missing?

Chuck

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 24
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 8:49:56 PM   
Uxbridge


Posts: 1505
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Status: offline
Yes, there's a lot of can't find node this and that, but this is routine I believe.

When it comes to the actual problem, I'm at a total loss. You mean that the system has somehow "misplaced" units and for lack of finding them it crash?

(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 25
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 9:15:55 PM   
cpdeyoung


Posts: 5368
Joined: 7/17/2007
From: South Carolina, USA
Status: offline
Perhaps the developers can tell us if it quit because of the "poorly defended front" routine, or if the next process in the sequence was where the failure occurs? I looked through my ConsoleOut from another game, and it did not have that routine. Perhaps another player might have the "poorly defended front" in their ConsoleOut and can tell what the next lines are?

Chuck

(in reply to Uxbridge)
Post #: 26
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/30/2009 9:49:34 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Ok, so I made the AI get a brainfart? Yay me!


(in reply to cpdeyoung)
Post #: 27
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/31/2009 9:16:50 PM   
Bleck


Posts: 741
Joined: 3/8/2009
From: Poland
Status: offline
The problem is in "Europe" map file, few of sea hexes near Bodo (Norway) has assigned parameter that is not allowed for sea nodes. That crashes the game during deploying new units. We will fix this problem in next patch. For now you can try replacing map.hmf in your save and scenario folders with the one I've attached to this post.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Wastelands Interactive member (Programmer)

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 28
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/31/2009 9:46:30 PM   
Tomokatu


Posts: 488
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline
Beck advised:
quote:

try replacing map.hmf in your save and scenario folders with the one I've attached to this post.


Beck, is that something all the rest of us (using 1.5 or 1.6 vanilla versions) should do as well, or is it ONLY for Uxbridge's ETO scenario mod?

_____________________________

For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction

(in reply to Bleck)
Post #: 29
RE: ETO-scenario is here! - 10/31/2009 11:04:16 PM   
Bleck


Posts: 741
Joined: 3/8/2009
From: Poland
Status: offline
This file is unofficial, official one will be in next patch... but if you want, you can try to replace it in all European scenarios and saves in 1.6 (not sure about 1.5, but also should work).

_____________________________

Wastelands Interactive member (Programmer)

(in reply to Tomokatu)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> WW2: Time of Wrath >> Scenarios and Mods >> ETO-scenario is here! Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.094