Chickenboy
Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002 From: San Antonio, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nikademus quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy Awww....come on.... The initial USN DD torpedo attack should be a case study of an effective night attack. I think there's grounds for considering it (right up there with Savo on the IJN side) the most effective single attack using torpedoes in the Second World War. The big guns on the prewar BBs just cleaned up some scraps. Its funny, and this comment is not directed at you specifically...just a chuckle of a thought given all the years i've been here....but it's funny how successful USN attacks tend to be classified as "case studies" in how to do it right, or 'the best way' while Japanese acomplishments tend to be written off as one offs, luck or worse...."statistical outliers". Still agree with Termy (gasp!) It sounds mildly interesting...but its way down on my book list. There are other battles much more interesting than the Surgaio slaughter and i've already got several resources that cover the battle to a good degree of detail. Just my personal take. Well, I'm not sure I agree with your observation re: Allied 'case study' bias. The IJN torpedo attack at the battle of Savo Island was certainly another 'case study'. However, my experience is that (as my post in the "Torpedo Attack" thread) the Long Lance attack at Savo has been beaten to death as an exemplary attack while comparatively fewer acknowledge the devastating attack of Desron 54 at Surigao. But, after reading a bit of the 'teaser' on Combined Fleet.com, I think I agree with your assessment. I'm not ready to commit to reading several hundred pages of arguments about whether Yamashiro or Fuso was the "North" or the "South" BB, or whether the Fuso really and truly split exactly in two (bisected) or merely had its bow blown off and then sank. Glad I could invoke 'togetherness' between you and Termi. Say, this isn't some sort of man crush of yours now, is it?
_____________________________
|