Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed)

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed)

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted >> Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed)

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed) - 11/9/2009 7:36:27 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

Hi,

I am preliminary looking for players dedicated to play the grand campaign to the (bitter) end.

I am interested in playing multiplayer campaign game for a long time, but I was waiting for AE to come out and now waiting for patch no2.

I am fairly skilled and higly motivated allied player with experience begining with UV, then WITP - I played three PBEMs until now, unfortunately all of them come to the end when my oponents quit unsuspectedly. I also can take a place on Japanese side with someone more skilled with economy :)

Biggest advantages I see in 2 vs 2 game are:
1. if one of the player drops out (temporarily or definitely) the other is able to continue with the game
2. divided command responsibilities (as to exact dividing this should be a matter of debate).
3. communication

Barb

< Message edited by Barb -- 12/1/2009 7:11:32 PM >

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/10/2009 5:35:25 AM

guctony

Posts: 669
Joined: 6/27/2009
Status: offline

hello I would like to play 2x2 play.

I would like to play japan and if possible preer to play land and Sea command. or some joint command system.

Regards

_____________________________

"Unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder."
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken."
"After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."
Mustafa Kemal

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 2

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/10/2009 7:23:30 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

As it stands now, there are two possible Japanese players and me. So if there is anyone who would like to join me to kick the rising sun right back under the horizon, let me know

_____________________________

(in reply to guctony)

Post #: 3

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/10/2009 7:33:18 PM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

Playing a team game seems interesting, but I'm not sure if you want to get stuck with me. I'm new to this game, haven't got far in my game against AI and am currently playing one other PBEM match. How would you like to divide commands ? By theatre, country or branch of armed services ?

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 4

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/10/2009 8:10:56 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

Well if you can PM me your experiences, what do you think about the game, you are sure you can take a PBEM and a multiplayer game in the same time (I am planning to do it myself), and what is the "driver" that forces you to commit to a game that could last 4 and more years to play without quitting prematurely, maybe we will make out something.

As to command division, I am not absolutely resolved on this. This should be inter-allied debate and it will depends if there will be two or three of us in that camp. My basic vision it theathre based (Nimitz, MacArthur, Mountbatten, and China and Russia as bonus, maybe the DEI as well).

_____________________________

(in reply to Smeulders)

Post #: 5

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/10/2009 8:37:41 PM

Venividivici10044

Posts: 137
Joined: 8/29/2009
Status: offline

I like the idea that you propose and would be interested if your still looking.

S

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 6

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/12/2009 7:28:47 AM

Antrax

Posts: 69
Joined: 8/10/2009
Status: offline

Antrax is candidate.

Any side.

John

(in reply to Venividivici10044)

Post #: 7

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/21/2009 10:21:01 PM

Wirraway_Ace

Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

Barb,

the bitter end is my favorite part. Either side if you are still looking at teams.

(in reply to Antrax)

Post #: 8

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 12:43:43 AM

Rising-Sun

Posts: 2082
Joined: 11/5/2009
From: Clifton Park, NY
Status: offline

barb any luck getting your game setup?

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)

Post #: 9

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 6:53:02 AM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

Well it seems that I will be playing with guctony (as japanese) against khyberbill and venividivico10044 - if noone drops out. I have few backups in bag...

_____________________________

(in reply to Rising-Sun)

Post #: 10

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 9:57:03 AM

Smeulders

Posts: 1879
Joined: 8/9/2009
Status: offline

We're actually not hearing much from Veni...., I'm around though, so as the moment it looks like you and guctony vs. khyberbill and me

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 11

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 1:04:46 PM

Antrax

Posts: 69
Joined: 8/10/2009
Status: offline

OK,

Let me know if I'm in timely.

John.

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 12

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 3:31:25 PM

Rising-Sun

Posts: 2082
Joined: 11/5/2009
From: Clifton Park, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Barb

Well it seems that I will be playing with guctony (as japanese) against khyberbill and venividivico10044 - if noone drops out. I have few backups in bag...

That good, well good luck on this and probably be long and impatient to play with that many ppls involved.

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 13

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 6:23:43 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

I have the patience.. I love to discuss things and strategy. It is not easy to write a loooooong e-mail in foreign language, but at least I try to :D
Smeulders is also in the game (how could I forget to mention him?

) on the allied side. So at least we will be playing 2vs2.

Combined command is such a wonderfull thing - guctony is overlyagressive and I am overly cautous... meeting in the middle should give us the right balance. So our allied enemies had something to look for in this game :)

_____________________________

(in reply to Rising-Sun)

Post #: 14

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 8:54:45 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

Can we talk you into an AAR?

_____________________________

Tom

The easy way is always mined...

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 15

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/22/2009 10:50:22 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

UH :D Maybe.. depends on lot of things... Girlfriend, Work, Family, you know.. the Real life stuff

However now I am doing nice e-mail conversations with guctony, that should be used for the AAR. There are some bright and other still brighter ideas

I will also work on war and theather directives and operational plans in word/excel type documents for our use. But maybe we could post them from time to time into the AAR. But we certainly cant begin our AAR outlining our general strategy for the whole war

_____________________________

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 16

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/23/2009 3:23:09 AM

offenseman

Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline

How do 2v2 and others of that ilk work? Does one player do part of a turn and send it to the other player on thier side who does their part, then it gets sent to the opponent?

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 17

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/23/2009 4:37:39 AM

Nomad

Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: offenseman

How do 2v2 and others of that ilk work? � Does one player do part of a turn and send it to the other player on thier side who does their part, then it gets sent to the opponent?

Yes. If the players are in the proper time zones, you can do a turn per day. I played a 2x2 for 4-5 months( our opponents conceited the game to us) and we maintained a turn per day most of the time.

_____________________________

(in reply to offenseman)

Post #: 18

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/23/2009 9:40:02 AM

Antrax

Posts: 69
Joined: 8/10/2009
Status: offline

Ok,

If you're sure ,then I can start another game.

John

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 19

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/30/2009 4:57:47 AM

offenseman

Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline

Any positions still open for this one?

Thx nomad for the answer.

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to Antrax)

Post #: 20

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game - 11/30/2009 3:43:19 PM

commissarhanish_MatrixForum

Posts: 70
Joined: 1/27/2007
Status: offline

Im keen if you need another player. Ive had quite a bit of experience with PBEM WITP, looking to share the load on AE though.
Let me know.

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 21

RE: Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed) - 12/1/2009 7:11:19 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

5 players are on the game now (waiting for the oficial patch and coping with japanese production):
Barb, Guctony as Japanese
Khyberbill, Smeulders and Venivedivici as Allied team

_____________________________

(in reply to commissarhanish_MatrixForum)

Post #: 22

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Opponents Wanted >> Looking for a 2 vs 2 (or3) game (Closed)

Page: [1]