Wild Bill
Posts: 6821
Joined: 4/7/2000
From: Smyrna, Ga, 30080
Status: offline
|
Hypersnap has worked well for me, Sandro. It is what I faithfully use for taking screenshots. My eyesight is not that good and with partial colorblindness, I cannot say if the colors are top notch. They do look good to me.
As to the leader being lost and replaced with reinforcements, you could get a HQ unit but I don't think it would go to the A0 slot. And I am not sure how much influence it would have. That is a good question.
As for FO, I would think it would work fine. Sometimes the A0 can be substituted to do the job. Often when I cannot connect with the F0, I try other command units, A0, B0, any with an officer rating and sometimes they will connect when the FO won't.
I think aircraft are coded to seek out vehicles as top priority. It would be nice to exclude trucks and vehicles of lesser importance.
It would also be nice to have the plane bomb what he is ordered to bomb every time, but alas, it does not always work that way.
WB
------------------
In Arduis Fidelis
Wild Bill Wilder
Coordinator, Scenario Design
Matrix Games
_____________________________
 In Arduis Fidelis Wild Bill Wilder Independent Game Consultant
|
Printable Version
Several question - 
) HOW TO CONVINCE THE DAMN PILOT OF EVERY DAMN AIRPLANE THAT A TRUCK IS NOT IMPORTANT LIKE THE ANTI TANKS UNIT NEAR IT?
Thanks
Lazarus
------------------
"The conqueror is always a lover of peace; he would prefer to take over our country unopposed." CLAUSEWITZ
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
. At the end of the battle I recommend de valiant truck crew for a posthumous medal. 
I don’t use to much air power, so I don’t have to much experience whit it. But I have the following feeling: Although there’re ground support specialist planes and other bombers in general, it seems to me that all of them follow the same patron when come into attack. I know that the GSS are better in spot the enemy and can came again and again during the battle. But I think that there have to be some other differences. Example: a P-47 and a B-25 seems to attack in the same way: they localize the target and start to shot their weapons. What I think is that the B-25 pilots didn’t see their objectives. The B-25 flew at medium or high altitude and drop their bombs where their were ordered. I don’t think that they saw the objective they were bombarding unless it was a bridge, a big fortification or a train road. What I mean is that seems logical that a Typhoon or a P-47 attacks a truck in spite of a AT-gun, but I feel that a B-25 should attack the hexagon that it have be ordered to attack. To put in another way: I think that medium and heavy bombers should behave more like artillery than as airplanes. (I read on another topic that we will probably have B-17 soon, I think that this is specially applicable to them)
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread