Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships - 2/10/2010 10:52:57 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		I'm not sure how this is going to pan out, but offer it as something of which players may need to be aware. The attached image shows the load state of a 'mixed cargo' TF on two consecutive days, with sensitive information edited out. It has been formed by amalgamation of three TF's, respectively loading oil, resources and supplies, and I'm pretty sure that it was the TF loading resources that received the ships from the other two TF's - that would explain why it's still loading resources on 31 May 1943. Note that the ships laden with supplies are 95% full.

On the following day the TF has departed its port of loading. Shock, horror! The ships nearly fully laden with supplies now appear to be carrying no more than 114 resource units apiece! What's become of the supply they were carrying? I can tell you that it has not been re-landed at the port at which the ships were loading on 31 May. If I examine the cargo of an individual ship carrying 114 resource points, I get no information beyond that. Nothing to indicate whether the supplies are all gone. However, hovering the mousepointer over the TF reveals the summary that indicates that it's still carrying the original 13430 supply load as well.

Has that load of 13430 supplies gone for ever, or will it be unloaded along with the oil and resource cargo? If anyone knows I'd be glad to hear. If there's any risk of losing part of the load when forming mixed cargo convoys like this, it seems that the safe course is to make sure that any current loading operation is cancelled before you end the turn.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships - 2/10/2010 6:57:16 PM   
herwin

 

Posts: 6059
Joined: 5/28/2004
From: Sunderland, UK
Status: offline 		They dumped the supply--perhaps over the side--and started loading resources...

_____________________________

Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 2
RE: A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships - 2/11/2010 12:48:56 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline 		Why do you expect there to be no problems when you are using an "Escort" mission for the task force?  From a port, "Cargo" or "Transport" missions are used to pick up and then move supplies/resources about - not "Escort" missions.  Particularly when your ships have no more than 1 sys damage and zero flotation damage.

Alfred

(in reply to herwin)
Post #: 3
RE: A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships - 2/11/2010 2:10:32 PM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		Harry: You may well be right.  If so, they managed an rate of unloading significantly in excess of the port's loading rate - wasn't that big a port.

Alfred: When invading Mindanao I set an endpoint for the invasion TF at Catanduanes.  Although the TF had 'do not unload' instructions it nonetheless unloaded, due to this still being an enemy-controlled beach.  I started converting loaded transport TF's to escort TF's in a bid to prevent unwanted discharge of cargo - it makes no difference if the base is enemy-controlled; even escort TF's will treat themselves as conducting an invasion and unload.  I think I also saw instances of cargo being dumped on a coastal hex when this was set as an intermediate 'destination' for a TF having 'retirement allowed' instructions, so I do anything I can to inhibit unloading until I really want it to take place.  In the case of this TF I don't want it unloading on arrival as the 3 fully-laden AK's that top the list are for onward transit to Japan; I'll set up unloading arrangements for those ships I want to unload once they arrive it their immediate destination.

So it's habit, really.  May make no real difference to whether unloading take place or not.  I just feel more comfortable with having done it, for the reasons given.

_____________________________




(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 4
RE: A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships - 2/11/2010 9:01:50 PM   
Uamaga

 

Posts: 79
Joined: 4/17/2008
From: Kraków, Poland
Status: offline
I'm pretty sure your transports have now BOTH supply nad resource load. It is more or less interface only issue - there is no way to display info about both loads on TF panel and resource just happen to have higher priority. Same situation will happen with tankers (partly) loaded with fuel and then oil. Never used that "feature" intentionally (and I'm not sure if it was intended to be used or is rather just "side effect" of defensive programming) but it happened accidentally to me too.

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 5
WiTP - 2/12/2010 4:59:34 AM   
hermanhum


Posts: 2209
Joined: 9/21/2005
Status: offline 		I find that it is a wonderful side-effect.  Whether intentional or not, I hope that this helpful function/feature stays with WiTP.


_____________________________


(in reply to Uamaga)
Post #: 6
RE: WiTP - 2/13/2010 10:34:56 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		Certainly it's difficult to see how details of a mixed cargo could be laid out within the existing interface, so I'm encouraged by the likelihood that the supply did indeed stay aboard.  If so, I too shall be impressed by the code design's ability to track multiple types of cargo aboard individual ships.  Anyone want to chance their arm with a mixed load of supply, resources and fuel?

_____________________________




(in reply to hermanhum)
Post #: 7
WiTP - 2/13/2010 4:15:33 PM   
hermanhum


Posts: 2209
Joined: 9/21/2005
Status: offline 		I don't know about all of them, but I have certainly been able to mix supplies and fuel aboard AKs.  I don't know about the other combinations simply because I have not tried as of yet.

_____________________________


(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 8
RE: WiTP - 2/14/2010 12:24:18 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		There are different datapoints for each raw material on-board, so I'd assume the same as Uamaga, interface problem ...

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to hermanhum)
Post #: 9
RE: WiTP - 2/22/2010 2:25:10 AM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		Postscript: I can now confirm that after the resources were unloaded the supplies previously loaded again became visible.

_____________________________




(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 10
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> A Cautionary Tale on Loading Ships Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.766