Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Star Trek

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Star Trek Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Star Trek - 2/5/2010 1:14:02 AM   
bairdlander2


Posts: 2264
Joined: 3/28/2009
From: Toronto Ontario but living in Edmonton,Alberta
Status: offline
Anyone get STO?

< Message edited by bairdlander -- 2/5/2010 3:56:18 AM >
Post #: 1
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 4:40:47 AM   
martok


Posts: 837
Joined: 8/30/2004
Status: offline
I've not picked it up yet, but I've been tempted....very tempted.

I'm a huge Trek fan (have been since I was five), and STO looks to be about the closest to realizing the ultimate Trek gaming experience as I've seen in a long time -- if not ever. I'm probably going to hold off on getting it for at least another month or so, partially because of some real-life issues and partially because of all the glitches/problems it's experiencing right now, but I have a strong hunch I'm going to end up getting it eventually.


_____________________________

"Evil is easy, and has infinite forms." -- Pascal


(in reply to bairdlander2)
Post #: 2
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 6:03:15 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
Got the tee shirt, but have not been there or done that.

(literally... I have a family's-worth of tee-shirts for the game that they were giving away for free at the Vegas Star Trek convention in 2008

I'm holding out for a turn-based Star Fleet Battles myself.  (in the same vein, I will not get an electronic leash, I mean cell phone until they have one that looks and acts like the original trek communicator... needless to say, I'll still be searching for pay phones when I die. *grin*)

(in reply to martok)
Post #: 3
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 7:29:40 AM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
Yes I have.

I enjoy it and it's done a good job of capturing the Star Trek fell imo (though loads disagree).

Three issues at the moment that stop me from really enjoying it...
1. Like most MMORPGs, it's samey - I mean the missions are different and plausible trekkie missions, but there's a routine (destroy ships, beam to surface, destroy ground forces, beam back to ship and destroy other ships, mission done) - like I said, though, the mission types are different...help survivors, disable listening post etc
2. Laaaaaaaaag - they clearly either didn't anticipate popularity of this game or they were waiting for money to flood in before getting servers...I think it's the latter, but anyho, they are getting more servers. The lag is only really on surface missions. Space battles, regardless of size, are free from lag (so might be my settings)
3. Bugs. There are still bugs, though very minor. As an example, in WoW missions you done did not ever show to you again. This appears not to be the case in Star Trek Online. To be fair, I've encountered very few bugs.

The main killer of the experience for me is the lag. Samey mission solving is kind of a things with MMORPGs I think.

I like the buffs you get for your ship and crew. I like the look of character progressions. Get into a war (I was in one the other day with the Borg, or the war at Starbase 24) and watch the glory as photon torpedoes, plasma rays and phaser banks light the darkness. The sounds are brilliant imo. Just about every sound you sit and think Star Trek, which given the games theme is a good thing. Listen to the music playing when you finish a mission....or the different music when you go on red alert...the Red Alert noise...the photon banks firing. Phasers...all the sounds are there and will put you in Star Trek.

It's a good game and will be getting better as it matures. For an "out the box" mmorpg, I think it ticks all the boxes, and as a Star Trek game, it ticks all the boxes.

(in reply to E)
Post #: 4
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 10:08:50 AM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
Had enough of MMORPG's for the time being, until someone designs one based around genuine human interactions from the word go rather than just solo and co-operative level and money grinding. Plus, last year's movie was a good experience for me, everything ST between 1969 and 2009 (maybe Wrath of Khan and First Contact excepted) being pretty much total crap. Except SFB and Starfleet Command 2 anyway. I think I'll just wait for the next movie.

If any MMO would tempt me at the mo' it would be Global Agenda. Anybody tried that yet?


EDIT: By the way, JD, how does the whole 'MMO' thing work in the Star Trek game? As I understand it, everyone gets to be a Starship captain from the off, so other than the odd fight (presumably) with any player controlled Klingon warbirds you might happen to bump into, how do you interact with other players - just these 'wars' you describe?

< Message edited by Hertston -- 2/5/2010 10:15:11 AM >

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 5
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 11:11:25 AM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
bairdlander, you might get more info over at The Wargamer. Some people talking about it in this thread

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 6
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 11:31:45 AM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
H

Sometimes you get pulled into missions as you pass by (instances if you want to call it that). These are enemy contacts. There's a whole bunch of people normally already there and you are all fighting to the same goal. In the example I mentioned with the Borg, there were maybe 20 Federation ships in there and the idea is to beat the Borg. However, with everyone going there own way it proved impossible when I was in there. No structure or cohesion to what was going on...so it was going to be difficult to win. I gave up and left the instance in the end.

Other times, you may go into a sector and there may be other people there. I noticed in the BETA that you would group together to do the mission, whether it was on land or in space and there would be a team leader...again people don't obviously have to follow the team leader and some don't. But I expect as the game progresses and people understand the mechanics more, these will be less like solo missions and more like structured battles.

Everyone gets a ship at the beginning. As you go through the game, you will be awarded staff for your bridge (up to 3 I think...maybe more later, I'm not sure)...one Tactical, one Science and 1 Engineering.

As you get promotoed, other ship classes become available. The five commissions are Lieutenant, Lieutenant Commander, Captain (something else) and Admiral. Each of these has 10 levels. As you gain levels, you use the skill points to progress your character and your team. Things like I have a Tactical Officer and she has a Photon Torpedo skill. When I'm attacking a ship and I click her "buff" torpedo icon, I have 30 seconds and if I fire torpedos in that 30 seconds, 2 are fired (but only once). Then I have to wait for the remainder of the 30 seconds to "cool down" before I can use that again. Now I can assign skill points to her Torpedo "buff" and this effectively (I think) increases accuracy and reduces the "cooldown" time for each level from one to nine. as an example, when I first got her and her skill level on this "buff" was 1, her torpedo accuracy was low and it probably had a 1 minute "cooldown". For each level between 1 and 10, her accuracy increases (5 maybe 10% something like that) and the "cooldown" drops...so now at level nine, she rarely misses when I fire photons and the cooldown period is down to 30 seconds.

All characters assigned to you (including you) have these "traits" or skills. And they can be upgraded as you gain points from completing missions.

Also as you go through, you can buy or pickup technology for you ship or your "away" team. For example for my ship, these include things like Phasers MkII which have 145DPS (damage per second) as opposed to your original phasers of 90DPS and for your surface party I had a suit that allowed me to build a level 5 turret...another one I had allowed me to lay mines near my team (I gave that to my tactical officer). Phasers on your ship have an arcs of fire (240 degrees I think). I picked up a disrupter the other day that had greater damage, but was limited to 45 degrees, so I sold that. You can pick up devices for your ship as well, like deflector enhancer or a science item and have 3 or 4 of them to attach to your ship...again, I don't know if you get more as you get promoted to bigger ships.

I think I'd say it's Warcraft in the Star Trek world, but it's been done very well imo and is very Star Trek feely. There's no real cohesion between players at the moment and there's no way that I know of knowing if your going into an instance that requires other people or not.

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 7
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 12:12:44 PM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
At the convention, they spoke of different eras being playable... any TOS era in there?

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 8
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 12:40:27 PM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

At the convention, they spoke of different eras being playable... any TOS era in there?


Nope

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to E)
Post #: 9
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 1:25:41 PM   
Nighteyes

 

Posts: 23
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline
Me and PunkReaper are playing star trek online together and really enjoying it.

We have finally both got a new ship and cant wait to try them out.

Maybe we should make a Matrix Games Fleet?

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 10
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 1:44:31 PM   
vonRocko

 

Posts: 1447
Joined: 11/4/2008
Status: offline
As a Star Trek (original) fan, I am enjoying the game. But I don.t see myself paying every month to play. After my free 30 days I'll probably quit, because I will ,pretty much ,have done everything and I'll be bored. It has some good potential and is good fun for a bit. IMO

(in reply to Nighteyes)
Post #: 11
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 2:59:50 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
My tax refund is coming next week so I'll be getting it. Do they have lifetime membership? I bought that for Lord of the Rings Online and I found that I LOVE lifetime! !  Best $199 I ever spent. 

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to vonRocko)
Post #: 12
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 3:11:56 PM   
Zakhal


Posts: 2494
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Jyväskylä, Finland
Status: offline
I play only mmos that are less about meaningless boring pve interaction and more about meaningful interaction between other players like WW2OL, Darkfall and Mortal Online. The gametype is more challenging but ultimately way more satisfying.

< Message edited by Zakhal -- 2/5/2010 3:13:02 PM >


_____________________________

"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."- unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 13
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 3:15:45 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zakhal

I play only mmos that are less about meaningless boring pve interaction and more about meaningful interaction between other players like WW2OL, Darkfall and Mortal Online. The gametype is much more challenging but ultimately way more satisfying.



I like pve play. It's really relaxing after a hard day's work. As much as I love strategy gamess(see my forum title! ) sometimes I just do not want to think.

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to Zakhal)
Post #: 14
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 4:02:26 PM   
Zakhal


Posts: 2494
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Jyväskylä, Finland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zakhal

I play only mmos that are less about meaningless boring pve interaction and more about meaningful interaction between other players like WW2OL, Darkfall and Mortal Online. The gametype is much more challenging but ultimately way more satisfying.


I like pve play. It's really relaxing after a hard day's work. As much as I love strategy gamess(see my forum title! ) sometimes I just do not want to think.

For me pve feels just like work. Its not fun enough for me. Id rather hire somone to play the game and advance the character for me than play it myself. My char would propably gain levels much faster.

In niche pvp games like darkfall or ww2ol the fun comes to me through meaningfulness of the gameplay. I dont play just to "advance levels" but for real tactical / strategic reasons.

Its a matter of taste. I usually like the more spicy ones when it comes to mmos.

But its true these games are harder. I actually had to quite df after summer since I didnt have enough time to play it anymore so my contribution would have been too low.

But generally I play very little of these mmos even. The only mmo that I go back and am going to go back soon is ww2ol. And thats just because that game doesnt require big time investment before you can make yourself useful.

< Message edited by Zakhal -- 2/5/2010 4:32:17 PM >


_____________________________

"99.9% of all internet arguments are due to people not understanding someone else's point. The other 0.1% is arguing over made up statistics."- unknown poster
"Those who dont read history are destined to repeat it."– Edmund Burke

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 15
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 4:56:45 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie


quote:

ORIGINAL: E

At the convention, they spoke of different eras being playable... any TOS era in there?


Nope

There are references to Old Star Trek...a friend of mine came across this the other day





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 16
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 5:17:56 PM   
Scott_WAR

 

Posts: 1020
Joined: 2/24/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: E

At the convention, they spoke of different eras being playable... any TOS era in there?



Forget nearly everything they said. STO isnt the game they claimed they were making. It is a shootem'up and nothing more. No exploration,.no diploamcy, no strategy in battles aside from circle, fire phasors while circling,...and occasionally turn to face the enemy and fire a photon torp. Thats it. Ground missions are simply push tab and a number. No cover, again no real tactics at all.
They claim they have exploration in the game.....let me sum it up for you. GO to XXXXXX usually a asteroid or planet, and scan it (press F). Then kill whatever enemies invariably show up. No, you dont get to talk to them to dfind any other resolution,..,...as I said its a shootem'up,...no point in comms.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy

My tax refund is coming next week so I'll be getting it. Do they have lifetime membership? I bought that for Lord of the Rings Online and I found that I LOVE lifetime! ! Best $199 I ever spent.


The lifetime sub will cost you $299. You will probably play a total of 3 months before you get bored at MOST,...so its really not a good deal at all.

(in reply to E)
Post #: 17
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 5:27:07 PM   
PunkReaper


Posts: 1085
Joined: 8/23/2006
From: England
Status: offline
JD what's your STO name and ship so I can look out for you..... We are really enjoying the game so far although I agree with your assessment. The graphics are lovely and having just completed a Fleet Action the gameplay can be quite intense.... love the colours of the phasers etc....

(in reply to Scott_WAR)
Post #: 18
RE: Star Trek - 2/5/2010 5:30:32 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
Online Name is Shawan (don't know the first bit....is it wmar67@shawan) and ship is USS Catalina

(in reply to PunkReaper)
Post #: 19
RE: Star Trek - 2/9/2010 6:28:15 PM   
NefariousKoel


Posts: 2930
Joined: 7/23/2002
From: Murderous Missouri Scum
Status: offline
I've been at it for awhile now. 

Only a couple people from my MMO guild has started playing it and they're all in Holland so I don't see them that often.  The rest seem to be spread out over other games, but some more will probably get curious.  It's pretty thin on acquaintances for me. 

Send me a tell if you want to do something or to just say hello.  My handle is @NefariousCoal.  I have Tier 2 & 3 Feds right now and a T1 Klingon.


_____________________________


(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 20
RE: Star Trek - 2/10/2010 3:57:09 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
I got it and I LOVE this game! I thought it would suck but I'm actually having a lot of fun with it. Like I did with Lord of the Rings Online, I'm going to get the lifetime with this also. 

I've tried several other online games but they never held my interest like this one does.


_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to NefariousKoel)
Post #: 21
RE: Star Trek - 2/12/2010 4:35:54 AM   
Moster

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 5/30/2008
Status: offline
Lifetime. How could I not get it being a lifetime Star Trek fan? I played City Of Heroes for sometime which is a game Cryptic did also. From my experience with COH, which was constantly updated with new free content and improved, I figured STO would get the same treatment from Cryptic.

On the negative side Cryptic has been taking some heat for Champions Online and hopefully they are not just living on past accomplishments.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 22
RE: Star Trek - 2/12/2010 12:59:46 PM   
Phatguy

 

Posts: 1348
Joined: 3/1/2006
From: Buffalo,ny
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy

My tax refund is coming next week so I'll be getting it. Do they have lifetime membership? I bought that for Lord of the Rings Online and I found that I LOVE lifetime! !  Best $199 I ever spent. 


I only went with the 3 month package when I came back after being a beta tester...to lazy to swith, especially being out on medical....Boy was I stupid not to have gone lifetime when I came back....

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 23
RE: Star Trek - 2/12/2010 3:18:51 PM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moster

Lifetime. How could I not get it being a lifetime Star Trek fan? I played City Of Heroes for sometime which is a game Cryptic did also. From my experience with COH, which was constantly updated with new free content and improved, I figured STO would get the same treatment from Cryptic.

On the negative side Cryptic has been taking some heat for Champions Online and hopefully they are not just living on past accomplishments.


Champions Online was a disaster, for me anyway. It was unbelievably laggy, to the extent it was literally quite unplayable most of the time; a problem I've never had with any other MMO. Cryptic's only resposnse was blame the ISPs (BT in my case, c'mon!), so I just gave up in disgust. CoH was OK but had the same problem I have with all of them, updated content or not they are all 'seen it, done that, got the T-Shirt' within the first three months, and only LotR and EVE survived on my hard-drive that long. I'd never do a 'lifetime' for that reason, the genre would have to experience a radical innovation overhall before I can imagine any game I'd play long-enough to justify it.

(in reply to Moster)
Post #: 24
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 1:31:08 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
Well, what a difference two weeks makes!

I'm only at level 9 and the biggest thrill of all for me (getting a Constellation Class Cruiser) is only 2 levels away and I simply can't be bothered!

It's just same, same, same. I am honestly genuinely bored now. The same missions with the same strategy for them. The only real plus side is the Fleet battles which can be awesome...but even there I'm noticing lag now.

Problems?
1. Lag - bad lag especially on starbases and terra firma battles
2. Samey missions with samey strategy
3. I don't want to fire it up to see
a) How big the latest patch is
b) How long it will take to download
c) How long it's going to take me to log in after the patch has be downloaded
d) How bad the lag will be once I get in

The game is very well done and presented. I think it's been thought through with regard to making it Star Trek...but the missions are boring the hell out of me now. I mean, in WoW, I wanted to get to Level 10 to get bear form...then I wanted to get to level 20 to get cat form, then I wanted to get to level 25 to get a mount, then I wanted to get to level 40 to get a faster mount blah, blah, blah....it took me to level 55 to get bored of the horribly samey missions...but it took me that long because there were little offerings here and there to make you want to move on...not so with this. The one thing I desparately wanted to achieve is 2 levels away and I can't be arsed!

I actually cancelled my monthly subscription this morning. Reasons?
1. Customer service is ridiculously bad. I know their busy...but don't piss off your paying customers by asking them to resubmit their support issues!
2. Bombardment in game and out with spam for buying gold and energy
3. Lag - terrible on planet and getting bad in space now
4. I am still pissed about finding out the subs were not £8.99 but were £8.99 + VAT (which was NOT advertised on the Subs FAQ)
5. They took £1 from my paypal account. I have no understaning as to why they did that. I have bought many things (including subs) with Paypal and I've never had a company check by submitting a fee charge!!

I am just not happy with how they've conducted their business. They've got a sh!tload of things wrong in my view and I've got too many good games and too little gaming time to mess around with this one - and have them charge me for the pleasure (and allow them to charge me MORE than other established MMOs out there).

I may be back one day...but I think that's a long way off at the moment. There's alot to like...but ultimately, their choices in design and execution will get you unless you are made of sterner gaming "stuff".

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 25
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 1:33:45 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
And to prove my point - I fired it up....





Attachment (1)

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 26
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 5:43:30 PM   
Jevhaddah


Posts: 626
Joined: 11/24/2005
From: Scotland
Status: offline
I feel for yoo Judge.

I made the mistake of subscribing to Everquest 2 when it launched after many years of fun in Everquest 1. I ended up as a beta tester paying a monthly fee for the the dubious honour of finding bugs. The game in its current state bears little resemblance to how it look on launch

Soo I made the decision never to try a new MMPORG or indead single-player on release and to just adopt a wait and see policy.

Star Trek has always been formulaeic, Warp in, Beam Down, Solve problem/Kill Baddy, bonk bird (in Kirks time), Beam up and Warp out....

Without a good war against the Klingons or Romulans with STealth missions and loong quest lines leading to an ultimate conclusion I can't see how any Star Trek MMPORG can be anything other than it already is... formulaeic

A friend of mine bought and got to level 10 then unistalled it.

She wanted to be a Klingon but says that was not an option... It made her brow ridges stand out more and her fangs to show

Cheers

Jev

_____________________________

I am really quite mad yoo know!

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 27
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 6:03:36 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline
Well I am definitely going to adopt that approach in future. I bought it early because it was on BETA for pre-purchasers. Little did I know that the problems would continue. I guess I shouldn't have been so naive.

It isn't that it's a bad game - in it's current state, it's not worth £10 a month. I would need to see some serious time back from them for me to re-engage I've spent way too much of my first months subscription sitting watching progress bars. I'm a programmer. I don't have to pay £29.99 and £10 a month to see progress bars - I can create them myself.

(in reply to Jevhaddah)
Post #: 28
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 6:49:49 PM   
Scott_WAR

 

Posts: 1020
Joined: 2/24/2005
Status: offline
I tried to warn ya.............

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 29
RE: Star Trek - 2/20/2010 7:00:39 PM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
Tried it, dislike it, left it.  Like Judge said, every mission seems to be the same, that's if it works properly.  Don't bother complaining about it on the forums though, you'll quickly be spotted for what you are, a hater 

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Star Trek Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844