RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues

Page: << < prev 60 61 [62] 63 64 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/13/2010 5:16:40 PM

Grollub

Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline

Another question concerning the Banshee Sqn that arrive in Australia 01/42;

I've dumped some good DB pilots from the squadrons training on the WC into the bomber reserve. My intention was to transfer these from the reserve to the Banshee Sqns.

Problem is, that when I "Request veteran" for the Banshees, the only pilots that show up for transfer to them is either from active fighter units or from the fighter, not bomber reserve?

Bug or something WAD?

_____________________________

�Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to rockmedic109)

Post #: 1831

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/13/2010 9:50:53 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

Arent those on the WC of Marines or Navy nationality? :) You cant have Marine flying an Army plane ...

< Message edited by Barb -- 1/13/2010 9:51:20 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Grollub)

Post #: 1832

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/14/2010 8:38:36 AM

Grollub

Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline

Ahhh ... that could be the reason.

Thanks.

_____________________________

�Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to Barb)

Post #: 1833

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/18/2010 11:08:58 PM

Menser

Posts: 206
Joined: 5/2/2005
From: Peabody, Massachusetts
Status: offline

I've posted this in the general thread and got no reply's so I'll try here.
Scenario 2 version 1.02.1097 ( and Guad scen)
I've been running a few turns to get the feel after playing this and the starter scenario's and I have noticed that dedicated fighter sweeps .... weather made by me or the AI most times launch after other escorted or non escorted raids. Is this WAD? In my understanding of standard operational procedures, Sweeps were made always before any raid and were a major priority to the success of most missions. Yet I see that is not the case. Just trying the 1st turn against the AI in Scen2, it sends sweeps against Clark field, Iba and Rangoon after other raids have arrived (and I have had in this and the shorter scenarioes my sweeps happen after escorted or non escorted raids). I am wondering if the sweeps can be givien a higher priority in the games cue ...... Like Recon, Search, and ASW search have already. Recon, Search, and ASW search start first, Sweeps second ....All other air operations 3rd. Sweeps seem to be hit or miss propositions now as to be the only way to use them effectively is to clear the sky's many days before your other operations are launched (giving up your element of surprise if you are playing PBEM).

< Message edited by Menser -- 1/18/2010 11:09:14 PM >

_____________________________

"Alea iacta est." Caius Julius
"If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing." Emo Philips
"Caedite eos! Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius." Abbot Arnaud Amalric

(in reply to Grollub)

Post #: 1834

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/19/2010 12:46:00 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

There was a thread about this a couple months back. The basic answer was that sweeps are not designed to come before raids. But, if you set them to the same altitude as a bombing raid there is a better chance that they will coordinate. And, same for fighter escort - if you set it to the same altitude as the bombers there is a better chance they will coordinate.

(in reply to Menser)

Post #: 1835

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/19/2010 1:20:28 AM

Menser

Posts: 206
Joined: 5/2/2005
From: Peabody, Massachusetts
Status: offline

Yes, fighter escorts need to be set for the bombers altitude to provide escort, that is well understood.
Sweeps need to be set for the highest altitude the fighters are effective at to try and get the bounce on the enemy planes, setting them low and you might as well not send them at all (unless you plan on strafing, which would be foolish in the presence of a strong cap).

_____________________________

"Alea iacta est." Caius Julius
"If you can't beat your computer at chess, try kickboxing." Emo Philips
"Caedite eos! Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius." Abbot Arnaud Amalric

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1836

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/19/2010 2:50:38 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Just passing you the information that was previously provided.

(in reply to Menser)

Post #: 1837

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/20/2010 8:00:21 PM

doc smith

Posts: 122
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline

2d request for help!!

I would have searched the db if I knew how to phrase it in a meaningful and directly-applicable form. That being said, I apologize if this was raised earlier.

I have run into the case where a base had over 20K supply pts, a nearby HQ (well within range of applicable air units), and replacements available. Nevertheless, I can't move replacements from the pool to a unit with less than TO&E strength.

For example, I have a squadron with 9 of 16 P-40Es at Townsville. The unit is part of II Fighter Command, part of the II Fighter Command in town, 8 replacements in the pool, yet no way to transfer planes from the pool to the squadron. According to the rules, I should be able to draw planes but no 'button' is available. Takes a long time to get a/c into the unit.

Also, where is the best place to draw replacements into an 'Independent' Navy fighter squadron from a carrier VF squadron with 23 of 27 a/c TO&E. Example, Hornet is at Noumea and the town has over 20K supplies plus several planes of the same type in the pool. Again, no button to draw the units, whether the carrier unit is on shore or on a docked or undocked Hornet. What am I doing wrong (playing the Dec. 8th campaign as the Allies against an AI Japanese 'player'). I tried changing the group to Pacific Ocean Areas or South Pacific, but no joy (the SP HQ is not in play).

Also, why, when picking an active veteran pilot, said selection is removed from the list but NOT added to the group which requested him. I usually have to go thru several tries to get one who actually appears "in transit" to the receiving group. (Page set to "50+", "Manual", and "Any" location for the candidates to add to my squadron). Seems that only if I select someone (say, from the reserves) for 49th PG/7th PS and his location changes (example, from 409th PG/37th PS) to 49th PG/7th PS with a travel delay of 6 days. Why does this work this way?

Appreciate any help.

(in reply to rockmedic109)

Post #: 1838

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/20/2010 8:23:25 PM

Barb

Posts: 2503
Joined: 2/27/2007
From: Bratislava, Slovakia
Status: offline

Did squadrons you mentioned draw replacements in last 7 days? If yes, they have to wait a little to get additional planes.

_____________________________

(in reply to doc smith)

Post #: 1839

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/20/2010 9:29:36 PM

spence

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline

Why is the ASW mission not available for (at least) radar equipped aircraft flying at night? Certainly it was within the capability of the combatants. A significant number of submarines were sunk by ASW aircraft at night, principally in the Atlantic but the capability certainly was not absent in the Pacific.

(in reply to Grollub)

Post #: 1840

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/23/2010 11:09:28 PM

FOW

Posts: 499
Joined: 11/6/2008
From: England
Status: offline

Only just noticed this issue when checking through the air losses screen - I've lost 75 B-29s in A2A combat BUT IT'S ONLY JUL 1942

EDIT: the B-25 B and C models losses are also screwed. The second -C model (US) isn't available until 42-08 (the first entry is the Dutch model of which I have one squadron in service). The -B model has zero production and I've no squadrons in service, so I have no idea where those losses came from

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by FOW -- 1/24/2010 10:37:08 AM >

(in reply to spence)

Post #: 1841

RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 1/24/2010 1:10:58 PM

cverbrug

Posts: 233
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Belgium
Status: offline

Could someone pls explain why the L1 - Thora transport plane is only to be produced from 1944, while the model is a 1936 model?
Completely strange is that the two follow up models L2 Tabby and L3 Tina can be produced from 1941...beats me???

I am playing the full campaign scenarion 001.

(in reply to Hipper)

Post #: 1842

RE: Admiral's Edition Air War Thread - 1/24/2010 9:19:31 PM

hunchback77

Posts: 189
Joined: 5/13/2002
From: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cverbrug

Could someone pls explain why the L1 - Thora transport plane is only to be produced from 1944, while the model is a 1936 model?
Completely strange is that the two follow up models L2 Tabby and L3 Tina can be produced from 1941...beats me???

I am playing the full campaign scenarion 001.

The L1N1 Thora isn't even in WITP AE and the L2D2 Tabby begins production in 1/44 and the L3Y3 Tina begins production in 12/41. Are you playing a modded scenario.

(in reply to cverbrug)

Post #: 1843

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 1/31/2010 5:55:06 AM

Pascal_slith

Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FOW

Only just noticed this issue when checking through the air losses screen - I've lost 75 B-29s in A2A combat BUT IT'S ONLY JUL 1942
EDIT: the B-25 B and C models losses are also screwed. The second -C model (US) isn't available until 42-08 (the first entry is the Dutch model of which I have one squadron in service). The -B model has zero production and I've no squadrons in service, so I have no idea where those losses came from

This is extremely disturbing. Have you posted this to the tech forum with a save?

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

(in reply to FOW)

Post #: 1844

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/1/2010 1:09:51 AM

Cathartes

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline

This can happen when a game in progress is updated to a patch that includes database changes.

(in reply to Pascal_slith)

Post #: 1845

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/2/2010 11:25:46 PM

FOW

Posts: 499
Joined: 11/6/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cathartes

This can happen when a game in progress is updated to a patch that includes database changes.

Yes this is an AI game started under original version and patched/hotfixed to current level accepting all database changes.
So probably a bit of uncleansed data from testing making it into the released product

- but I can live with that

(in reply to Cathartes)

Post #: 1846

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/3/2010 1:44:28 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Slot 339, the P-400. Has different machine gun armament for regular range versus extended range.

Wpn 1 is "1893 .30 Browning MG"

Wpn 11 is "150 .303 Browning MG"

(in reply to FOW)

Post #: 1847

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/6/2010 10:04:38 PM

erstad

Posts: 1944
Joined: 8/3/2004
From: Midwest USA
Status: offline

The cannon on the Ki-44b and at least one other plane has an accuracy of 2. Is this a typo or is this correct?

(Not being one of the guys who can tell you how many rivets are in a Tojo and which geisha christened the maiden flight, I don't know if this is an accurate reflection of the gun or not but it's markedly different than most all other accuracy values)

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1848

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/7/2010 3:33:18 PM

Cathartes

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline

quote:

Slot 339, the P-400. Has different machine gun armament for regular range versus extended range.

Wpn 1 is "1893 .30 Browning MG"

Wpn 11 is "150 .303 Browning MG"

I see two different guns, the .50 cal which is centerline and the the .30 cal in the wings. Sure, you might fire your .50s farther out, but don't know that this is exactly modeled in AE.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1849

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/7/2010 3:36:03 PM

Cathartes

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline

quote:

The cannon on the Ki-44b and at least one other plane has an accuracy of 2. Is this a typo or is this correct?

(Not being one of the guys who can tell you how many rivets are in a Tojo and which geisha christened the maiden flight, I don't know if this is an accurate reflection of the gun or not but it's markedly different than most all other accuracy values)

This is correct. 40mm Ho-301 Cannon had a very short range and was an overall poor design. This is probably why it only made it into a couple aircraft.

(in reply to erstad)

Post #: 1850

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/7/2010 4:25:13 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cathartes

quote:

Slot 339, the P-400. Has different machine gun armament for regular range versus extended range.

Wpn 1 is "1893 .30 Browning MG"

Wpn 11 is "150 .303 Browning MG"

I see two different guns, the .50 cal which is centerline and the the .30 cal in the wings. Sure, you might fire your .50s farther out, but don't know that this is exactly modeled in AE.

You misread my post. I said nothing about "Wpn 3" which you are pointing to in your graphic.

(in reply to Cathartes)

Post #: 1851

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/8/2010 5:56:05 PM

Cathartes

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline

quote:

You misread my post. I said nothing about "Wpn 3" which you are pointing to in your graphic.

Yes I did misread. I don't know about that one, TimTom could answer. The difference in mg devices is nearly nil from what I can tell, but might be a carryover error.

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1852

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - 2/8/2010 6:05:11 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cathartes

... but might be a carryover error.

That's what it looks like to me, just the rough equivalent of a typo.

(in reply to Cathartes)

Post #: 1853

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/10/2010 10:09:08 PM

Oliver Heindorf

Posts: 1911
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Hamburg/Deutschland
Status: offline

I dont understand, why I cannot withdraw a unit which is shedueled for withdrawal.

See Screenshot. This makes absolutly NO sense to me and annoys me.

Withdrawal Button is alwways greyed out. This is just an example. 9 out of 10 air units that are shedueld to withdraw have the button for wiothdrawal greyed out. comments please

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 1854

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/10/2010 10:30:06 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

I do not know why, but some of them have to be Disbanded instead of Withdrawn. It still meets the requirements of the withdrawal rule.

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)

Post #: 1855

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/10/2010 10:44:24 PM

Cathartes

Posts: 2155
Joined: 1/5/2001
Status: offline

quote:

I dont understand, why I cannot withdraw a unit which is shedueled for withdrawal.

There was some confusion early on in what disband and withdraw meant. When you typically withdraw an air unit, it returns in 60 days. Air units that have withdraw dates, are meant to be withdrawn permanently so you don't suffer PPs. They need to be permanently disbanded. The withdraw button was grayed out so you may only make the right choice.

(in reply to Oliver Heindorf)

Post #: 1856

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/12/2010 2:59:07 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

I have a question about Realistic R&D. When an airframe reaches it's production month and has an R&D facility, does that R&D facility become a production facility or remain an R&D facility?

_____________________________

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cathartes)

Post #: 1857

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/12/2010 2:59:08 PM

Mike Solli

Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cathartes)

Post #: 1858

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/13/2010 5:42:03 PM

LoBaron

Posts: 4776
Joined: 1/26/2003
From: Vienna, Austria
Status: offline

Don�t think so.
I have to admit that I�m not 100% sure but from a logical point of view:
- Realistic R&D in the manual states iirc you cant change R&D into production manually. So what sense would it make that it still
happens automatically.
- This would mean that the Japanese lose one R&D for every single sub plane type developed and this sounds just off.
- You could influence production brutally by researching only the bare minimum of planetypes or the maximum possible
and this also sounds off.

_____________________________

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 1859

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues - withdrawal - 2/13/2010 6:40:06 PM

WLockard

Posts: 183
Joined: 11/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I have a question about Realistic R&D.� When an airframe reaches it's production month and has an R&D facility, does that R&D facility become a production facility or remain an R&D facility?

I think it should, what would you do with an R&D factory for an aircraft you are producing?

(in reply to Mike Solli)

Post #: 1860

Page: << < prev 60 61 [62] 63 64 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues

Page: << < prev 60 61 [62] 63 64 next > >>

Jump to:

New Messages	No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages	Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages	Locked w/o New Messages

Post New Thread

Reply to Message

Post New Poll

Submit Vote

Delete My Own Post

Delete My Own Thread

Rate Posts

1.765

Slitherine

RE: AE Air Issues and Air OOB Issues