mikemike
Posts: 501
Joined: 6/3/2004 From: a maze of twisty little passages, all different Status: offline
|
This seems to me even more far-fetched than the Turtledove stuff (with the exception of "Guns of the South" which uses time travel) and is apparently designed to have the French win the war. - Darlan's headache was not fooling the Vichy government (of which he was an important part) but that having the Fleet go over to the Britons would be a breach of the Armistice treaty that would certainly make Hitler occupy the rest of France; this (and the fact that he trusted the Britons just as much as he trusted Hitler, seeing that French ships in Portsmouth had just been seized by British troops who killed a number of French sailors in the process) prevented the Oran force from accepting any of the alternatives proposed by Somerville except offering armed resistance. A much more plausible alternate version of Oran would have the French getting under way half a minute earlier, letting both "Dunkerque" and "Strasbourg" escape cleanly, and maybe dispatch "Ark Royal" by gunfire on their way to Toulon (there was a very real risk of that happening even in RL). - The French ships would have to be based in Britain, putting even more load on the base facilities there, and would have presented a hideous logistical problem (metric spare parts and non-standard ammunition) - Richelieu might be possible, but without access to US yard facilities? Jean Bart - where would the guns have come from? CVs Foch and Clemenceau were not even launched in 1940, so ships of that name would have to be British-built. - Without the USA in the war, would Britain have been able to provide the escort forces necessary for the Battle of the Atlantic? French ships wouldn't have been much of a help there, because there weren't a lot of them, especially if the French Navy also had a significant presence in the Far East. - British BBs with US 16-in guns? Selling those guns to Britain would have delayed USN battleships, can't imagine that happening, but even so, either you also buy the turrets from the US (and shoehorning them into the KGV design would have posed quite thrilling problems) or you have to design and build your own turrets for them, which means still getting saddled with the major bottleneck (British turrets always were late and bug-ridden to boot). ..."with possibly the best designed heavy cruisers & large destroyers" Well - the only decent French CA was "Algerie" (but that was a splendid design, all right), all the others were tin-cans, and as to the superdestroyers, they were certainly fast, good-looking ships, but the ones that had decent guns had problems with their ammo hoists, and just enough ammunition for a 15-minute fight, they all had even worse AA armament than British DDs, and like almost all French ships were desperately short-ranged, being designed for service in the Mediterranean where there were bases every few hundred nautical miles. - I don't believe Hitler would have gone through with the scrapping order under any circumstances. He was majorly pissed off, but essentially Dönitz stopped him with one remark - "This would be the cheapest naval victory Britain has ever achieved". - Hitting a maneuvering target with a Tallboy? Now really - when Lancasters on a Tallboy mission were as good a target as a blimp? - An imposing Anglo-French fleet with Metropolitan France completely occupied? Well - look at the RL performance of "Richelieu" under those circumstances, and its operations were even supported by US resources. Really, highly far-fetched. Reminds me of a story on an alternate-history site that has the Serbian Army essentially winning WWI single-handedly.
_____________________________
DON´T PANIC - IT´S ALL JUST ONES AND ZEROES!
|