Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 4:46:15 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline
Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com

Forums\Off-topic\PC Gaming

http://forums.galciv2.com/377079/page/2/#2579385

The following was written by Taltamir, on the GalCiv2 forum; not by me.
-----

quote:

Reply #37
taltamir

Member No.2,334,181
Karma0
March 30, 2010 3:29:32 PM
the game is cool, but the lag is unbearable. it is only using 30% of cpu but its fairly choppy... as is expected with hundreds of colonizes planets and thousands of civilian ships per side flying about doing stuff.

they desperately need multi-threaded support
-----

Reply #38
taltamir

Member No.2,334,181
Karma0
March 30, 2010 11:14:59 PM
alright, i just "finished" with a sandbox game (no victory conditions)...

i did really well, making me rule 60% of the galaxy with a human monarchy... there are about a dozen single planet (or under 5) empires who sprung from independent colonies (I am definitely disabling the option for them to do that next game)... I have never started a war with anyone, I end wars quickly... later i started ending wars with the subjugate result because otherwise they keep on declaring war on me.

as it stands, everyone hates me because "we envy your colossal might and strength" and "we covet your colonies"... as a result pissant 1 colony "empires" keep on declaring war on me... not terrible, i just squash them... Nobody will make a trade agreement with me because they hate me (because they are jelous)... as such my relationship constantly deteriorate.

thing is, i got into a war with one of the two remaining big empires. (each is 1/5th my size and power). Well... they paid off the one empire that had a trade agreement with me to impose sanctions... then several of the empires with 1-5 planets only declared war on me in the space of just a few minutes due to the other big empire paying them, until that moment they kept on pestering me to impose sanctions or go to war with that empire, but now that i am they all side with it... then as a result of that my alignment got shot deep into evil (yes, your empire is judged as good or evil)... when I got judged as evil all the other pissant 1-5 colony empires declared war on me... then all my colonies started rebelling (i have members of every single race and then some special ones that jumped in from another galaxy, etc). So they are all upset i am at war with their race AND upset I am at war at all AND upset that I am "evil" (because other people keep declaring war on me, because they are jealous according to the game)

... no its not over yet... so my planets are rebelling and not paying taxes, i am attacked from every side... still not a big deal, I am still more then twice as big then everyone else in the galaxy combined and my tech is much more advanced... but then "disaster, civil war broke out"... 60 of my colonies break off to form a new empire and are at war with me!

Result? for the first time I am at war with humans so now EVERY planet I have has its morale drop into the crapper because I am not only evil, humans are all upset i am at war with other humans. So almost all my other planets are rebelling.

Yea... might want to fix that.

My solution is:

1. Slaughter small empires ASAP to avoid being labeled evil (your alignment is entirely determined by how many people you are at war with)

2. Form trade agreements EARLY before everyone hates you for being successful.

3. Disable the option in game creation that allows independent populations to ascend into being empires...



Other interesting issues:

1. taking apart captures ships for tech yields practically no tech at all... just a tiny boost to one research field chosen at random... oddly enough, even ships you find which are LOWER tech then your current level.

2. With the exception of the occasional offer to buy it for ~1.5-2.5 million (is it millions already? million x million) in cash (no financing allowed, you must have the cash on hand) races absolutely refuse to sell their starting tech.. no matter how much and what i offer them... even if i give them an awesome deal...

3. For some reason, an estranged splinter colony with no tech when it suddenly ascends to empire status will always have their racial tech... but if you colonize it and they join your empire, you don't, and it can NOT steal it with spies (it will not show up as a valid option of tech to steal).

4. laaaaaaag... god the game needs to be multithreaded.

5. RAM... i tried to reload the game, it said "error, not enough memory" and shut down.. I have 4GB of ram.

6. SLoooow... saving and loading takes minutes.

7. make sure you disable nubulae showing up in star systems in the advanced graphic options, it causes the game to stutter when zooming it (stutter is an understatement)

8. ship designs (when automated) are refreshed randomly, there is an "update" button, which requires you to click to select the ship, click it, then click "ok" in a popup box, then select the next ship... it is extremely clumsy...

a. it should automatically update all ships whenever a new tech is acquired in any way shape or form (planetary discovery, research breakthrough, trading tech, etc).

b. there should be an update all button.

c. the popup asking you to click ok is total BS.

9. The music is rather annoying, but i got used to it.

10. you cannot use the "advanced trade" menu to make trade agreements, as a result you cannot ever improve your relationship with other empires once you start dominating (because they are jealous).

11. if someone offers you a trade, you must accept immediately if you are interested, you cannot go into advanced trade and then accept (because they will suddenly not like it)

12. be careful not to accidently choose to leave ruins unexplored, they will be forever unexploreable.

13. it should really have a more serious notification when enemy spies manage to cause a revolution changing your system of government, I didn't even notice for a while that i was turned into fuedalism from way of ancients. (there was actually no harmful effects of switching back because way of ancients is so superior to feudalism).



All that being said, the game is pretty awesome. It definitely lacks polish, but it probably the best implementation of the 4x janre in space right now.



Just an FYI, my machine is an intel C2Q 9400 with 4GB of ram and an nvidia GTX260 in cast anyone wonders.



EDIT: I found a solution of sorts...

1. get lucky and find "way of the ancients"... it is really really good.

2. kill lots of pirates. Every pirate base you destroy gives you a good amount of positive reputation. Morale improves across the empire and other empires ask you for trade agreements etc.


< Message edited by Wade1000 -- 4/1/2010 5:52:05 AM >


_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.
Post #: 1
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 8:25:40 PM   
fabio80mi

 

Posts: 57
Joined: 3/26/2010
Status: offline
Nasty.. a thread i hope the devs will look closely.
From my experience (from mostly smaller games) i found out that is very hard to make friend with someone that hates you.... bribes and gift seems not to work for me.

(in reply to Wade1000)
Post #: 2
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:00:41 PM   
Gertjan

 

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline
But at least you can keep them from going to war without you. Having lots of trade with them helps as well.

(in reply to fabio80mi)
Post #: 3
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:02:40 PM   
ASHBERY76


Posts: 2136
Joined: 10/10/2001
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fabio80mi

Nasty.. a thread i hope the devs will look closely.
From my experience (from mostly smaller games) i found out that is very hard to make friend with someone that hates you.... bribes and gift seems not to work for me.



Are you using 1.2.The release version had a bug with gifts.

_____________________________


(in reply to fabio80mi)
Post #: 4
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:28:22 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Establish free trade with everybody you run into immediately and don't let things slide. Throw whatever goodies you need to make this happen. (+20 or so relations seems to be about the point where you can get a free trade agreement going.) Pick and choose your opposition don't wait until they all gang up on you. The guy in this thread just totally mismanaged the diplomatic end of the game. It can be handled even if you are very strong and disliked for it.

Also, during wartime you may need to change governments. The more economically efficient governments are bad for war weariness and planetary revolts will cripple them. And try to incorporate races in your empire with bonuses for this (like the bugs.)

Edit: the most efficient way to get other races to love you is tech. Give it to them on the cheap or even free when you first meet them. If you have a racial tech that by itself will move the approval rating where it needs to be. Cash gifts don't seem nearly as effective.

< Message edited by Flaviusx -- 3/31/2010 10:30:34 PM >

(in reply to ASHBERY76)
Post #: 5
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:32:05 PM   
Journier

 

Posts: 349
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline
yea, I have to agree with some of those points.

Most especially Multithreading.

a game this large can only go so far without multithreading.

Funny thing is another game that is similar in style in some ways is Hearts of Iron 3 (HOI 3).
HOI 3 had all automation capable for all area's just like distant worlds. But HOI 3 added so much stuff like that, that without multithreading the game ran so terribly slow compared to HOI 2 that those of us used to playing HOI 2 thought it was unbearable.

I doubt Multithreading will come into Distant Worlds, unless dev's say otherwise however. You really need to plan it out at the start. However their are programs that convert code to multi threading capable made by Intel IIRC.

Why games still arent made that are this immense without multithread support is sorta disheartening.

Multithreading has been around on servers for a very long time, Consumer's have had cpu's capable of them since 2006ish generally.

#2- Wars, creating evil empire, civil war and general failure

I had this happen in a smaller game I was playing. I went to war with 1 empire who kept threatening me.

I move in with my fleet and begin kicking their ass taking colonies.

Then i have to refuel my fleet and cant end the war very soon, Suddenly another empire declares war on me.

Then Another, and another, and another, till the whole galaxy is at war with me.

Then I got a civil war... But thats not even the funniest part. 5 minutes after the first civil war broke out, I GOT A SECOND CIVIL WAR....

WHAT THE.....

Thats some weird game mechanic action there.


< Message edited by Journier -- 3/31/2010 10:38:18 PM >

(in reply to ASHBERY76)
Post #: 6
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:47:50 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Journier
Most especially Multithreading.
a game this large can only go so far without multithreading.


Sorry to contradict you, but Distant Worlds does multi-thread actually and is multi-core aware. It does not use the other cores for everything though, so sometimes you will see just one core being actively used.

Based on what the poster there described, I think he may have some other performance issues going on as DW can run pretty smoothly on much less hardware than a modern system has.



_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Journier)
Post #: 7
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:48:23 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline
I should add that we read that original post as well and are taking his comments into account.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 8
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:49:41 PM   
fflaguna

 

Posts: 295
Joined: 12/29/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Journier

yea, I have to agree with some of those points.

Most especially Multithreading.

a game this large can only go so far without multithreading.

Funny thing is another game that is similar in style in some ways is Hearts of Iron 3 (HOI 3).
HOI 3 had all automation capable for all area's just like distant worlds. But HOI 3 added so much stuff like that, that without multithreading the game ran so terribly slow compared to HOI 2 that those of us used to playing HOI 2 thought it was unbearable.


Problem is HoI3 was released a full 6-8 months before it SHOULD have been... that was the WORST release product I have EVER played, bar none. I will NOT be buying a Paradox game at release ever again. The game is still buggy, and even though patch 1.4 is around the corner, the devs are still holding back in general for their expansion pack...

Paradox must either run on a shoestring budget where they have trouble gathering capital, or else they are run by idiots that think releasing a crappy product and patching later is preferable to fixing first and releasing a reliable product later... just look at Blizzard. Do you expect to find ANY bugs in their upcoming releases?

_____________________________


(in reply to Journier)
Post #: 9
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:52:07 PM   
Journier

 

Posts: 349
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins


quote:

ORIGINAL: Journier
Most especially Multithreading.
a game this large can only go so far without multithreading.


Sorry to contradict you, but Distant Worlds does multi-thread actually and is multi-core aware. It does not use the other cores for everything though, so sometimes you will see just one core being actively used.

Based on what the poster there described, I think he may have some other performance issues going on as DW can run pretty smoothly on much less hardware than a modern system has.




Ive only seen your game touch 30-35% of core useage on my quad core cpu. I knew of your game being multicore aware but....

image of core use in largest game with 19 AI's all old etc etc


Also, To FFLAGUNA-

The story I heard with Paradox and HOI 3 coming out the way it did is this.

They began the game trying to make it all multithreading capable etc, however they ran into so many problems with integration from I assume a group of programmers that have been at Paradox for a long time IE Johan, and never really got alot of practice for multithreading before begining on HOI 3. Well 6+ months into the project they scrapped the whole thing and said forget it and it became what HOI 3 is today. This is the story I heard from someone that was supposedly in the know. But thats a entirely different game


< Message edited by Journier -- 3/31/2010 11:11:23 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 10
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 3/31/2010 10:56:34 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline
That post quoted in the original post was writen by Taltamir on the GalCiv2.com forum; not by be.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to Journier)
Post #: 11
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 12:11:20 AM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fflaguna

Problem is HoI3 was released a full 6-8 months before it SHOULD have been... that was the WORST release product I have EVER played, bar none. I will NOT be buying a Paradox game at release ever again. The game is still buggy, and even though patch 1.4 is around the corner, the devs are still holding back in general for their expansion pack...


No, that would have been HOI 1 where they made me pay to be a beta tester for them. I've never bought another game from them after that. I came here and have been here since then.

quote:


Paradox must either run on a shoestring budget where they have trouble gathering capital, or else they are run by idiots that think releasing a crappy product and patching later is preferable to fixing first and releasing a reliable product later... just look at Blizzard. Do you expect to find ANY bugs in their upcoming releases?


I don't know what Paradox does or doesn't have but this game was patched within HOURS of release to kill a single bug. That's what I call support.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to fflaguna)
Post #: 12
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 1:24:57 AM   
Janster

 

Posts: 54
Joined: 2/19/2004
Status: offline
Hearts of Iron is an extremly complicated game made with no a fraction of the resources that went into Mass Effect 2, its a lot to demand that these games are to be 100% from the start. This game seems to suffer from exactly the same problems, and will require extensive patching before a good idea can turn into a playable one.

Paradox has a dedicated track record of fixing their games, and getting it right eventually, Hoi 3 just got patch 1,4 which finally gets things right I believe.

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 13
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 1:47:31 AM   
Ranbir


Posts: 142
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline
Is there an assumption all four cores need to be maxing out?

(in reply to Janster)
Post #: 14
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 3:13:22 AM   
Kamonrius

 

Posts: 69
Joined: 3/31/2010
Status: offline
Hmm My computer is a pitance to the one described ATI1200x integrated 4gb laptop Vista 32 Amd turion 2 Core duo, 2 years old, and I do not have this unbearable lag I keep hearing about settings, are maxed me thinks and I play currently a 1400 star system (or so) I scroll in and out better than the pre release DW vids and have yet to have a CTD but the empire mechanics described are a worry for me as empires do get pissed for no reason when your large..thing is mine worked..fine? smaller empires kept giving me money, even those who hated me. some kept asking for trade agreements..I guess I've yet to reach the strenght of the poster in question :D Give DW some time if continuing on the track in a sense it can only get BETTAR!

(in reply to Ranbir)
Post #: 15
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 3:58:42 AM   
BigJ62


Posts: 1800
Joined: 12/28/2002
From: Alpharetta, Georgia
Status: offline
Your machine appears to be balancing the load across all four cores and in particular not greater than 25% of total according to your screenshot.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Journier

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins


quote:

ORIGINAL: Journier
Most especially Multithreading.
a game this large can only go so far without multithreading.


Sorry to contradict you, but Distant Worlds does multi-thread actually and is multi-core aware. It does not use the other cores for everything though, so sometimes you will see just one core being actively used.

Based on what the poster there described, I think he may have some other performance issues going on as DW can run pretty smoothly on much less hardware than a modern system has.




Ive only seen your game touch 30-35% of core useage on my quad core cpu. I knew of your game being multicore aware but....

image of core use in largest game with 19 AI's all old etc etc


Also, To FFLAGUNA-

The story I heard with Paradox and HOI 3 coming out the way it did is this.

They began the game trying to make it all multithreading capable etc, however they ran into so many problems with integration from I assume a group of programmers that have been at Paradox for a long time IE Johan, and never really got alot of practice for multithreading before begining on HOI 3. Well 6+ months into the project they scrapped the whole thing and said forget it and it became what HOI 3 is today. This is the story I heard from someone that was supposedly in the know. But thats a entirely different game




_____________________________

Witp-AE
AeAi…AeAi …AeAi…Long live AeAi.

(in reply to Journier)
Post #: 16
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 4:04:15 AM   
BigJ62


Posts: 1800
Joined: 12/28/2002
From: Alpharetta, Georgia
Status: offline
My machine not running DW.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BigJ62 -- 4/1/2010 4:05:58 AM >


_____________________________

Witp-AE
AeAi…AeAi …AeAi…Long live AeAi.

(in reply to BigJ62)
Post #: 17
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 4:05:27 AM   
BigJ62


Posts: 1800
Joined: 12/28/2002
From: Alpharetta, Georgia
Status: offline
Running DW.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Witp-AE
AeAi…AeAi …AeAi…Long live AeAi.

(in reply to BigJ62)
Post #: 18
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 4:21:15 AM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Janster

Hearts of Iron is an extremly complicated game made with no a fraction of the resources that went into Mass Effect 2, its a lot to demand that these games are to be 100% from the start. This game seems to suffer from exactly the same problems, and will require extensive patching before a good idea can turn into a playable one.

Paradox has a dedicated track record of fixing their games, and getting it right eventually, Hoi 3 just got patch 1,4 which finally gets things right I believe.


Really? I bought HOI 1 and it was full of bugs. They have since sold HOI 2 and 3, for money, not patches but new buggy games. Where in there have they fixed HOI 1 that I was a beta tester for?

No thanks. I've not bought a Paradox game since then.

If DW goes down that same path, which it doesn't seem to be I'll not buy from this developer again either.

It's my money and I get to vote. Now enough about Paradox and back to playing DW.

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to Janster)
Post #: 19
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 10:46:51 AM   
Gertjan

 

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline
Cool to see those pictures of the core activity. I need to get more than 2 cores ;)

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 20
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 10:55:09 AM   
Journier

 

Posts: 349
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BigJ62

Your machine appears to be balancing the load across all four cores and in particular not greater than 25% of total according to your screenshot.




Oh it is?

(in reply to BigJ62)
Post #: 21
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/1/2010 3:46:29 PM   
Ranbir


Posts: 142
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline
Yes, that is the point of multiple cores, they'll split and share the load.

(in reply to Journier)
Post #: 22
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 6:35:40 AM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline
hi there... I am taltamir whom the OP of this thread quoted. you can find the original thread here: http://forums.elementalgame.com/377079/page/1
I have made some further posts in the thread where I originally posted what he posted so let me mention them here:

quote:

Original: taltamir
I did discover another issue... a large part of rebelling planets is taxation... they will have something like

"+1 something"

"+2 we have some development"

"-6 <race> are upset we are at war with their race"

"-18 to 60 due to taxes being too high"

turns out the taxation AI will randomly set planets to max tax levels of 50% (or just below it at 48 or 49... although sometimes even 30 or 40 can be too high, especially on a planet with 0 development)... its not like those planets actually can make any money since they have no development, at all! Worse, it lets it go into the "rebellion" status where they pay 0 taxes


quote:

Original: taltamir
Well, My last save was 10pm... the game crashed at 2:30am... so i lost 4.5 hours of play there... I will migrate the install from my 2 platter 640GB WD Caviar blue to my intel SSD G2 80GB with trim... hopefully that will improve load and save times.

i actually looked up the planet amounts of the other empires and my own...

mine was 208... went all the way up to 350 before game crashed.

AI was: ~60, ~30, 5, 4, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1. went down some before the game crashed... i destroyed a bunch of pirated but every time a new pirate faction spawned immediately...

quote:

I agree, this is an AAR and suggestion post in one. I like the way your game went, but I can see it was frustrating. I have a similar problem now in which many races start to get jealous on me. However, my power difference is not as big as yours with the other empires. Indeed a good suggestion to improve relations early on in the game. I also have some performance issues. But playing on a "smaller" map (not 500 stars and 5000 planets/moons) helps . I've read somewhere that this game plays better on lower end pcs than on new pcs. But it is quite processor intensive. So make sure you have suffiencent mhz.


I am certain playing on a smaller map would help... but then the game wouldn't be as epic as i want it to be :) the reason I like this game over others is how epic i can make it.

As for how my game went, i found a solution:

1. get lucky and find way of ancients or path of darkness (helps a lot!)

2. kill a bunch of pirates (destroy their base, easy as pie later on) and you will go from evil to a saint... now your citizens are gaining moral instead of losing it, and the hate due to jelously is mitigated by you being good... so the other empires will form trade agreements with you.

It is rather ridiculous that 1 planet empires are declaring war on 200+ planet empires because they are jealous of their overwhelming power. they should be licking my boots and asking for hand outs and protection... I tried offering protectorates to a few of them who were at war with the other 2 big bads... and they refused because they hate me too much.

EDIT: I recalled the last bit of info from the "lost" post... it was that I noticed that if the game inches to the 3 to 3.5GB used (I only have 4GB remember), and then i load a game, it will crash with an out of memory error. I need to first exit to main menu then load the game... i assume that to save loading time it keeps assets that it already needs to load... but that could cause it to run out of memory, better do a purge and full reload OR check how much free ram there and then decide whether to do concurrent load or purge and load.

As for the claim by them that something is wrong with my machine... nope, everything is spiffy.. i am playing on max sized map but the game says the requirements for that are 2GB of ram, and 1GB for smaller...

Also, of course it has multithreading, the fact that i peg 30% on my quad core means it has to have it... what I meant is have BETTER multi threading... pegging one core at 100% (25% of my quad core) and then a tiny smidgen spread across the three remaining cores is very weak multi threading, especially for a super CPU intensive game such as this...

On a quad core it manages to get 120% the utilization of a single core... Full utilization is possible, but understandably difficult... but this game practically requires it for its higher end gameplay options.


Let me right out say that I love the game... it has many distinct flaws but it is a very awesome game that I love. it just has some issues.

< Message edited by taltamir -- 4/2/2010 6:36:40 AM >


_____________________________

I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman.

(in reply to Ranbir)
Post #: 23
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 6:52:15 AM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline
:(
loading the same save game took 1 minute 15 seconds from spindle drive and 1 minute 1.13 seconds from the SSD... well actually in BOTH cases the save file was on the SSD, but the actual game installation directory was on either the SSD or HDD.
loading it where the game is on the SSD and the save file on the HDD added 10 seconds to load time.
i was really hoping the SSD will help.

_____________________________

I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman.

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 24
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 6:08:53 PM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

taltamir-

I believe that the rebellion issue you see due to taxes is actually enemy covert ops causing rebellion and not the taxAI randomly screwing with the rate, however, I am not 100% certain of this, it is something I have gleened from reading around about the issue.


Well, I have some massive anti spy things in place, as well as highly trained maxed out spies.

the rebellion occurs due to "approval" being below 15%.and I am given a point by point breakdown...

if enemy spies caused that then there are two options:

1. enemy spies set tax rate up to max on those planets and my tax AI didn't notice and did not care.

2. enemy spies cause the planet to rebel and the readout that specifies happiness modifiers for the colony is instructed to lie when spies successfully perform a covert op against me.

This remind me, the game should pause and give you a huge blinking message when enemy spies manage to OVERTHROW YOUR GOVERNMENT... i went a while as feudalism without even noticing...

Currently I think the game needs two changes ASAP:
1. Have a "never show me this message again" checkmark for the box that tells you that a ship design has been upgraded and the old design marked obsolete whenever you click on the upgrade button (ouch my carpal tunnel).
2. Have a "upgrade all designs" button in ship design.

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 25
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 6:37:25 PM   
licker

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
Eh?

If the spies 'bribed' your AI to not notice...

Otherwise what would the point of that operation be?

Again, assuming that spies are the cause of drastically inflated tax rates.

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 26
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 7:15:12 PM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: licker

Eh?

If the spies 'bribed' your AI to not notice...

Otherwise what would the point of that operation be?

Again, assuming that spies are the cause of drastically inflated tax rates.



that is kinda what i said in option 1. the thing is the "ai" isn't really the AI so much as the rest of my empire and advisors.
so who did they bribe? they bribe local officials to raise taxes, and somehow nobody in the entire empire notices?
again, still assuming spies did that...

it makes more sense if the planet just had "-XX to morale due to enemy propaganda" or some such, which lasts a certain duration and then starts shrinking to nothing. or just literally lock the planet into rebellion without any morale penalties or bonuses.

_____________________________

I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman.

(in reply to licker)
Post #: 27
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 7:28:48 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
ok, so with an advanced in game system, terrible word choice will my computer suystem bog down .. a really big universe??? with my quad core running 2.6/ 6 gig ram, good video card?
This would be destressing as I thought my sys was prety good for this sort of thing???

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 28
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 7:55:50 PM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline
best i could get on my quad is 30% which is equivalent to 100% use on one core and 20% use on another and 0% on last two.
and yes... a really big universe will bog it down, play on smaller ones.

< Message edited by taltamir -- 4/2/2010 7:57:00 PM >


_____________________________

I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman.

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 29
RE: Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com - 4/2/2010 8:13:26 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
or, simply wait for patches to optimise it or pass!

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> Distant Worlds forum thread at GalCiv2.com Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.469