Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence??

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 8:17:35 AM   
barniewhittle

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 3/11/2008
Status: offline 		Anyone know whether the 'rule in absence' automation setting (ie all fully automated) is supposed to allow the game to run fully unattended?

I would like to do that - let it run in the background and then dip in and out as the empire grows - but even with all pop ups deselected I still get at least Pirate and Ruin dialogues that require human intervention, thereby preventing background running.

Post #: 1
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 9:04:43 AM   
Wicky

 

Posts: 102
Joined: 4/1/2010
From: Linz, Austria
Status: offline 		Hehe yeah I know what you mean, who would ever decide to not investigate ruins?
For me, you can discard that question and just message a report of the outcome.

(in reply to barniewhittle)
Post #: 2
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 12:26:50 PM   
forsaken1111

 

Posts: 281
Joined: 3/30/2010
Status: offline 		If a ruin is at a planet you'd like to colonize would you risk pirates or kraltors coming out as your colony ship arrives?

(in reply to Wicky)
Post #: 3
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 12:36:00 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Rule in absence should be that though. The popup choices should all be chosen as "yes" by the AI manager I suppose.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to forsaken1111)
Post #: 4
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 12:38:57 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		It means everything is automated that can be, but it still requires some decisions from you. Having the AI make those decisions for you to make it completely "unattended" is something we can add in the future.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Wade1000)
Post #: 5
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 2:49:10 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

It means everything is automated that can be, but it still requires some decisions from you. Having the AI make those decisions for you to make it completely "unattended" is something we can add in the future.


But that begs the question...why?

Why play if all you are is a spectator?

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 6
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 2:54:06 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		It might be fun to some. They might want to play as a background leader that might make certain major desicions.

People enjoy movies and other entertainment where we only watch.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to Shark7)
Post #: 7
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 5:23:26 PM   
HsojVvad

 

Posts: 1036
Joined: 3/24/2010
Status: offline 		Yeah I can see add in the feature, to select yes, no when investigating ruins so you can start up DW and come back 8 hours and just to see what happens. I guess it would be for a laugh. I don't think I would be doing it more than once, so I don't know if it's really an option to have or not. But if enough people want it, and it's not hard to implement, go ahead, I say. As long as someone has fun with it, why not.

(in reply to Wade1000)
Post #: 8
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 6:14:57 PM   
barniewhittle

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 3/11/2008
Status: offline 		Why? Don't have huge amounts of time to play this. I love the Alt Tab capability to pop in and out while doing other things and would like to be able to leave the game 'fully automated' while doing some of the 'other things' so it can develop a bit on it's own while I'm away.

(in reply to HsojVvad)
Post #: 9
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 6:15:06 PM   
barniewhittle

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 3/11/2008
Status: offline 		Why? Don't have huge amounts of time to play this. I love the Alt Tab capability to pop in and out while doing other things and would like to be able to leave the game 'fully automated' while doing some of the 'other things' so it can develop a bit on it's own while I'm away.

(in reply to HsojVvad)
Post #: 10
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 6:51:33 PM   
HsojVvad

 

Posts: 1036
Joined: 3/24/2010
Status: offline 		You don't even need to alt-tab, you can play in windowed mode I believe.

(in reply to barniewhittle)
Post #: 11
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 7:45:58 PM   
Conflictx

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 4/8/2010
From: Belgium
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: forsaken1111

If a ruin is at a planet you'd like to colonize would you risk pirates or kraltors coming out as your colony ship arrives?


No, but i keep clicking the investigate button anyway, I dont really remember the planet names I send my colony ships to, lost several Colony Ships this way though.

_____________________________

BSG Colonial - Ship and Base Set
DW - New HQ Shield Effect

(in reply to forsaken1111)
Post #: 12
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 8:08:31 PM   
taltamir

 

Posts: 1290
Joined: 4/2/2010
Status: offline 		i would like to see an option to truly turn over your empire to AI control. where its considered just another AI empire...

Some things could help though... i wish there was a "always investigate ruins/ships" option, I hate having to click things unencessary... and i hate accidently clicking "don't investigate" even more.

_____________________________

I do not have a superman complex; for I am God, not Superman.

(in reply to Conflictx)
Post #: 13
RE: Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? - 4/8/2010 8:21:25 PM   
Banquet

 

Posts: 1184
Joined: 8/23/2002
From: England
Status: offline 		I also think 'rule in absence' should mean that the computer makes all the decisions.

One of the alternate ways to play is to set the AI to rule, and then play a starship captain. Well if you're just playing as a bounty hunter (for instance) you shouldn't be getting asked whether some ship half way across the known galaxy investigates a ruin.

_____________________________

http://i904.photobucket.com/albums/ac241/norfolktraveller/command-banner_zps8a55d0fa.jpg

(in reply to taltamir)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> Rule in absence doesn't rule in absence?? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.047