Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Turn 112 update

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: Turn 112 update Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Turn 112 update - 5/6/2010 2:15:54 PM   
Da_Huge_D

 

Posts: 195
Joined: 8/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karri

Wait...are you keeping your armies actually together? I just throw whatever I get wherever I need it.

Yes? I have played against you so i bet you know it. Also playing with your style it's much more senseless and less-histoical idiotic playing IMO. It's like playing classic boardgame risk. X units attack vs. Z and Y. Units are faceless.

It's more nice and "historical" to play with units & etc. sticked together. Also supply keeps up better etc. Looks better in AAR too.

You can "throw" your units where you want to, i don't care. I understand if you really want win game. I don't play this game with cut-throat mode either, so it's not big loss if i lose this game. I like more "roleplaying" you know...
This is not god-damn chess.

< Message edited by Da_Huge_D -- 5/6/2010 2:20:12 PM >

(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 391
RE: Turn 112 update - 5/6/2010 2:29:26 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline 		Yes, my play style is without a doubt idiotic. However, as you can see from the post it included a question mark, hence making it a question, not a statement or an advice and even less a demand to change your play style. I'll refrain to commenting simply on Larrys side from now on.

(in reply to Da_Huge_D)
Post #: 392
RE: Turn 112 update - 5/6/2010 2:58:19 PM   
Panama


Posts: 1362
Joined: 10/30/2009
Status: offline 		6th Rifle Division: June 22, 1941 in the 4th Army at Brest. Remnants retreated and joined 13th Army on 25 July 1941. April 1942 40th Army. November 1942 10th Reserve Army. January 1943 6th Army. August 1943 1st Guards Army. February 1944 until end of 1944 'usually' under 53rd Army. 40th Army in early 1945. March to May 1945 1st Guards Mech Group. Sent to Far East to 53rd Army against the Japanese.

This is by no means an exception. The Soviets moved their divisions from army to army as much or more than the Germans. It makes sense to move them around as the situation dictates. The Soviets were not robotic 'Elmers' who could not act in a flexible manner. Karri's play style is representative of how the Soviets thought and is far from 'idiotic'. Moving divisions from army to army as needed is smart.

Having divisions on internal support is historically inaccurate and contrary to how the entire war was fought.

< Message edited by Panama -- 5/6/2010 3:01:21 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 393
RE: Turn 112 update - 5/6/2010 3:52:35 PM   
Da_Huge_D

 

Posts: 195
Joined: 8/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Panama

6th Rifle Division: June 22, 1941 in the 4th Army at Brest. Remnants retreated and joined 13th Army on 25 July 1941. April 1942 40th Army. November 1942 10th Reserve Army. January 1943 6th Army. August 1943 1st Guards Army. February 1944 until end of 1944 'usually' under 53rd Army. 40th Army in early 1945. March to May 1945 1st Guards Mech Group. Sent to Far East to 53rd Army against the Japanese.

This is by no means an exception. The Soviets moved their divisions from army to army as much or more than the Germans. It makes sense to move them around as the situation dictates. The Soviets were not robotic 'Elmers' who could not act in a flexible manner. Karri's play style is representative of how the Soviets thought and is far from 'idiotic'. Moving divisions from army to army as needed is smart.

Having divisions on internal support is historically inaccurate and contrary to how the entire war was fought.

True. True. Also that's why TOAW need some kind of command hierarchy like HoI3. Would be very excellent addition. But still i like to play with my way, units sticked together, unless there's some way to 'transfer' unit into different formation.

(in reply to Panama)
Post #: 394
RE: Turn 112 - 5/6/2010 4:39:01 PM   
barman

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 5/6/2010
From: Haarlem
Status: offline

http://65.101.188.183:4444

Download whatever you want, it's free



Larry, the link doesn't seem to work







(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 395
RE: Turn 112 - 5/6/2010 5:17:49 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ribak
Isn't there a supply bonus?

I'm not sure that the Soviets would benefit from a supply bonus for keeping your units together since they are so many and the HQ unit itself can only be at one spot at a time but I kinda like keeping my units together myself. I'm not so sure the Germans kept their units together in the real deal but I'm trying to do it in this game. I've noticed that Dave does too. I think I do that because it seems to make the game more 'real' to me and gives me one more detail to keep track of ( and I like that ) and whether or not I get a supply boost is just a bonus for me.

Um........@barman you say the link is down? D'oh. I checked it just now ( 09:14 am Tucson time ) and grabbed a screenshot to show you that the site is up and running. *I* have to use the link-back address to access it because my computer and the Qwest modem are linked together my using the 'real' link, the link you guys use would just go from my computer to my Qwest modem and stop there since the 'real' link is simply the address of the Qwest modem ( which forwards outside TCP/IP packets to my computer just fine thank you very much ) and TCP/IP packets from my computer to the modem are designed to leave the modem going outbound not inbound. At any rate, it worked just now and I'd ask you to try it again please.

EDIT: NOTE: you can download MyWebServer.jar, and startup.bat as well and start your own webserver on your computer if you want to.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/6/2010 5:22:14 PM >

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to barman)
Post #: 396
RE: Turn 112 - 5/6/2010 5:21:02 PM   
parzival


Posts: 44
Joined: 12/17/2009
From: Helsinki, Finland
Status: offline 		Why did u decide to attack Stalingrad and not Moscow+ Leningrad. Now your front line becomes extremely long, maybe overextended?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 397
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 5:27:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: parzival
Why did u decide to attack Stalingrad and not Moscow+ Leningrad. Now your front line becomes extremely long, maybe overextended?

I'm like a stream of water flowing into the easy spots and flowing around the hard spots. I guess. More to the point: My thinking was that at one time, earlier in the game I had more units than Dave did and a long long front line made sense. Now that it's later in the game and we both have roughly the same number of units that little detail doesn't argue for a long long front line but Stalingrad is the 'closest' objective left to me and my troops so I thought I'd go for it.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to parzival)
Post #: 398
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 5:31:00 PM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		Larry,

The scenario link http://65.101.188.183:4444 doesn't work for me either :(

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 399
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 5:33:49 PM   
parzival


Posts: 44
Joined: 12/17/2009
From: Helsinki, Finland
Status: offline 		But the German units come in regiments and the Russian units in divisions. So if u have the same number of units as your opponent, your front line is then weaker, I think? Or is one German regiment equal to one Russian division?

< Message edited by parzival -- 5/6/2010 5:35:12 PM >

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 400
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 5:43:46 PM   
Da_Huge_D

 

Posts: 195
Joined: 8/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: parzival

But the German units come in regiments and the Russian units in divisions. So if u have the same number of units as your opponent, your front line is then weaker, I think? Or is one German regiment equal to one Russian division?

Yes ofcourse. One german regiment can even defend against 4-5 red-army divisions, like it did in real life.

(in reply to parzival)
Post #: 401
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 9:30:54 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Da_Huge_D

quote:

ORIGINAL: parzival
But the German units come in regiments and the Russian units in divisions. So if u have the same number of units as your opponent, your front line is then weaker, I think? Or is one German regiment equal to one Russian division?

Yes ofcourse. One german regiment can even defend against 4-5 red-army divisions, like it did in real life.

This is the reason why I like FITE so much. It pits the finest Army in the world ( at the time, it was the German Army ) against the biggest Army in the world ( at the time, this was the Soviets ). If the Soviets can hold on long enough to mobilize it's *entire* Army it could theoretically defeat *any* Army. As the Germans are finding out. It takes a finite period of time to draft a farmer, put him through basic training, infantry training ( or some speciality training ) and then put him in the reinforcement pipeline or ship him over to a specific unit somewhere. I heard of time periods of upwards of 9 months for the Soviet(s) to do this. So the finest Russian troops didn't start showing up at the front lines until late in '42 and early '43. Dave is holding up just fine ( for his situation ) in that his troops aren't in immediate jepardy of destruction. I've seen some situations where a miracle occured and the Axis troops ground up the Soviet units several at a time until the Winter of '43 Soviet Offensive when the tide turned. Dave isn't quite in that situation....he's still got a semi-hardened front line. Plus in a lot of places he's defending behind a river or marsh or something and the temporary lack of numbers of units isn't such a disadvantage anymore. D'oh.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Da_Huge_D)
Post #: 402
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 9:33:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
Larry,
The scenario http://65.101.188.183:4444 doesn't work for me either :(

I read your post and tried it again ( about 13:30 Tucson time )and it worked just fine *for me*. So I'm not sure what problem you guys are running into. ???

EDIT: I found out that the Qwest modem wasn't forwarding my packets because the rule for forwarding packets specifies ports 80 and 443.....so I changed the 4444 port to 443 and tried it and it worked for me. So I'm thinking maybe you guys can try it now and see what gives. Okay? Somebody?

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 5/6/2010 9:49:36 PM >

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 403
RE: Turn 113 - 5/6/2010 10:08:58 PM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		http://65.101.188.183:443/

It works now, Larry. (when I changed it from 4444 to 443. The link on the site is still 4444 and doesn't work, however). Thanks for finding the solution!


< Message edited by Bamilus -- 5/6/2010 10:09:43 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 404
RE: Turn 112 - 5/6/2010 10:35:59 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: parzival

Why did u decide to attack Stalingrad and not Moscow+ Leningrad. Now your front line becomes extremely long, maybe overextended?



Leningrad doesn't actually hold much value in the game. Well apart from tying down a lot of units if you attack it. Moscow on the other hand is quite easy to defend, whereas in Stalingrad, if succesfull, will open up a lot of room to manouver. And since, at this point, there is now way Axis can win a war of attrition, a war of manuever is the only chance.


EDIT:
There is of course the chance of switching to defence.

< Message edited by Karri -- 5/6/2010 10:36:40 PM >

(in reply to parzival)
Post #: 405
RE: Turn 113 - 5/7/2010 1:15:19 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
http://65.101.188.183:443/

It works now, Larry. (when I changed it from 4444 to 443.

Good deal. Somebody downloaded the batch file and MyWebServer.jar so I guess they are going to try to do what I did. Cool.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
The link on the site is still 4444 and doesn't work, however). Thanks for finding the solution!

Good eyes Bailus dude. I fixed the link on the site so it should work now.


_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 406
RE: Turn 113 - 5/7/2010 9:38:21 AM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline 		Watch out Larry, in my game I just took Stalingrad Center (-2% Supply) in my turn, but my opponment captured it back! For any reason this is enough for the Event to trigger the recapture before it was lost...

Now my opponment got +2% points Supply for the rest of the game. So if you attack this hex make it clear that your opponment canno't take it back inthe same turn otherwise it works the otherway round then it was designed to... :(

To make it clearer:

Turn 104 Sowet supply way perhaps 30
Turn 105 I took Stalingrad center in my part, but he captured it back
Turn 106 Event for recaotureing Stalingrad appears +2% Supply for Russianplayer Russian Supply Level increases to 32.

This event should only work if the event triggered before. Means if the russian lost 2% before... So just be aware of this affect. The 10% Production loss, and this is also nice to know... is not in Stlinagrad it is placed in 244/186 the hills before the city!

regards

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 407
RE: Turn 114 - 5/7/2010 3:38:30 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		My map might be different from yours. According to my map Stalingrad is at 245,187. Oh well.

Even though I'm not through putting it together yet I've posted the beta version of the Axis turn 114 AAR
on my site so you can at least see the front lines. You can find it here:

http://65.101.188.183




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 408
RE: Turn 114 - 5/7/2010 6:43:12 PM   
pionier

 

Posts: 116
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline 		it is the same.... but the trigger is on the hills before...

Trigger and onmap text are in this case different!

< Message edited by pionier -- 5/7/2010 8:21:42 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 409
RE: Turn 114 - 5/8/2010 6:30:20 AM   
parzival


Posts: 44
Joined: 12/17/2009
From: Helsinki, Finland
Status: offline 		At least Larry doesnt do the same mistake as Hitler did in 1942: tried to take Baku and Stalingrad both at the same time. Maybe there is more succes this time.

(in reply to pionier)
Post #: 410
RE: Turn 115 - 5/8/2010 10:48:08 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I received Dave's moves for the end of turn 114 and I've started my moves for turn 115 which means I've started building the AAR for turn 115 and I've posted the beta version at my web site:
http://65.101.188.183

(in reply to parzival)
Post #: 411
RE: Turn 115 - 5/8/2010 11:40:36 PM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		The progress on the site is looking good, Larry! Once I learn the ropes of the game a bit more and get out of school for the summer (May 20th) hopefully I can start an AAR of my own.

And of course, your AAR updates are amazing as well :D


_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 412
RE: Turn 115 - 5/9/2010 2:32:02 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
The progress on the site is looking good, Larry!


Thanks. I thought about putting some pictures on the first web page you see when you arrive at my site but then I thought about those of you who are still on dial-up and how too many pictures can slow down the opening of a site's page and we don't want any slow-downs to plague my site. Simple ( well, quick and dirty ) is the word. I add stuff to the page every now and then but for the most part it's done all I have asked of it so far. What kinds of stuff would you guys like to see that I don't have already?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
Once I learn the ropes of the game a bit more and get out of school for the summer (May 20th) hopefully I can start an AAR of my own.

Yeah, by all means start an AAR and I'll follow it and offer my little tidbits of advice and make your AAR a little bit different from the other AAR's. LOL. Like my advice might be of worth to anybody. LOL. What game are you planning on playing?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
And of course, your AAR updates are amazing as well


Well, thank you very much. What else would you like to see in it ( them )?

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 413
RE: Turn 115 - 5/9/2010 8:25:45 PM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		I don't know, I like the current AAR layout with the whole map and then thumbnails to specific battles. The only suggestion for the site is if you could upload all your previous turns from this AAR so they are all at a central location.

As for my AAR....I wanna do something on the Eastfront but something not too complex. Maybe the Road to Moscow series?


_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 414
RE: Turn 115 - 5/10/2010 12:56:18 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
The only suggestion for the site is if you could upload all your previous turns from this AAR so they are all at a central location.

I'll see what I can do. Stay tuned.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
As for my AAR....I wanna do something on the Eastfront but something not too complex. Maybe the Road to Moscow series?

Good choice. Good series and good scenarios. Good luck. You gonna play PBEM or hot-seat ?

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 415
RE: Turn 115 - 5/10/2010 1:24:36 AM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		Hopefully PBEM. If I'm lucky I'll be able to find someone on these forums who won't mind playing with a total noob.

I'll probably start a D21 solo against the Soviet PO, too. (EDIT: Eventually. I mind farted and forgot D21 was really really big. I'll probably start a divisional or higher level East Front map with a Soviet PO)


< Message edited by Bamilus -- 5/10/2010 1:26:38 AM >

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 416
RE: Turn 116 - 5/10/2010 1:52:16 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		It took a minute or two to round up all the AARs from the past but I found 'em and now we have them all together. Now we can look at any or all of them from one place.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 417
RE: Turn 116 - 5/10/2010 1:53:39 AM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		Oh snap! You're the man, Larry!

EDIT:

Turn 12 to Turn 36 have broken pictures and the links on the left side don't work. Just a heads up. Other than that everything looks to be working great!

< Message edited by Bamilus -- 5/10/2010 2:25:47 AM >

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 418
RE: Turn 116 - 5/10/2010 10:22:55 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bamilus
Oh snap! You're the man, Larry!
EDIT:
Turn 12 to Turn 36 have broken pictures and the links on the left side don't work. Just a heads up. Other than that everything looks to be working great!


D'oh. I'll look into it. Thanks for the heads up.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 419
RE: Turn 116 - 5/11/2010 4:42:27 AM   
Jdub

 

Posts: 83
Joined: 5/24/2009
Status: offline 		Larry, I took a quick glance at the end of turn file for turn 117. It seems to me that you have far too few troops protecting the flanks of your advance on Stalingrad. There are sections of the line that are very weakly held. I have no experience as Germans but it seems to me that the Germans are in a very dangerous situation. If Dave decides to try and take the initiative early, AGS is going to have to make a very costly withdrawal. Why not take some troops out of the center to reinforce AGS?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 420
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Norm Koger's The Operational Art Of War III >> After Action Reports >> RE: Turn 112 update Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.781