Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

"I need an event" - discussion and proposals

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Storm over the Pacific >> "I need an event" - discussion and proposals Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
"I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 1:09:20 AM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		As doomtrader said in one his of posts we, I mean WI, originated form a modding community. Our journey started several years ago when we were changing/creating quite simple scripts responsible for events. A few years has passed since, but still we have a kind of special sentiment connected with this part of content in our games. In Storm over the Pacific there are something like 200 pure historical events and more flavour ones, but still there is a lot place for more of them. SoP engine has a lot of possibilities considering events so I would like to get know your opinion regarding those which are already in the game, but also I would like to encourage you to make your own proposals of new events that in your opinion are "must have" and/or "nice to have" in the game.

Of course as everything in our life also events have at least a few downsides, for example giving ToW experience especially PBEM players prefer limited number of events, but such issues are also to discuss here.

_____________________________
Post #: 1
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 5:26:50 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		Nomohan Incident in 1937 Campaign

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 2
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 8:57:26 AM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		Consider it done for the next update!

_____________________________


(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 3
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 10:45:03 AM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		And what about "Battle of Lake Khasan"?


_____________________________


(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 4
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 3:28:15 PM   
gwgardner

 

Posts: 6722
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline 		Is it possible to make an event that would trigger Soviet intervention if the Japanese don't garrison Manchuria?

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 5
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 4:32:21 PM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gwgardner

Is it possible to make an event that would trigger Soviet intervention if the Japanese don't garrison Manchuria?


Maybe not for 1.02, but most probably this can be done.

Also I think that should be addressed directly to the AI behavior, not simply to the events.

_____________________________


(in reply to gwgardner)
Post #: 6
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 5:05:08 PM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anraz

And what about "Battle of Lake Khasan"?



For Nomohan, make that a limited war where, after a few months there is peace. What ever territory is taken is kept.

For Lake Khasan.... thats only 3 weeks or 3 turns...... maybe double that before there is a peace?

I am not sure. I would have to look at map and test the event.

The timing is good, as it diverts attention and Japanese forces away from China.

So I say yes, include it and make it game playable.


(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 7
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/17/2010 10:46:17 PM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		IIRC during Battle of Lake Khasan loses were rather limited and there were no major movement of units. I see it rather as PP wastage then war (in terms of SOP).

[We have only a few days for discussion...]

_____________________________


(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 8
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 2:13:17 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Yamaoto's death. 

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 9
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 2:35:32 AM   
Mike Dubost

 

Posts: 273
Joined: 8/24/2008
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline 		I would like to see an event "tree" related to one of the odder weapons of WWII, the IJN's submarine aircraft carriers.

It may require a bit of work, but it would be cool.

How about: First, an event in late 1944, along the lines of "Submarine Aircraft Carrier Program" with the IJN given the choice to abort the program or continue it. Aborting it would maybe give a PP boost, while continuing it (the historical choice) would be no immediate impact.

If the choice of continuing it was chosen, then in the summer of 1945, the IJN would have the choice of "Submarine Aircraft Program Target Choice". The IJN would be able to choose to re-target the mission on surface vessels (historical choice), or to continue training for strike on Gatun Locks [Panama Canal]. If the historical choice was selected, I am not sure what to have happen, since the 2 I-400-class subs would have not been exactly like a sub group. We could maybe treat them like one, even so and just have a free sub group for the IJN. For the attack on the Panama Canal, we could have a third event with an X% chance of nothing and a 100-X% chance of an effectiveness drop or a social unrest increase to simulate a morale hit.

(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 10
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 3:22:22 AM   
Magpius


Posts: 1632
Joined: 9/21/2007
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline 		Without having looked at the manual yet, is there a list of all the existing events in the game under their respective scenarios?
I'd like to see a "Brisbane Line" defense trigger in the Australia Scenario, but I'm not sure if one is already there.


_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Dubost)
Post #: 11
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 4:00:35 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		Yes Agent.

Mike Dubost, sorry, you are asking for a new type of unit. If I could choose to add one new unit to the game that would not be it.

(in reply to Magpius)
Post #: 12
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 4:02:00 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anraz

IIRC during Battle of Lake Khasan loses were rather limited and there were no major movement of units. I see it rather as PP wastage then war (in terms of SOP).

[We have only a few days for discussion...]


umm.. then steal all the PP for one turn and make it zero for the Japanese?

That might slow a players plans.

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 13
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 9:26:50 AM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		Stealing of all PP for one turn is a very interesting idea, but also seems very harsh, at least at first glance.

_____________________________


(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 14
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 4:54:01 PM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		Can we make the Nomonhan Incident with a fourWEEK random start and finish date?

That way the scenario is playable over and over again.

Concerning Lake Khasan, the Japanese have a good start in the game and can easily crush the Chinese.

< Message edited by Razz -- 6/18/2010 5:08:07 PM >

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 15
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 5:01:34 PM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline
quote:

Can we make the Nomonhan Incident with a four random start and finish date?

yes

_____________________________


(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 16
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 5:05:34 PM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Razz
Can we make the Nomonhan Incident with a four random start and finish date?
That way the scenario is playable over and over again.

Absolutely! But first I would like to hear others players since it is crucial point of this campaign. Let say to catch following quickfix decision will be made in Sunday based on players` feedback.

< Message edited by Anraz -- 6/18/2010 5:06:27 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to doomtrader)
Post #: 17
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/18/2010 5:09:03 PM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		oops..... four weeks random start and finish date, is what I meant to say.

(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 18
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/19/2010 2:23:57 AM   
Mike Dubost

 

Posts: 273
Joined: 8/24/2008
From: Sacramento, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Razz

Yes Agent.

Mike Dubost, sorry, you are asking for a new type of unit. If I could choose to add one new unit to the game that would not be it.


I will offer a defense of my ideas.

I did try to fit it into the existing system as either a free sub group or an event-driven morale hit.

I admit that my main reason for wanting the submarine carriers is that they are neat gadgets and historical oddities. However, I also feel that this will add to the sense of the submarine as a new weapon, whose full uses and best employment were still being worked out by all navies.

In particular, the IJN spent a large amount of "skull sweat" on the submarine carrier, the float planes, and supply-transporting subs, and the US had a few subs designed between the 2 World Wars as "submarine cruisers". For that matter, I think I read somewhere that the first experiment with flying a float plane off a sub was in the late 1920s by the USN.

No matter what the call on this event is, I expect to have a large number of enjoyable hours playing this game.

(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 19
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/19/2010 7:13:49 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Noticed that the Philippines doesn't /cannot pull off War Plan Orange (defense at Bataan).  The Japanese are always fast enough to prevent this.  And Singapore holds out longer than the Philippines.  Maybe it's the nature of the game mechanics. Singapore is a city with supply.  Bataan is not.

Could we add historical accuracy though events, like activation of WPO and we magically get a Corps in Bataan with regular supply each turn (though minimal).

< Message edited by jomni -- 6/19/2010 7:15:07 AM >

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to Mike Dubost)
Post #: 20
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 6/19/2010 10:59:46 PM   
Anraz

 

Posts: 785
Joined: 7/25/2008
Status: offline 		@Razz, because it is already Sunday, at least for me, I may say that we got those events (7).
@jomni, I will examine possibilities.

_____________________________


(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 21
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/24/2010 8:36:57 PM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline 		As we are working over next patch, I decided to woke up this thread.

_____________________________


(in reply to Anraz)
Post #: 22
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/24/2010 10:47:39 PM   
Tomokatu


Posts: 488
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline 		What about a percentage possibility that Douglas Macarthur fails to escape from the Philippines?

Was he as influential as Yamamoto?
Would Macarthur's death or capture have been a morale loss as Yamamoto's was intended to be?
Could another general have taken over and done better?

_____________________________

For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction

(in reply to doomtrader)
Post #: 23
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/25/2010 2:10:53 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		Well changing of commanders is not implemented yet. No change in experience in rank. I don't think we can kill them either.

Not all commanders are working.

Naval and Air commanders do not gain experience. :(

I read somewhere that General Tomokatu was very influential is strategic planing in the USN.

(in reply to Tomokatu)
Post #: 24
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/26/2010 12:27:11 AM   
Tomokatu


Posts: 488
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I don't think we can kill them either
Aaaawww! Go on, maybe just Dugout Doug? Just kill him a little bit?

quote:

..... strategic planing in the USN.
That would be the RAAF.

_____________________________

For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction

(in reply to Razz1)
Post #: 25
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/26/2010 12:27:55 AM   
Tomokatu


Posts: 488
Joined: 2/27/2006
Status: offline 		Couldn't serve in the USN, anyway. Dry navy --- shudder!

_____________________________

For every action, there is an equal and opposite malfunction

(in reply to Tomokatu)
Post #: 26
RE: "I need an event" - discussion and proposals - 9/26/2010 2:00:12 AM   
Razz1


Posts: 2560
Joined: 10/21/2007
From: CaLiForNia
Status: offline 		I forgot... Cats can't swim.

(in reply to Tomokatu)
Post #: 27
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Storm over the Pacific >> "I need an event" - discussion and proposals Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.344