DasHoff
Posts: 109
Joined: 8/11/2009 Status: offline
|
ok, he had an mg42 in a 3 story brick house, and i had a rifle squad ambushing in a 2 story brick house. distance, around 160-200m. (the height of the building doesn't matter, does it?). By the time the mg42 had finished its 2500 rounds, it had killed 4/6 guys who had been lying in ambush. previously, those guys would've been dead within 300 or so rounds. I then replied with a 50 cal against him, which killed 4 guys before it ran out of its 350 rounds, which is what i would expect of a 50 cal machine gun. I still don't think you should be able to murder guys huddling in ambush, however (unless you had a 50 cal which could punch through the walls). haven't tried trenches yet, but blind firing on trenches has always been an easy way to kill enemy squads in CC, which is another thing which has always annoyed me. i've always thought that if you set a squad to lie down in ambush in a trench/shellhole, it should be pretty much immune to fire, unless a shell or a grenade falls into the trench, and that once the squad gets up and starts firing out of the trench they should start taking casualties. Obviously if the trench gets flanked and the enemy is firing down your trench, you should be gunned down easily we also had an mg42 vs 30 cal mmg battle at the same distance, each of us in a 2 story stone house. this time i got the upper hand, and killed 2 guys within the first 300-400 rounds, but after that it stabilised and we both basically shot it out for a while and didnt really take any casualties. i find it odd that my squad firing out of a stone house at the enemy didn't get killed, but the guys lying down behind a brick wall were killed. i'm guessing stone is stronger than brick?
< Message edited by DasHoff -- 7/30/2010 10:40:30 AM >
|