Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

my idea

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> my idea Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
my idea - 8/20/2010 9:54:53 AM   
caldy

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 8/20/2010
Status: offline
i have always had an idea that i want to explain here!
why the games are not linkable !!!
i explain better, why is not possible to play our best strategic game and then play (if you want), the resulting battle with another game of another developer ???
somewhere as the total war series but much large-scale idea.
if you think this the arrangements are infinity, play our air engagement with il-2 or the naval battle with silent hunter.
the only problem, the two games must be linkable.
there are problems i know but the vantages are large and the market of games obtain certainly benefits as also developers.
that's all... Bye
Post #: 1
RE: my idea - 8/20/2010 10:18:21 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Only if they come from the same developers.  Micropose tried to link Gunship with M1 Tank Platoon.  But that didn't push through.  LOMAC can link with BlackShark.

Welcome to the forums.  Just remember not to post links to dealstudio and other sites to earn commission.

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to caldy)
Post #: 2
RE: my idea - 8/20/2010 10:30:53 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Haha! Now that is amusing!

< Message edited by jomni -- 8/20/2010 10:31:36 AM >

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator
Post #: 3
RE: my idea - 8/21/2010 12:37:37 AM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline 		If I think the arrangements are "infinity"? 

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 4
RE: my idea - 8/21/2010 2:03:32 AM   
jjax


Posts: 289
Joined: 2/24/2005
Status: offline 		Well, I am sure English isn't his first language, but at least he got his point across. That is more than I can say about many forum posters who do claim English as their first.

_____________________________

--JJAX


(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 5
RE: my idea - 8/21/2010 8:47:07 AM   
caldy

 

Posts: 15
Joined: 8/20/2010
Status: offline 		yes it's true, English isn't not my first language (...not even the second ) but i think this is a strategic forum and not a grammatical.
thanks to all x the constructive debate about my idea   (i think don't care nobody )

(in reply to jjax)
Post #: 6
RE: my idea - 8/22/2010 1:23:29 AM   
diablo1

 

Posts: 994
Joined: 2/27/2010
Status: offline 		lol they way he types is funny.

(in reply to caldy)
Post #: 7
RE: my idea - 8/22/2010 7:17:02 PM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline 		"...the only problem, the two games must be linkable..."

Yes that's the only problem, and at the same time it's an unsurmountable problem. People differ just too much (opinions, thoughts, insights, points of view, you name it) to make games linkable. Maybe it would work for a small dedicated company, but then the (niche-)market for it would be much too small---> too few buyers is a guaranteed no go.
So yeah, the idea might seem good, but it's not around the corner. Well maybe one day when everything is Microsoft and Google (or their successors) then games might become linkable. (gosh I hope I don't see that day though; everything MS/Google/Steam)

(in reply to diablo1)
Post #: 8
RE: my idea - 8/22/2010 7:39:51 PM   
Widell


Posts: 913
Joined: 4/27/2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden
Status: offline 		What does Steam have to do with this?

(in reply to Josh)
Post #: 9
RE: my idea - 8/22/2010 8:38:28 PM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Widell

What does Steam have to do with this?


Well not exactly Steam, no steam bashing from me, nor MS or Google bashing, I merely wanted to point out that in a distant future everything *might* be linked together, all the "pc's" ( or whatever they will look like in X years time), all your searches, all the things you buy, all places you've been to, all the movies and series you've watched, or will watch...) all that combined in super computers. Then it will be possible to make linkable wargames. I doubt very much it will be possible to make really "linkable" wargames before that happens.

(in reply to Widell)
Post #: 10
RE: my idea - 8/22/2010 11:45:16 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caldy

yes it's true, English isn't not my first language (...not even the second ) but i think this is a strategic forum and not a grammatical.
thanks to all x the constructive debate about my idea   (i think don't care nobody )



English is your third? Wow, for a third language I'm impressed. Tagalog is my 2nd and I have a hard time writing it!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to caldy)
Post #: 11
RE: my idea - 8/23/2010 2:17:20 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestrategy


quote:

ORIGINAL: caldy

yes it's true, English isn't not my first language (...not even the second ) but i think this is a strategic forum and not a grammatical.
thanks to all x the constructive debate about my idea   (i think don't care nobody )



English is your third? Wow, for a third language I'm impressed. Tagalog is my 2nd and I have a hard time writing it!


Marunong ka pala mag tagalog!

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 12
RE: my idea - 8/23/2010 7:35:27 AM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline 		Oo! Pero hindi ako mahusay. Nag-practice na ako kasi Pilipina ang asawa ko. (Yes! But I'm not very good. I practice because my wife is  Filipina.)


I am so jealous of you guys that have English as a second language and write it better than I do. 

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 13
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 12:24:01 AM   
Chijohnaok2


Posts: 628
Joined: 7/29/2002
From: Florida, USA (formerly Chicago)
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caldy


i have always had an idea that i want to explain here!
why the games are not linkable !!!
i explain better, why is not possible to play our best strategic game and then play (if you want), the resulting battle with another game of another developer ???
somewhere as the total war series but much large-scale idea.
if you think this the arrangements are infinity, play our air engagement with il-2 or the naval battle with silent hunter.
the only problem, the two games must be linkable.
there are problems i know but the vantages are large and the market of games obtain certainly benefits as also developers.
that's all... Bye


I'm not a programmer, but I presume that making games from different developers linkable would require them to have access to each other's programming code (at least to a certain extent).

I'm not sure many developers would agree to that.

_____________________________



Feel free to drop by and chat about whatever is on your mind.

(in reply to caldy)
Post #: 14
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 12:48:04 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline 		d00g's bbs is still down. 

Somebody ring im and get his asz up. 

What's the matter w/ im

< Message edited by t001001001 -- 8/24/2010 12:49:01 AM >

(in reply to Chijohnaok2)
Post #: 15
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 12:51:27 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline

(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 16
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 12:54:58 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline 		It's still down

 


ima ring im   this is ridiculous

If misspelling definately don't get his ass in gear nothing will.


(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 17
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 2:23:54 AM   
jomni


Posts: 2827
Joined: 11/19/2007
Status: offline 		Are you aware that you are replying to a thread started by a potential spammer?

_____________________________

My Blog
Random Wargame Name Generator

(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 18
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 2:37:55 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline 		Are you aware that you are replying to a thread started by a potential spammer?

I don't know about the bot that started the thread but I can say for sure that chijohn is a spammer

Why is d00g's bbs still down

O'Bama needs to figure out which butts to kick and get that danged hole back online. 

(in reply to jomni)
Post #: 19
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 2:55:38 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline
quote:

SQL ERROR [ mysql4 ]

Too many connections [1040]


,d00g

tss.  ima go watch tv

(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 20
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 3:11:44 AM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline 		It's obviously a conspiracy.  d00g has taken down the bbs to suppress SLAAKMAN. 

I bet goblin conceived this entire plan.  He's the only one dastardly and smart enough to think it up.

(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 21
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 3:37:02 AM   
Bamilus


Posts: 973
Joined: 4/30/2010
From: The Old Northwest
Status: offline 		Is it bad that I can't understand half of the people posting in this thread?

_____________________________

Paradox Interactive Forum Refugee

(in reply to t001001001)
Post #: 22
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 10:15:24 AM   
undercovergeek

 

Posts: 1526
Joined: 11/21/2006
From: UK
Status: offline 		i think t001001001 maybe referring to his favourite website no longer working and he is unable to contact his friends/colleagues there who appear to administer the site - it appears that in his frustration and exhaustion at trying to contact these friends/colleagues he has decided to post here in an attempt to capture their attention






i dont think its working

(in reply to Bamilus)
Post #: 23
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 2:37:48 PM   
paseocn

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 8/24/2010
Status: offline 		it's sounds like a good idea

_____________________________

[url=www.playerarmory.com]Playerarmory[/url]

(in reply to undercovergeek)
Post #: 24
RE: my idea - 8/24/2010 8:53:11 PM   
t001001001

 

Posts: 322
Joined: 4/30/2009
Status: offline 		i dont think its working

It's back up

I don't know how the place survives w/o my consistent whining

http://www.maddogdrivethru.net

"open 24/7"
Well... mostly

It's a spinoff from this bbs here "Nobody Asked Me, But...." old matrix and wargamer ppl. Private bbs d00g owns. A place to discuss things that won't fly here on a commercial bbs w/ pretty much the same guys. I'm not here to promote it, just wondering why it was gone. But that's the story of it. There used to be a link to it here at matrix.

< Message edited by t001001001 -- 8/24/2010 8:58:06 PM >

(in reply to paseocn)
Post #: 25
RE: my idea - 8/25/2010 7:07:19 AM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: paseocn

it's sounds like a good idea



See? Even the bot thinks it's a good idea!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to paseocn)
Post #: 26
RE: my idea - 8/25/2010 10:42:26 PM   
Widell


Posts: 913
Joined: 4/27/2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden
Status: offline 		Why do we get all the looser bots? Bots with posts without links, and bots that fail to make links, hmm, well, clickable.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 27
RE: my idea - 8/26/2010 12:29:51 AM   
Mobeer


Posts: 662
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline 		Someone's posted recently about the idea of linking Pacific War and Carrier Strike, to resolve the battles occurring in the former in the latter. This never (properly) came to pass, but it was an interesting idea. The biggest conceptual problem I think would have been the opportunity for a player talented in one game to dominate the other.

(in reply to Widell)
Post #: 28
RE: my idea - 8/26/2010 4:11:12 PM   
Widell


Posts: 913
Joined: 4/27/2005
From: Trollhättan, Sweden
Status: offline 		There was also a project, albeit it was supposedly intended to be run by a "Game Master" (much like the good old Dungeon Master I guess) that prepared for the players. If I remember correctly, the high level game was done using TOAW (I or II at that time) and the lower level air and sea combat was done with Harpoon. Can't remember what they intended to use for ground combat. I don't think they got very far with the workload involved in manually linking all this stuff etc, but the idea was interesting.

The idea of having an actual computer system that would be AT/TOAW for the grand scale ground operations, but with leaders of course, HoI style production and research, WitP for the fleets, Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich for Air Ops, and then it zooms into Harpoon and Battle for the Bulge to resolve the actual combat is great, and a grognards perverse dream! If it would actually be possible / enjoyable to play is another question.

I guess WWII Online in some respect addressed this with their High Command guiding the lower level operations in a sense, but compared to what we are talking about here, that was more of a beer and pretzel approach.

(in reply to Mobeer)
Post #: 29
RE: my idea - 8/26/2010 11:21:29 PM   
TonyE


Posts: 1551
Joined: 5/23/2006
From: MN, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Widell

There was also a project, albeit it was supposedly intended to be run by a "Game Master" (much like the good old Dungeon Master I guess) that prepared for the players.


You might be thinking of the Global Thunder MBX. See one list of MBX/CPX past and present at http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?showtopic=8774


_____________________________

Sincerely,
Tony Eischens
Harpoon (HC, HCE, HUCE, Classic) programmer
HarpGamer.com Co-Owner

(in reply to Widell)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> my idea Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672