RE: One Weird Battle

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: One Weird Battle

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: One Weird Battle

Page: << < prev 27 28 [29] 30 31 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/15/2010 2:51:00 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/21/42 and 8/22/42

Some small but important developments:

The Odyssey of 20th Indian Division: This is the Indian division that was stranded in south India during the Japanese blitzkrieg advance. I couldn't extract a cadre by air because I didn't have the PP to transfer the unit to an unrestricted command. I tried my best to get the unit out through a variety of channels, but Brad adroitly stopped each effort, then pummeled the division into near oblivion. Finally, the division retreated into a small, interior base still controlled by the Allies. The unit is down to zilch, so I paid the PP to transfer, and now I'll try to extract a cadre by air, using transports in Hyderabad and Bangalore, both of which Brad has left in Allied hands (I assume he doesn't want to have to garrison these bases). If I suceed in getting a cadre to Bombay or further north, a small but important victory will have taken place.

India Reinforcements: One of three TFs carrying 27th Division has exited the Abadan channel and will arrive at Karachi tonight, with a second set to exit tomorrow. SigInt reports "call sign of DD Suzukazi at 26/12, out in the Arabian Sea about 800 miles from Karachi. I decided to go ahead and allow the first TF to proceed to Karachi to unload. I wanted to recall the second to Abadan, but all orders buttons are grayed out (this sometimes happens to TFs in the channels, especially when they've already been issued recall orders while previously in the channel). I'll have to hold my breath tomorrow, hoping that neither a combat TF nor the KB interdict this convoy.

India in the Air: Brad stood down his airforce - an unusual occurrence - after taking a bit of a rap on the nose. He has big airfields and hundreds of aircraft in the area, but he has not been using them in a big way. I can only conclude that supply must be an major issue for him.

India on the Ground: The situation north of Bombay remains unclear. I'm not sure yet whether Brad is setting up a defensive/blocking position, or preparing to press north to test Allied defenses in the Surat/Indore/Cawnpore area.

SoPac: Two more Lightning recon squadrons have arrived. I will ramp up reconnaissance activity. In addition to the regular New Caledonia/New Hebrides flights, the Allies will include Vaitupu and Norfolk Island.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 841

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 2:37:05 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/23/42

Brad must be busy at work, because turns have declined steadily over the past two weeks to the point where they are very irregular now. With so much at stake it's hard to be patient...

India Reinforcements: Most of 27th Division (286 AV) landed at Karachi yesterday. This is a big relief and boost to morale.

20th Indian Div. Odyssey: Two cadres were air-evacced to Hyderabad and Bangalore from the hopeless position near the tip of India. It now appears very likely that the Allies will be able to rebuild this division, whereas all hope had been lost just a few days ago.

India in the Air: Japan renewed strikes against Bombay, but came out on the short end. Most days, two small and weary P-38 squadrons are the only fighters flying CAP. They acquit themselves well, but can only do so much against scores or even hundreds of aircraft.

India on the Ground: The picture north of Bombay remains unclear - not sure whether Brad is advancing or erecting a perimeter around Bombay.

India at Sea: No ship sightings in the Arabian Sea.

India Strategic: Japan's airfield at Calicut, on the southwest coast of India, just went to level seven. This doesn't do much for Brad's point total, and it's too distant to help him with the Bombay siege. The only reason to build Calicut is to guard against Allied amphibious operations. It is hard for me to believe that Brad could envisions a long, massive campaign in India. He really needs to go for the jugular or get his troops out.

SoPac: Recon indicates Noumea very lightly held (one unit less than 2k strong), Efate lightly held; Vaitupu vacant. A probe of Norfolk Island is scheduled for tomorrow. It looks like Brad has pulled troops out of this forward region, inviting Allied attack. Since this area is so far forward, it makes sense to entice the Allies to focus time and troops so far forward of the Japanese MLR. But Noumea is worth 700 VP, so from that standpoint Brad has to hold it. The Allies don't mind targeting "easy pickings" in this region, but SoPac will never be a major vector of attack. I'm chewing over all these things at the moment.

Sumatra: Padang, which is guarded by 65th Brigade, just went to level three airfield.

SigInt: 71st Division prepping for Sydney; 28th prepping for Karachi. I think these must be Manchurian units, but I'll double-check later today.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 11/16/2010 2:44:56 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 842

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 2:55:15 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

Canoerebel,

Something I've been wondering about with your evacuation of so many eviscerated fragments: how long will it take for you to piece together a functional combat unit with your scant Indian or British replacement schedule? It's nice to get the parent units out of harms way, but how will you prioritize LCU replacements into your system moving forward? I assume that you'll have to do some rationing of your reserves / replacements?

Also, I'm curious why you believe that he needs to 'go for the jugular or get his troops out'? Are you in a position to forcibly expel Brad's forces from his current hold in India? If not, unless there's another immediate counterinvasion that you're mounting (that Brad will identify as a credible threat), why should he evacuate? You may have saved Karachi, but there's a long, long, long ways between a last-ditch defensive stand in Karachi and Allied reclamation of the subcontinent before auto-victory...

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 843

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 3:45:21 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Chickenboy, how was your trip to Thailand? (If you've already discussed this, I missed it). As for your two questions:

1. One British division was wrecked in the defense of Ceylon. I don't expect it to recover until late 1943 or later. But the cadres of the Indian units are important for two reasons: (a) If Brad does cross the "Line of Death" triggering reinforcements, I think the Allies get a bunch of troops and supply convoys that will help fill out cadres; (b) Sometime in 1943 the Indian units begin to grow much stronger, so I expect the cadres to flesh out at that time. To have lost an entire division - in this case 20th Indian - would have left me without the means to "flesh out" what will eventually become a powerful unit.

2. I believe it is a fundamental mistake for Japan to commit to a long defensive war in India for three reasons: (a) it allows the Allies to employ LBA to maximum effect as the calendar flips into 1943, (b) India makes a great buffer for Japan in 1942, but eventually it's largely irrelevant to Japan - what good is it to have 15 divisions in India if, in the meantime, the Allies are free to rampage across NoPac or CenPac or SWPac? (3) India is a very promising auto-victory route for Japan, so go for it. Once auto-victory is off the table, though, Japan needs to extract its troops so they can help defend Japan's heart and guts (Home Islands, DEI, etc.).

In our game, auto-victory is still on the table if Japan remains on the offensive. So Brad needs to press forward. If he doesn't, or if he can't, he needs to begin an orderly withdrawal of his troops so that they aren't stuck in no-man's-land fighting an unfavorable war of attrition while the real war is being waged in Sumatra or Java, or Saipan or the Kuriles.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 11/16/2010 3:46:21 PM >

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 844

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 7:07:27 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

CR,

Thanks for your answers. I agree with you philosophically. From a practical perspective, however, he will only be hoisted on his own petard if you make him pay elsewhere. Rampaging across NoPac, CenPac or SWPac is as rampaging does. He's only strung out insofar as you can take advantage of it elsewhere. Not can-I should say DO.

Anyways, Thailand was OK. I was there working, so intentionally avoiding too much of the touristy stuff. I did get a day to see the Bangkok zoo (Binturongs galore! Fish Therapy!

) and the Grand Palace. The latter with most impressive architecture and ornate decor. Oh-if you want Buddhas-they've got 'em. Cheap food and transport too.

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 845

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 7:28:00 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

That's the point. The longer Japan is tied down in India, the better the chances for the Allies to strike in a meaningful way elsewhere.

In Scenario 2, it is difficult for the Allies to accomplish anything more than raids in 1942* - at least through summer and maybe autumn. Anything more ambitious is likely to get isolated and detroyed.** But later in '42 and especially into '43, the Allies do have the means to take and hold serious real estate.*** That's why I think Brad is playing with fire if he leaves most of his troops in India to wage a war that isn't vital to the Empire's longevity.****

* There are exceptions, of course.
** There are exceptions, of course.
*** There are exceptions, of course.
**** It is vital to auto-victory, which is still in play, so at the moment I think he needs to do everything he can to crush the
Allies in India.

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 846

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 8:37:44 PM

Cribtop

Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline

You have a great opportunity to use a quick descent on high point Noumea if he is flirting with auto-victory in India near the end of the year; provided you have the troops and ships prepped and in position to do it (and assuming KB is known to be elsewhere).

< Message edited by Cribtop -- 11/16/2010 8:39:50 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 847

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 8:50:41 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I'm prepping three Kiwi brigades, and transports are on the way from Capetown via Balboa.

This is such an obvious move that I fear a trap. Nevertheless, with good recon giving an "all clear," it might be worth risking a move on Noumea just after the Allies invade Marcus and Wake.

(in reply to Cribtop)

Post #: 848

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/16/2010 11:44:25 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

This is such an obvious move that I fear a trap. Nevertheless, with good recon giving an "all clear," it might be worth risking a move on Noumea just after the Allies invade Marcus and Wake.

I like it. Keep trimming the edges. Take what he will give you, long as you know where the KB is.

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 849

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 2:59:07 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/24/42

Odyssey of the 20th Indian Division: The Allies did manage to extract a cadre - actually two cadres - of this isolated division. The remainder of the beleaugered division will probably be destroyed shortly.

Hyderabad: For months, Brad had declined to take this vacant base. I had pulled out during the retreat from southern India, but he didn't want to take it due to the garrison requirement. Weeks ago, he asked me about it since he knew it was a VP drain for me because it wasn't garrisoned, but I told him that was my problem. However, he changed his mind, in all probability because an Indian unit arrived there (it was a way-station for the 20th Division evacuation). Thus, the evacuation of the cadres paid an unexpected but helpful little dividend.

India in the Air: The Allies scored a 2:1 victory (28 to 14) today - mainly because B-17s from Ahmadebad destroyed 18 aircraft on the ground at Goa.

India at Sea: A large TF transporting crated aircraft will cross the "Socatra Straits" over the next two or three turns. This is a "hold-your-breath" moment.

NoPac: The Allies just dropped off a Canadian brigade at Adak. Things are quiet here, but soon I will move a bunch of ships this way to give at least some appearance that something might be happening.

CenPac: Troops are roughly 15% prepped for Marcus and Wake, meaning the Allies should be able to proceed on schedule (October). All troops except one unit are in Hawaii or aboard ship heading that way. The only exception is a CD unit down at Samoa.

SoPac: Recon shows that Horn Island is surprisingly heavily garrisoned (Brad doesn't want to leave open that door to the eastern DEI) and Norfolk Island has a garrison. I will develop more information about Norfolk over the next few days, as I'd like to first invade there as soon as possible (some Aussie and Kiwi troops are prepping, but I don't know if I have enough).

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 850

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 3:26:22 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Placeholder (to keep track of IJA divisions in India):

As of 8/24/42, the whereabouts of 15 divisions are known, plus three suspected:

Bombay: 12th, 38th, 45th, 5th
North of Bombay/Poona: Imperial Guards, 6th Guards, 4th Guards, Guards Tanks, 1st
Benares and vicinity: 18th, 4th, 54th:
NE India/Burma: 33rd
South: 10th, 52nd
Previously known to be in India, but current whereabouts unknown: 2nd, 18th, 21st
Prepping for Karachi, whereabouts unknown: 28th

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 11/17/2010 3:45:15 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 851

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 4:03:32 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

India in the Air: The Allies scored a 2:1 victory (28 to 14) today - mainly because B-17s from Ahmadebad destroyed 18 aircraft on the ground at Goa.

What altitude are the B-17's bombing from? Any CAP harassment? Are they going in escorted and have you taken many losses?
thanks

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 852

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 4:05:27 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I vary B-17 height from 10k to 20k. They fly unescorted. Brad has employed Nicks against them (and some Zeroes) with some success. Overall, the Forts haven't been flying in big enough numbers to register a major impact or to take large losses.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 853

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 5:58:12 PM

vettim89

Posts: 3615
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Toledo, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Placeholder (to keep track of IJA divisions in India):

As of 8/24/42, the whereabouts of 15 divisions are known, plus three suspected:

Bombay: 12th, 38th, 45th, 5th
North of Bombay/Poona: Imperial Guards, 6th Guards, 4th Guards, Guards Tanks, 1st
Benares and vicinity: 18th, 4th, 54th:
NE India/Burma: 33rd
South: 10th, 52nd
Previously known to be in India, but current whereabouts unknown: 2nd, 18th, 21st
Prepping for Karachi, whereabouts unknown: 28th

Looking at that list begs a question. Have you considreed moving some serious surface forces to Aden in case Q-Ball tries an Anzio type landing in your rear. I know you don't want to risk your carriers but maybe a good portion of the RN? Especially considering the fact that a lot of it gets withdrawn anyway

_____________________________

"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 854

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 6:17:30 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Yes, I've thought about sending a BB/CA force to Abadan, but haven't yet.

I'm not as worried about an Anzio operation now because there isn't any rear left! There are only three coastal bases north of Bombay where Brad could land: Surat, the port across the bight (name escapes me), and Karachi. I have 550 AV to 750 AV at each of these three bases along with good fortification levels. The Allies also have mobile reserves stationed nearby so that I could heavily reinforce.

Also, Brad has so many divisions on the ground in India that it doesn't leave much for him to work with. He would probably need three divisions to successfully invade Surat or the adjacent base, and more than that to take Karachi.

Two things that worry me more:

1. The KB and/or combat TFs imposing a blockade of Karachi. If that happens, I may well use my carriers and combat ships. (This has been my biggest concern for many months, but for some reason Brad hasn't employed this strategy).
2. Eventually I'm going to want to move an army down the coast road to reopen the supply line to Bombay. If I weaken the Surat garrison, Brad might invade at that point. So I'll have to be careful to keep the base strongly garrisoned.

(in reply to vettim89)

Post #: 855

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 7:45:12 PM

Cribtop

Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline

His failure to blockade Karachi is a mystery to me as well. It makes sense whether he's planning to Cross the Line or not, and with all he's taken in southern India the risk is pretty low for him as friendly bases and LBA are nearby.

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 856

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/17/2010 8:09:06 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Yeah, had Brad employed strong CA/DD forces to periodically raid shipping at Karachi, or had he more regularly positioned the KB five or eight hexes offshore, I'd have had no choice but to commit my carriers to ensure my key reinforcements made it. Now that they have all arrived, the need to use Karachi will become critical only if I begin to run low on supplies, which won't happen for a long time.

Perhaps Brad's thinking went something like this: "I would have to commit my combat ships (or carriers) regularly to have any shot of shutting down traffic to Karachi. The fact that Allied ships can appear and disappear from the wormhole makes the mission even more difficult. The fact that the Allied carriers could suddenly appear and then just as easily withdraw entails signficant risk. And I don't have enough fuel to do this long enough to really stop the flow of men and supplies."

That's pure speculation, but it's the best I can come up with.

I've been occasionally sending unescorted supply xAKs to Karachi knowing that some would be sunk by IJN subs, hoping that this might persuade Brad that his sub blockade is effective. I can't believe this would really deceive him, though.

(in reply to Cribtop)

Post #: 857

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 4:33:54 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/25/42

India at Sea: Brad has been reading my AAR!

After yesterday's discussion here about his strategy around Karachi, a CL/DD force shows up and sinks two KV and three ML on ASW duty. Right now, I only have a handful of CA/CL/DD in the Aden/Abadan area. I'm going to move BB Ramilles, CA Devonshire, two CL, and four DD up there. Meanwhile, I'm thinking about retiring my carriers to Capetown to upgrade additional aircraft squadrons (they won't upgrade at Mombasa, for some reason, even though it's a level five port - or perhaps because it's only level five?).

India in the Air: The Allies came out ahead again, facing mostly Oscars, Nates, and Zeros, with a few Tojo arriving late. I've moved about 150 fighters to Bombay to try for an ambush tomorrow.

India on the Ground: Nothing happening that I can tell. Oddly, though, Brad has backed away from the tired remnants of 20th Indian Division near the southern tip. I suppose he's decided he doesn't want to destroy it only to have it rebuilt elsewhere. The balance of 27th Division (around 160 AV) is still aboard transports - one will exit the Abadan channel in two or three days (assuming I give the all clear). The other will depart Abadan tomorrow.

SoPac: This area looks pretty open, which is a good strategy on Brad's part, and one which I've advocated for Japan in the past: weakly garrison remote, strategically non-vital outposts to try to entice the Allies into campaiging far, far from more vital areas. In this case, though, I want to pick up some of these bases if I can do so on the cheap, but this will never be a major vector of attack. There's no question in my mind that the Allies will choose either Sumatra, Java, the western Pacific Island chains, or NoPac for the main vector or vectors when the time arrives.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 11/18/2010 4:34:25 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 858

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 4:35:48 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel
(they won't upgrade at Mombasa, for some reason, even though it's a level five port - or perhaps because it's only level five?).

Airfield size there is what? Supply>20,000? AirHQ in range?

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 859

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 4:38:51 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Airfield is size five, supplies are 14k, no HQ The supply level explains it. I'll see if I have any loaded xAKs nearby. If so, it would be quicker to unload at Mombasa than to move the carriers back to Capetown. Thanks, Chickenboy.

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 860

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 4:44:35 PM

hkbhsi

Posts: 96
Joined: 4/22/2007
From: Rome, Italy
Status: offline

If you don't have an HQ in range it is not only the supply level which is preventing you from upgrading your planes; you need a level 7 airfield and >20k supply.

Great AAR by the way.

< Message edited by hkbhsi -- 11/18/2010 4:47:29 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 861

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 5:19:00 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

India at Sea: Brad has been reading my AAR! After yesterday's discussion here about his strategy around Karachi, a CL/DD force shows up and sinks two KV and three ML on ASW duty. Right now, I only have a handful of CA/CL/DD in the Aden/Abadan area. I'm going to move BB Ramilles, CA Devonshire, two CL, and four DD up there. Meanwhile, I'm thinking about retiring my carriers to Capetown to upgrade additional aircraft squadrons (they won't upgrade at Mombasa, for some reason, even though it's a level five port - or perhaps because it's only level five?).

Sounds like scouts. If he found stuff he would definitely be back. He will probably be back anyway. He knows he has to time this right for a big payoff. I'd say move some capital ships into the area. Ships is the one area where you can win a battle of attrition. Actually, these raids might be tough for him as he has to have a few task forces. By sinking some of your junk, he has to go back to a base and reload torpedoes each time. Your task forces have a more gun based doctrine and you can reload at Bombay (I assume, not near a game right now). Still, he gets some more DD's in scenerio 2, this is a good gamble for him.

_____________________________

(in reply to hkbhsi)

Post #: 862

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 5:44:33 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Yes, Brad has to commit ships to shut down Karachi (and the wonder is that he didn't do so long before). He'll expect me to counter with a more powerful CA force, so he'll send something bigger next time, I would think. I'm very fortunate that nearly all my reinforcements are already ashore. I don't really want to commit my carriers up that way. I will only do so if a blockade of Karachi becomes a critical threat to India's survival by choking off supplies. Right now, though, I'm good on supplies for a long time.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 863

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/18/2010 6:16:36 PM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I vary B-17 height from 10k to 20k. They fly unescorted. Brad has employed Nicks against them (and some Zeroes) with some success. Overall, the Forts haven't been flying in big enough numbers to register a major impact or to take large losses.

I pretty much have just set them all to bomb at 7,000 feet. Nothing seems to hurt them much and the results at 7k make it worth it.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 864

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 2:37:12 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/26/42

Reading the Tea Leaves: My opponent is making it very difficult for me to figure out what is going on. He orchestrates false, misleading, or confusing SigInt that doesn't fit together in a way that allows me to know exactly what's happening. Some examples:

10th Tanks: For months, I've been getting reports that 6/10th Tanks is aboard xxx Maru heading for Calcutta. This has been going on so long that I'm certain 10th Tank is aboard a bunch of ships steaming in circles in the Bay of Bengal.

The Engineers are Coming!: Weeks ago I reported SigInt that an engineer unit was aboard a Maru bound for the key base across the bight from Surat, India. Nothing ever came of that, so either Brad recalled a real invasion (unlikely) or this was deception (likely).

Dancing Division Part One: Months ago, I received SigInt that 2nd Division, which had been at Diamond Harbor, was aboard a Maru bound for Truk. This suggested that Brad wasn't going to come full bore in India, else why would he weaken his forces? Since that report, I haven't seen hide nor hair of 2nd Divsion. It could be at Truk or aboard an assault TF at Colombo.

Dancing Divisions Part Two: Yesterday, I noted that the whereabouts of three divisions previously known to be in India was unknown - 2nd, 18th, and 21st. Today, I received SigInt that 21st Division is prepping for Suva. As with 2nd Division, it makes no sense for Brad to strip this unit from India if he really wants to defeat the Allies there. At the same time, it really doesn't make sense to send it to Suva - in the first place, he's already weakened his SoPac garrisons like Noumea. In the second, if he's hunting VP, it would be alot easier to keep 21st in India to go after Bombay or Ambadebad or Delhi.

On the Other Hand: Brad doesn't show any signs of backing down in India. He has Bombay under siege and a stout army to the north. He's actively building up airfields throughout India, even in places remote from Bombay.

Conclusion: I can use good evidence to support reasonable inferences ranging from Brad is coming for India full bore to Brad is going to stand down in India and try to glean easier pickings elsewhere.

Default Position: Since India poses the gravest threat, the Allies have played like that was the chief target since early March. IE, even during periods of maximum uncertainty, I've still sent everything possible to India. As for the Pacific bases, all of them are garrisoned adequately now. If Brad wants them, he'll have to come in a serious way and he'll take some losses.

As for August 26, 1942: The big Allied fighter ambush over Bombay didn't turn out very well. The Japanese scored a 2:1 victory. No sign of IJN raiders around Karachi. The second TF carrying 27th Division exits the Abadan channel tomorrow.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 11/19/2010 2:47:23 PM >

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 865

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 8:16:58 PM

Capt. Harlock

Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline

quote:

Your task forces have a more gun based doctrine and you can reload at Bombay (I assume, not near a game right now).

Bombay is well within range of Japanese airpower. There are Allied fighters there, but Q-Ball appears to be well able to blast through them when he wants to.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 866

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 8:53:50 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

Bombay is a level six port; Karachi is level seven. The latter isn't within range of IJ LBA, so it is open for business unless and until the IJN shuts it down.

I hope I don't ever have to try to force supply into Bombay by sea. I'm probably better served doing so via land campaign.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)

Post #: 867

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 10:20:58 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

8/27/42 and 8/28/42

Reinforcements: Important turn for reinforcements. First, a large TF carrying aircraft finished the risky transit of the "Socatra Straight." Brad had a surface combat TF in the area, so I was taking a chance here. Second, the second of three TF carrying elements of 27th Division safely arrived at Karachi. 384 AV are now ashore, with the balance to arrive in about four days. This division is late arriving - my estimates three months ago were an ETA of late July. However, I also thought it highly likely that I would have to use my carriers as escorts. The fact that I didn't, and that the whereabouts of the CVs remain a closely guarded secret, is a plus.

Sub Wars: I-162 near Karachi picked off two supply xAK over these two days.

India in the Air: Allied fighters performed creditably over Bombay, with IJ losses over these days slightly higher than Allied.

India on the Ground: I get the feeling that Brad may be about ready to move forward in India - perhaps west from Allahabad/Benares and north from Poona/Bombay. But that's a vague feeling that might not amount to anything. The Allies only have 275 AV at Cawnpore, which is my eastern flank, so I might end up sending reinforcements that way. I don't want to reveal the Marine units and 27th Division until a propitious moment, but I'm not sure I'll have that luxury.

The Pacific: Allied troops are prepping for Norfolk Island, Noumea, Wake, Marcus, and even Iwo Jima. I've sent some supply TFs to NoPac, where they will steam back and forth to the forward Aleutians in a Nathan Bedford Forest ruse to create the appearance of a threat. The October date for the invasions of Wake and Marcus, to be preceded by the invasion of Norfolk, and to be followed by the invasion of Noumea, remain on schedule.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 868

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 10:21:26 PM

Chickenboy

Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

8/26/42

Reading the Tea Leaves: My opponent is making it very difficult for me to figure out what is going on. He orchestrates false, misleading, or confusing SigInt that doesn't fit together in a way that allows me to know exactly what's happening. Some examples:

10th Tanks: For months, I've been getting reports that 6/10th Tanks is aboard xxx Maru heading for Calcutta. This has been going on so long that I'm certain 10th Tank is aboard a bunch of ships steaming in circles in the Bay of Bengal.

The Engineers are Coming!: Weeks ago I reported SigInt that an engineer unit was aboard a Maru bound for the key base across the bight from Surat, India. Nothing ever came of that, so either Brad recalled a real invasion (unlikely) or this was deception (likely).

Dancing Division Part One: Months ago, I received SigInt that 2nd Division, which had been at Diamond Harbor, was aboard a Maru bound for Truk. This suggested that Brad wasn't going to come full bore in India, else why would he weaken his forces? Since that report, I haven't seen hide nor hair of 2nd Divsion. It could be at Truk or aboard an assault TF at Colombo.

Dancing Divisions Part Two: Yesterday, I noted that the whereabouts of three divisions previously known to be in India was unknown - 2nd, 18th, and 21st. Today, I received SigInt that 21st Division is prepping for Suva. As with 2nd Division, it makes no sense for Brad to strip this unit from India if he really wants to defeat the Allies there. At the same time, it really doesn't make sense to send it to Suva - in the first place, he's already weakened his SoPac garrisons like Noumea. In the second, if he's hunting VP, it would be alot easier to keep 21st in India to go after Bombay or Ambadebad or Delhi.

On the Other Hand: Brad doesn't show any signs of backing down in India. He has Bombay under siege and a stout army to the north. He's actively building up airfields throughout India, even in places remote from Bombay.

Conclusion: I can use good evidence to support reasonable inferences ranging from Brad is coming for India full bore to Brad is going to stand down in India and try to glean easier pickings elsewhere.

Default Position: Since India poses the gravest threat, the Allies have played like that was the chief target since early March. IE, even during periods of maximum uncertainty, I've still sent everything possible to India. As for the Pacific bases, all of them are garrisoned adequately now. If Brad wants them, he'll have to come in a serious way and he'll take some losses.

As for August 26, 1942: The big Allied fighter ambush over Bombay didn't turn out very well. The Japanese scored a 2:1 victory. No sign of IJN raiders around Karachi. The second TF carrying 27th Division exits the Abadan channel tomorrow.

It sounds like you're indecisive. Or maybe not. I think.

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 869

RE: One Weird Battle - 11/19/2010 10:23:46 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I know what you mean. I truly don't know what Brad's intentions are, which means I sound indecisive. Yet I've played all along as though he was coming full bore for India, which means I've been decisive in my actions. So I've been indecisevly decisive.

(in reply to Chickenboy)

Post #: 870