Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/18/2010 4:50:09 PM   
BrucePowers


Posts: 12094
Joined: 7/3/2004
Status: offline 		Hi Mike!

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 931
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/20/2010 2:20:29 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		12 May 42

Ted's back in town and we're back in business!

Reinforcements: DD Naganami (Yugumo class), Std-C xAK, SC Ch-30. The DD & SC allow me to accelerate the Shimikaze.

Quiet turn today, but a couple of significant events happened.

Palembang

Palembang's airfield reached level 5, which is a milestone. Since the port is already maxed at 4, there no longer is a max for fuel or supply in that hex. To this point, I've had the refinery shut off and have been using everything that will float to suck fuel out of the hex because the fuel was maxed when I liberated it. I can now turn the refinery back on and set up my convoys properly.

SE Fleet

Since Ted has offered up the 8 Marine Regiment on a silver platter on Ndeni, I am going to use everything available to take it from him. I currently have Ndeni isolated and have an SNLF and 3 Naval Guard units there, which is not enough to take it. The Gds Bde is enroute (still several days out). I have the 90 Regiment garrisoning Pt. Moresby and 3 more Naval Guard units that have recently arrived at Truk that have begun prepping for Ndeni. They'll all head there too. That should be the equilalent of 1.5-2 divisions vs. the Marine regiment, who's AV is around 83 right now.

KB 1 (Hiryu, Soryu, Shokaku and Zuikaku) is hovering to the north unseen in case Ted tries to reinforce or evacuate. I also have the 4 Furutakas that are bombarding.

I had this report appear for the 3rd time this month:

Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Vava'u (141,165).

I had diverted a Glen carrying sub to check the place out but it ran low on fuel and returned to base. I've got another headed in that direction and have a mine carrying sub sending some presents there. Those are the last of my Mk 88 mines for awhile.

Central Pacific

KB 2 (Akagi & Kaga) is headed north from Kwajalein to visit Adak.

Burma

Ted bombed Magwe's oil field again, causing no additional damage. The field is still at 63 of 300.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BrucePowers)
Post #: 932
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/20/2010 7:49:22 PM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

I had this report appear for the 3rd time this month:

Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Vava'u (141,165).



Mike, something I learned fairly recently is when you see messages like this, check out the base on the map and you should get more than normal "mouse over" intel.

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 933
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/20/2010 8:57:20 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Hmm, all I can see is that there is something in port.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 934
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/20/2010 9:16:22 PM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline 		I guess it's not perfect.  

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 935
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/20/2010 10:55:48 PM   
Djordje

 

Posts: 537
Joined: 9/12/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Hmm, all I can see is that there is something in port.


Which is more than we usually can see, at least you have confirmation that there are some ships there.
Also sometimes you can see air icon as well, showing at least some air groups there.

Can be really useful if it is in range of your naval bombers and unprotected by air.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 936
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/21/2010 1:45:07 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		You guys are right. It can be useful. Unfortunately, not this time.....

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Djordje)
Post #: 937
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/21/2010 1:58:07 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		13 May 42

Reinforcements: Sasebo 5 SNLF (SE Fleet), 14 Naval Guard (SW Fleet)

Sub War

Two hexes SW of Kobe, a Dutch sub sank an xAK. Really stupid on my part. It was the Std-C I got yesterday as a reinforcement. I was sending it to Maizuru to get converted into a TK next month. Brand new ship and the stupid part was that it was unescorted.

I did get a bit of retaliation though. The I-175 sank a puny xAKL 3 hexes south of Brisbane.

Burma

Magwe was hit again and this time the oil fields were damaged further. Now they are down to 57 of 300.

The only other incident to note was that I took Lautern. The two Allied units there (AA and BF) both surrendered.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 938
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/22/2010 1:48:55 AM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Something interesting happened that I can't explain.  There are a bunch of air units belonging to restricted commands in the Home Islands.  For the most part they train pilots.  I had 2 IJN air units spontaneously change from a restricted command to independent!  No clue how it happened.  Does anyone have any idea?


The Gods of War Love You!

Mac


_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 939
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/22/2010 7:06:46 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		We'll see how long that lasts, Mac!

14 May 42

Reinforcements:  DD Akizuki, CMc Ma2, SC Ch-28, SC CHa-34

Very quiet turn.  Ted bombed Magwe again, reducing the oil field there to about 45. 

I-1 caught a TK off the coast of San Franscisco and put a torpedo into her.  She probably won't sink but she was carrying fuel.

I took the dot hex Warazup in Burma.  That leaves one dot hex remaining in Allied hands along the NW border.  Once I take that, I'll own all of Burma and will finish setting up my defenses.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 940
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/22/2010 8:16:25 PM   
BigBadWolf


Posts: 584
Joined: 8/8/2007
From: Serbia
Status: offline 		What are your plans for Burma, Mike? How many divisions and sentais will you have up there?

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 941
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/22/2010 8:34:43 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		I was waiting for someone to ask about Burma.  That place is going to be the place where the IJA/IJAAF gets sucked dry.

Right now I have 3 divisions and ~4-5 Tank regiments.  Two more infantry divisions will head that way and the major tank reinforcements that come in about 1.5 months will be bought out and sent there as well.  I'll form both Tank Divisions there.

Air power.  About 75% of 3 Air Division will be there.  The rest of that Air Division will be around Palembang, Java and Borneo.  Most of the fighters will be in Burma along with ~50% of the recon and some bombers.  The stuff in the rear will be mainly recon, bombers acting as ASW and a few fighters for Palembang and Java.

IJNAF:  22 Air Flotilla, which currrently has 3 Zero daitai and a bunch of Bettys/Nells as well as a few Mavis.  They'll be primarily in Pt. Blair with 1 Zero daitai in Burma.  The bombers will rotate out as needed with some in Northern Summatra providing additional naval attack/ASW/recon.

I'll provide more detailed info once it's set (which will be soon).

Right now I'm relenquishing the air to the Allies.  Once I move in there, it'll be enmasse.  At least 1 daitai of Zeros and 3 sentai of Oscars (~150 fighters) all concentrated in a small area around Magwe along with recon.  The bombers will be farther to the rear.  There won't be many of them.  Ted has a lot of fighters at Akyab.  I'll send another naval bombardment there as well as massed fighter sweeps to knock it back a bit.  If I can get air superiority over Akyab, then I'll send the bombers in to pummel the airfield.  If I can push Ted's fighters out of Akyab, I'll be in good shape in Burma for awhile.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to BigBadWolf)
Post #: 942
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/25/2010 2:57:28 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		15 May 42

Well, I've been spoiled so far this game. My losses have been extremely light. My total warship losses so far have been one Fubuki class DD. I just lost a sub. *Sigh* I should have known better. I had a few off the US west coast and Ted had been chasing me around. He finally got one, the I-3 about 4 hexes west of San Francisco.

To counteract my loss, I just got the I-11 as a reinforcement. She's destined for the Indian Ocean area.

I landed the final third of the 21 Div at Oroquieta, Mindinao. They'll take that base and push eastward. The rest of that division is heading north from Davao. Mindinao's days are numbered.

Ted attempted to bomb Magwe's oil again unsuccessfully.

KB2 is still headed north to hit the Adak area. They're about 3 days out.

Down at Ndeni, my reinforcements are closing in on the base. There is 1 SNLF, 3 Naval Guard units and a construction unit there with the Gds Brigade, 90 Infantry Regiment and several more Naval Guard units within a couple of days of landing. Three Furutakas (the 4th is repairing sys damage) will be in the hex covering the landing with KB hovering north of the island.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 943
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:10:20 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		16 May 42

Sub War

The I-17 found an xAK east of Hawaii and put a torpedo into her. That's a very fertile ground for my subs. She won't sink, but she's definitely not happy.

Burma

Once again, Ted attempted to bomb the oil fields at Magwe but didn't hurt them further. They remain at 44 of 300.

Australia

I have a CA TF at Broome, in case Ted tries to mess around there. Instead, he sent 18 Albacores to stir things up. The Oscar chutai stationed there shot down 5 Albacores for no loss but the remaining Albacores put a 500 lb bomb into the Mogami. No serious damage resulted but I'm still sending her to Soerabaja to repair the damage.

Some maps will follow.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 944
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:23:29 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Burma.

The 22 Air Flotilla HQ is at Pt. Blair, along with most of the attached units .

The 3 Air Division HQ is moving to Toungoo (red arrow). Once the HQ arrives, it will be able to support all of the airfields within the red circle. Then I'll move in lots of fighters and start to eat up the RAF and AVG. Here's what I have available for Burma:

22 Air Flotilla
81 A6M2
72 G3M2
36 G4M1
3 Mavis

3 Air Division
115 Ki-43-Ic
85 Ki-21-IIa
31 Ki-48-Ib
27 Ki-30
12 Ki-32
24 Ki-51
29 Ki-46-II






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 11/26/2010 1:40:52 AM >

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 945
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:25:58 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Australia.

The mob is moving toward Katherine then north to Darwin. A small force will move south toward Daly Waters. If it's unprotected, I'll take it. If not, it'll have to wait.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 946
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:27:14 AM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline 		He should not waste too much more on Magwe. It seems like the more damage there then returns start to diminish.

I am much further along in my game but it just blew me away that my oppoent could land a massive army at Wyndham (level one port) and then support it from there as it marched 400 miles over what was in real life a dirt track and incredibly hostile terrain to flank Darwin. Who put that "cheese" in the game. Japanese army was critically short, of trucks and running supply and tanks over that road would have consumed any vehicles.

The designers have made it very easy for Japan to take North Oz but made it impossible for the Allies to retake it overland due to very restrictive supply flow. With a commitment of force, it can easily be held until late into 1943 cutting off a major route to the DEI for the Allied counter offensive.

< Message edited by crsutton -- 11/26/2010 1:34:35 AM >

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 947
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:29:52 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Ndeni.

KB1 (4 CVs) is in the pink circle. The surface TF is 3 Furutakas heading south to support. Just to the NE is the Gds Bde invasion force, 2 days out. Just north of the northern map edge is another invasion TF (also 2 days out) with 3 Naval Gd units and the Replenishment TF. Off map to the west is the 90 Infantry regiment (3 days out) coming from Pt. Moresby.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 948
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:31:12 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

He should not waste too much more on Magwe. It seems like the more damage there then returns start to diminish.


I hope he continues for another couple of turns. I can ambush him with >100 fighters to his ~30.


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 949
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:33:22 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Strategic Map.

The TF in the red circle is KB2 (2 CV). It's headed to Adak to pay a visit. It's about 2 days out.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 950
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:43:36 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton

He should not waste too much more on Magwe. It seems like the more damage there then returns start to diminish.

I am much further along in my game but it just blew me away that my oppoent could land a massive army at Wyndham (level one port) and then support it from there as it marched 400 miles over what was in real life a dirt track and incredibly hostile terrain to flank Darwin. Who put that "cheese" in the game. Japanese army was critically short, of trucks and running supply and tanks over that road would have consumed any vehicles.

The designers have made it very easy for Japan to take North Oz but made it impossible for the Allies to retake it overland due to very restrictive supply flow. With a commitment of force, it can easily be held until late into 1943 cutting off a major route to the DEI for the Allied counter offensive.


Yeah, you have to keep telling yourself that it's just a game, not a simulation in a lot of respects. I invaded Australia because Ted would have bombed the southern SRA into the stone age by the end of 1942, as he was doing in our WitP game before this. I had to take it.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 951
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 1:56:14 AM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline 		Go take Port Hedland and Exmouth too.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 952
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/26/2010 2:01:53 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Yup, that's the plan. Too many places to visit and too few troops.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 953
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 12:18:46 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		17 May 42

Quiet turn. The only real thing to note was that Ted once again attempted to bomb the oil fields at Magwe and was unsuccessful.

KB2 is moving toward it's little visit of Adak.

The reinforcements for the Ndeni invasion are still headed there.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 954
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 12:26:24 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		18 May 42

I landed on Christmas Island (the one near Java) finally. It's undefended. I'll take it tomorrow.

An Allied sub (Silversides possibly) attempted to sail into the port of Hakodate and kissed a mine. She showed up as sunk but didn't increase the number of Allied ships sunk. I don't think she actually sank.

Australia

11 surviving Albacores visited Broome again. I reinforced the Oscar chutai with another Oscar chutai. Five Albacores were shot down before arriving over the Japanese CAs there. Two were shot down by flak, the surviving bombers missed, and 3 of the 4 remaining Albacores were shot down on the way home. Banzai!

Burma

Teds bombers were successful against Magwe's oil fields today, reducing them from 44 to 35 of 300. I'm moving in 2 Oscar Sentai and 1 Zero Daitai to LRCAP Magwe tomorrow and try to knock down some Allied planes. We'll see how that works out.

Ndeni

The Guards Brigade and 3 Naval Guard units began landing today. It'll take a couple of turns before they're ready to attack.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 955
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 12:34:30 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		19 May 42

Burma

Allied fighters flew over Magwe again, but this time my planes opposed them. The results weren't as good as I had hoped but it wasn't too bad. I lost 9 Oscars and 2 Zeros in the air (and another half dozen or so operational) to 6 Hurricanes and 2 Warhawks. Overall, I lost 4 pilots killed and 12 wounded. Question: How many wounded pilots have you guys seen come back? I've seen exactly 1 in this game.

Adak

KB2 arrives tomorrow and has not been spotted.

Yamato arrives tomorrow! That'll allow me to accelerate 3-4 CVs!

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 956
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 12:50:58 AM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Yamato arrives tomorrow! That'll allow me to accelerate 3-4 CVs!


Huh? Yamato is 233 durability/points. A Unryu is 63 durability, 189 points accelerated (assuming it is already in the build queue). If they aren't building yet, then you are almost 2 years away from getting them unless you expend the 3xdurability points. By March of 1944 the US will get 8 Essex carriers plus numerous CVLs and CVEs.

I would definitely start thinking about stopping some subs and expanding some shipyards.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 957
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 2:09:20 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Not sure what I want to do yet, cap. I know, I need to make a decision.

By the way, we got hit by the data bug. We had to go back and run the 17 May turn. It was the same. I redid the 18 May turn, so we're back a couple of days. Ted and I are both out of town this week so no turns until Friday or Saturday. Damn work.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 958
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 2:17:32 AM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Not sure what I want to do yet, cap. I know, I need to make a decision.



Well, as you know, I made that decision on day one.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 959
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 11/29/2010 4:00:44 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Yes you did, and very successfully. I'm still of the mindset of accelerating ships at the number of turns left before construction ends equal to between 10x and 30x duability. That allows me to accelerate the maximum number of ships. I change them from accelerate to normal when I have the ability to halt them (10x durability). Yeah, I know all the arguments against my position and for your position. At some point (probably after Musashi is finished), I'll start to accelerate within 10x durability. Many will say it's too late. I am betting that it won't be too late for my style of play. I'm a conservative player (if you hadn't noticed).

Your philosophy is fewer ships as fast as possible (CVs). Mine is more ships accelerated somewhat but not as fast as yours (CVs and DDs). I'm of the opinion that DDs are just as important as CVs. In different ways obviously, but very important in their own way.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 960
Page:   <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  30 31 [32] 33 34   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.141