Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 10/29/2010 3:58:52 AM   
noguaranteeofsanity


Posts: 257
Joined: 11/24/2009
From: Sydney, Australia
Status: offline 		Its not a bug, its the carrier capacity. In my game Yorktown and the other carriers had just engaged some IJN escort carriers and lost some SBDs, which left the room for VF-71 to expand to its full complement of 36 aircraft. But my SBD squadrons are now understrength and won't take any further replacements. Seems the squadrons on a carrier will only take replacements, up until roughly 110 percent of its capacity, or 81-82 aircraft for the Wasp.

30 fighters + 36 dive bombers + 15 torpedo bombers = 81 aircraft, or in my case, 36 fighters + 31 dive bombers + 15 torpedo bombers = 82 aircraft.

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 301
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 10/29/2010 2:59:12 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline 		Babes and BabesLite have both been updated: Babes to v04, BabesLite to v07. Includes enhancements to AAA.

Eff and Acc values tweaked for Device Type = 12 AA Gun, for both land and sea based AA Guns. Eff and Acc values tweaked for land based (ONLY) Device Type = 17 DP Gun. Ship based DP guns untouched because of the data value conflict with Naval Combat mode.

And yes, if you want to use the new AAA values in an ongoing game, I think it's possible to update the savegame with data from Device, Aircraft, ToE, Class; michaelm added the capability. So go shoot down more airplanes.

< Message edited by JWE -- 10/29/2010 3:10:34 PM >

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to noguaranteeofsanity)
Post #: 302
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 10/29/2010 3:25:45 PM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline 		Yay!!!

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 303
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/5/2010 7:40:20 PM   
Local Yokel


Posts: 1494
Joined: 2/4/2007
From: Somerset, U.K.
Status: offline 		Still poking about DaBigBabes backwaters.

At Osaka I found a pair of Type N TL tankers capable of conversion to Tonan Maru-type whale factory ships. This used to be possible in stock and became the subject of a post I made some time ago about what could be done with these ships. As a result I think this particular conversion was taken out of the Scen. 1 database - is its retention in Big Babes inadvertent?

_____________________________




(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 304
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/5/2010 9:15:07 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Local Yokel
Still poking about DaBigBabes backwaters.

At Osaka I found a pair of Type N TL tankers capable of conversion to Tonan Maru-type whale factory ships. This used to be possible in stock and became the subject of a post I made some time ago about what could be done with these ships. As a result I think this particular conversion was taken out of the Scen. 1 database - is its retention in Big Babes inadvertent?

Yes. Recall you mentioned this before, but probably had a brain fart. Will fix. Thanks.

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Local Yokel)
Post #: 305
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/13/2010 10:16:58 AM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline 		Hi

In the scenario exist the japanese 1st, 2nd and 5th Raiding Force. In some sources about the Japanese OOB of the 32nd Army on Okinawa listed the 3rd and 4th Japanese Commando Units. Are these mayby not the 3rd and 4th Raiding Force units?


There are the following Dutch OOB errors.

1. The KNIL Mariener Brigade must be Mariniers Brigade and is not a KNIL unit. The men of this unit came for a part of Dutch volunteers from the whole world with the most from US/Canada/West Indies and the UK. And part from the Netherlands.

2. The 1st KNIL (T) Brigade must be T Brigade and is also not a KNIL unit. It's raised in the Netherland from Dutch Volunteers.

3. I miss Korps Insuline a Dutch para-trained commando unit raised from volunteers from the Princess Irene brigade in 1942 on Ceylon. Raised 16 May 1942 as NSO renamed 01-08-1942 in Korps Insuline in Laksapatiya Colombo. In 1945 the strength is increased from about 1 company to more then 2 companies. From 1946 it's reinforced with the 1st Para Commando company and renamed in the Para-Commando Battle Group.

4. Some KNIL battalions who are raised.
KNIL I - Raised 01-06-1944 "Victoria Camp" Australia - 04-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL II - Raised 08-1945 Balikpapan - 16-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL III - ?
KNIL IV - Raised 09-1945 Singapore - 08-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL V - Raised 02-11-1945 Tjihapitkamp""
KNIL VI - Raised 15-04-1946 Medan



_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 306
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/13/2010 3:16:39 PM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym

Hi

In the scenario exist the japanese 1st, 2nd and 5th Raiding Force. In some sources about the Japanese OOB of the 32nd Army on Okinawa listed the 3rd and 4th Japanese Commando Units. Are these mayby not the 3rd and 4th Raiding Force units?


There are the following Dutch OOB errors.

1. The KNIL Mariener Brigade must be Mariniers Brigade and is not a KNIL unit. The men of this unit came for a part of Dutch volunteers from the whole world with the most from US/Canada/West Indies and the UK. And part from the Netherlands.

2. The 1st KNIL (T) Brigade must be T Brigade and is also not a KNIL unit. It's raised in the Netherland from Dutch Volunteers.

3. I miss Korps Insuline a Dutch para-trained commando unit raised from volunteers from the Princess Irene brigade in 1942 on Ceylon. Raised 16 May 1942 as NSO renamed 01-08-1942 in Korps Insuline in Laksapatiya Colombo. In 1945 the strength is increased from about 1 company to more then 2 companies. From 1946 it's reinforced with the 1st Para Commando company and renamed in the Para-Commando Battle Group.

4. Some KNIL battalions who are raised.
KNIL I - Raised 01-06-1944 "Victoria Camp" Australia - 04-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL II - Raised 08-1945 Balikpapan - 16-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL III - ?
KNIL IV - Raised 09-1945 Singapore - 08-10-1945 Batavia
KNIL V - Raised 02-11-1945 Tjihapitkamp""
KNIL VI - Raised 15-04-1946 Medan




You need to post more often

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 307
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/13/2010 4:00:23 PM   
Mifune


Posts: 787
Joined: 4/28/2005
From: Florida
Status: offline
quote:

You need to post more often
I will second that motion

_____________________________

Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.

(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 308
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/13/2010 4:57:01 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mifune

quote:

You need to post more often
I will second that motion



Jo -

I third that motion!

Mac

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to Mifune)
Post #: 309
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/13/2010 5:35:22 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

You need to post more often


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mifune
quote:

You need to post more often
I will second that motion


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mac Linehan
Jo -

I third that motion!

Mac


Ok. Here is another post.


< Message edited by Jo van der Pluym -- 11/13/2010 5:36:17 PM >

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 310
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 2:02:38 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
1. The KNIL Mariener Brigade must be Mariniers Brigade and is not a KNIL unit. The men of this unit came for a part of Dutch volunteers from the whole world with the most from US/Canada/West Indies and the UK. And part from the Netherlands.


The Mariniers Brigade is raised in the US and where trained bij the USMC and the subunits have also the same TO&E as the USMC. The only difference is that they are Dutch Marines

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
2. The 1st KNIL (T) Brigade must be T Brigade and is also not a KNIL unit. It's raised in the Netherland from Dutch Volunteers.


The T brigade is trained by the British and had also the same TO&E as a British Infantry Brigade. Only the men where Dutch from the Netherlands.

Here some arrival dates of Dutch Brigades in the NEI. They where all raised in the Netherlands with volunteers. And had the British TO&E
V-Brigade 27-01-1946 Malacca - 29-03-1946 Batavia
W-Brigade 15-02-1946 Malacca - 30-03-1946 Batavia
X-Briagde 23-02-1946 Malacca - 29-03-1946 Soerabaja
U-Brigade 01-03-1946 Batavia

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 311
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 2:55:54 PM   
Mifune


Posts: 787
Joined: 4/28/2005
From: Florida
Status: offline 		Thanks and much appreciated.

_____________________________

Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 312
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 5:20:12 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
1. The KNIL Mariener Brigade must be Mariniers Brigade and is not a KNIL unit. The men of this unit came for a part of Dutch volunteers from the whole world with the most from US/Canada/West Indies and the UK. And part from the Netherlands.
>>The Mariniers Brigade is raised in the US and where trained bij the USMC and the subunits have also the same TO&E as the USMC. The only difference is that they are Dutch Marines.
2. The 1st KNIL (T) Brigade must be T Brigade and is also not a KNIL unit. It's raised in the Netherland from Dutch Volunteers.
>>The T brigade is trained by the British and had also the same TO&E as a British Infantry Brigade. Only the men where Dutch from the Netherlands.

Well hi there Jo, you crazy Dutchman. So what's got you verward in uw onderbroek, broer? There's not too many early war Dutch HQs we can assign these folks to, so there's not a lot we can do with them. If you were thinking of just getting rid of "KNIL" in the name, that's an easy thing, but assignment to Nationality and operational HQs depends on what's available in-game. There's some Dutchness on the Babes team, and I know that MO would bust his broekie to make it right. If you have any suggestions, you have only to ask.
quote:

Here some arrival dates of Dutch Brigades in the NEI. They where all raised in the Netherlands with volunteers. And had the British TO&E
V-Brigade 27-01-1946 Malacca - 29-03-1946 Batavia
W-Brigade 15-02-1946 Malacca - 30-03-1946 Batavia
X-Briagde 23-02-1946 Malacca - 29-03-1946 Soerabaja
U-Brigade 01-03-1946 Batavia

1946 is getting real close to our scenario cut-off date. Could be fun for a Downfall time-frame scenario. Will keep in mind.

Dank. J

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 313
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 5:37:29 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

Well hi there Jo, you crazy Dutchman. So what's got you verward in uw onderbroek, broer? There's not too many early war Dutch HQs we can assign these folks to, so there's not a lot we can do with them. If you were thinking of just getting rid of "KNIL" in the name, that's an easy thing, but assignment to Nationality and operational HQs depends on what's available in-game. There's some Dutchness on the Babes team, and I know that MO would bust his broekie to make it right. If you have any suggestions, you have only to ask.

Dank. J


JWE

Ja, ik dacht om voor deze formaties het woord KNIL te verwijderen.

Because the Mariniers are from the Dutch Navy or Koninklijke Marine. The Dutch goverment had the Dutch warships in the war operational attached to the Royal Navy, except the warships in the NEI. Only after the Japanese attack/occupation of the NEI are the remants of the warships also attached to the Royal Navy.

I like only KNIL in the name for the Dutch KNIL unita.

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 314
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 5:55:22 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE
Well hi there Jo, you crazy Dutchman. So what's got you verward in uw onderbroek, broer? There's not too many early war Dutch HQs we can assign these folks to, so there's not a lot we can do with them. If you were thinking of just getting rid of "KNIL" in the name, that's an easy thing, but assignment to Nationality and operational HQs depends on what's available in-game. There's some Dutchness on the Babes team, and I know that MO would bust his broekie to make it right. If you have any suggestions, you have only to ask.

Dank. J

JWE

Ja, ik dacht om voor deze formaties het woord KNIL te verwijderen.

Because the Mariniers are from the Dutch Navy or Koninklijke Marine. The Dutch goverment had the Dutch warships in the war operational attached to the Royal Navy, except the warships in the NEI. Only after the Japanese attack/occupation of the NEI are the remants of the warships also attached to the Royal Navy.

I like only KNIL in the name for the Dutch KNIL unita.

Jo, Ik begrijp. Voor u zal bevestigen.

Dank opnieuw. J

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 315
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 6:02:07 PM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE
Well hi there Jo, you crazy Dutchman. So what's got you verward in uw onderbroek, broer? There's not too many early war Dutch HQs we can assign these folks to, so there's not a lot we can do with them. If you were thinking of just getting rid of "KNIL" in the name, that's an easy thing, but assignment to Nationality and operational HQs depends on what's available in-game. There's some Dutchness on the Babes team, and I know that MO would bust his broekie to make it right. If you have any suggestions, you have only to ask.

Dank. J

JWE

Ja, ik dacht om voor deze formaties het woord KNIL te verwijderen.

Because the Mariniers are from the Dutch Navy or Koninklijke Marine. The Dutch goverment had the Dutch warships in the war operational attached to the Royal Navy, except the warships in the NEI. Only after the Japanese attack/occupation of the NEI are the remants of the warships also attached to the Royal Navy.

I like only KNIL in the name for the Dutch KNIL unita.

Jo, Ik begrijp. Voor u zal bevestigen.

Dank opnieuw. J



Hallo aan jullie beiden. Google Translator is geweldig !

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 316
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 6:34:05 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman


Hallo aan jullie beiden. Google Translator is geweldig !


But not perfect. It's dependent of the languages which you used. Some languages are for about 60% right and others are about 80% right.


_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 317
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 6:57:24 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
But not perfect. It's dependent of the languages which you used. Some languages are for about 60% right and others are about 80% right.

But he tries Jo, he tries. You must give him that. Maybe not perfect, broer, but I see it as eerbiedig. I mean, how many Americans would even think of going to Google Translater just to try and say howdy to a crazy Dutchman in Dutch?



_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 318
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 7:53:39 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
But not perfect. It's dependent of the languages which you used. Some languages are for about 60% right and others are about 80% right.

But he tries Jo, he tries. You must give him that. Maybe not perfect, broer, but I see it as eerbiedig. I mean, how many Americans would even think of going to Google Translater just to try and say howdy to a crazy Dutchman in Dutch?




I must you give right.


_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 319
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/14/2010 11:46:47 PM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman


Hallo aan jullie beiden. Google Translator is geweldig !


" But not perfect. It's dependent of the languages which you used. Some languages are for about 60% right and others are about 80% right. "

You are right, especially when slang, colloquialisms and abbreviations are heavily used. I used to correspond with a group of gamers from Brazil, man sometimes I missed 80 % of the discussion. They did it on purpose I just know it !



< Message edited by stuman -- 11/14/2010 11:51:56 PM >

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 320
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/15/2010 11:09:37 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		A comment regarding the new AAA values.

It is February '42 in two very different PBM games of Da Big Babes, and I am seeing increased losses in bombers. At first I thought it was a combination of the new AAA values plus reduced air support, but in one of those games I have been very careful to have enough support at most front-life airfields, and there is a negligible difference in losses. The losses did jump in both games, to a level where production is having trouble keeping up with combined AA/ops losses.

If the designers would like more precise info, or would like me to track specific losses, PM me and I'll gladly do it :)

It may be a pain in the proverbial neck... but oh boy, do I enjoy this game!

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 321
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/16/2010 4:17:39 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami
A comment regarding the new AAA values.

It is February '42 in two very different PBM games of Da Big Babes, and I am seeing increased losses in bombers. At first I thought it was a combination of the new AAA values plus reduced air support, but in one of those games I have been very careful to have enough support at most front-life airfields, and there is a negligible difference in losses. The losses did jump in both games, to a level where production is having trouble keeping up with combined AA/ops losses.

If the designers would like more precise info, or would like me to track specific losses, PM me and I'll gladly do it :)

It may be a pain in the proverbial neck... but oh boy, do I enjoy this game!

Good to know. Don't need specific loss info - game doesn't quite work that way, so it's not all that useful. The AAA tweaks were mostly for the ship AA auto-weap guns. We did have the database in hand, so extended the data tweaks throughout all the AAA weaps (Land and Sea). Would be good to know whether increassed losses are against a TF or against a land target (a base, LCU stack, that sort of thing).

Will no longer comment publicly on the forums about method, so please send a pm with any info or questions you may have. Be glad to have your input. Will respond to the righteous as deeply as possible. And you are pretty darn righteous, Kitakami.

J



< Message edited by JWE -- 11/16/2010 5:11:14 PM >

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 322
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/22/2010 10:49:59 PM   
Bliztk


Posts: 779
Joined: 4/24/2002
From: Electronic City
Status: offline 		Misc Errata. DaBigBabes scen 28

Location 4639,4638 IJN Base force points to TOE 2639 "IJN BF", should point to itself or 0 or arrange the 2639 slot to match. Results in the bases 150% overstrengh in TOE.

Same for 11th Air Fleet HQ (slot 34). It has 144 support, but only 36 in the TOE. The same repeats for all Fleet or Army HQs

Slot 3988 also is 188% overstrengh.

5th Field construction Bn (slot 3999) TOE points to something that`s totally unrelated.

3rd Port unit (slot 4672) starts the game at Nakhon Ratchasima !

< Message edited by Bliztk -- 11/23/2010 5:42:21 AM >

_____________________________


(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 323
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/23/2010 1:29:08 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bliztk
Misc Errata. DaBigBabes scen 28

Location 4639,4638 IJN Base force points to TOE 2639 "IJN BF", should point to itself or 0 or arrange the 2639 slot to match. Results in the bases 150% overstrengh in TOE.

??? In rev 04, Scen 28, locations 4638 and 4639 point to TO&E 2146 – TO&E 2639 is a Soviet Mongolian Cav Div.
quote:

Same for 11th Air Fleet HQ (slot 34). It has 144 support, but only 36 in the TOE. The same repeats for all Fleet or Army HQs

Intended. Assume they will eventually get depleated. Perhaps we were too generous, and these should be taken down a peg or three?
quote:

Slot 3988 also is 188% overstrengh.

Also as intended. The 14th was 'overstrength', but eventually got shot away to normal size.
quote:

5th Field construction Bn (slot 3999) TOE points to something that`s totally unrelated.

??? In rev 04, Scen 28, 5th Fld Const Bn at 3999 points to TO&E 2224 which is a IJN Fld Const Bn.
quote:

3rd Port unit (slot 4672) starts the game at Nakhon Ratchasima !

3rd Port Unit at 4672 seems to have a typo. It should start at location 466, not 446. Go ahead and make that change, if you haven't already done so.

We'll get that into the next rev, along with Jo van der Pluym's suggestions.

< Message edited by JWE -- 11/23/2010 1:41:55 PM >

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to Bliztk)
Post #: 324
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/23/2010 4:35:53 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline 		The Crazy Dutch, Jo van der Pluym, got us thinking about the DEI. So we tweaked the HQs a teensy bit.

KNI Leger stays the same, with ter Poorten in command. Militaire Luchtvaart stays the same too – ML-KNIL reports up to KNI Leger, with van Oyen in command.

Added a top level naval HQ - KNI Zeemacht - and gave Helfrich something to command. I know it should technically be Zeemacht Nederlands-Indie, but KNI Zeemacht differentiates it nicely from KNI Leger, and is easier to keep track of for them folks that aren’t all that Dutch. The Nederlands-Indie Marine Luchtvaartdienst (NI-MLD) got subordinated to KNI Zeemacht, as did the KNM-CMM bases.

Then stuck in one more, also subordinate to KNI Zeemacht; NI DdS (Nederlands-Indie Dienst der Scheepvaart). This was the command authority for the Gouvernementsmarine, the Gewestelijke Vaartuigen, and even the KPM, so it’s convenient for ship assignments to the technically inclined.

All the new HQs have the same restriction requirements as those they were derived from, so this will have absolutely no effect on games in progress. We just wanted our Dutch contributors to know we are thinking of them too.


_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 325
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/23/2010 6:00:27 PM   
Bliztk


Posts: 779
Joined: 4/24/2002
From: Electronic City
Status: offline
quote:


Location 4639,4638 IJN Base force points to TOE 2639 "IJN BF", should point to itself or 0 or arrange the 2639 slot to match. Results in the bases 150% overstrengh in TOE.

??? In rev 04, Scen 28, locations 4638 and 4639 point to TO&E 2146 – TO&E 2639 is a Soviet Mongolian Cav Div.


Yes, it points to 2146, but the question is the same, is intended that all Japanese BFs are 150% overstrengh vs their TOE, or there is a fault in 2146. (Reason I messed the numbers: doesn´t do database checking after being awake for 16 hours)

quote:


quote:

5th Field construction Bn (slot 3999) TOE points to something that`s totally unrelated.

??? In rev 04, Scen 28, 5th Fld Const Bn at 3999 points to TO&E 2224 which is a IJN Fld Const Bn.


Yes, but if you compare the field order, they do not match. Engineer vehicles in slot 3 in unit 3999, while line 3 is support for the TOE slot. The last three lines doesn´t match very well.

Will continue reporting as I check the scenario.


_____________________________


(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 326
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/27/2010 1:28:04 AM   
asdicus

 

Posts: 260
Joined: 5/16/2002
From: Surrey,UK
Status: offline 		Looking at scen29v4 I notice all the Tojo models are still using the Ha-35 engine. The new ae patch changes this to the HA-34 engine. Am I right in assuming that the babes mod v4 files are supposed to contain all the data changes in the latest ae patch ?

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 327
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/27/2010 11:24:46 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: asdicus
Looking at scen29v4 I notice all the Tojo models are still using the Ha-35 engine. The new ae patch changes this to the HA-34 engine. Am I right in assuming that the babes mod v4 files are supposed to contain all the data changes in the latest ae patch ?

Yep, they are supposed to. Somehow that one got lost in the shuffle. Easy to fix your own self.

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to asdicus)
Post #: 328
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/27/2010 3:53:18 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		John - we are less than 2 weeks into a scenario 28 PBM. If we make that change to the Tojo engine (that'll be my IJ opponent's decision), will that change load as an OOB change, or do we just have the other Tojo engine for the duration?

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 329
RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata - 11/27/2010 9:13:37 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs
John - we are less than 2 weeks into a scenario 28 PBM. If we make that change to the Tojo engine (that'll be my IJ opponent's decision), will that change load as an OOB change, or do we just have the other Tojo engine for the duration?

Michaelm thinks changes to the aircraft file will update just fine. Never tried it so would be nice to know if it works.

_____________________________

Home of DaBabes

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 330
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: DaBigBabes Beta errata Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.156