Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

July 27-29/42

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> July 27-29/42 Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
July 27-29/42 - 10/27/2010 11:30:45 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
July 27/42:

Burma:

It seems the Allies are getting restless in this theatre. With the recent recapture of Akyab, the Allies now have stepped up air operations somewhat. Allied recon had picked up on the 112th Inf. Rgt. at Katha and deduced the unit was in strat mode heading west. Hurricane IIb Trop's (16) set on ground attack raced in at 9k before dropping to 100' to bomb Japanese forces. Leaking CAP from 1st Sentai's Oscar's (3) based at Myitkyina interdicted the Hurricanes and downed one fighter and damaged 3 more for the loss of one Oscar. The 112th suffered 40 casualties from disrupted squads.

July 28/42:

Burma:

The Hurricane IIb Trop's (14) were back today, and once again leaking CAP from Myitkyina interdicted. Oscar's (4) damaged 8 Allied fighters while one Japanese plane was downed. The 112th suffered one non-combat squad lost and a few disablements totalling 30 casualties. The troops will be safely on their way now and out of danger.

China:

The 15th Chinese Corps is wiped out from air attack northwest of Sian.

July 29/42:

Sub Ops:

SS Truant (sunk the Hiryu) entered Singapore waters and launched 6 torpedoes at the DD Sanae escorting a large tanker TF. All missed and the DD Kurukaya responded with a DC attack scoring one direct and 2 near miss hits. I'm disappointed though, actually catching an Allied submarine in shallow water is rare and to only score one hit was a poor effort. Perhaps I just want revenge for the Hiryu too badly to have the Truant get away once again.

SS Permit was spotted by ASW air search near Saipan and an ASW TF was dispatched. The SC Ch 28 launched a sustained DC attack, sadly no hits were recorded.

Burma:

I've been sweeping most Allied air bases in Burma/India periodically with no luck actually engaging Allied CAP as the majority of the bases have been empty or no CAP has been assigned. That changed today . Japanese recon over Dimapur on the 28th indicated a sizable force of Allied fighters at home and I decided to sweep the base. Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (24) from Myitkyina at 18k engaged layered Allied CAP of P-40E Warhawk's (30) from the 23rd FG divided into 3 units patrolling at 20k, 15k and 10k respectively. I'm glad to report 11 P-40E's were downed for the loss of only one Oscar. My pilots are all in the 70's and between the height advantage, experience level and operating within a good maneuver band for the Oscar's it was a one sided engagement. Allied losses could have been much worse, but the number of Oscar's having to abort for various mechanical problems was shockingly high and ended the fight prematurely.

It's been so hard to nail the Allies down to actually engage them so today felt good. Even after months of training the Allies took it on the chin. Tomorrow is another day of course, but today I'll enjoy the result.

I need to do a strategy and industry update soon. With more Allied activity of late it's time to start getting more aggressive and interrupt their movement and preparations. I've dispatched a small cruiser force to Rangoon to start bombarding Allied troops along the coast of Burma. Perhaps this will draw out more Allied air units, or even forces of the British Fleet.

More Allied activity in the Southeast Pacific is not going unnoticed either. Another cruiser SCTF is en route to Kwajalein for operations in the theatre. I'm not commiting much at this stage while my carriers continue their upgrading in the Home Islands (another 12 days till completion). Now that I'm starting to see some hard targets I can begin to respond in a more offensive nature, before it was like chasing ghosts. Perhaps the inactivity has the Allies chomping at the bit to do something and maybe I can put myself in a position to give them a bloody nose somewhere.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 10/27/2010 11:31:04 PM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 391
Update - 11/21/2010 1:43:47 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Sorry everyone, life's been hectic these days and the updating has taken a back seat. There's not much happening anyway so my updates will consist of just bringing everything up to date visually and focus more on strategy and production. To start is China once again as it's been the most active theatre for me at least. Enjoy and as always comments are welcome.

Aug. 9/42:

Northern China:





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 11/21/2010 1:44:07 AM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 392
RE: Update - 11/21/2010 1:45:27 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Aug. 9/42:

Southern China:





Attachment (1)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 393
RE: Update - 11/21/2010 1:45:18 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
Probably the best written AAR on the forum.

I guess you don't get many comments due to the early stage of the game, where everyone else has been there done that.

Regards cookie

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 394
RE: Update - 11/23/2010 10:29:49 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I wouldn't go that far cookie monster , I think of this AAR more in terms of the ramblings of an inexperienced player and what Japan's war effort might have looked like being run by Charlie Brown . Rather indecisive and wishy washy . Thanks for the compliment though and it's appreciated. I try to find the time to update, but lately there just aren't enough hours in the day. It's great to hear you are enjoying the read and it makes the effort writing it worthwhile.

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 395
RE: Update - 12/8/2010 4:52:20 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
The war is still Sitzkrieg and I've decided to skip updating July 30th to Aug 8th to spare everyone the boredom as nothing of note happened. The primary focus is still on China and the movements there as the remainder of the Empire goes about it's daily routine of preparing defences and increasing the flow of raw materials to the Home Islands.



Aug. 9/42:

Australia:

Allied LRCAP of (15) P40-E Warhawk's surprised the Darwin air attacks today and shot down 3 A6M2 Zero's and 4 Ki-21-IIa Sally's for no loss. I'll sweep Katherine tomorrow for payback. Darwin still received 15 Runway hits.

Aug. 10/42:

Sub Ops:

SS Stingray spots a small tanker TF near Toboali, but DD Yakaze does its job and suppresses the submarine scoring a near miss DC hit.

SS I-164 torpedoes the AM Mirimichi and presumably sinks her inflicting heavy damage and fires. I-164 slips away unscathed. A rare successful Japanese submarine attack.

Australia:

Japanese bombers get the day off from the Darwin routine after being mauled the day before. Recon of Katherine indicated Allied fighters still at home so the Zero's got a break from tedious escort duty to sweep instead. In two separate waves, 30 A6M2 Zero's engaged 20+ P-40E Warhawk's on CAP. 3 Zero's were downed against 7 Warhawks. I believe the Allies lost more than indicated according to the air loss table at days end.

Miscellaneous:

Soerakarta expands fortifications to size 3
Sidate expands fortifications to size 3

E Ishigaki beginning refit at Kobe

Aug. 11/42:

Australia:

Japanese bombers get another day off.

China:

In a rare mistake by the Allies the 56th Chinese Corps shock attacks across the river at 83,44 and is handled roughly by the Japanese 6th Division and the 53rd Inf. Bde. For 0(1) non-combat squad disabled, the Japanese defenders cause the Chinese 9(137) infantry, 8(157) non-combat and 0(1) engineer squads lost totalling 2043 casualties. Japanese forces will shock attack the hapless Chinese tomorrow.

Miscellaneous:

Madang expands airfield to size 2

Aug. 12/42:

Australia:

Darwin bombed for 1 AB, 2 ABS, 34 Runway and 1 Port hits.

China:

12th Army launches a shock attack against the 23rd Chinese and 3rd Chinese Cavalry Corps at 84,42 and routs the enemy. Japanese losses include 5(31) infantry and 1(46) non-combat squads lost totalling 664 casualties. Chinese casualties are 84(32) infantry, 30(12) non-combat and 1(0) engineer squads lost including 2(0) guns totalling 2155 troops. One Chinese unit is destroyed while the survivor retreats due west leaving control of the main road in Japanese hands. Mission accomplished. 12th Army troops will rest and replenish at Sian.

The 56th Chinese Corps is shock attacked by Japanese forces and Chinese troops suffer 52(0) infantry and 60(0) non-combat squads destroyed totalling 838 troops. Japanese losses are light at 0(2) infantry and 1(0) non-combat squads lost totalling 41 casualties.

Miscellaneous:

Takamatsu expands port to size 5
Yokohama/Yokosuka expands fortifications to size 2
Uttaradit expands airfield to size 2
Truk expands fortifications to size 5
Paotow expands fortifications to size 3

Aug. 13/42:

Sub Ops:

SS Pollack near Den Passar elects to not target an ASW TF. SC Ch 26 attacks and scores one direct DC hit.

Australia:

Darwin bombed for 1 AB, 2 ABS, 21 Runway and 1 Port hits are recorded.

China:

The ordeal of the 56th Chinese Corps ends as it surrenders after another shock attack by Japanese forces. Chinese casualties are 202(0) infantry, 211(0) non-combat and 4(0) engineer squads destroyed including 61(0) guns totalling 2454 troops.

Miscellaneous:

Uttaradit expands fortifications to size 3
Padang expands fortifications to size 3

3rd Raiding Regiment arrives at Kagoshima
4th Raiding Regiment arrives at Kagoshima
Sasebo 6th SNLF arrives at Nagasaki/Sasebo
Yokosuka 6th SNLF arrives at Yokohama/Yokosuka
51st Base Force arrives at Ominato

Aug. 14/42:

China:

Tienshui is captured for the disablement of one Japanese infantry and four non-combat squads totalling 12 casualties. The defending 13th Chinese Corps loses 8 guns destroyed and retreats.

Miscellaneous:

Hong Kong expands fortifications to size 2
Rabaul expands port to size 6

DMS W-22 arrives at Tokyo
SC Ch 32 arrives at Okayama
SC CHa-40 arrives at Takamatsu

Aug. 15/42:

SS RO-60 hits a mine at Luganville and sinks.

Miscellaneous:

Meiktila expands fortifications to size 2
Great Nicobar expands fortifications to size 2

Strategy and Production of late:

My carriers have completed their latest upgrades at Kobe and are ready for redeployment. As there is absolutely no action anywhere I'm at a loss as to what to do with them. I am thinking of maybe an incursion into the Southeast Pacific to disrupt Allied base building efforts in the region, but I have to admit this doesn't excite me. I am loathe to risk a lucky torpedo hit on a carrier for the possible sinking of a few support and transport ships. I still feel it's best to just hunker down and await developments in light of no strategic opportunities at the moment.

China is going well. I think my planned offensive in Central China will go ahead as planned and my forces are weeks away from joining up at Pingsiang for moves against Hengyang and Changsha. Northern China is quiet with only local Japanese actions to shore up the line while the Chinese continue to do nothing. The capture of Tienshui will allow the rail line to be utilized to expedite movement of troops and resources in the area. Lanchow continues to repair and has reached 26(64) with oil and fuel moving as there is no stockpile building up.

I'm reorganizing Manchuria's defences and starting to buy out some garrison units to free up frontline units in China currently stuck on garrison duty. Air units continue to train and as they upgrade aircraft I will begin to redeploy them to the Pacific. I hope to reinforce China with another 1000 AV for frontline duty.

Raw material wise I am not doing so good. I have primarily shipped a lot of fuel to outlying bases for future fleet use and have neglected getting the oil/fuel back to the Home Islands. Japan's reserves in the Home Islands of fuel and oil are down to 123 and 175 days respectively. Resources are at a reserve of 165 days. Fuel dipped to as low as 1209567, but with renewed efforts I'm back up to 1518186. I use small tankers to ship fuel from Borneo and Sumatra to Singapore and have now created a mega fuel/oil TF that ships 200k worth of the black gold back to the Home Islands every trip. I mix it up between fuel and oil as I want as much of both not sitting idle and somewhere more protected and useful...Japan!

I've reduced my major resource outlets to Singapore, Port Aurthur, Fusan and Hakodate. Takao is a major hub for resources shipped from Singapore. I use the transports that can carry both resources and oil from Singapore to supplement the dedicated oil/fuel TF's. I figure an extra 8k of oil every trip heading towards the Home Islands a good thing. Shikuka will only provide an oil TF on occasion as it's a favourite hunting ground for Allied subs and I have a feeling a carrier raid will occur one day and I want them to find nothing. The priority right now is the maximum amount of fuel/oil/resources transported to the Home Islands and conserve fuel by avoiding major fleet movements unnecessarily and reducing the number of small inefficient resource TF's.

Engine and aircraft production is often turned off as non-existent air losses have allowed a great pool of engines and airframes to be built up. I turn the production off to ensure I don't waste further HI expenditure when I don't have to.

I have a question about Naval Shipyard Points. I currently have a pool of 34843 points built up and the Musashi is 90 days away from completion. I produce a surplus of almost 300 points per day. Question, should I start reducing Naval Shipyard activity to save the HI or is it important to keep a large pool built up and start accelerating ship production?

One expansion of note, I'm expanding Singapore's repair yard to 100k capacity in anticipation of the large numbers of ships I'll have damaged in that theatre when the Allies move. I think it will be strategically important to have that capacity in that theatre and not have to sail all the way to the Home Islands to repair the larger BB's and CV's. It may be a bit of a shock for the Allies to see them back in action sooner than anticipated . Does anyone else do a similar thing with other repair yards in other ports?

In conclusion, I muddle along and continue to prepare for the Allied opening moves while trying to maximise my production and resource flow.

A few screenshots of Ha-33 and Ha-35 use to get an idea of the pools built up and any possible suggestions for redirection of resources. I'll update China with screenshots once my offensive is ready to be launched in a few weeks.

Engine production to date:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/9/2010 11:03:23 PM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 396
RE: Update - 12/8/2010 4:53:53 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Ha-33 key airframes:





Attachment (1)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 397
RE: Update - 12/8/2010 4:54:40 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Ha-35 key airframes:





Attachment (1)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 398
Naval Shipyard Points - 12/9/2010 11:12:41 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Just a follow up to my question posted earlier for JFB's out there.

I currently have 34843 naval points in the pool and am wondering what to do with them. The Musashi is still under construction and is about 90 days away from completion. I have the Taiho and two other CV's currently accelerated. Should I be reducing the number of points I'm producing? Should I begin to accelerate more surface ships? Do I need to have this many points in the pool, or should I be using them up regularly to eventually reach a zero balance? Mike, Q-Ball, cap_and_gown...anyone? Bueller?

Thanks in advance!

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 399
RE: Naval Shipyard Points - 12/9/2010 11:42:44 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon

Just a follow up to my question posted earlier for JFB's out there.

I currently have 34843 naval points in the pool and am wondering what to do with them. The Musashi is still under construction and is about 90 days away from completion. I have the Taiho and two other CV's currently accelerated. Should I be reducing the number of points I'm producing? Should I begin to accelerate more surface ships? Do I need to have this many points in the pool, or should I be using them up regularly to eventually reach a zero balance? Mike, Q-Ball, cap_and_gown...anyone? Bueller?

Thanks in advance!

quote:

Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl who saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.

Economics Teacher: "In [1942], the [Japanese High Command], in an effort to alleviate the effects of the... Anyone? Anyone?... [the glut of Naval Points], passed the... Anyone? Anyone? [The acceleration bill]? The [Sqz-Lemon Act?] Which, anyone? Raised or lowered?... [lowered the avail naval points], in an effort to [gain more CV shipping quickly]. Did it work? Anyone? Anyone know the effects? It did not work, and the [Japanese] sank deeper into the Great [HI]Depression. Today we have a similar debate over this. Anyone know what this is? Class? Anyone? Anyone? Anyone seen this before? The Laffer Curve. Anyone know what this says? It says that at this point on the [HI] curve, you will get exactly the same amount of [Naval Points] as at this point. This is very controversial. Does anyone know what Vice President Bush called this in 1980? Anyone? Something-d-o-o economics. "Voodoo" economics. "

Seriously though ... 2 options - Cap would tell you to accelerate late war CV's; others to shut down production to save HI ... without a detailed look I'm not calling it (although I prefer the former)... And I was an economics teacher

_____________________________


(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 400
RE: Naval Shipyard Points - 12/10/2010 12:09:24 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Too funny Damian, I have to wipe off my keyboard now. I should not have been drinking at the time, water everywhere!

By more detailed look, what is it you'd need to know to give a better opinion? I don't understand the Voodoo economics comment to be honest. Are you saying whether I accelerate or not the amount of points I use will be the same? I think I understand that actually, but I guess you're saying it's slow and steady, or spend and have the toys now kind of choice as either way it will all come out a wash in the end.

I'll post some tracker screenshots if you need some, just tell me which ones. I actually need to have an idea if I'm in good, so-so or bad shape production wise. I have no clue right now although I'm leaning towards so-so heading to poor.

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/10/2010 12:10:46 AM >

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 401
A personal/strategy assesment - 12/20/2010 8:58:35 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I've just read through my AAR again and one thought strikes me time and again...indecisive! No wonder I've struggled when I look at all the half measures and constant changes in operational plans which have made any overall strategic plan impossible to formulate. I have never really focused/realized until now just how much my emotions influence my decision making. With this now in mind I'm looking at how best to go forward from here.

I'll update what's been happening soon and get everyone back to speed. Essentially there are now two active theatres, China and Burma. China has been ongoing since the war started, but Burma is now showing signs of being where the Allies will first push back. Large Allied troop concentrations are moving to/from Akyab which appears to be the initial axis of advance. It's a conservative approach that requires little to no naval commitment on the part of the Allies and was predicted months ago as a likely early Allied theatre of operations.

Due to poor initial play I've limited myself to primarily defending a rather small perimeter with little chance to interdict Allied transport or fleet TF movements to date. Freedom of movement has allowed Allied troops/supplies/fuel to redeploy to forward bases and Australia with a minimal commitment of Allied surface ships as there has been no threat of interdiction from Japanese forces to date. An effort will be made to start probing Allied forward bases with the goal of drawing out Allied surface ships to defend against the disruption of further troop deployments and the stockpiling of supply/fuel.

Immediate strategic goals for the remainder of 1942.

1. Continued offensive operations in China to maintain pressure on Chinese forces, improve Japanese lines of communication, resource/fuel/oil extraction and creation of a strong defensive perimeter to allow redeployment of LCU's to the Pacific theatre.

2. Contain the Allied offensive in Burma by deployment of tactical reserves, limit air operations to defence of controlled territory and creation of a strategic reserve to allow an Anzio type landing at Akyab to isolate and destroy a portion of the Allied army if the opportunity presents itself.

3. Disruption of further Allied deployment of troops and material to forward bases in the Southeast Pacific. Force the Allies to commit substantial fleet assets to protecting these movements and destroy them.

4. Protecting Malasia, Sumatra, Java and the Celebes are the primary goal. Main line of defence in the Central Pacific will be the Mariana's and Caroline's. Mimimal defensive measures will be committed in defence of the Marshall's or Gilberts. The Solomon's will be defended by means of counterinvasions not a static defence. Defensive reserves to be deployed at Truk, Saipan, Babeldoab, Soerabja and Singapore. The Kuriles will be fortified and mimimal assests deployed in their defence as they are deemed a low priority target.

5. Imperial Fleet units will be deployed to Truk, Soerabaja, Singapore and Rangoon. KB will not be separated until the whereabouts of Allied CV's are confirmed. Raiding surface TF's will cruise Allied LOC's in order to draw out enemy surface/carrier forces.

6. Improve resource/fuel/oil flow to Japan proper. Stockpiles are woefully inadequate for long term production requirements of Japanese industry.

7. Use PP's to buy out as many support and combat LCU's as possible to create the strategic reserves needed for a counterinvasion defensive strategy. No air/sea/land unit commanders will be changed that require PP expenditure unless deemed critical. All PP's are reserved for the redeployment of air and LCU forces for offensive operations.

8. Submarines will be deployed defensively for recon and interdiction of Allied surface assests outside of LBA Allied ASW range for maximum concealment. Glen carrying fleet submarines will be used exclusively in cooperation with surface TF's in order to discover LOC's for naval interdiction.

More to come...

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 402
RE: A personal/strategy assesment - 12/20/2010 9:08:54 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
5. Imperial Fleet units will be deployed to Truk, Soerabaja, Singapore and Rangoon. KB will not be separated until the whereabouts of Allied CV's are confirmed. Raiding surface TF's will cruise Allied LOC's in order to draw out enemy surface/carrier forces.


Hey Lemon, I'd be concerned about stationing elements of the fleet at Rangoon. That's pretty close to British bombers.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 403
RE: Update - 12/20/2010 9:36:31 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SqzMyLemon
Strategy and Production of late:

My carriers have completed their latest upgrades at Kobe and are ready for redeployment. As there is absolutely no action anywhere I'm at a loss as to what to do with them. I am thinking of maybe an incursion into the Southeast Pacific to disrupt Allied base building efforts in the region, but I have to admit this doesn't excite me. I am loathe to risk a lucky torpedo hit on a carrier for the possible sinking of a few support and transport ships. I still feel it's best to just hunker down and await developments in light of no strategic opportunities at the moment.

China is going well. I think my planned offensive in Central China will go ahead as planned and my forces are weeks away from joining up at Pingsiang for moves against Hengyang and Changsha. Northern China is quiet with only local Japanese actions to shore up the line while the Chinese continue to do nothing. The capture of Tienshui will allow the rail line to be utilized to expedite movement of troops and resources in the area. Lanchow continues to repair and has reached 26(64) with oil and fuel moving as there is no stockpile building up.

I'm reorganizing Manchuria's defences and starting to buy out some garrison units to free up frontline units in China currently stuck on garrison duty. Air units continue to train and as they upgrade aircraft I will begin to redeploy them to the Pacific. I hope to reinforce China with another 1000 AV for frontline duty.

Raw material wise I am not doing so good. I have primarily shipped a lot of fuel to outlying bases for future fleet use and have neglected getting the oil/fuel back to the Home Islands. Japan's reserves in the Home Islands of fuel and oil are down to 123 and 175 days respectively. Resources are at a reserve of 165 days. Fuel dipped to as low as 1209567, but with renewed efforts I'm back up to 1518186. I use small tankers to ship fuel from Borneo and Sumatra to Singapore and have now created a mega fuel/oil TF that ships 200k worth of the black gold back to the Home Islands every trip. I mix it up between fuel and oil as I want as much of both not sitting idle and somewhere more protected and useful...Japan!

I've reduced my major resource outlets to Singapore, Port Aurthur, Fusan and Hakodate. Takao is a major hub for resources shipped from Singapore. I use the transports that can carry both resources and oil from Singapore to supplement the dedicated oil/fuel TF's. I figure an extra 8k of oil every trip heading towards the Home Islands a good thing. Shikuka will only provide an oil TF on occasion as it's a favourite hunting ground for Allied subs and I have a feeling a carrier raid will occur one day and I want them to find nothing. The priority right now is the maximum amount of fuel/oil/resources transported to the Home Islands and conserve fuel by avoiding major fleet movements unnecessarily and reducing the number of small inefficient resource TF's.

Engine and aircraft production is often turned off as non-existent air losses have allowed a great pool of engines and airframes to be built up. I turn the production off to ensure I don't waste further HI expenditure when I don't have to.

I have a question about Naval Shipyard Points. I currently have a pool of 34843 points built up and the Musashi is 90 days away from completion. I produce a surplus of almost 300 points per day. Question, should I start reducing Naval Shipyard activity to save the HI or is it important to keep a large pool built up and start accelerating ship production?

One expansion of note, I'm expanding Singapore's repair yard to 100k capacity in anticipation of the large numbers of ships I'll have damaged in that theatre when the Allies move. I think it will be strategically important to have that capacity in that theatre and not have to sail all the way to the Home Islands to repair the larger BB's and CV's. It may be a bit of a shock for the Allies to see them back in action sooner than anticipated . Does anyone else do a similar thing with other repair yards in other ports?

In conclusion, I muddle along and continue to prepare for the Allied opening moves while trying to maximise my production and resource flow.


I missed this one. (Yeah, I know, what a post to miss.) I agree with Damian, details are necessary before saying much. I just can't help myself though.

Carriers: Sometimes a fleet in being is the best defense. Especially a fleet your opponent can't see. He'll never know when it's going to show up. It'll give him ulcers.

Fuel: Keep your fleet where the fuel is - the SRA. If you station it in Japan, they'll suck critical fuel out of Japan into their tanks. Never ship fuel from Japan.

Naval build points: If you have an excess of 300 points per turn, accelerate some CVs and DDs. I like to accelerate DDs because you're going to need escorts when the Allied sub menage gets in gear. I can't believe you have 35k extra points. Use them! They don't cost anything to use. How's your HI pool looking? Post a shot of your stats. That'll tell a lot.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 404
Confession - 12/21/2010 12:27:01 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Hi Mike! Thanks for posting.

I'll provide some numbers for you later when I get home tonight. I should clarify, Imperial Fleet assets will be based around Rangoon and certainly not disbanded in port to be fodder for Allied bombers on port attack. I do want to have some form of quick naval response ships in the area in case British Fleet forces make a special guest appearance.

I'm going to start accelerating DD's and Tanker's, as Damian has already pointed out to me privately that I've left things a little late to get more CV's into action sooner . I digress though and have a question for JFB's out there.

I have to admit something I'm rather embarrassed about, it's August of 1942 and I have no idea how to utilize my CVE's! Just where the heck do you find air units to operate on them? Considering most of the smaller naval fighter units are restricted and can't be enlarged to fill the capacity of 27 aircraft how do you provide planes for them? I'd like to start having the CVE's supprt KB for replacement of aircraft and pilots, not to mention have a few provide CAP for my soon to be roving surface raiders and important fuel TF's. Do you have to break up existing air units into their detachments to provide air units for them to utilize? Do they eventually get assigned air groups of their own? I have all my CVE's in ports sitting idle doing absolutely nada.

I need guidance.



(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 405
RE: Confession - 12/21/2010 12:37:29 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
CVEs have several uses, but in AE it's limited. You're right that there are limited air units to put on them. I can come up with two possibilities (3 if you consider just letting them rust in port).

1. Put air units on them from damaged carriers while those carriers repair. Ithink this will happen pretty infrequently though. When a carrier is damaged, often it's from a carrier battle and the air complement is usually trashed. If you don't have enough planes and/or pilots to replace the losses, the air unit is usually training pilots. It is a possibility though.

2. Have the CVEs follow KB empty. Should things go sour, there are some spare flight decks for the now orphaned planes. I do this on occasion. I'll keep the CVEs a few hexes behind KB. At least that's what I did in WitP. I haven't done it in AE yet.

3. Let 'em rust in port.

Edit: The CVEs do not get air groups.

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 12/21/2010 12:38:01 AM >


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 406
As Requested - 12/22/2010 4:42:15 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I know you love to crunch numbers and really get into the production side of things Mike, so here you go. This should give you a pretty good idea of how the Rising Empire of Lemons is doing at the moment and should highlight any pending disasters.

All comments and suggestions will be appreciated from the peanut gallery, please note that I had little idea of the consequences/restrictions of playing with PDU off when starting the game, so initially my aircraft production was geared towards early upgrading of units to the latest models and anticipating much more air combat than has occurred to date.

The following information is current to Aug. 24/42

First off the WITP Chart:






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/22/2010 4:43:14 AM >

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 407
RE: As Requested - 12/22/2010 4:43:32 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Industry Overview:

I never really look at this tab very often and I should as it contains a wealth of information! First off I've noticed three red flags immediately. There should be no LI, Manpower or Resource repairs occuring anywhere in the Empire, so I've obviously missed turning these off and that will be the first order of business.

Ha-35 engine production will be halted to conserve HI when the pool reaches 1000.

Armaments will be reduced further to roughly 250+ points/day to increase HI.

I neglected to turn Miri's oil/fuel facilities to repair 'on' until a week ago and that was a complete bonehead move wasting 6 months of repairs!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/22/2010 7:42:17 PM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 408
RE: As Requested - 12/22/2010 4:49:50 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
I just accelerated a bunch of stuff last turn and I'll still get a projected +59 naval points added daily so I'll accelerate a few more to start running a deficit of points.

A question regarding the start building column. Does a negative number mean that the ship has been builidng for that many days and if positive mean it will start construction in that many days?

I'm not really sure how best to utilize ship acceleration and just how to interpret what I am seeing. Delay is the number of days till completion at normal while the Accelerate column is the number of days till completion while accelerated...correct?


Ship Production:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 12/22/2010 7:41:44 PM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 409
RE: As Requested - 12/22/2010 4:54:24 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
And finally... Air Production:

Let's hear what people's thoughts are






Attachment (1)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 410
Update Aug 16-23/42 - 12/24/2010 3:35:08 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
It's been awhile since I've posted anything operations wise. There have only been a few engagements worth mentioning over this period and I'll stick with those. China and Burma are going to both see action within days/weeks as my forces approach their kick off point in China , while the Allies are mounting their first large scale offensive in Burma .

Aug. 16/42:

Australia:

A small Allied TF of three ships was spotted by naval search heading inbound to Portland Roads in Northern Australia. Japanese naval LBA was ordered to intercept and attack the TF on the 17th and catch it as it arrived in port.

Aug. 17/42:

I love it when a plan comes together . A6M2 Zero's (18) from Buna swept over Portland Roads and interceptd Kittyhawk IA's (15) on CAP. Two Allied fighters were downed for the loss of one Zero. Then G4M1 Betty's (13) escorted by Zero's (21) based at Lae attacked the transports. Only four Kittyhawk's were on CAP and one was shot down for no loss to the escorts. The xAKL Caledon and xAKL Corrimal were sunk with 1 and 2 torpedo hits respectively and no Betty's were lost. The escort AM Dubbo was attacked but all torpedos missed. A small action with no bearing on the war, yet I was pleased to have set everything in motion and watch as the sweeps went in first, the escorts protected the bombers and the bombers nailed the target. A good days work and a notice to the Allies that I'm out there watching and waiting.

Aug. 21/42:

Sub Ops:

SS I-29 near Lifou spots an ASW TF and successfully sinks the DD Norman with one torpedo hit. Heavy fires and damage were reported followed by the sinking sound so I'm pretty sure she went down. I finally nailed a DD! SS-I-29 made good her escape suffering no damage.

China:

Japanese air units have been reorganized and about to start a sustained bombing campaign of the aifbases at Changsha and area. Siangtan was hit by Sally Ki-21-IIa' (40) and Ki-51 Sonia's (22) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's and caused 9 AB, 8 ABS and 48 Runway hits. The primary goal is to cause supply hits and scoring 8 was a nice start.

Burma:

Allied forces are on the move in the theatre signalling the start of what appears to be an Allied offensive. Akyab's airfield was bombed by Ki-21-IIa Sally's (28) causing 1 AB, 6 ABS and 13 Runway hits. Another raid of Ki-45 KAIa Nick's (12) attacked at 100' inflicting a further 3 AB and 6 Runway hits.

Aug 22-23/42:

China:

Changsha's airfield was bombed two consecutive days by Sally's and Sonia's supported by escorting and sweeping Oscar's and Nate's . The airfield Receiving a total of 9 AB, 1 ABS and 20 runway hits. Not stellar results by any means and the 29 units at Changsha must include many engineers as the damage is repaired quickly. There has been no sign of Allied CAP in the three days of Japanese air attacks.

My Chinese offensive against Hengyang is being re-evaluated in light of what's happened in cap_and_gowns AAR and my own concerns. I thin kth efocus of the offensive will shift to Kweilin as it's the weakest held point although in better defensive terrain. I like the fact that I can stay well supplied during my entire attack, I have no river crossing to undertake and I don't put myself in a position where I can be outflanked or out maneuvered. I will post a new screen showing the change of plan. This is not being indecisive, but stepping back and seeing a better operation that has better chance of success in my opinion and can really crack open the Chinese MLR.

Burma:

Japanese troops are ordered to move out to counter an Allied two pronged offensive in Burma. Screenshot of this theatre to follow. It looks like we have a war developing!

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 411
Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 2:11:01 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
We have reached Aug. 29/42 and things are heating up nicely, it looks like a war has started once again. . I will update the 24th to 28th individually tomorrow, but wanted to provide some screenshots of both Burma and Southern China to quickly bring things up to speed.

Happy and safe New Year to everyone!

Burma:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 1/1/2011 2:15:39 AM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 412
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 2:15:46 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Southern China:





Attachment (1)

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 413
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 2:26:21 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Be careful that you don't accidentally reopen the Burma Road to China while you retreat from Myitkyina to Bhamo. Playing as Japan in early '43 with the Burma Road open will not help your cause.

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 414
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 5:16:00 AM   
vicberg

 

Posts: 1176
Joined: 4/19/2008
Status: offline
You don't have enough air in Burma...3 units of Oscar Cs aren't going to cut it....4Es or allied 2Es are going to wipe out your Oscars...no guns on those planes....as far as HI goes...will the carrier make a difference?  One carrier can, IMO...A bunch of HI in the pool won't, though I'm about as far away as a economics professor as anyone can get.  I do trade on the stock market though, if that gives me some standing :)

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 415
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 5:16:01 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Be careful that you don't accidentally reopen the Burma Road to China while you retreat from Myitkyina to Bhamo. Playing as Japan in early '43 with the Burma Road open will not help your cause.


Thanks for posting ny59giants!

I don't know if you are following along regularly or just commenting on the current situation, but I certainly appreciate any advice. Do you think it is a better decision then to hold the coast road and throw everything at retaking Myitkyina? I can hold the coast and hit the 18th British division eventually with 6 divisions including tank and engineer support, or try and retake Katha and isolate the 18th British division before too many more Allied units cross the jungle. If I hold Bhamo would this still not close the Burma road or would supplies now travel overland to Paoshan? I definitely want to keep my advantage in China with the Burma Road closed and no fuel getting to Chinese HI from controlling Sian and Lanchow.

The only fear I have is becoming isolated myself if both the Allies strike from Katha and the Chinese move out from Paoshan, Myitkyina can quickly become a trap for Japanese forces if I can't hold the Chinese flank. I'll recon Imphal and area to see what's headed my way. I have so far commited 8 Japanese divisions to Burma. Is this enough or too many? Needless to say I'm rather thin elsewhere. I have the 19th division in China that is assigned to the 15th Army available as well, but nearly a month away from reaching Burma.

Looking at it from that perspective it seems like holding the Burma Road is the more important strategic objective, rather than a complicated amphibious assault to net a few Allied LCU's. I'll sleep on it and decide in the morning. I definitely did not see the Burma Road angle.



< Message edited by SqzMyLemon -- 1/1/2011 5:17:04 AM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 416
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 10:53:03 AM   
khyberbill


Posts: 1941
Joined: 9/11/2007
From: new milford, ct
Status: offline
quote:

Be careful that you don't accidentally reopen the Burma Road to China while you retreat from Myitkyina to Bhamo. Playing as Japan in early '43 with the Burma Road open will not help your cause.

I thought a supply line had to be traced from Rangoon to China for the Burma Road to be open.

_____________________________

"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 417
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 3:20:50 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
per the manual - p. 254

quote:

15.8 Burma Road
For the Allies, if a rail/road/trail path free of Japanese units between Tsuyung and Ledo or between Tsuyung and Rangoon can be traced, than each day, 500 supply points per turn are added to Tsuyung.


My understanding (which could be wrong) the hexside ZOC is temporary unless there is an actual unit in it. Gone are the WITP days were it remained yours until the enemy took it over.

As to what to do in Burma, I would say you need more Level Bombers and use the superior manufacturing of Japan to pound on his troops in the jungle. Akyab is on the end of a trail from Chittagong and damaging the base should slow down the flow of supplies to his troops moving away from it. It is best to defend in the jungle rather than behind forts in clear terrain. See how PzB is doing it well vs Andy Mac. I hope you have expanded Rangoon to port 7 so you can reload your ships. I would first use your 4 minelaying subs to mine Akyab and then use CAs (don't forget to use your FPs to recon the base - set them to range 1 and make sure that at least one group is set on night) and smaller to bombard the hex. LRCAP the TF with Zero from Prome.


(in reply to khyberbill)
Post #: 418
RE: Screenshot Updates - 1/1/2011 4:20:48 PM   
khyberbill


Posts: 1941
Joined: 9/11/2007
From: new milford, ct
Status: offline
I didn't realize that. Goes to show how much I pay attention to China. Of course, I usually lose the other avenue early on in the conflict. After one of the patches, it became hard to keep allies supplied in Burma. I find it difficult to even keep Katha supplied.

_____________________________

"Its a dog eat dog world Sammy and I am wearing Milkbone underwear" -Norm.

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 419
Aug. 24-28/42 - 1/3/2011 2:23:21 AM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
Recapping combat reports prior to the posting of the screenshots. they are noteworthy in terms of the developing air operations in both China and Burma.

Aug. 24/42:

Australia:

Darwin hit by Ki-21-IIa Sally's (33) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (20) for 2 AB, 1 ABS, 26 Runway and 1 Port hits.

Burma:

Akyab swept by Oscar's, no Allied CAP was present. Akyab's airfield was then hit by Ki-21-IIa Sally's (28) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (22) and damage to the airbase was 5 AB, 1 ABS and 15 Runway hits.

The 21st Australian Bde. and 18th British Division capture an undefended Katha.

China:

Changsha's airfield was bombed again today. The first morning raid consisted of Ki-21-IIa Sally's (17) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (25) and damage to the airbase was 2 AB, 1 ABS and 14 Runway hits.

Miscellaneous:

CL Katori taken out of commission to begin refit at Truk
CL Kashii taken out of commission to begin refit at Truk

Aug. 25/42:

Australia:

Darwin hit for only 1 AB and 6 Runway hits today, a poor result.

Burma:

I decided to test the RAF over Burma for a few days with sweep and bombing attacks to see how I fared and see if I could gain an advantage. Imphal was targeted first as it showed Allied fighters present. Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (24) of 1st Sentai swept Imphal at 18k and engaged Hurricane IIb Trop's (28) on CAP. Allied fighters from three squadrons were layered at 18k, 20k and 24k. Despite getting the dive/bounce my Oscar's performed horribly and nine were downed against only one Hurricane. Needless to say that sweep did not go well. It wasn't until I checked the unit post combat to learn why it had performed so poorly, moral had dropped to 46 despite the unit not being involved in any recent combat and droves of my fighters aborted. As mentioned earlier despite numerous dive attacks the poor armament of the Oscar's proved ineffective in downing the Allied fighters. Post sweep the 1st Sentai's morale had dropped to 26 and it was withdrawn to Bangkok for recuperation and training. The unit is mixed in terms of pilot experience and luckily it was mostly inexperienced pilots that paid the price for me sending in a unit that should not have been utilized with such a low morale.

Cox's Bazar was hit by Ki-21-IIa Sally's (26) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (22) and the damage to the airbase was 1 AB, 1 ABS and 12 Runway hits. No Allied CAP was present.

China:

Changsha was again bombed by Ki-21-IIa Sally's (40) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (7) and damage to the airbase was 7 AB. 3 ABS and 18 Runway hits. A second raid of Ki-51 Sonia's (27) escorted by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (6) caused a further 2 AB and 24 Runway hits.

Miscellaneous:

DD Kuroshio beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Hatsukaze beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Isokaze beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Hagikaze beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Tanikaze beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Nenohi beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe
DD Wakaba beginning refit in shipyard at Kobe

6th Tpt.Chutai converting to Ki-57-II Topsy

Aug. 26/42:

Sub Ops:

SS O20 in the South China Sea sinks the xAK Kinai Maru with one torpedo. No damage to the enemy submarine with a half-hearted DC attack.

Australia:

Daily air attack on Darwin resulted in 1 AB, 21 Runway and 1 Port hits.

Burma:

There was to be another sweep of Imphal today, but the fighters were grounded due to weather.

Cox's Bazar was bombed again, but my bombers lost their escort and went in unescorted. Luckily there was no Allied CAP and the airbase received 1 AB and 9 Runway hits.

China:

Changsha hit again by multiple raids for 5 AB, 10 ABS and 56 Runway hits. I'm happy to see the base supply hits, but recon shows very little damage to the airfield. With 29 Chinese units at Changsha I'm sure there are plenty of engineers quickly repairing the damage. Rather moot considering the airfield is not being used and there is no sign of the Chinese airforce.

Aug. 27/42:

Australia:

Darwin received another 1 AB and 15 Runway hits.

Burma:

Imphal was swept by two separate attacks with the first sweep underperforming while the second sweep fared much better. In both cases I dove on the Allied CAP, but the first raid performed very badly. Morale of the first raid was 99% and the unit experience was 65. The Oscar's are just too undergunned to be effective. The second sweep performed much better and had a morale of 99% and unit experience of 71.

First sweep: Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (26) engaged Hurricane IIb Trop's (25). Once again the CAP was layered at 18k, 20k and 24k while the sweep was increased to 20k. One Hurricane reported shot down against 3 Oscar's.

Second sweep: Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (22) engaged Hurricane IIb Trop's (12) and 3 Hurricanes were downed for no loss. The sweep was at 25k against the same CAP as previous.

Smeulders in an e-mail mentioned that he felt the results proved that height advantage didn't matter after seeing these results. In this case I have to agree, but not for the same resaons as I'm sure he's thinking. Both my sweeps had the height advantage and numerous times Japanese fighters dove on the enemy. In more cases than not an Allied fighter evaded or suffered sleight damage from the Oscar's in the first pass. This could be a result of excellent pilots on the Allied side resulting in the evasions, however the lack of outright kills is squarely to blame on the poor armament of the Oscar's. Had these been Tojo's the Allies would have been creamed.

The second sweep caught the Allied fighters having to climb to altitude and were picked off piecemeal. The intelligence report had total losses for the day of 17 Hurricane's lost A2A with another 5 as Ops losses, while 7 Oscar's were lost to A2A and 2 more to Ops. Quite a descepancy with the actual combat reports.

Cox's Bazar was hit by Sally's (28) once again and once again the escorts failed to show. The Allies had moved in a unit of P-40E Warhawk's, but they were set to training according to my opponent. The airbase received 1 AB and 3 Runway hits and one Warhawk was destroyed on the ground. My Sally's were lucky, they get the day off tomorrow.

China:

Changsha's airbase was further damaged with 5 AB and 33 Runway hits.

Aug. 28/42:

Sup Ops:

SS Halibut near Foochow sinks the xAK Hoeisan Maru with two torpedoes. That's two transports in as many days lost to Allied submarines.

Burma:

Cox's Bazar was swept by Ki-43-Ic Oscar's (37) and engaged P-40E Warhawk's (43) on CAP. A second sweep of Oscar's (22) engaged P-40E Warhawk's (18)The combat report showed 10 Oscar's downed against 4 P-40E's. The CAP was at 15k while the sweeps went in at 20k. The intelligence report however put the losses at 8 P-40E's in A2A and 9 Ops losses, against 14 Oscar's downed A2A with 3 Ops losses. These losses are not acceptable to me. The Oscar's get a tactical advantage daily, but they just can't shoot down the armoured enemy fighters while they get lit up regularly. The Oscar's in my opinion suck big time.

Akyab's airfield is bombed for 5 AB, 2 ABS and 15 Runway hits. P-40E Warhawk's (2) on CAP from Cox's Bazar intercept and despite Ki-43-Ic's (20) on escort two Sally's are damaged and no P-40E's are downed.

China:

Changsha gets hit for 7 AB, 4 ABS and 21 Runway hits.

A small land combat between the Japanese 12th Tank Rgt. and the 8th New Chinese Corps and 13th Chinese Corps at 91,39 sees the Chinese forced to retreat suffering 7(9) infantry, 5(2) non-combat and 9 guns lost totalling 490 casualties, there were no Japanese losses.

(in reply to khyberbill)
Post #: 420
Page:   <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> July 27-29/42 Page: <<   < prev  12 13 [14] 15 16   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.969