Update
Posts: 122
Joined: 10/8/2007 Status: offline
|
FIRST, NOTHING PERSONAL TO ANYBODY WITH THIS POST AND APOLOGIES IF I STEP ON SOMEBODY'S TOES!!! General observation to many posts above and other posts on the political situation in Finland: If you understand Finnish, PLEASE read the studies on the Finnish political situation during the Continuation War, saves a lot of needles arguments. I wish that whoever set up WITE Finnish rules would have done it also. A good one is by Manninen, Ohto:Suur-Suomen ääriviivat. Helsinki 1980. If that is too heavy reading (it is quite deep analysis) then easier reading would be found in Jatkosodan pikkujättiläinen where there is couple of nice chapters that summarize pretty well the different political and military situations pulling and pushing Finlands situation. For those poor souls who do not know the perfect language, I have posted a very brief and short summary reply in general discussion post called Finnish Front. quote:
Part of the issue is the rail line going across the Svir river is tied into the Finnish rail net when in fact this was not the case....IF the rail road was correct in game as it was in the war, the Finns could not go much beyond the river and not have logistical issues. They had enough issues as it was trying to supply the troops on the river since no rail lines were available that were in the Finnish rail net. On the question of rail, I attached a map that shows the 1941 summer existing rail in red, the green is, I think, the line that Klydon refers as quote:
The rail line comes down from Murmansk and served no real purpose to the Finns there from a logistics stand point of view. and the purple line is B455's mentioned quote:
subsequently Finns build another rail-line during the war that went along the coast of Ladoga almost down to Svir river There was, in fact, a connection to Finnish rail line, part of the area in map used to be Finland before Winter War after all. As can be seen clearly, the rail and supply as such were not the issue limiting actions. On the other hand, fatique & casualties together with expendet supply (ammo. fuel, food etc) were an issue. So, the solution to this pecky Finnish problem? Well, I still advocate my previous suggestion to extend the map, also the limitation of Finns tied to Leningrad could be changed to Tikhvin and to the ability of Germans to hold it.
Attachment (1)
_____________________________
Nobody respects a country with a poor army, but everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish Army. Attributed to Josef Stalin, 1948.
|