Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

163rd German Infantry Division

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Scenario Design and Modding >> 163rd German Infantry Division Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
163rd German Infantry Division - 12/20/2010 9:27:47 PM   
Naughteous Maximus


Posts: 301
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Los Angeles, California
Status: offline
I was just wondering why in the '41-'45 Campaign, the 163rd in Finland is a Finnish division with Finnish TO&E? Couldn't you guys just kept it German with a German TO&E and had it attached to a Finnish HQ? I was also wondering where the division is in the '42-'45, and '43-'45 Campaigns?
Post #: 1
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/20/2010 9:33:23 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
It's a Finnish division to make the no attack line limitations apply, as otherwise it would be able to attack across it.

It was reassigned to the 20. Gebirgsarmee that was at the time trying to get to Murmansk in Febraury 1942, which moves it off the game map.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Naughteous Maximus)
Post #: 2
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/20/2010 9:50:06 PM   
Great_Ajax


Posts: 4774
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Alabama, USA
Status: offline
Its there to prevent some rules abuse. There's also a rule about German on-map units not being able to cross into Finland as well. Jim could fix the Finnish OB though - that does look rather odd.

Trey

quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

It's a Finnish division to make the no attack line limitations apply, as otherwise it would be able to attack across it.

It was reassigned to the 20. Gebirgsarmee that was at the time trying to get to Murmansk in Febraury 1942, which moves it off the game map.



_____________________________

"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 3
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/20/2010 9:51:30 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
Trey, I think I've found an unpleasant problem after checking the editor. I'll report it in the tester forum.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Great_Ajax)
Post #: 4
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/21/2010 6:58:27 AM   
Update


Posts: 122
Joined: 10/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:

It's a Finnish division to make the no attack line limitations apply, as otherwise it would be able to attack across it.

It was reassigned to the 20. Gebirgsarmee that was at the time trying to get to Murmansk in Febraury 1942, which moves it off the game map.


The mission for 163.D was to attack towards Tikhvin over river Svir after AG Nord gets there. When AG Nord started their attack towards Tikhvin in November, Mannerheim order Finnish 11.D to prepare to assist 163.d in their attack since
German division was not expected to fulfill its mission without Finnish troops (Finnish evaluation of the quality of 163.D was "Shaky, not to be used for demanding operations without Finnish troops"). When AG Nord reached Tikhvin on 10.11 -41 (November!) order was given for the whole Karelia Army to prepare for supporting 163.D and Finnish 11.D for their drive to Tikhvin. That was put on hold by Mannerheim orders (Did he expected the Russian heavy counterattack because of Leningrad situation?) and when 8.12 Germans withdraw from Tikhvin, the assault was called off. 163.D did not get assigned to Lappland until 5/42 (15.5-42).

FYI, I am in process of correcting Finnish troops template TOE and actual TOE. 163.D is in my list of things to do. It just seems to take more time than I expected, quite a few weird compositions.

_____________________________

Nobody respects a country with a poor army, but everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish Army.

Attributed to Josef Stalin, 1948.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 5
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/21/2010 4:58:37 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

163.D did not get assigned to Lappland until 5/42 (15.5-42).


Lexikon der Wehrmacht skips a few months, so it was moved to Lappland somewhere between February and July according to the information there. I just took the first mention of it being reassigned.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to Update)
Post #: 6
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/21/2010 5:42:09 PM   
B455

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pertti


The mission for 163.D was to attack towards Tikhvin over river Svir after AG Nord gets there. When AG Nord started their attack towards Tikhvin in November, Mannerheim order Finnish 11.D to prepare to assist 163.d in their attack since
German division was not expected to fulfill its mission without Finnish troops (Finnish evaluation of the quality of 163.D was "Shaky, not to be used for demanding operations without Finnish troops"). When AG Nord reached Tikhvin on 10.11 -41 (November!) order was given for the whole Karelia Army to prepare for supporting 163.D and Finnish 11.D for their drive to Tikhvin. That was put on hold by Mannerheim orders (Did he expected the Russian heavy counterattack because of Leningrad situation?) and when 8.12 Germans withdraw from Tikhvin, the assault was called off. 163.D did not get assigned to Lappland until 5/42 (15.5-42).



Yes this is my understanding also. The Army of Karelia was to provide engineer support to the German 163rd ID as well as cover its flank with at least two regiments. The 11th Finnish ID had to assist and further develop the operation. In my view the stop-line ruins the historical events that took place on the Finnish Front as the Russians didn't give the ground for free. And they had a hell of a good reason for that behaviour; they were defending Leningrad from north and northeast...there were no "stop-line" on Zhukov's planning map. I think it should be optional.


(in reply to Update)
Post #: 7
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/21/2010 6:53:28 PM   
Update


Posts: 122
Joined: 10/8/2007
Status: offline
ComradeP don't sweat it, sometimes it is a real headache to get the information from varied sources. I lately use only 11 different books for Finnish Continuation war alone.

quote:

there were no "stop-line" on Zhukov's planning map. I think it should be optional.


This is a tricky thing. As far as things go (Road to Leningrad scen.) computer pulls all troops from Petroskoi-Svir area before any Finnish troops are able to catch them. Maybe one solution is to requre Russian to have certain amount of CV facing Finnish troops or they can cross Svir. On the other hand, Finns did not (generally speaking) share the German idea of crusade against Bolshevism. Finns wanted just to get back the pre-Winter War borders. Going to Svir was stretching the troops "enthusiasm" for combat but since it was good defensive line, well.... As it is modelled in the game, going over Svir would have caused moral issues to units.
So, this is something I think needs to be kicked around for possible change.

_____________________________

Nobody respects a country with a poor army, but everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish Army.

Attributed to Josef Stalin, 1948.

(in reply to B455)
Post #: 8
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/21/2010 7:43:38 PM   
Great_Ajax


Posts: 4774
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Alabama, USA
Status: offline
One of the most hotly debated issues within the team.

Trey

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pertti

ComradeP don't sweat it, sometimes it is a real headache to get the information from varied sources. I lately use only 11 different books for Finnish Continuation war alone.

quote:

there were no "stop-line" on Zhukov's planning map. I think it should be optional.


This is a tricky thing. As far as things go (Road to Leningrad scen.) computer pulls all troops from Petroskoi-Svir area before any Finnish troops are able to catch them. Maybe one solution is to requre Russian to have certain amount of CV facing Finnish troops or they can cross Svir. On the other hand, Finns did not (generally speaking) share the German idea of crusade against Bolshevism. Finns wanted just to get back the pre-Winter War borders. Going to Svir was stretching the troops "enthusiasm" for combat but since it was good defensive line, well.... As it is modelled in the game, going over Svir would have caused moral issues to units.
So, this is something I think needs to be kicked around for possible change.



_____________________________

"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer

(in reply to Update)
Post #: 9
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 12/22/2010 10:03:30 AM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Maybe you could use political points to activate units to cross the line somehow??

cav

(in reply to Great_Ajax)
Post #: 10
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/10/2011 3:59:07 PM   
vinnie71

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
Actually I like the idea that the no cross line should be garrisoned with some real formations (not forts) by the Russians because otherwise the Finns will just walz through. I'm not sure if this could be implemented in the game though. Re this 'division', does the third regiment ever crop up to form the division? Or am I missing something?

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 11
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/10/2011 5:55:57 PM   
Great_Ajax


Posts: 4774
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Alabama, USA
Status: offline
Yep, we have been through this with the testers. Its gamey and I don't like it but there are other more important things to look at and no easy solutions.

Trey

quote:

ORIGINAL: Offworlder

Actually I like the idea that the no cross line should be garrisoned with some real formations (not forts) by the Russians because otherwise the Finns will just walz through. I'm not sure if this could be implemented in the game though. Re this 'division', does the third regiment ever crop up to form the division? Or am I missing something?



_____________________________

"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer

(in reply to vinnie71)
Post #: 12
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/10/2011 7:13:34 PM   
Manstein63


Posts: 688
Joined: 6/30/2010
Status: offline
I have just completed the Lenningrad Scenareio as the Soviet player & I also thought that the Finnish no attack line is gamey. It might be a better idea to treat the those hexes as a river hex & allow the Finns to attack at a reduced strength because all that I did was as soon as the soviet front line unfroze I withdrew all soviet forces behind the attack line sent the rifle & tank divisions to face the Germans & used security regiments to garrison the line. which ment I had the Finnish Army sitting on the other side of the border unable to use their not inconsiderable fire power because a NKVD Colonel has told them that they don't have the correct papers & could they speak more quietly as it is nap time for his men. This was fine from my point of view (as the Russian Player) but it does lead to the question if the Finns are unable to do anything before Lenningrad falls what is the point in having them representeted on the map.

(in reply to Great_Ajax)
Post #: 13
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/11/2011 8:17:06 AM   
Update


Posts: 122
Joined: 10/8/2007
Status: offline
I mentioned in one of the above posts that it was also political problem.
In addition, at the beginning of the war (6/41) Finns tied up to 16% of their total population to the war effort. According to international calculations 10% is the maximum that could be sustained by a nation without falling to pieces. By early -42, around February, the strain started to be too much and Finns had to downsize their military substancially. Therefore, after that date the front became pretty much static until summer -44.
The Finnish advance was not tied up to the fall of Leningrad but to the ability of Germans to advance to Tikhvin and hold it after which the 163D. and Finns would link up from the north. (see earlier post here). That never happened, so Finns stayed at the Svir line.

I think that one big problem for players to understand the situation is the (sorry, nothing personal to anybody!) poor decision by developers to cut the map at the north. It should have been extended more to the north and the limitation problem would not be so weird .
I have included a -41 map to illustrate the point.
Red line is the approx. current edge. Blue line is the place where it should have been cut out, if Murmansk is excluded permanently. (It is the dividing line between Finns and German responsibility, though Finnish 3.D and 6.D are given to German command). The green line is about where the front lines settled after Finns ended their attacks in early -42.
You hold those lines with the reduced Finnish forces and you are more than happy to stay away from crossing the Svir river.

PLEASE, extend the map to north to the blue line!!!




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Nobody respects a country with a poor army, but everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish Army.

Attributed to Josef Stalin, 1948.

(in reply to Manstein63)
Post #: 14
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/11/2011 6:39:58 PM   
B455

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/25/2010
Status: offline

Yes I fully agree about the map! It has been "cut" at totally wrong place. I doubt this will be changed though - too much work for too little gains I guess.

Yes it needs to be understood that Finnish economy, politics etc were not supporting continuous offensive over the stop-line. But, currently the Soviet player can give up Karelia all too easily. Soviets wanted to keep the railway up to Murmansk in their hands as well and not give it for free (because the other railway through via Archangelsk was longer obviously). Perhaps a modified "road to Leningrad" scenario appears some day where there are victory point locations in Karelia to better represent the Finnish front.

Quote from Glantz: "...at a time when Popov most needed reserves, Finnish operations forced him to transfer the 265th Rifle Division, the Forty-Eight Army's reserve, and the 291st Rifle Division from the Krasnogvardeisk Fortified Region to bolster the Twenty-Third Army's defence against the Finns." ...In WitE why not just man the Finnish front line with fortified regions...?

(in reply to Update)
Post #: 15
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/12/2011 10:00:42 AM   
Navodchik


Posts: 15
Joined: 1/11/2011
From: Turku, Finland
Status: offline
I also totally agree that map should be extended northwards. Of course, being Finnish myself has definitely something to do with it... Russian general S.M. Stemenko used the word "secondary front" in his (boring) book "To Berlin" when he was talking Karelian Front 1941-44. However, I think that when Russo-Finnish "Continuation War" ended in september 1944, it released huge amount of Soviet forces, who now were capable to fight against Germans. Does this show in the game in any way? I do not know the excact amount of troops, but it should be clear that with this "extra" manpower the struggle in the very end was made somewhat easier for Soviets...

In the end of game manual the reason for absence of northern part is told by saying that the situation in that part of front was essentially "stalemate". However, this brilliant game allows otherwise to try various "what if's" so it really would have been nice to try to cut the vital Murmansk supply line...and of course to play some kind of scenario with Finnish Army the 1941-44 war...but then again, the game is excellent even without the northern battlefields.

BTW, Sorry if my English has some mistakes!

_____________________________


(in reply to B455)
Post #: 16
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/12/2011 6:37:12 PM   
B455

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Navodchik

However, I think that when Russo-Finnish "Continuation War" ended in september 1944, it released huge amount of Soviet forces, who now were capable to fight against Germans. Does this show in the game in any way? I do not know the excact amount of troops, but it should be clear that with this "extra" manpower the struggle in the very end was made somewhat easier for Soviets...




Not really. The units that took part in Soviet assault on Finland 1944 became fatigued and took fair amount of losses. Yes, they were sent to rest & refit afterwards and obviously needed elsewhere along active fronts, but certainly not a HUGE amount of troops in context of the entire Eastern Front. The 30th Guards Corps that was the "shock group" on the Karelian Isthmus was battle hardened already in many many winter offensives against Germans during -42 -43 and -44. So were many other Soviet Corps/Divisions. So the Finnish Front didn't really teach them nothing about war - only caused casualties as the entire Soviet strategic offensive was blunted. There were not so many of Soviet Strategic strikes that failed in -44.


(in reply to Navodchik)
Post #: 17
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/12/2011 7:54:17 PM   
vinnie71

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pertti

I mentioned in one of the above posts that it was also political problem.
In addition, at the beginning of the war (6/41) Finns tied up to 16% of their total population to the war effort. According to international calculations 10% is the maximum that could be sustained by a nation without falling to pieces. By early -42, around February, the strain started to be too much and Finns had to downsize their military substancially. Therefore, after that date the front became pretty much static until summer -44.



Historically everyone knows what happened and why. The basic problem is this. If the Germans were triumphant and removed the bulk of Red Army forces, do you think that Mannerheim would have settled for limited objectives? I'm not so sure especially since everyone knows of his aversion to Communism. But again, this is a what if scenario that would be difficult to simulate in practice...

(in reply to Update)
Post #: 18
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/12/2011 11:06:06 PM   
Klydon


Posts: 2251
Joined: 11/28/2010
Status: offline
Extending the line of the game north really serves no purpose compared to the rest of the map since the Finns got so far and stopped. Part of the issue is the rail line going across the Svir river is tied into the Finnish rail net when in fact this was not the case. The rail line comes down from Murmansk and served no real purpose to the Finns there from a logistics stand point of view. The other issue with the Finn rail net is the Finns used the same gauge as the Russians did. Repairs are somewhat understandible but should be at the reduced rate like the Baltic States at the very least. A lot of this is hard to program and the system in use is simplified, so I understand why it is the way it is, but it is not the way it was. IF the rail road was correct in game as it was in the war, the Finns could not go much beyond the river and not have logistical issues. They had enough issues as it was trying to supply the troops on the river since no rail lines were available that were in the Finnish rail net.

The Finns were able to resist the German pressure to "do more" in the war after their offensives since they had so many troops tied down around Leningrad. In effect, the Finns told the Germans that if the Germans did not take Leningrad, the Finns were done doing much of anything else. Above all, Mannerheim was looking to keep casualties at a minimum given Finland's small population. They were more than willing to participate in cheap victories, but it was going to be the Germans doing the heavy lifting.

Most any game I have seen involving the Eastern front has severe restrictions on the Finns, especially until Leningrad is in German hands. (Fire in the East has some great options involving the Finnish participation in the war). This game is no exception.

(in reply to vinnie71)
Post #: 19
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/12/2011 11:44:54 PM   
B455

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/25/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Klydon

Part of the issue is the rail line going across the Svir river is tied into the Finnish rail net when in fact this was not the case. The rail line comes down from Murmansk and served no real purpose to the Finns there from a logistics stand point of view.


What? You mean the railway that goes west to Finland from Petrozavodsk on the Onega? ...It DID exist in 1941. And subsequently Finns build another rail-line during the war that went along the coast of Ladoga almost down to Svir river. My point earlier was that Russians were very keen to have that railway from Svir to Petrozavodsk to up north to Murmansk open because it was the shortest (rail)route to Arctic Ocean and troops fighting up there/Lend-Lease coming down.

quote:


IF the rail road was correct in game as it was in the war, the Finns could not go much beyond the river and not have logistical issues. They had enough issues as it was trying to supply the troops on the river since no rail lines were available that were in the Finnish rail net.

Most any game I have seen involving the Eastern front has severe restrictions on the Finns, especially until Leningrad is in German hands. (Fire in the East has some great options involving the Finnish participation in the war). This game is no exception.


The supply issues are true obviously. But, then again, limited offensives were entirely possible and Russians had to consider this as well - not just flee from Karelia and man riverline with "fortified regions". I think the Finnish restrictions should be there, but not represented as a "stop-line" drawn upon a map with hindsight. Instead, Finnish supply should be low, and commanders should be cautious in front of heavy casualties because of limited replacements and perhaps providing negative VPs from destroyed Finnish units. Also some VP locations into Karelia should do a lot. I am sure someone crafts another "battle of Leningrad" scenario in the future. The one that comes with the game is very exiting and fun btw!





(in reply to Klydon)
Post #: 20
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/14/2011 7:49:40 AM   
Update


Posts: 122
Joined: 10/8/2007
Status: offline
FIRST, NOTHING PERSONAL TO ANYBODY WITH THIS POST AND APOLOGIES IF I STEP ON SOMEBODY'S TOES!!!

General observation to many posts above and other posts on the political situation in Finland: If you understand Finnish, PLEASE read the studies on the Finnish political situation during the Continuation War, saves a lot of needles arguments. I wish that whoever set up WITE Finnish rules would have done it also.
A good one is by Manninen, Ohto:Suur-Suomen ääriviivat. Helsinki 1980. If that is too heavy reading (it is quite deep analysis) then easier reading would be found in Jatkosodan pikkujättiläinen where there is couple of nice chapters that summarize pretty well the different political and military situations pulling and pushing Finlands situation.

For those poor souls who do not know the perfect language, I have posted a very brief and short summary reply in general discussion post called Finnish Front.

quote:

Part of the issue is the rail line going across the Svir river is tied into the Finnish rail net when in fact this was not the case....IF the rail road was correct in game as it was in the war, the Finns could not go much beyond the river and not have logistical issues. They had enough issues as it was trying to supply the troops on the river since no rail lines were available that were in the Finnish rail net.


On the question of rail, I attached a map that shows the 1941 summer existing rail in red, the green is, I think, the line that Klydon refers as
quote:

The rail line comes down from Murmansk and served no real purpose to the Finns there from a logistics stand point of view.
and the purple line is B455's mentioned
quote:

subsequently Finns build another rail-line during the war that went along the coast of Ladoga almost down to Svir river

There was, in fact, a connection to Finnish rail line, part of the area in map used to be Finland before Winter War after all.

As can be seen clearly, the rail and supply as such were not the issue limiting actions. On the other hand, fatique & casualties together with expendet supply (ammo. fuel, food etc) were an issue.

So, the solution to this pecky Finnish problem? Well, I still advocate my previous suggestion to extend the map, also the limitation of Finns tied to Leningrad could be changed to Tikhvin and to the ability of Germans to hold it.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Nobody respects a country with a poor army, but everybody respects a country with a good army. I raise my toast to the Finnish Army.

Attributed to Josef Stalin, 1948.

(in reply to B455)
Post #: 21
RE: 163rd German Infantry Division - 1/15/2011 10:21:29 AM   
B455

 

Posts: 38
Joined: 2/25/2010
Status: offline

Nice map. Shows the Soviet attack 1944 I suppose with that Soviet naval invasion on the coast. Something that should be allowed also in WiTe at Ladoga area.... there were also Finnish/German/Italian(sic!) naval attempts to harass the Russian supply route to Leningrad over Ladoga.

(in reply to Update)
Post #: 22
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Scenario Design and Modding >> 163rd German Infantry Division Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.172