Armed Guard

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Armed Guard

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Armed Guard

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Armed Guard - 12/22/2010 10:46:59 PM

Ametysth

Posts: 74
Joined: 12/10/2009
Status: offline

I have been reading about U-boat operations and seen mentions of armed guards, who operated US Merchant Marine vessel's guns. They are always listed along the crew as losses or mentioned as they fought off enemies.

Which service these Armed Guard - gunners belonged? Were they regular Navy, Merchant Marines or Marines (as ship board troops)?

One the related issue, any chance of getting the "Monsoon Boats", German U-boats operating out of Batavia, to the game? Any mods out there? Four of them were taken over by IJN in early 1945 and they even had I-numbers (I-501, -502, -505 and -506)

Post #: 1

RE: Armed Guard - 12/22/2010 10:52:54 PM

lolz

Posts: 149
Joined: 11/22/2004
Status: offline

iirc ive seen U-501 under combined fleet
edit: its u532

< Message edited by lolz -- 12/22/2010 10:58:44 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to Ametysth)

Post #: 2

RE: Armed Guard - 12/22/2010 11:10:21 PM

YankeeAirRat

Posts: 633
Joined: 6/22/2005
Status: offline

The Armed Guard were US Navy personnel who manned the guns on most of the Merchant Marine Fleet through out the War. Here is the NHHC's page on the Armed Guard

_____________________________

Take my word for it. You never want to be involved in an �International Incident�.

(in reply to lolz)

Post #: 3

RE: Armed Guard - 12/22/2010 11:31:02 PM

Ametysth

Posts: 74
Joined: 12/10/2009
Status: offline

Thank you AirRat. Very helpful.

Lolz, that is a IX/C boat. Such boat was indeed in IJN inventory as one was sold to them in 1943, but its number was RO-500. I-501 was originally U-181, a IXD2 type boat (add 9000 miles to range and 6 torpedoes on deck storage).

(in reply to YankeeAirRat)

Post #: 4

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 12:02:40 AM

Pascal_slith

Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline

To make the "Monsoon" boats work, they have to be attached to the IJN. I believe DaBabes included all of these.

See this for a history: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/Germany/KM/IndianOcean/index.html

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

(in reply to Ametysth)

Post #: 5

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 11:46:39 AM

Terminus

Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

We briefly debated including the transferred and seized Italian and German boats in the IJN OOB, but the Japs never used them.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Pascal_slith)

Post #: 6

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 5:08:08 PM

Pascal_slith

Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

We briefly debated including the transferred and seized Italian and German boats in the IJN OOB, but the Japs never used them.

But the Germans did operate them independently under the authority of Wenneker in Tokyo.

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

(in reply to Terminus)

Post #: 7

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 5:53:38 PM

stuman

Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

(in reply to Pascal_slith)

Post #: 8

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 6:30:06 PM

Pascal_slith

Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.

Read the Hyperwar link. They were quite effective during the periods they were able to operate.

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(

(in reply to stuman)

Post #: 9

RE: Armed Guard - 12/23/2010 8:09:01 PM

stuman

Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pascal

quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman

Ineresting. So the Germans went to the trouble of operating subs out of Batavia ? I wonder if they sank much shipping.

Read the Hyperwar link. They were quite effective during the periods they were able to operate.

Interesting read. Thx for the link.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley

(in reply to Pascal_slith)

Post #: 10

RE: Armed Guard - 12/26/2010 2:17:43 PM

wwengr

Posts: 678
Joined: 1/14/2007
From: Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin, USA
Status: offline

Very interesting read. Thanks for the link.

In WITP terms, it does not look like they were much of a factor. The average turn around time in Batavia was about 70 days and the report talks at length about the lack fo skill maintenance crews and such to keep the boats operational. It appears that they were used to some extent, in Batavia and Singapore, as blockade runners with the intent of pulling raw materials back to Germany.

In terms of combat effectiveness, the claim of 1760 vessels sunk does not distinuguish between early operations in the Southern Ocean, and later operations. As reported the average vessel size for these 1760 was less than 600 tons. This would imply that they mostly sunk fishing boats, coastal barges, and small coastal tramp steemers, which are not units in the game.

_____________________________

I have been inputting my orders for the campaign game first turn since July 4, 2009. I'm getting close. In another month or two, I might be able to run the turn!

(in reply to Pascal_slith)

Post #: 11