Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

I have a problem with Soviet OOBs

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> I have a problem with Soviet OOBs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
I have a problem with Soviet OOBs - 12/16/2000 3:07:00 PM   
Tombstone

 

Posts: 764
Joined: 6/1/2000
From: Los Angeles, California
Status: offline
When platoons of Guards Riflemen dont have any guys in them. I looked at the oob editor and it said that a platoon had 3 rifle squads, but in the game I get nothing. When you go to the Gds rifle company you get the support units, but no rifle squads. Is anyone else getting this problem?? Tomo

_____________________________

Post #: 1
- 12/17/2000 1:22:00 AM   
Arralen


Posts: 827
Joined: 5/21/2000
Status: offline
F#1075 Guards Plt has 3 units U#119 SO Guard Inf. Availability dates are Oct.'41-'49 for Plt and Co, but Oct.'43-'49 for the Unit. So you won't get any grunts from Oct.'41 to Sep'43 Arralen

_____________________________

AMD FX-4300
Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Kingston 24GB DDR3-1600 (PC3-12800)
Asus GTX 750 Ti OC 2GB GDDR5
Seagate Barracuda SATA III 1TB
Windows 8.1

(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 2
- 12/17/2000 1:31:00 AM   
Kharan

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 5/9/2000
Status: offline
Arralen, could you check if IS-3 armor is way too thin? It should be closer to IS-4 than IS-2.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 3
- 12/17/2000 2:35:00 AM   
Kharan

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 5/9/2000
Status: offline
IS-3 turret armor is 110mm at thinnest point. It should be 110-220mm all round (165mm average) according to Russian Military Zone. http://history.vif2.ru/is3.html [This message has been edited by Kharan (edited December 16, 2000).]

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 4
- 12/17/2000 4:03:00 AM   
Tombstone

 

Posts: 764
Joined: 6/1/2000
From: Los Angeles, California
Status: offline
Thanks Arralen. That helps, I can modify the oobs for the time being... Tomo

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 5
- 12/17/2000 5:39:00 AM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
The thickness is only a part of the "effectiveness" of armor...the slope is in many ways more important. While the thickness is given as the "low" end, the slope of 50 gives a proper "average" thickness. The compound sloping shape is impossible to model correctly, but the current stats give a good representaion of "average" armor performance.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 6
- 12/17/2000 6:24:00 AM   
Kharan

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 5/9/2000
Status: offline
IS-3 hull armor and slopes in that RMZ diagram are identical with SPWAW. So the turret armor numbers (110-220mm) without angles on the diagram are effective armor? [This message has been edited by Kharan (edited December 16, 2000).]

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 7
- 12/17/2000 8:23:00 AM   
Paul Vebber


Posts: 11430
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Portsmouth RI
Status: offline
The thicknesses shown on the diagram are actual thickness of metal, not effective thickness. The turret is cast so its effective thickness is less than RHA by about 10%. The game engine randomizes the incidence angle by +/- 15 degrees in the horizontal and from -6 to +3 or so in vertical, so the 110 RHA (say 125 Cast) at an angle between 44 and 53 in vertical is an effective thickness of between 185 and 250 The diagram shows a turret thickness that varies for 110 to 220mm and a slope that varies from about 40 to 55 degrees (but is curved so its not possible to represent by a single "block" the 110@50 degrees is an approximation. Might it be "more realistic" to call it 130@43, or 105@60 or something else, that's a judgement call...I picked 110@50 based on an "averaging" model I think is close

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 8
- 12/17/2000 8:36:00 AM   
Kharan

 

Posts: 505
Joined: 5/9/2000
Status: offline
Thanks Paul.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 9
- 12/17/2000 11:39:00 AM   
Major Destruction


Posts: 881
Joined: 8/10/2000
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Tombstone: When platoons of Guards Riflemen dont have any guys in them. Tomo
This should be fixed in the patch. Let me know if you find new errors or old unreported errors. Stuart Millis

_____________________________

They struggled with a ferocity that was to be expected of brave men fighting with forlorn hope against an enemy who had the advantage of position......knowing that courage was the one thing that would save them.

Julius Caesar, 57 BC

(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 10
- 12/17/2000 12:06:00 PM   
victorhauser

 

Posts: 318
Joined: 5/29/2000
From: austin, texas
Status: offline
Kharan: I, too, believe that the IS-3 turret armor is too weak, but this is an old issue that has been beaten into the ground weeks and weeks ago. So I won't start that whole thing up again. The good news is that, as with almost any aspect of SPWaW, the best way to handle your own vision of the "way it should be" is to simply go into the OOBs and edit them until you are happy. Makes it easier to sleep at night that way.

_____________________________

VAH

(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 11
- 12/17/2000 10:26:00 PM   
ncpanther

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 5/22/2000
From: NC
Status: offline
I got one for ya. Maybe its just me, or maybe I suck at this game but it seems that when I'm the Soviets evrything is crap! Rifle squads cant kill a gnat, they run from a fight ect, T34s never kill anything and usually get killed by the first Tiger shot they take. However when I play the Germans t34s routinly kill tigers, inf never retreats and they seem to superhuman! whats the deal or am I a poor player?? ------------------ NC Airborne Sappers Lead the way!! SAPPERS ATTACK!!!!

_____________________________

NC Airborne Sappers Lead the way!! SAPPERS ATTACK!!!!

(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 12
- 12/18/2000 1:53:00 AM   
Tombstone

 

Posts: 764
Joined: 6/1/2000
From: Los Angeles, California
Status: offline
I'm playing a russia v germany pbem battle in 1943 right now and the russians (me) seem to be doing ok... However, sometimes I feel like the computer is screwing me over, but I know it's not really happening... I think. Tomo

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 13
- 12/18/2000 4:59:00 AM   
Musashi

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 11/22/2000
From: Carson CA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by ncpanther: I got one for ya. Maybe its just me, or maybe I suck at this game but it seems that when I'm the Soviets evrything is crap! Rifle squads cant kill a gnat, they run from a fight ect, T34s never kill anything and usually get killed by the first Tiger shot they take. However when I play the Germans t34s routinly kill tigers, inf never retreats and they seem to superhuman! whats the deal or am I a poor player??
Hate to say it but it may be tactics. I've just about finished the "Heros" campaign, and learned a few lessons after starting over twice. First, the Soviets are VERY sensitive to crew quality. This is due to low gunnery ratings, primarily "Stab" which is a one (two man turret with the TC acting as gunner), in T-34/76s. This is bad, real bad. Compound this with experience levels from 50 to 60 and your T-34s only get one low % shot per turn. In campaigns KEEP YOU CREWS ALIVE. As their experience goes up you get more shots at higher % to hit. Veteran T-34s in 1941 truely DOMINATE Germain armor. In 1941 and early '42 TRUST YOUR ARMOR. You wont be killing tanks very quickly but neither will he! In all games keep your platoons tightly packed, close the range and shoot three tanks at each target (alternately to break up his op fire). Use mob tactics to increase your hits. This gets harder later in the war as German AT fire gets more lethal. Buy Guards tanks. Buy KVs, they're less vulnerable, they get more shots and hit more often. I'm not sure but I think they also get the EXP/Moral bonus as well (in my experience they have higher numbers than average in both). Look at working a couple KV-1M41's with each company of T-34s. The '34s can keep him busy while the KVs get kills. Against Tigers and Panthers you need 85s. The T-34/85 is a great tank! It has a three man turret which vastly improves its shots on target (crew quality is still vital) and the 85 will kill Tigers at some distance (haven't labed this out yet). You'll need APCR for Panthers frontally. HOWEVER, note the Panther's weekness! Very thin side armor. A BT can do a Panther from 10 hexes (provided he can hit it!). USE YOUR SPEED!!! Your tanks are much, much, much faster. USE IT! By simple math he's not going to have many Panthers. Use covered approaches (create them with smoke) and mob him. Veterans in T-34 M43s will kill Panthers if you mob them and get flank shots at close range. Finally the best solution for a Panther is an Il-2m. Historically you should meet 4-5 PZKW III/IVs or their variants for every Panther or Tiger you meet. Frankly, I'm not afraid of PzIVs or Marders (Nashorns DO worry me). Gut it out. In truth the Soviets probably have the best tank OB in the game, learn to use it. If you played SPI FORGET EVERYTHING, Start over and learn by playing. For infantry, have you noticed the TWO rifles available? I'm a bit of a gun nut so when I saw the Tokarev M40 I thought "can't be". It is. This was a early Semi-auto Rifle issued in some numbers, think Garand!!! It triples the HE factor of your rifle fire! Cheap to, a must buy! (The actual rifle was a failure, piculiarities of the Russian 7.62 case and design problems caused frequent breakage in the action; the motivation for the SKS and the 7.62X39 round to be made famous by the AK-47) And yes the AI cheats! Much less in this version though! Thank the makers the Arty cheats have FINALLY been eliminated. I've yet to catch the AI shelling where it shouldn't! It does get extra shots on target however! I recently counted off 8 shots from a PzIIIg, THAT MOVED! I don't get that when I play the IIIg. As with ALL wargames there are going to be some things we don't agree with (wargamer since Panzerblitz was the standard) work with what works. Musashi

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 14
- 12/18/2000 6:19:00 PM   
Miku

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 7/31/2000
Status: offline
Is it just me, but it seems that AI on Soviet side does not buy any Scout cars? I am playing the WW2-campaign on German side, and have played 4 battles against Soviet so far, and have not seen a single Scout car... kind a relief actually, because their 47mm guns would be quite troublesome.

_____________________________


(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 15
- 12/25/2000 6:24:00 PM   
Arralen


Posts: 827
Joined: 5/21/2000
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Miku: Is it just me, but it seems that AI on Soviet side does not buy any Scout cars?
Check on the "scores" screen if it really does not buy them - I'm not shure if the "retreating bug" is fixed in v4.5 . Could be the case that they simply retreat immidatly when the battle starts Arralen

_____________________________

AMD FX-4300
Gigabyte 970A-DS3P
Kingston 24GB DDR3-1600 (PC3-12800)
Asus GTX 750 Ti OC 2GB GDDR5
Seagate Barracuda SATA III 1TB
Windows 8.1

(in reply to Tombstone)
Post #: 16
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> I have a problem with Soviet OOBs Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.953