Charles22
Posts: 912
Joined: 5/17/2000 From: Dallas, Texas, USA Status: offline
|
Kluckenbill: Perhaps what you are seeing is that you've run into a number of fort units that have a '0' hull rating, such as the WF mg posts do. One thing good about those light tanks (which as things stand we can't buy, just yet) is like the HTs they carry quite a lot of ammo. In the first WF battle, I too seemed to knock out mg posts more easily with whatever I was using (I believe it was 37L46s on HTs) than with Tigers. Given the mg post hull was a zero rating (and many forts have hull ratings no more than 40mm), I almost felt as though I was wasting time and ammunition better spent elsewhere than to use the Tiger guns on them, but it's one of those things where in order to hope to advance your Tigers very far, safely, you need to help out the infantry, so as it generally happens with me, there will be a phase where the big tanks are suppressing/destroying any anti-personnel obstacles, and then later, as more AT factors have been dealt with, I will move up some of the lightest stuff to take over while the Tigers move on.
I looked at the panzerschreck yesterday when I got home, and other than what I already knew about it's having more shots, a few other things popped up. For one thing, it has a range of '4', while the best panzerfaust has range of '3'. The accuracy is about the same, given that the more inaccurate panzerschreck is blessed with 33% more range to work off of. Secondly, the panzerschreck has max. penetration of 195, while the faust has 225. A considerable advantage to the faust, but then again, how many tanks withstand the potential of 195? Of course HEAT rounds don't achieve the max all of the time, but given the advantages of the schreck, in the areas it has them, ideally, the enemy tanks would face fausts, frontally from the infantry, while facing schrecks, more distant, from the sides/rear.
_____________________________
|