Apollo11
Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001 From: Zagreb, Croatia Status: offline
|
Hi all, quote:
ORIGINAL: Apollo11 quote:
ORIGINAL: Terminus quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones. Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict... I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then? Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening? It's a bad idea. I think that you guys didn't read the actual resolution... thsi is not just "No Fly Zone"... Here it is... http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10200.doc.htm#Resolution quote:
“Protection of civilians “4. Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council; Leo "Apollo11"
_____________________________
Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance! A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
|