Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: THE THREAD!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  521 522 [523] 524 525   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/17/2011 11:41:39 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


quote:

ORIGINAL: sprior


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Cultural curiosity: what do you guys put on your pancakes?

ETA: butter and maple syrup would be the most common here. Fruit, jam or fruit compote would also be rather common.

Warspite1

Lemon juice and sugar.....mmmm luverly.


+ 1


Erm...what is a 'pancake' to you islanders?

Warspite1

My other half uses a batter mix, sticks it in a pan and cooks until a nice brown colour.... I think . My role is to add lemon juice and sugar, fold into a sort of flat oblong shape and then eat .

I must admit, I do not tend to get involved in the Kitchen side of things.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 15661
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/17/2011 11:46:21 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


You've never had Swedish pancakes CB? You who live in that bastion of Scandinavians called the Upper Midwest?


He has probably had it in a "hot dish."


I dont whant to know what CB and a "hot dish" would mean in the same sentence.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 15662
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/17/2011 11:58:04 PM   
Kwik E Mart


Posts: 2447
Joined: 7/22/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Cultural curiosity: what do you guys put on your pancakes?

ETA: butter and maple syrup would be the most common here. Fruit, jam or fruit compote would also be rather common.


i prefer butter only...but i offer pancakes in the belgian manner, "Care for a smoke and a pancake?"

_____________________________

Kirk Lazarus: I know who I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude!
Ron Swanson: Clear alcohols are for rich women on diets.


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 15663
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 12:04:06 AM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Curse the UN!


Upset about the Libyan no-fly zone?

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 15664
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 1:36:27 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Curse the UN!


Upset about the Libyan no-fly zone?


I have a feeling that Brother Dixie is about to become very busy at work for a while....

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 15665
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 1:44:30 AM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie

Curse the UN!


Upset about the Libyan no-fly zone?


I have a feeling that Brother Dixie is about to become very busy at work for a while....


Yeah, I know. I was hoping he was upset about the color of the new hallway tiles at the UN headquarters or something. At least is pretty safe as long as youre not in the country.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 15666
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 3:48:55 AM   
offenseman


Posts: 768
Joined: 2/24/2007
From: Sheridan Wyoming, USA
Status: offline
I saw that two arab league members ( I didn't know they had a league) were going to enforce the no-fly zone.  I wonder where they will stage from? Long flight from Saudi, Iran, etc. Shorter flight from Syria but they would never get overflight privileges from Israel- well, the Israelis might use them for ACM practice...  Egypt has issues of its own.  Might be interesting.

_____________________________

Sometimes things said in Nitwit sound very different in English.

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 15667
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 5:01:15 AM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...

_____________________________


(in reply to offenseman)
Post #: 15668
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 5:17:17 AM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
A pernicious Irish whiskey good evening tithe...

_____________________________


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 15669
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 6:23:45 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 15670
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 8:33:29 AM   
Grollub


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline
Good morning friends.

_____________________________

“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15671
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 8:39:16 AM   
Grollub


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.

Agreed. As usual with the UN - Too little, too late and the wrong setup. It's a political alibi, nothing else.


_____________________________

“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15672
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:01:27 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

Good morning!


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Grollub)
Post #: 15673
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:02:34 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.


I think that you guys didn't read the actual resolution... thsi is not just "No Fly Zone"...


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15674
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:04:50 AM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.


Exactly. Although we aren't talking about just a no fly zone are we? The wording of the resolution seems to say that "UN" forces can carry out attacks on the Libyan army if it's deemed neccessary. So in effect we're going to be the rebel air force whilst forcing the Colonel to stay grounded. So once again we're involved in someone else's war.

It's a bad idea, badly thought out.

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15675
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:09:57 AM   
Hortlund


Posts: 2884
Joined: 10/13/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus
I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Actually if you read the UN-resolution, you will notice that the mandate is a bit wider than that.

First, it is a chapter 7 resolution, which means military force is allowed (perhaps that seems like a no-brainer for most, but it is important to point this out, because once chapter 7 has been opened, normal rules do not apply).

Second, the resolution authorizes member states “to take all necessary measures… to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamhariya, including Benghazi.

That means that while the resolution seems to be about a no-fly-zone, it is actually much much wider than that. This resolution authorizes anyone to go after any and all Ghadaffi forces.

quote:


Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.

My, such cynisism. Better to let Ghadaffi slaughter his own civilians? Airstrikes dont win a war you say? What happened in Kosovo then? And without the resolution, what would prevent Ghadaffi from just rolling over Bengazi like the Russians took Grozny? Heavy artillery for a couple of weeks and then the tanks roll in...what sort of humanitarian disaster do you think that would make? Not to mention the awful message it would send to the arab world.

Airstrikes might not have won wars in the ww2-era, but it sure as /&%# will prevent any offensive operations whatsoever by Ghadaffi.

_____________________________

The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15676
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:20:25 AM   
Hortlund


Posts: 2884
Joined: 10/13/2000
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie
So once again we're involved in someone else's war.

It's a bad idea, badly thought out.

What is the alternative? Just let all those people die?

We are talking about a rebellion against one of the worst dictators in the world. If we dont help, then who will? And more importantly, if we dont help, then what have we become?

_____________________________

The era of procrastination, of half-measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to a close.
In its place we are entering a period of consequences..

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 15677
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 9:53:07 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.


I think that you guys didn't read the actual resolution... thsi is not just "No Fly Zone"...



Here it is...

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sc10200.doc.htm#Resolution


quote:

“Protection of civilians

“4. Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;



Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 15678
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 10:36:52 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panzerjaeger Hortlund


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus
I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Actually if you read the UN-resolution, you will notice that the mandate is a bit wider than that.

First, it is a chapter 7 resolution, which means military force is allowed (perhaps that seems like a no-brainer for most, but it is important to point this out, because once chapter 7 has been opened, normal rules do not apply).

Second, the resolution authorizes member states “to take all necessary measures… to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamhariya, including Benghazi.

That means that while the resolution seems to be about a no-fly-zone, it is actually much much wider than that. This resolution authorizes anyone to go after any and all Ghadaffi forces.

quote:


Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.

My, such cynisism. Better to let Ghadaffi slaughter his own civilians? Airstrikes dont win a war you say? What happened in Kosovo then? And without the resolution, what would prevent Ghadaffi from just rolling over Bengazi like the Russians took Grozny? Heavy artillery for a couple of weeks and then the tanks roll in...what sort of humanitarian disaster do you think that would make? Not to mention the awful message it would send to the arab world.

Airstrikes might not have won wars in the ww2-era, but it sure as /&%# will prevent any offensive operations whatsoever by Ghadaffi.


Kosovo? You're kidding, right? That war ended when KFOR rolled in, not when the last bomb fell.

And this UN resolution is a half-arsed abortion, typical of the place, and only endorsed by 2/3 of the security council.

What'll the Western media say when the first downed NATO pilots are dragged through the streets of Tripoli? Because they will be.

I may be cynical but you're catastrophically naive.


_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Hortlund)
Post #: 15679
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:16:43 AM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Panzerjaeger Hortlund


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie
So once again we're involved in someone else's war.

It's a bad idea, badly thought out.

What is the alternative? Just let all those people die?

We are talking about a rebellion against one of the worst dictators in the world. If we dont help, then who will? And more importantly, if we dont help, then what have we become?


Yes. That's the alternative and it's one I'd take. The West isn't welcome in the Arab world, all we're doing is sticking our noses into the internal affairs of another nation. In the worst case scenario, I don't believe that any number of rebel lives are worth the loss of a single NATO pilot. Why isn't the UN getting involved in Bahrain? Are they less deserving of our protection?

The resolution isn't about saving the civilians. It's about having a ready-made excuse to get involved and overthrow the Colonel. We had our chance years ago and didn't take it when we reasonably could have.

Speaking from a UK viewpoint, we don't have the assets to do this. The forces are being cut and now we're wading into another scrap half cocked and with no loing term plans.

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to Hortlund)
Post #: 15680
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:19:28 AM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apollo11

Hi all,


quote:

“Protection of civilians

“4. Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures, notwithstanding paragraph 9 of resolution 1970 (2011), to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council;



Leo "Apollo11"


In effect we're going to be providing airstrikes for the rebels and stopping the Libyan government from doing the same. It's not UN action, it's getting fully involved IMO.


_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 15681
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:41:25 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sprior

Okay, so who ordered a copy of this?

quote:

Or this?


Thank you for pointing those out. I will get right on it.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to sprior)
Post #: 15682
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:43:29 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grollub

[chuckle] Swedish commercial; "Looking for a new job?"





_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Grollub)
Post #: 15683
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:45:30 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Cultural curiosity: what do you guys put on your pancakes?

ETA: butter and maple syrup would be the most common here. Fruit, jam or fruit compote would also be rather common.



I prefer butter and cane syrup, but the latter is hard to find around here.


+1

http://www.steensyrup.com/Merchant2/products.html

< Message edited by stuman -- 3/18/2011 11:50:55 AM >


_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 15684
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:49:32 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Grollub


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Unlikely that fixed-wing FBs will challenge NATO-enforced no fly zones.  Now, rotary wing ground support will be a bit more challenging to interdict...


I think this no-fly zone is a poor idea, arrived at too late. The Colonel can just keep his planes on the ground while his soldiers roll into Benghazi and Tobruk and kill the population off. What are we going to do then?

Airstrikes don't win a war, and since the UN resolution doesn't allow for ground troops, and the rebels are not powerful enough to go on the offensive and win for months (if not years), what is to be gained from intervening?

It's a bad idea.

Agreed. As usual with the UN - Too little, too late and the wrong setup. It's a political alibi, nothing else.




I tend to agree here.

< Message edited by stuman -- 3/18/2011 11:50:29 AM >


_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Grollub)
Post #: 15685
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:52:32 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Panzerjaeger Hortlund


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dixie
So once again we're involved in someone else's war.

It's a bad idea, badly thought out.

What is the alternative? Just let all those people die?

We are talking about a rebellion against one of the worst dictators in the world. If we dont help, then who will? And more importantly, if we dont help, then what have we become?


Yes. That's the alternative and it's one I'd take. The West isn't welcome in the Arab world, all we're doing is sticking our noses into the internal affairs of another nation. In the worst case scenario, I don't believe that any number of rebel lives are worth the loss of a single NATO pilot. Why isn't the UN getting involved in Bahrain? Are they less deserving of our protection?

The resolution isn't about saving the civilians. It's about having a ready-made excuse to get involved and overthrow the Colonel. We had our chance years ago and didn't take it when we reasonably could have.

Speaking from a UK viewpoint, we don't have the assets to do this. The forces are being cut and now we're wading into another scrap half cocked and with no loing term plans.

Warspite1

+1

......and for Bahrain, add the poor people of Zimbabwe etc etc.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 15686
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 11:53:31 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
Off to work, more tax returns calling my name.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 15687
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 12:08:43 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
And what "signal" will we be sending to the Arab world once the bombs start going astray and killing the civilians this clusterf**k is supposed to protect? Because they will.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 15688
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 12:31:29 PM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
Because I want my Thread Brothers to live happier lives ( from an article I read concerning health tips ):

" 4. Have hotter sex

The researcher: Alan Hirsch, MD, director, Smell & Taste Treatment and Research Foundation

The lesson: Smelling popcorn can boost your sex life. "Our studies found that men respond to just about any scent with increased penile blood flow. Skip the pricey perfume—it upped blood flow by only 3%. The smell of cheese pizza increased it by 5%; buttered popcorn, by 9%; and the combined scent of lavender and pumpkin pie, a whopping 40%." "

I told my wife to go look for some lavendar flavored popcorn. I don't think she believed me.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 15689
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 3/18/2011 12:33:55 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline
Morning tithe.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to offenseman)
Post #: 15690
Page:   <<   < prev  521 522 [523] 524 525   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  521 522 [523] 524 525   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.984