Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Panzer Command: Ostfront >> US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/17/2011 9:11:29 PM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675027664_M-7-Motor-Carriage_fires-howitzer_soldiers-handle-shells_fires-from-the-net

I remember some online 'discussions' regarding the firing rates of the 25 pdr. and the US 105mm howitzer. Clearly, the video shows a firing rate that the 25 pdr, or any seperate projectile/charge system can not achieve.

Hopefully PC4 can model the actual 'quick-fire' that some weapons could achieve. This did come at a price. The US not only ran short of 105 ammunition, they also burnt out tubes very quickly.

< Message edited by Yoozername -- 4/17/2011 9:12:58 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/17/2011 10:06:29 PM   
Mobius


Posts: 10339
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: California
Status: offline 		People make the mistake of using the indirect firing rate of some guns as the rate that would be used in their anti-tank mode. With targeting, tracking, obscurance slowing down the rate.

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 2
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/17/2011 10:49:13 PM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		That's true.  The M7's are clearly firing indirect and there is hardly time to even look through the sight.  The loader seems to be the limiting factor.  I doubt this rapid-fire can be held up for more than a dozen rounds before human or gun factors play in.

Tanks firing direct at long range would initially have to observe the fall of the shot.  The weapon might be reloaded before the first shot is observed, the sight corrected and the next round is fired. 

(in reply to Mobius)
Post #: 3
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/18/2011 5:38:03 PM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		If you look closely at the 88mm firing in videos, it appears there is an oscillation of the barrel in the ground fire role (when the barrell is parallel to the ground).  This would certainly have to dampen out if there was to be accurate long range AT fire.  Its very noticeable at the end of this video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sElNyLusnNU&NR=1

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 4
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/18/2011 8:21:57 PM   
Ratzki

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Chilliwack, British Columbia
Status: offline 		It looked as though the barrel movement appears in all positions, but more when parallel to the ground. I think that target re-aquisition after recoil would give enough time for this movement to stop. It appears on the video to calm down quickly after firing. It might be needed somewhat for accuracy. I know that rifle barrels vibrate during bullet travel down the length of the barrel and afterwards. It has to do this or accuracy would be extremely reduced. This is why you float a barrel, to allow for the movement and why traditional long stalked guns like was used during the war are not very accurate, then put a bayonet on the gun and you might as well not even aim at all.
Just a thought.

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 5
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/18/2011 9:04:56 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline 		well, perhaps we should define accurate.. for the hunter hitingthe elk at 350 yards is awesome, for the competitive shooter 1000 yard tight groups are the goal.
The german 88 in anti tank role was very accurate, plus 2000 meters, from the anti tank gun or turretted versions... if you are looking for a cold to hot barrell calc and the goal is to put a round on a tank at 1000 -2000 then accuracy to me would be hitting it...

(in reply to Ratzki)
Post #: 6
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/18/2011 11:21:55 PM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		http://www.youtube.com/embed/MasHown9MH4

These 88s are certainly pushing it. They are helped by a auto-eject of spent rounds.

< Message edited by Yoozername -- 4/18/2011 11:22:33 PM >

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 7
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 1:35:37 AM   
Ratzki

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Chilliwack, British Columbia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freeboy

well, perhaps we should define accurate.. for the hunter hitingthe elk at 350 yards is awesome, for the competitive shooter 1000 yard tight groups are the goal.
The german 88 in anti tank role was very accurate, plus 2000 meters, from the anti tank gun or turretted versions... if you are looking for a cold to hot barrell calc and the goal is to put a round on a tank at 1000 -2000 then accuracy to me would be hitting it...


I am not saying that the 88 was not accurate, I am just noting that the long barrel might need the movement to keep it accurate at range. I thought that the discussion had moved to rates of fire and the 88's barrel movement after firing. I am not talking about hot/cold barrels either, but the movement all barrels have during projectile movement down the length of the barrel. Floating the barrel in a gun definately improves the hot/cold barrel warp from firing shell after shell, but it also helps by allowing the barrel to vibrate freely each and every shot. If viewed from a high speed camera, the gun barrels vibrate and move quite a bit as the projectile moves down and exits the end of the barrel. All barrels vibrate after they have fired. All barrels have to be "tuned" to the calibre being used. This is done in a number of ways from barrel length to barrel wall thickness, and others. Then once this "tuning" is found, the barrels can be mass produced to the same specs. I was thinking that an 88 is way bigger then anything I have ever seen shot so maybe this vibration/movement was needed to keep the round from tumbling or exiting the barrel off target. I thought that exponentially moving from a small calibre to a very large one might part explain why a better recoil system was not in place to help prevent this barrel movement in the 88. First it is a huge round and the projectile is moving fast enough that I would dare say that there is no moss growing on it along the way. It must generate a huge amount of recoil. I know that they must have had the ability to reduce this recoil, but as Yoozer pointed out, recoil is not only there but the barrel has this gyrating wobble as well. Would this affect the rate of fire? I wonder... maybe it was not an issue as the guy targetting the 88 would have to get off the first shot, then judging by the video clips, the target would probably have to be totally re-aquired as this gun kicks as hard as any and could be way off target for a second follow-up shot, by the time he is able to lock in on the target again this wobble is gone and is no longer an issue.

(in reply to freeboy)
Post #: 8
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 3:41:33 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		I would think the 88, when firing at near vertical elevations (AA) would not exhibit this obviously unwanted angular motion.  Mostly because gravity is not effecting the long parallel hanging off like a beam.  'Accuracy' is not that much of an issue when shooting AA.  88s would fire into a 'box' and the fleet of bombers would have to keep formation and fly through it.

When firing AT, I would almost guartantee that angular motion seen in the videos is going to change the range of the high velocity shot.  It needs to dampen out before the next round.  And that second video shows some fast firing. 

I have also seen video of the 88s firing indirect as artillery and the rounds are being fired at something like every 3 seconds.  Again, if the barrel does not stop moving, the angular change would translate into a large spread of HE rounds.

I remember a discussion I had with rexford and he was stating that the 88 had greater dispersion than he would expect.  I believe we came to a conclusion that its 'accuracy' fame was because the crews had good range-finders so they could take the range-estimation error out of the equation.  They had a great rate of fire and therefore could get hits and the impression of accuracy.

(in reply to Ratzki)
Post #: 9
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 3:51:49 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline 		All I'm going to say in response to that is, my grandfather was a German tanker, and I would like nothing more than to see the Yoozername losername moron's head exploded by an 88 shell.

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 10
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 3:56:12 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hellmann

All I'm going to say in response to that is, my grandfather was a German tanker, and I would like nothing more than to see the Yoozername losername moron's head exploded by an 88 shell.



OHHHHH YEEEAAAHHHH??? My grandmother made Lt. Colonel in the Coast Guard reserves and she would scrape you off like a barnacle...

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 11
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:04:09 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:



OHHHHH YEEEAAAHHHH??? My grandmother made Lt. Colonel in the Coast Guard reserves and she would scrape you off like a barnacle...

Thing is, I didn't say what he would've done to you. I just said I'd like to see him make mincemeat of a coward like you. So, somehow your grandmother is in the picture now? Seems like everyone else is in the frame now except your sorry ass self? Ah yes... how convenient.....

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 12
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:09:24 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		 
I think you have taken the 'Asshat-of-the-Week' award.  Congrats. 

And who said the Germans don't have a sense of humor?

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 13
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:17:58 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline 		I am German, so YOU are the "asshat of the week/month/year", congrats!

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 14
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:19:40 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		I would have never have guessed...

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 15
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:22:33 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I would have never have guessed...

Indeed, same as I would have never guessed you were an asshat.......

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 16
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:30:29 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		Is this your granpa? I would hate for a comic-book hero to make me into mincemeat...


(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 17
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:38:56 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

Is this your granpa? I would hate for a comic-book hero to make me into mincemeat...



Funnily enough... no a comic book cartoon isn't actually my grandfather... surprise surprise... but if you would prefer, I'd make you into mincemeat anytime you like by meeting me? Oh wait.. you can't actually do that? Oh dear, what a shame... what a little coward you are, for all to see...

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 18
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:41:18 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		Sure. Where do you live?

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 19
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:47:03 AM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline 		Guys, this is going nowhere. We need to get back to the topic at hand.

Good Hunting.

MR


_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 20
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:49:54 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline 		So why do you put up with having morons like Yoozername on your site? it's like the moderation here is non existent

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 21
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:53:34 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline 		This guy must be a kid or someones sock-puppet.

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 22
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 4:57:38 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

This guy must be a kid or someones sock-puppet.

Sock puppet? That's rich coming from the sock puppet meister haha! And "kid"? That's a horrible term, so you classify anyone under your age as a goat now? I'm thinking that you must be Israeli... or at least from JEW York, as everyone else is clearly the Goyim under you?

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 23
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 5:00:22 AM   
Yoozername

 

Posts: 1121
Joined: 3/4/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hellmann


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

This guy must be a kid or someones sock-puppet.

Sock puppet? That's rich coming from the sock puppet meister haha! And "kid"? That's a horrible term, so you classify anyone under your age as a goat now? I'm thinking that you must be Israeli... or at least from JEW York, as everyone else is clearly the Goyim under you?


Nice

(in reply to Hellmann)
Post #: 24
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 5:19:54 AM   
Hellmann

 

Posts: 25
Joined: 4/12/2011
Status: offline 		Nice? Is that seriously all you can say? Typical. I'm calling you out losername. You're nothing.

_____________________________

Hellmann of Hammer Force

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 25
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 6:13:04 AM   
Ratzki

 

Posts: 581
Joined: 8/18/2008
From: Chilliwack, British Columbia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yoozername

I would think the 88, when firing at near vertical elevations (AA) would not exhibit this obviously unwanted angular motion.  Mostly because gravity is not effecting the long parallel hanging off like a beam.  'Accuracy' is not that much of an issue when shooting AA.  88s would fire into a 'box' and the fleet of bombers would have to keep formation and fly through it.

When firing AT, I would almost guartantee that angular motion seen in the videos is going to change the range of the high velocity shot.  It needs to dampen out before the next round.  And that second video shows some fast firing. 
...


It was a little tough to tell in some of the clips if the 88 was on it's wheels or if the bogies were removed. In an AT role, was the 88 always set up differently then it would be in an AA role? The on clip were the gun was firing while on it's wheels had much more barrel action after the shot.

The fast loading would imply that the gun was capable of some serious rates of fire, but there is no way to tell if they are firing at another vehicle or area firing in a direct role. It would be nice to see some AT firing with clips showing some follow-up shots to see what the rate of fire was in the clip.

Does the 88mm have the same motion when a Tiger fires off a round?

(in reply to Yoozername)
Post #: 26
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 2:04:46 PM   
morganbj


Posts: 3634
Joined: 8/12/2007
From: Mosquito Bite, Texas
Status: offline 		The asylum must have an early release program for their prepubescent clientele.

_____________________________

Occasionally, and randomly, problems and solutions collide. The probability of these collisions is inversely related to the number of committees working on the solutions. -- Me.

(in reply to Ratzki)
Post #: 27
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 2:54:30 PM   
dieseltaylor

 

Posts: 11
Joined: 10/25/2010
Status: offline 		I am curious how burts fire is managed in games. The theorretical fire rate of a Sherman75mm is 20 ish which has no practical application other than if you were trying to knockdown a large building not too far away. If you are trying to nail another vehicle at 1500metres then your rate of fire should be very much lower. What seems to happen is an average fire rate is chosen no matter what the circumstance.

BTW Sherman 105mm could fire 4* in 30 seconds but over ten minute sowuld be expected to fire 30. * I imagine these would be the rounds stored to hand.

(in reply to morganbj)
Post #: 28
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 3:00:44 PM   
Mad Russian


Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline 		What do you mean by "burts fire"?

Good Hunting.

MR


_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to dieseltaylor)
Post #: 29
RE: US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate - 4/19/2011 3:47:31 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Hellman, Yoozername,

Formal warning to both of you. Personal attacks are not allowed here. If you continue this you'll get a vacation from the forum to review the rules.

Everyone, please keep the discussion friendly and civil and leave any baggage from other places behind when you come here.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Mad Russian)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Panzer Command: Ostfront >> US Artillery in WWII: 105mm firing rate Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.500