Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in Distant Worlds?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in Distant Worlds? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/3/2011 10:07:48 PM   
Chet Guiles

 

Posts: 267
Joined: 6/14/2002
From: Southern CA
Status: offline 		Please, Please, Please, consider allowing us to CHOOSE which components to install on new ship designs so that when we do a mass upgrade to install a really cool new tech the AI doesn't undo half of what we have done in selecting our favorites. A sinple on/off switch for each available component would work, just like we can manually determine which ship designs are considered "obsolete". If we switch off ALL of a component type the AI could warn us "You MUST have at least one engine type" etc...

I hate to develop an improved shield system then have the AI remove them when I develop and install, for example, install Titan Beams across the board, and reinstall all the old crappy shields. Duh!

I guess I could do updates on every unit separately one at a time, but it would be nice to have that simple choice available.

A great game and this would makie it greater!

< Message edited by Chet Guiles -- 5/3/2011 10:08:54 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Hawawaa)
Post #: 121
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/3/2011 10:11:23 PM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chet Guiles

Please, Please, Please, consider allowing us to CHOOSE which components to install on new ship designs so that when we do a mass upgrade to install a really cool new tech the AI doesn't undo half of what we have done in selecting our favorites. A sinple on/off switch for each available component would work, just like we can manually determine which ship designs are considered "obsolete". If we switch off ALL of a component type the AI could warn us "You MUST have at least one engine type" etc...

I hate to develop an improved shield system then have the AI remove them when I develop and install, for example, install Titan Beams across the board, and reinstall all the old crappy shields. Duh!

I guess I could do updates on every unit separately one at a time, but it would be nice to have that simple choice available.

A great game and this would makie it greater!


I raised this very issue here http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2794101 in the tech support forum.

It was a pain on an empire wide upgrade session.

You may want to copy and paste your similiar complaint there.


(in reply to Chet Guiles)
Post #: 122
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/4/2011 12:15:23 AM   
Igard


Posts: 2282
Joined: 3/29/2010
From: Scotland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chet Guiles

Please, Please, Please, consider allowing us to CHOOSE which components to install on new ship designs so that when we do a mass upgrade to install a really cool new tech the AI doesn't undo half of what we have done in selecting our favorites. A sinple on/off switch for each available component would work, just like we can manually determine which ship designs are considered "obsolete". If we switch off ALL of a component type the AI could warn us "You MUST have at least one engine type" etc...

I hate to develop an improved shield system then have the AI remove them when I develop and install, for example, install Titan Beams across the board, and reinstall all the old crappy shields. Duh!

I guess I could do updates on every unit separately one at a time, but it would be nice to have that simple choice available.

A great game and this would makie it greater!



Yes, I find this to be a bit of a problem too.

Perhaps if we had a ship design section in the empire policy screen, we could go through it and select what type to use. A combo box with each component we've researched. Or even the option to never use this type of tech. For example, I hate area effect weapons. I could set the policy to never use area effect weapons on any of my designs, just like I can set the policy to never build robotic troop facilities.

The advantage of using a policy screen combo box is that we could hopefully, eventually set design policies for each race via modding, but still have the ability to change the policy for the race we're playing.


_____________________________

The Picard Era for Distant Worlds

Igard's Romulan Stormbird

(in reply to Chet Guiles)
Post #: 123
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/4/2011 6:07:02 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline 		great idea
+1

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 124
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 3:13:59 AM   
Igard


Posts: 2282
Joined: 3/29/2010
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		Just another update. Quite interesting tie for second place.

Good to see conquer/colonization options up there too.

And a massive 17 votes for space creature farms. Surely reason enough to make 'em happen for the next expansion?




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

The Picard Era for Distant Worlds

Igard's Romulan Stormbird

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 125
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 9:45:21 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline 		All of the sudden 17 votes for space creature farms? The votes are farmed for sure

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 126
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 7:36:31 PM   
gmot


Posts: 123
Joined: 11/22/2010
Status: offline 		Surprised the ground combat & conquer/colonize options aren't more popular. Or perhaps that's just my pet peeve...

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 127
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 7:44:03 PM   
Igard


Posts: 2282
Joined: 3/29/2010
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		Conquer/colonize is one of mine as well, gmot. It's doing quite well anyway when you consider it's joint 8th and there are only 8 votes available, which means almost everyone wants it.

Ground combat is something I think just needs some work. It's not huge for me and I'm not sure if it needs a mini game. First things first, make sure we can't invade until all space ports have been destroyed IMO.


_____________________________

The Picard Era for Distant Worlds

Igard's Romulan Stormbird

(in reply to gmot)
Post #: 128
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 9:06:19 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
quote:

First things first, make sure we can't invade until all space ports have been destroyed IMO.


right beside you on this one

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 129
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 9:21:05 PM   
2guncohen


Posts: 401
Joined: 4/9/2010
From: Belguim
Status: offline 		voted 

_____________________________

Alternative stormtrooper picture




(in reply to Data)
Post #: 130
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/12/2011 11:23:55 PM   
martok


Posts: 837
Joined: 8/30/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Data

quote:

First things first, make sure we can't invade until all space ports have been destroyed IMO.


right beside you on this one

+2

IMHO, ground invasions shouldn't be able to occur until all planetary defenses are disabled/destroyed.






_____________________________

"Evil is easy, and has infinite forms." -- Pascal


(in reply to Data)
Post #: 131
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/13/2011 1:00:44 AM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: martok


quote:

ORIGINAL: Data

quote:

First things first, make sure we can't invade until all space ports have been destroyed IMO.


right beside you on this one

+2

IMHO, ground invasions shouldn't be able to occur until all planetary defenses are disabled/destroyed.



I agree in principal.

But what mechanism/feature would mean you can't invade?

Super shielded transports can land troops anywhere.

Perhaps planets should have Ion Cannon's which would destroy a transport at point blank range.

You can't really give the Ion Cannon function to a space port.

Maybe a LSP's ground attack function should be better so they can vapourize invading troops better than present.

(in reply to martok)
Post #: 132
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/13/2011 3:32:58 AM   
Igard


Posts: 2282
Joined: 3/29/2010
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		Good points there, CM.

I like the idea of some kind of anti-invasion component. Perhaps taking the form of a ground attack, or a satellite defence network controlled from the spaceport. Why it's not controlled from the ground? Well, I suppose we can just assume it's better controlled from orbit.


_____________________________

The Picard Era for Distant Worlds

Igard's Romulan Stormbird

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 133
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/13/2011 8:02:26 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline 		We can find a middle ground, troops are allowed to trasnport down but incurr heavy loses if the orbital defences are not eliminated first; so not only a defense bonus but some fighters to bombard the invading troops and such. That way, if you really want it, you can do this as well and assume the risks.

< Message edited by Data -- 5/13/2011 8:05:40 AM >

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 134
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/13/2011 4:54:25 PM   
Shark7


Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cookie monster


quote:

ORIGINAL: martok


quote:

ORIGINAL: Data

quote:

First things first, make sure we can't invade until all space ports have been destroyed IMO.


right beside you on this one

+2

IMHO, ground invasions shouldn't be able to occur until all planetary defenses are disabled/destroyed.



I agree in principal.

But what mechanism/feature would mean you can't invade?

Super shielded transports can land troops anywhere.

Perhaps planets should have Ion Cannon's which would destroy a transport at point blank range.

You can't really give the Ion Cannon function to a space port.

Maybe a LSP's ground attack function should be better so they can vapourize invading troops better than present.



Ion cannon disables the ships electronics, loses helm control, falls into a decaying orbit...burns up upon entering the planets gravity. I could buy that.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to cookie monster)
Post #: 135
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/13/2011 11:17:40 PM   
tjhkkr


Posts: 2428
Joined: 6/3/2010
Status: offline 		That is the one thing I wish this had... a ground based fighter installation. Most planets would have that kind of minimal protection, especially with fighters about.

NOW HERE IS AN ADD ON: have pirates sack your planet for money... every time they do, the subtract money from your bank account, so that makes them more of a menace than JUST shooting up your installations.

_____________________________

Remember that the evil which is now in the world will become yet more powerful, and that it is not evil which conquers evil, but only love -- Olga Romanov.

(in reply to Shark7)
Post #: 136
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/14/2011 12:16:45 AM   
Andrew Brown


Posts: 5007
Joined: 9/5/2000
From: Hex 82,170
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Data

We can find a middle ground, troops are allowed to trasnport down but incurr heavy loses if the orbital defences are not eliminated first; so not only a defense bonus but some fighters to bombard the invading troops and such. That way, if you really want it, you can do this as well and assume the risks.


I agree with this approach. It is better than an arbitrary ban.

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 137
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/14/2011 12:51:59 AM   
cookie monster


Posts: 1693
Joined: 5/22/2005
From: Birmingham,England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andrew Brown


quote:

ORIGINAL: Data

We can find a middle ground, troops are allowed to transport down but incurr heavy loses if the orbital defences are not eliminated first; so not only a defense bonus but some fighters to bombard the invading troops and such. That way, if you really want it, you can do this as well and assume the risks.


I agree with this approach. It is better than an arbitrary ban.


Ref Orbital Defences

It's already in game. It's mentioned in the patch notes. Perhaps the damage to troops they can do should be made higher.

(in reply to Andrew Brown)
Post #: 138
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/14/2011 8:25:38 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tjhkkr

That is the one thing I wish this had... a ground based fighter installation. Most planets would have that kind of minimal protection, especially with fighters about.

NOW HERE IS AN ADD ON: have pirates sack your planet for money... every time they do, the subtract money from your bank account, so that makes them more of a menace than JUST shooting up your installations.


Both these ideas remind me of MOO2; need I say more? I totally want them as well.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to tjhkkr)
Post #: 139
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 3:15:06 AM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline 		Thanks again for this poll, it was part of the design discussion for the next expansion.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC



For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 140
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 3:43:03 AM   
ehsumrell1


Posts: 2529
Joined: 8/17/2010
From: The Briar Patch Nebula
Status: offline 		Thanks for the info Erik.

Way to go Igard!

_____________________________

Shields are useless in "The Briar Patch"...

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 141
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 7:01:55 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline 		Here, here, Igard FTW.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to ehsumrell1)
Post #: 142
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 11:41:22 AM   
Sithuk

 

Posts: 431
Joined: 12/17/2010
Status: offline 		Erik: please note that this poll was the second of two. The most popular option was removed (AI). Modding was also removed as an option.

From the OP:

quote:


Omissions from the first poll :-

AI Improvements - This was by far the most popular choice among players in the first poll. It's been removed from this one as it's now a given that we all want to see the AI keep up with any new features and mechanics.

UI Improvements - This is a generic answer that allowed for too much ambiguity. We can assume that UI improvements will occur regularly as they have done in previous patches. Some of the new answers on this poll are related to specific changes/additions in user interface.

Mod support - This has been removed as it's unkown what form it will take. Again it's a general answer and thus, slightly ambiguous. I will do a poll in the future for specific mod support items.


Oh and a well earned thanks to Igard.

< Message edited by Sithuk -- 5/21/2011 11:42:55 AM >

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 143
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 1:01:48 PM   
J HG T


Posts: 1093
Joined: 5/14/2010
From: Kiadia Prime
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Thanks again for this poll, it was part of the design discussion for the next expansion.

Regards,

- Erik


Yeah! Though I've only been lurking here nowadays, that is a great thing to hear.
Well done Igard!
BTW. As others have said, enhanching the AI should be quite high on the priority list.

Probably should get back playing DW once again. Have had other games to play and chores to do.


_____________________________

Nothing is impossible, not if you can imagine it!
"And they hurled themselves into the void of space with no fear."

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 144
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/21/2011 2:27:22 PM   
Igard


Posts: 2282
Joined: 3/29/2010
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		It was my pleasure, Erik. Had lots of fun doing this and it's very interesting to gather the results and get new ideas for the next poll.

As has been pointed out, AI is paramount and was the number 1 vote for the last poll. It kind of goes hand in hand with any game improvement, but we also know that you're working on AI at all times anyway, so it was deemed unecessary for this poll.


_____________________________

The Picard Era for Distant Worlds

Igard's Romulan Stormbird

(in reply to J HG T)
Post #: 145
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/25/2011 4:54:34 AM   
tjhkkr


Posts: 2428
Joined: 6/3/2010
Status: offline 		You da man, Igard!

_____________________________

Remember that the evil which is now in the world will become yet more powerful, and that it is not evil which conquers evil, but only love -- Olga Romanov.

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 146
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/29/2011 12:59:17 AM   
Pipewrench


Posts: 453
Joined: 1/5/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Igard


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chet Guiles

Please, Please, Please, consider allowing us to CHOOSE which components to install on new ship designs so that when we do a mass upgrade to install a really cool new tech the AI doesn't undo half of what we have done in selecting our favorites. A sinple on/off switch for each available component would work, just like we can manually determine which ship designs are considered "obsolete". If we switch off ALL of a component type the AI could warn us "You MUST have at least one engine type" etc...

I hate to develop an improved shield system then have the AI remove them when I develop and install, for example, install Titan Beams across the board, and reinstall all the old crappy shields. Duh!

I guess I could do updates on every unit separately one at a time, but it would be nice to have that simple choice available.

A great game and this would makie it greater!



Yes, I find this to be a bit of a problem too.

Perhaps if we had a ship design section in the empire policy screen, we could go through it and select what type to use. A combo box with each component we've researched. Or even the option to never use this type of tech. For example, I hate area effect weapons. I could set the policy to never use area effect weapons on any of my designs, just like I can set the policy to never build robotic troop facilities.

The advantage of using a policy screen combo box is that we could hopefully, eventually set design policies for each race via modding, but still have the ability to change the policy for the race we're playing.




+1
a simple lock button on each component for the design would solve the upgrade guessing the AI does.


for me:

mystery on research as you should not know the whole tree and the time-frame unless you are very close to a break thru.

spies that can be sent back as double agents. Imagine the jaw-drop when your cruiser blows up for no reason or even worse a virus turns your fleet around on itself.

tighter diplomacy where you should not be able to trade with empires that are on good terms with someone you are at war with. It would also be fitting that a definite. cooling of relations would happen when it is found out that you are using their tech

more cloak and dagger when it comes to forces defending planets. you should not know the exact ground forces on a planet unless you have invested in intelligence.

add breakdowns into components. rushed techs or a substandard manufacturing or repair tech could cause problems. ie WW2 USA torpedo's.

speaking of which,


force specialization of ships


small ships can cloak and provide recon, mine laying and espionage. Cloaking should be limited by size

small-mid size hunt the small ships and recon ahead giving early warning.

mid-size for bombardment and anti-fighter/bomber defense.

large for heavy bombardment

very large for bomber and fighter platforms.



it sounds like the navy and as far as i am concerned it would evolve that way.

just some thoughts.

the game as it is now is great and my cash is ready to support the development

...now back to walking the bull, by the tail, thru the china-shop. Everything is on hard with dead slow research and a very harsh homeworld. Sweat!! :-)





< Message edited by pipewrench -- 5/29/2011 1:04:50 AM >

(in reply to Igard)
Post #: 147
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 5/29/2011 6:37:21 AM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline
quote:

force specialization of ships


+1
I agree with all of it but this sums it up nicely

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Pipewrench)
Post #: 148
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 6/1/2011 6:58:10 PM   
Wade1000


Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline 		Terraforming, Ringworlds, sphereworlds(Dyson spheres) would be great but the current technology tree suggests only incremental advances as if like a WW2 game. Of course, another expansion could change every thing.

Also, please, Orbital Rings(like in The Culture novels and others), Orbital Spheres, and ships as population centers like in The Culture. Ships and Orbital Rings are their greatest percentages of population centers. Planets are like back country villages, research stations, and nature preserves.

See my signature below. Lol.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to Data)
Post #: 149
RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in ... - 6/1/2011 7:32:14 PM   
Data


Posts: 3909
Joined: 1/3/2011
Status: offline 		Aye, that's some signature....may we see Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds in whatever measure.
Long live the ideas of Dyson and Niven.

_____________________________

...Igniting stellar cores....Recharging reactors...Recalibrating hyperdrives....

(in reply to Wade1000)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: POLL - What 8 things would you like to see next in Distant Worlds? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.578