Hong Kong HQ Ruling

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Hong Kong HQ Ruling

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Hong Kong HQ Ruling

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Hong Kong HQ Ruling - 6/6/2011 4:24:39 PM

quelita

Posts: 4
Joined: 5/22/2011
Status: offline

Hello All...

Initially whe you capture Hong Kong it is atached to China HQ.

And there are several questions.

1) If I change HQ to Southern Army I will prevent the supplyes produced in HK to flow to China
2) And the most important I will prevent the chinese army to enter HK?
3) What will happent to those Garrisons present at HK which are restricted and belong to China HQ?

Thanks in advance.

Post #: 1

RE: Hong Kong HQ Ruling - 6/6/2011 4:59:23 PM

Chris21wen

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: quelita

Hello All...

Initially whe you capture Hong Kong it is atached to China HQ.

And there are several questions.

1) If I change HQ to Southern Army I will prevent the supplyes produced in HK to flow to China
2) And the most important I will prevent the chinese army to enter HK?
3) What will happent to those Garrisons present at HK which are restricted and belong to China HQ?

Thanks in advance.

1) I don't think this will have any effect on supply moving into China from Hong Kong. It doesn't elsewhere e.g India to Burma etc.
2) Not to sure what you mean by the Chinese Army. If you mean can you move Japanese restricted units into Hong Kong from China then yes you can. There are no restrictions on land movement only on shipping them 'abroad' so to speak.
3) Nothing, changing the command that a base is attached to has no afffect on any LCU based their. You will still need a garrison.

(in reply to quelita)

Post #: 2