GreyJoy
Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nemo121 witpqs, Andy, No, Greyjoy was very specific that he was penny-packeting his forces out in order for them to be defeated piecemeal. I've asked about it repeatedly ( as have some others ) but the dispositions remain. This would, IMO, be the best route for the IJA to take: 1. Red = STrategic railing supported by para drops. Small forces offshoot westward to take Delhi and other roads heading west in order to prevent Allied troops from cutting the LOCs. 2. Green = line of march ( not strategic movement ) which dislocates ALL Allied defences outside of Karachi and renders them useless. Without actually having to engage any of the defences Greyjoy has built up the Japanese can easily arrive in Karachi. It also forces the Allies to shock attack across a river to get back to Karachi - which will destroy them as a combat capable force ere they reach it. As re: Rader. I truly don't think we need to worry too much about anything sneaky similar to what I've posted above/below. I think that the "hey diddle, diddle, right up the middle" approach we see is what we're getting. The indirect approach would negate positions which Rader will bypass but would negate them much more cheaply and keep more of his combat power available at the tip. I don't think he has done the right analysis here though so he won't see that. I think Greyjoy's analysis is even more spotty so it'll still work out reasonably well for Rader - although he hasn't the killer instinct needed to guarantee a victory here. Thx Nemo. I've already stated that he had 3 different possible advancing vectors. Probably the one you analyzed is the best choice for him. However i do think that he wants to get first a decent AF closer to my defensive positions (in order to be able to put his Tojos in the arena) and that's why i think he wants to march to Jodpur first. Having Jopur first will give him the chance of advancing along the route you suggested without caring about the threat posed by my bombers on his advancing columns. My defences are not "penny-packeted" (don't know what it means exactly but i guess is something like "divided into pieces")...at least i don't see this in that way. I have 3 strongholds, all of them connected by railways. I can easily move inside my defensive perimeter according to his moves but i don't want to give him the advantage of knowing what i'll be doing. Karachi is well defended and all my troops are fully prepped for it. So, if i see him coming en masse with an allmighty army with the risk of being cut out from Karachi, be sure that i will run for it and this time he won't have the chance of cutting my retreat path. But before doing that i want to keep my mobility (interior lines) as long as possible, so to be able to be flexible to any possible changement of the situation. Digging right now everything in Karachi won't change anything strategically. Karachi forts are already building fast enough, having there all my engeneers (8 and 20% right now) and the supplies are already stocked there, so that's why i'm not changing my defensive positions.... I think these are sound motivations...for sure i may be wrong but i don't see any real flaw in this strategical defensive plan. If Rader makes a mistake in his advance i want to be able to exploit it. And this disposition of my troops is exactly motivated by that. If he doesn't cover his flanks correctly i could (that doesn't mean i WILL...but it's a chance i have and have to consider it) use Hyderabad and his fortifications as a fixed strongpoints and rotate on his right flank using my armoured units.... if i dig in Karachi i will spoil immediately any chance like this one of turning the cards... Off course, if i see that he advances with good disposition and under a tremendous air umbrella, i'll be the first one who recognize the need to rush back to Karachi and wait for the final siege. Hope this clarifies my strategical POV Thanks again
|