Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Mother of all Air Battles

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Mother of all Air Battles Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 11:01:40 AM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
Going from memory I dont think Japan has many land based Kate and Val units at this stage of the game, certainly not enough to more than half fill the KB.

Another thing is IF these are mainly land based "Carrier capable" units he is employing from the KB, what is he using to train his next generation of pilots back home???

Assuming GreyJoy manages to get the bulk of his units back to Karachi (Say 5000AV), how on earth can Rader ever hope to capture it?

(in reply to modrow)
Post #: 781
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 11:10:36 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

witpqs, Andy,
No, Greyjoy was very specific that he was penny-packeting his forces out in order for them to be defeated piecemeal. I've asked about it repeatedly ( as have some others ) but the dispositions remain.


This would, IMO, be the best route for the IJA to take:

1. Red = STrategic railing supported by para drops.
Small forces offshoot westward to take Delhi and other roads heading west in order to prevent Allied troops from cutting the LOCs.


2. Green = line of march ( not strategic movement ) which dislocates ALL Allied defences outside of Karachi and renders them useless. Without actually having to engage any of the defences Greyjoy has built up the Japanese can easily arrive in Karachi. It also forces the Allies to shock attack across a river to get back to Karachi - which will destroy them as a combat capable force ere they reach it.


As re: Rader. I truly don't think we need to worry too much about anything sneaky similar to what I've posted above/below. I think that the "hey diddle, diddle, right up the middle" approach we see is what we're getting. The indirect approach would negate positions which Rader will bypass but would negate them much more cheaply and keep more of his combat power available at the tip. I don't think he has done the right analysis here though so he won't see that. I think Greyjoy's analysis is even more spotty so it'll still work out reasonably well for Rader - although he hasn't the killer instinct needed to guarantee a victory here.





Thx Nemo. I've already stated that he had 3 different possible advancing vectors. Probably the one you analyzed is the best choice for him. However i do think that he wants to get first a decent AF closer to my defensive positions (in order to be able to put his Tojos in the arena) and that's why i think he wants to march to Jodpur first. Having Jopur first will give him the chance of advancing along the route you suggested without caring about the threat posed by my bombers on his advancing columns.
My defences are not "penny-packeted" (don't know what it means exactly but i guess is something like "divided into pieces")...at least i don't see this in that way. I have 3 strongholds, all of them connected by railways. I can easily move inside my defensive perimeter according to his moves but i don't want to give him the advantage of knowing what i'll be doing. Karachi is well defended and all my troops are fully prepped for it. So, if i see him coming en masse with an allmighty army with the risk of being cut out from Karachi, be sure that i will run for it and this time he won't have the chance of cutting my retreat path. But before doing that i want to keep my mobility (interior lines) as long as possible, so to be able to be flexible to any possible changement of the situation. Digging right now everything in Karachi won't change anything strategically. Karachi forts are already building fast enough, having there all my engeneers (8 and 20% right now) and the supplies are already stocked there, so that's why i'm not changing my defensive positions....
I think these are sound motivations...for sure i may be wrong but i don't see any real flaw in this strategical defensive plan.
If Rader makes a mistake in his advance i want to be able to exploit it. And this disposition of my troops is exactly motivated by that. If he doesn't cover his flanks correctly i could (that doesn't mean i WILL...but it's a chance i have and have to consider it) use Hyderabad and his fortifications as a fixed strongpoints and rotate on his right flank using my armoured units.... if i dig in Karachi i will spoil immediately any chance like this one of turning the cards...
Off course, if i see that he advances with good disposition and under a tremendous air umbrella, i'll be the first one who recognize the need to rush back to Karachi and wait for the final siege.

Hope this clarifies my strategical POV

Thanks again


(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 782
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 11:15:42 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller

Going from memory I dont think Japan has many land based Kate and Val units at this stage of the game, certainly not enough to more than half fill the KB.

Another thing is IF these are mainly land based "Carrier capable" units he is employing from the KB, what is he using to train his next generation of pilots back home???

Assuming GreyJoy manages to get the bulk of his units back to Karachi (Say 5000AV), how on earth can Rader ever hope to capture it?


with the last Bde arrived the amount of AVs that can sit into Karachi si now 6500.

And no, i have no intel about the fact that those Kate and Vals or Zeros were the original pre-war pilots...but i think there's, statistically speaking, a little chance that Rader is using only his carrier capable aircrafts...he's using so many daitais of zeros from Surat that i really do think he's sending almost the 80% of his global fighter forces into this meatgrinder.

Will surely be interesting to see how much Japan, after the fall of India, will be hurt by this long and bloody campaign and how his air forces will be able to resume their supremacy in the rest of the map!


(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 783
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 11:18:20 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Thats a damned slow route he has chosen for his main Line of Advance - suspiciously slow........

Even armour will take weeks to cross that desert out of strat mode and strat mode cannot be used if you hold Hyderabad - thats a mix of Desert (fast) and Desert (Rough) VERY SLOW hexes this looks like a bluff to be




Andy, that's exactly why i chose to defend Jodpur, Hyderabad and Karachi. Having Jodpur is essential for him in order to estabilish a strong AF closer to Karachi. At the same time he cannot march from Jodpur directly to Hyderabad and Karachi so the presence of a strong allied garrison at Jodpur will force him to invest this location first, thus slowing down the advance to the main objective (Karachi)


(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 784
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 1:16:33 PM   
terje439


Posts: 6813
Joined: 3/28/2004
Status: offline
I agree with what was said about GreyJoy being the one that should play it, and also that alot of good avdice has been offered here.

What I want to ask GreyJoy is this;
you have forces present in Jodpur to defend that base, relying on your railroads to get you out when the time comes.
What will you do if the enemy goes up to Jodpur and then starts to make flanking moves on the city towards the "west"?
By making such a move your opponent will force one of two conditions on you;
-keep your troops in Jodpur and let them die there, or
-use the railroads to move out before he has even entered the city

Is this something you keep in mind?


Terje

_____________________________

"Hun skal torpederes!" - Birger Eriksen

("She is to be torpedoed!")

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 785
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 1:18:49 PM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline
Whats Oz look like? Do you control the norther part? How does the rest of the map look also?

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 786
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 1:49:35 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: terje439

I agree with what was said about GreyJoy being the one that should play it, and also that alot of good avdice has been offered here.

What I want to ask GreyJoy is this;
you have forces present in Jodpur to defend that base, relying on your railroads to get you out when the time comes.
What will you do if the enemy goes up to Jodpur and then starts to make flanking moves on the city towards the "west"?
By making such a move your opponent will force one of two conditions on you;
-keep your troops in Jodpur and let them die there, or
-use the railroads to move out before he has even entered the city

Is this something you keep in mind?


Terje


In that case i will evacuate only the precious units (Indian bdes) and leave the rest there to sacrify themself behind the walls (6 forts) slowing down the enemy advance. however this time i don't think he'll try to flank...not here at least!

thx for your support since the first days terje

(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 787
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 1:52:12 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DOCUP

Whats Oz look like? Do you control the norther part? How does the rest of the map look also?



Northern Oz is back in my hands after the inital japanese conquest but he strongly controls Timor (with an Air HQ and an Army HQ present there i think he's ready to move his Netties to smash any attempt of mine) and the islands north of Darwin...and considering that northern Oz can be supplied only by sea that leads to a statlemate untill i can think about an amphib operation there

The rest of the map will be posted later with a screenshot mate...

(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 788
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 2:36:06 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Cannot make a screenshot right now, howver basically nothing changed during the last 5 months.
Japan has conquered the whole China but Chungking, India (well you know) and the whole DEI-SRA-BURMA-MALAYA (having recently cleared Manila). In the pacific the whole NG, Solomons and New Heb. are under japanese control, along with the Gilberts/Marshalls, Marcus and Wake Island.
The only ground captured back is in the Aleutinas, where Japan, after the initial conquest, has abbandoned everything.

For what i can tell from the little info gathered by the intelligence, the main Rader's base in the Pacific is Saipan, while Timor is for sure well fortified (i've seen intel about 2 different eng regiments there, along with an air HQ)


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 789
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 2:47:02 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Concerning the advises given, guys, i am absolutely grateful for every single of them and i thank every one of you that cared to drop a line here giving me suggestions, counseils, warnings or just a supporting word.


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 790
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 2:52:34 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Concerning Oz, the situation is pretty good i'd say.
After the patch i was able to swicth off the Hi and then, following the suggestion made by many of you(among them i remember NY59Giants), i started to build up a chain of convoys between East Cost, Cape Town, Perth(or Adelaide) to bring to Oz supplies and, above all, fuel.
Along with that to Oz have been shipped some american units (a division, a couple of regiments, 3 base forces, and lots of arty, engeneers and AAA units) in order to help securing it from a possible invasion.
All the native units have been moved back to the Triangle Brisbane-Melbourne-Sydney, where they started to build and fortify bases and to mass supplies and fuel.
Some squadrons of bombers and fighters have been also shipped from the US to Oz in order to give to the continent a decent power. The only thing that in Oz is missing is a decent naval force.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 791
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 3:24:26 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
Have you thought about attacking the Kido Butai with your 4Es?

I mean, the goal is not to hurt the carriers even if hits are preferable, but to kill even more of his Zeroes. Naval attack at 20 or 25kft, theres 100% chance of him having Zeroes in the CAP, and AAA most likely wont damage more than a 1-2 bombers. full KB fighter force, 40% CAP 60% escorts means he will have max 120, but now probably only around 40 Zeroes vs. your 50-60(?) bombers, he WILL lose more Zeroes and even more of his elite pilots than you do your 4Es. I know the bombers are valuable, but thats one way to bring your bombers in the air superiority battle without getting them chewed up by flak bombing ampty air fields or Ki-45 protected troops. You can also do that from Karachi and target is pretty close... See if his poker face holds seeing half a hundred 4Es fly over his most important assets.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 6/7/2011 3:27:17 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 792
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 3:27:51 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Have you thought about attacking the Kido Butai with your 4Es?

I mean, the goal is not to hurt the carriers even if hits are preferable, but to kill even more of his Zeroes. Naval attack at 20 or 25kft, theres 100% chance of him having Zeroes in the CAP, and AAA most likely wont damage more than a 1-2 bombers. full KB fighter force, 40% CAP 60% escorts means he will have max 120, but now probably only around 40 Zeroes vs. your 50-60(?) bombers, he WILL lose more Zeroes and even more of his elite pilots than you do your 4Es. I know the bombers are valuable, but thats one way to bring your bombers in the air superiority battle without getting them chewed up by flak bombing ampty air fields or Ki-45 protected troops. You can also do that from Karachi and target is pretty close... See if his poker face holds seeing half a hundred 4Es fly over his most important assets.


Thx Erkki but we have an HR saying 4Es on Naval attack are allowed only if composed by ONE single squadron and with alt max 15k... so i think it's just an Heil Mary option at the moment also because the 4Es pilots are not trained for naval attack...


(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 793
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 3:33:10 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

Have you thought about attacking the Kido Butai with your 4Es?

I mean, the goal is not to hurt the carriers even if hits are preferable, but to kill even more of his Zeroes. Naval attack at 20 or 25kft, theres 100% chance of him having Zeroes in the CAP, and AAA most likely wont damage more than a 1-2 bombers. full KB fighter force, 40% CAP 60% escorts means he will have max 120, but now probably only around 40 Zeroes vs. your 50-60(?) bombers, he WILL lose more Zeroes and even more of his elite pilots than you do your 4Es. I know the bombers are valuable, but thats one way to bring your bombers in the air superiority battle without getting them chewed up by flak bombing ampty air fields or Ki-45 protected troops. You can also do that from Karachi and target is pretty close... See if his poker face holds seeing half a hundred 4Es fly over his most important assets.


Thx Erkki but we have an HR saying 4Es on Naval attack are allowed only if composed by ONE single squadron and with alt max 15k... so i think it's just an Heil Mary option at the moment also because the 4Es pilots are not trained for naval attack...




RGR... Most of the KB AAA can shoot to 16kft. Naval bombardment/LowN skills arent required as you would have wanted to target the CAP, not ships, but at 15kft a single squad will first get every one of its planes damaged by the Zeroes and then 25 to 50% more by the AAA, 6 hex flying distance means more losses than gains...

_____________________________


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 794
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 3:49:47 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
You are focussing on the B-17s as an effective attack force. That isn't their only possible role. Some planes are your sword, some are your shield and sometimes swords are used primarily to block or absorb a thrust, having the appearance of an offensive weapon but actually defending the rest of the strike.

Also, you are focusing on maximum altitude.... That's interesting but only half of the story. Their altitude range is 100 feet to 15,000 feet. Are you, possibly, missing somethingby just focusing on the limitation of maximum altitude and not considering other altitude bands or the interactions possible with other forces which aren't limited by these HRs?

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 795
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 3:59:53 PM   
Erkki


Posts: 1461
Joined: 2/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

You are focussing on the B-17s as an effective attack force. That isn't their only possible role. Some planes are your sword, some are your shield and sometimes swords are used primarily to block or absorb a thrust, having the appearance of an offensive weapon but actually defending the rest of the strike.

Also, you are focusing on maximum altitude.... That's interesting but only half of the story. Their altitude range is 100 feet to 15,000 feet. Are you, possibly, missing somethingby just focusing on the limitation of maximum altitude and not considering other altitude bands or the interactions possible with other forces which aren't limited by these HRs?


Yeah, a 100ft Conga line attack against KB performed by a single squad could also give him some breathing room. He'd know you to not be afraid to use your bombers, and with some luck the CAP is thin and set to 25kft, there being high chances of getting through with no more than 1 or 2 hit bombers. Flak for sure would shoot some down, but he'll think twice about keeping KB 6 hex from Karachi AND keeping only the light 25kft CAP screen. Every Zero CAPing is a Zero that doesnt fly over Karachi, and a lucky 500lbs on the deck of a Jap CV is at minimum 53 plane capacity damaged that needs to be escorted to safety.

< Message edited by Erkki -- 6/7/2011 4:02:21 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 796
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 4:09:33 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
That might certainly be one result of such an approach. There may, possibly, be others.

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 797
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 4:58:08 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Regarding some earlier comments, AFAIK you can not use strategic movement to leave a base when enemy forces are already in that base hex.

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 798
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 6:05:00 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Yes, conducting an orderly and effective retreat or withdrawal is complicated.  Weird or unexpected things can happen to throw you off schedule, allow the enemy to cut off or isolate an army, or to pound the army to death by air.  Just about everybody has experienced the routine of thinking you have enough time and space to evacuate an important force, only to see the enemy catch up and maul it.  I've had this done to me in Malaya and in India in major ways, and in Oz and China to a lesser extent.  So be forwarned, your position probably isn't as safe as you think it is!

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 799
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 6:47:48 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

Concerning Oz, the situation is pretty good i'd say.
After the patch i was able to swicth off the Hi and then, following the suggestion made by many of you(among them i remember NY59Giants), i started to build up a chain of convoys between East Cost, Cape Town, Perth(or Adelaide) to bring to Oz supplies and, above all, fuel.
Along with that to Oz have been shipped some american units (a division, a couple of regiments, 3 base forces, and lots of arty, engeneers and AAA units) in order to help securing it from a possible invasion.
All the native units have been moved back to the Triangle Brisbane-Melbourne-Sydney, where they started to build and fortify bases and to mass supplies and fuel.
Some squadrons of bombers and fighters have been also shipped from the US to Oz in order to give to the continent a decent power. The only thing that in Oz is missing is a decent naval force.



What about your West Coast to Aussie supply lines?

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 800
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 6:48:34 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline
Also- have you sorted out and KEPT all of your APs that can convert to APAs?  That is a must.

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 801
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:21:57 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
July 31, August 1 1942

Rader's usual sweeps today didn't find anything to hit cause i decided to give my guys a couple of days of full rest in order to reorganize my lines and fill some holes.
Later in the afternoons he came with an unsually low-alt ground attack at my units at Karachi. 200 Bombers came in at 11k feet and.....this time my AA finally decided to do something and mauled the attackers, causing in 2 days more than 50 losses on his bombers lines!
Then Rader sent in A SCTF to clear Karachi harbour (luckly enough 6 AKs managed to deliver 16k supplies to Karachi while the KB was R&R at Bombay and managed to leave the base just in time)...1 CLs and 5DDs faced 2 DDs of mine...we exchanged blows for an hour or so during the night (1 DD badly damaged on each side), then when the day came KB's kates (the KB came back!) sunk the survivor DD of mine, while my torpedo bombers frok Karachi managed to hit with a fish the CL Sentai...but unfortunately not causing too many damages. I think the damaged jap DD sunk during the night.

Now August has begun with its promises and shades. We'll have 40 brand new P-38Fs to rely upon but nothing much more...we'll have to remain stiff and focused.

In the meanwhile the Japanese "Manila" Army is moving from Singer to Calcutta...in a couple of weeks Rader will have 3500 more experienced AVs... My goal is to remain alive as long as possible!






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by GreyJoy -- 6/7/2011 10:23:07 PM >

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 802
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:23:18 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Allied Flak greatest day




Attachment (1)

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 803
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:24:30 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Regarding some earlier comments, AFAIK you can not use strategic movement to leave a base when enemy forces are already in that base hex.


Yes, i'm aware of that, thanks! You can enter into a contested base hex using strat mode but you cannot exit in the same way

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 804
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:25:15 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Yes, conducting an orderly and effective retreat or withdrawal is complicated.  Weird or unexpected things can happen to throw you off schedule, allow the enemy to cut off or isolate an army, or to pound the army to death by air.  Just about everybody has experienced the routine of thinking you have enough time and space to evacuate an important force, only to see the enemy catch up and maul it.  I've had this done to me in Malaya and in India in major ways, and in Oz and China to a lesser extent.  So be forwarned, your position probably isn't as safe as you think it is!


I know CR...have already experienced that in China and in southern India. Think this time i know what to do...hopefully

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 805
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:27:36 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510



What about your West Coast to Aussie supply lines?


Have been constantly secured step by step.

Line Islands are well guarded and patrolled. Pago Pago and Savai are my two next bases and then the Fijis. All these bases have fighters, naval bombers, patrol crafts and a DD division lead by a CL.

NZ is well defended too. New Caledonia, on the other side, is still abbandoned...but really don't have enough forces for it at the moment

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 806
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:28:49 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510

Also- have you sorted out and KEPT all of your APs that can convert to APAs?  That is a must.


Done, even if i was planning to use them during the Marshalls invasion due to their Superb unload ratio... think i'll use them in the Bonins too...i know they're usefull but i need to be ashore fast!

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 807
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:31:12 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erkki

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

You are focussing on the B-17s as an effective attack force. That isn't their only possible role. Some planes are your sword, some are your shield and sometimes swords are used primarily to block or absorb a thrust, having the appearance of an offensive weapon but actually defending the rest of the strike.

Also, you are focusing on maximum altitude.... That's interesting but only half of the story. Their altitude range is 100 feet to 15,000 feet. Are you, possibly, missing somethingby just focusing on the limitation of maximum altitude and not considering other altitude bands or the interactions possible with other forces which aren't limited by these HRs?


Yeah, a 100ft Conga line attack against KB performed by a single squad could also give him some breathing room. He'd know you to not be afraid to use your bombers, and with some luck the CAP is thin and set to 25kft, there being high chances of getting through with no more than 1 or 2 hit bombers. Flak for sure would shoot some down, but he'll think twice about keeping KB 6 hex from Karachi AND keeping only the light 25kft CAP screen. Every Zero CAPing is a Zero that doesnt fly over Karachi, and a lucky 500lbs on the deck of a Jap CV is at minimum 53 plane capacity damaged that needs to be escorted to safety.


i've tried it before but my 4Es never seem to want to take off when the KB is around and they're set on naval attack...probably is due to the fact that pilots in them have their nav bomb skill in their 20s...
However i'll try it again and see if i can get some lucky shots or drive away some precious zeros from my Capital base...

Thanks guys!

(in reply to Erkki)
Post #: 808
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/7/2011 10:51:13 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
August 2,3 1942

We decided to try and see if at Bombay harbour there were any of the jap ships repairing from the last fights in Karachi...60 4Es sent there at 15k found a stiff opposition made up by 50 zeros. Losses were high on both part but we had no luck and found no ships. Rader is clearly aware of the threat posed by my 4Es and is avoiding his major port on the coast.

the good news is that his sweeps (this time both Hyderabad and Karachi) went again like a punch into the empty space. My fighters were resting...and he's not committing his bombers that easily no more after the recent losses...It's becoming a game of cat and mouse with Rader chasing me down and me hiding behind my forts and AAs. Saving pilots...saving airframes...and gaining days...and reorganizing my squadrons.


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 809
RE: The Mother of all Air Battles - 6/8/2011 6:24:01 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline
GreyJoy: In terms of your long-overdue fighters, how filled out are those squadrons? What I mean is that if they are operating at half their numbers, you might want to disband them in order to flesh out your other squadrons and save the PPs.

Keep up the good work. This is like watching Star Wars for the first timeas a kid.

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 810
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Mother of all Air Battles Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.063