delatbabel
Posts: 1252
Joined: 7/30/2006 From: Sydney, Australia Status: offline
|
I can only echo what others have already said. I have used up more of my leisure time hours on this game than any other I have purchased in many years, and that makes it great value for money. I am a big fan of games such as Europa, World in Flames, etc, and I am also familiar with computerisations of various boardgames (Empires in Arms). This game is done the way a mega-boardgame should be done on a computer and done right. Sure, it still feels like a board game (which is no bad thing) but instead of the ridiculous notion (e.g. WiF) that an armoured corps "vanishes" after taking a loss, the corps is damaged, may retreat, and will possibly have to be pulled back behind your lines to refit for a few weeks. Losses are handled down to the squad level, the way they should be, and the computer manages all of those messy calculations involved in working out the combat odds and losses, etc. I remember some of the small scale operational games from 3W such as Kirovograd where you assigned step losses to units and they became weaker as a result, and "reinforcement points" could then be applied to recover those step losses. Now that was a great system and a boardgame done right but very very fiddly. Only on a computer can you get a system such as that to work on a game of this scale, and that's what Matrix and 2by3 have achieved here. Buy it, you know you want to.
_____________________________
-- Del
|