Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 9:45:41 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		8 Jun 42

Reinforcement: I got my first Std-A class xAK which is being converted to a TK.

Summatra

I took Sibolga today, eliminating the last Allied presence on Summatra. 447 Dutch surrendered.

Burma

Ted decided to use his bombers attacking one of my infantry units for little gain. He escorted them with his Hurricanes so only the two squadrons of Warhawks met my fighters. The net result was 2 Zeros and 1 Oscar shot down (and one of each an op loss) for 7 Warhawk losses. I lost an IJN pilot killed and one WIA and 1 IJA pilot killed. Not a bad start.

Other Stuff

A day or two ago I sent my last 4 midget subs down to Vava'u hoping they'll hit something. I'm not sure if I get any more. So far, I've hit a BB on 7 Dec 41 and then didn't do a thing with the rest since then.

Heavy radio traffic has occurred at Noumea. I'll send a couple of subs to snoop the place. I've got a screen north of there but nothing around that base. I'd really love to find his carriers. The only one I ever saw was the Enterprise when I sank her at the start of the game. Not a glimpse of the others ones at all. I haven't a clue where they are.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1051
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 9:52:29 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline 		I thought midgets were like PTs - pay supply and they show up.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1052
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 9:55:19 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		That's right Cribtop, but there's none in the pool.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 1053
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 11:25:42 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline 		Ah. Does the pool re-charge?


_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1054
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 11:44:13 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		No clue. They show up in Tracker. They're halted but allegedly appear on 10 June. We'll see....

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 1055
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/29/2010 11:57:34 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline 		Oh, well. It's not like they're a super weapon or anything.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1056
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/30/2010 2:13:29 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		9 Jun 42

Reinforcements: The SS I-33 arrived and will head to Singapore to do it's work in the IO. I received another xAP as well.

Burma

More fighting in the skys over the Magwe complex. Today I lost 3 Zeros (1 WIA, 1 KIA) to 5 H81-A3s and 1 Warhawk. Again the Hurricanes escorted the bombers which bombed a Japanese infantry brigade. It's currently at 94%/100% so no permanent damage has been done. That's the first time I've seen H81-A3s in a long time. Maybe they were flying CAP? Not sure.

Australia

The Japanese mob (14 Army) heading north to Darwin finally moved to the hex NE of Katherine and shock attacked 4 Australian units on the other side of a river. They were successful in pushing the Aussies out (3:1 odds). The Aussies were composed of 2 Australian Division, 26 Aus Cav Bde (the guys that were trashed in Katherine), 2/2 Ind Co and 2/4 MG Bn. The last two units were destroyed. Total casualties were 2280 for the Japanese to 3031 for the Aussies. That was more than I had hoped but expected due to the constant B-17 bombing and then a shock attack. Anyway, all that's in their way of investing Darwin are the 2 Aus Div and the Cav bde.

Ndeni

The B-25Cs that have been bombing Ndeni from Luganville found a surprise today. Six B-25s ran into 8 Zeros over Ndeni. Two B-25s were shot down for no Japanese loss and the remaining bombers were ineffective. There are reportedly some Allied fighters (a couple dozen) at Luganville but apparently too short ranged to escort the B-25s.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 1057
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/31/2010 2:02:21 AM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cap_and_gown

I would not get used to calling Japanese tank divisions Panzer Divisions. More like mobile divisions, except perhaps in China.


Well, according to Rottman, they were based on the Panzer Division organization--so maybe "baby panzer divisions" or "whanna-be panzer divisions"?

Of course, I don't think the Panzer Division org structure was all that great--too few tanks and too many horses...

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 1058
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/31/2010 4:54:33 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		10 Jun 42

Burma

The British DD Inconstant (strange name) caught the I-32 off Colombo and hit her with a depth charge. She sustained moderate damage, 10-37(27)-1-0, and is headed home.

The air war over Burma continues to go my way. Zeros, Oscars and Nicks (in their debut) shot down 4 Warhawks and 7 Hudson IIIas for the loss of 3 Zeros and one IJN pilot WIA. The Nicks wee particularly effective, shooting down 4 planes.

Not much else to report. Just the same old things, spreading out in Australia, taking dot bases and repairing minor damage in KB.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 1059
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 12/31/2010 10:42:53 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		11 Jun 42

Reinforcement: 53 JNAF AF Unit

Burma (the only real action in town)

A British ASW TF (different from the one from yesterday) attacked the I-11 hitting her with a depth charge. She took a little less damage (5-13(5)-9(5)-0) but enough to head for Singapore. I may turn Baby KB around to make a surprise attack up there. Killing those British DDs with a lot of racks would be a nice thing.

I had 2 CAs bombard Akyab. They succeeded in destroying an H81-A3 on the ground and causing quite a bit of damage and fires. There was some damage left on the airfield during the next turn.

Ted sent fighters to tangle with my fighters again. Only one daitai of Zeros engaged. I guess the Oscars didn't feel like flying out 4-5 hexes to engage today. Anyway, I lost 5 Zeros (and 3 pilots KIA) for 3 Warhawks and 11 Hurricane IIb Trop shot down. Banzai! Once again, the fight is in my favor.

Intel

The Pennsylvania was reported today to have sunk near Pearl Harbor. Now we're up to 4 BBs sunk again....

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1060
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 3:34:28 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Intel

The Pennsylvania was reported today to have sunk near Pearl Harbor. Now we're up to 4 BBs sunk again....


Reported as sunk today or reported today as sunk on a previous date--say Dec 7? Ted may have become impatient and tried to move her to the West Coast without getting all her system damage repaired or just been unlucky; or your humint guys may have been trying to provide encouraging news to the emperor...

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1061
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 3:40:16 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

10 Jun 42

Burma

The British DD Inconstant (strange name) caught the I-32 off Colombo and hit her with a depth charge. She sustained moderate damage, 10-37(27)-1-0, and is headed home.



While I have always been a RN Fanboy, the ship naming conventions provide ample opportunity for mirth. This one always reminds me of the line from The Life of Brian, "I have a friend in Rome...,and his wife's name is...." For those Monte Python fans.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1062
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 3:47:23 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline 		Mike,

this is one of the truly great AARs from which so many of us learn. How do you balance the attention to detail on the logistics with an appropriate level of attention to operations and tactics, or for that matter, strategy?

From another Mike

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 1063
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 8:46:34 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		Hi Mike. Thanks for the kind words. I really like the production piece of it. I'm just the right kind of anal to enjoy the difficulties of Japanese production.

I've been accused of spending too much time on production and not enough on strategy. That was from a very aggressive Japanese player. I'm not that aggressive. My offensive portion of the game is just about over. I'm trying to tie up loose ends (Australia). The air war in Burma is going to get ugly. I realize that air superiority is the key and I can get it for only a short period of time. My goal there is to cause an operational pause in Ted's probable offensive plans there. If I can prevent him from a ground offensive in Burma for 3-6 months, I'll be happy. I'm not concerned with IJAAF losses, but I am concerned with IJNAF fighter pilot losses. My Zero daitai started with ~36 pilots each, but that is being whittled down. One daitai is down to ~20 pilots now as you will see with the next turn. But I am causing Ted at least twice as many plane losses and I suspect he's losing good pilots at a 3:1 or so ratio. Fighting over my own airspace reduces my pilot losses.

I have been a wargamer and student of history for 40 years. Much of my military schooling involves in depth study of military history. The WWII Pacific theater seems to be a popular topic. That gives me a nice fountation for the diversity (tactical, operational and strategic) of this game.

I made stragegic plans before we ever played the first turn. Of course that has evolved since then. I toyed briefly with an invasion of Ceylon which I think is going to be shelved due to the length of time it's taking to take Darwin. Basically, the strategy hasn't changed much. Capture the SRA and N. Australia. I'll go no further south than Ndeni and no further east than the current line I'm on in the Pacific. I won't move to take any of the Aleutians. I don't have the ground strength available (due to Burma). I'm keeping an eye on Ted's expansion of Adak. As long as he doesn't move west from there, I'm happy.

I'm slowly increasing ground strength in Burma (8 Div is 3 days out and the 2 Tank Divisions will follow as soon as they arrive in about 10 days). 4 Division is slated for Burma as well. I'll pull out at least one of the two Zero Daitai and move in an additional Sentai of Oscars to fight for the airspace over Burma.

My goals after I finish my expansion will be to keep hitting Ted to slow down his base expansion. I can't stop it but I can slow it down. I figure I won't see his carriers for the remainder of the year (but I always plan for them in every operation). You'll see in the next turn the types of things I've got planned to keep him off balance.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 1064
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 9:03:32 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		12 Jun 42

Australia

I forgot to mention yesterday that a US S class sub sank one of my small PBs which was out looking for it. The remaining 3 got a bit of retaliation today and hit her with a depth charge. No confirmation that she sank, but she's definitely not happy.

I'm attacking the dot hex to the NE of Katherine tomorrow. That's the remnants of the 2 Aus Div and the Aus Cav Bde that I smashed a few days ago. After that, the next stop is Darwin.

Burma

Bloody day today. There was a huge battle over Magwe involving huge numbers of fighters. In the end, I shot down 14 Warhawks and 10 Hurricanes of various flavors for a loss (from all causes) of 3 Oscars and 9 Zeros. Pilot losses amounted to 4 KIA and 3 WIA for the IJNAF and 1 KIA and 1 WIA for the IJAAF. I moved up a 30 plane Oscar Sentai to replace a Zero Daitai that's down to 12 operational planes. Another 30 plane Oscar Sentai will arrive in a day or two. That will give me 144 Oscars, 27 Zeros and 12 Nicks with another Daitai of Zeros rebuilding. I'm considering transferring another Sentai of Oscars from Kwantung to reinforce Burma. The limiting factor is air support. More is on the way there, but it's a shortage across the map.

The 8 Division will arrive by convoy at Rangoon in about 3-4 days. That'll increase my ground strength in Burma to 3 infantry divisions with another in reserve (4 Division). By the middle of July, there will also be 2 tank divisions in Burma. That will have to do for the time being. It'll use up all of my PPs through the end of June.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1065
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 9:21:35 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		The BB Pennsylvania showed up as sinking on 10 Jun 42 from damage on 7 Dec 41 (an 800 kg bomb).

Burma air losses to date. I'm comparing my pilot losses (the only issue for me) to his plane losses (the only data I have):

Allied:Japanese 55:18 (+7 Allied bombers)

Breakdown:

IJN/IJA:

KIA: 9/2
WIA: 6/1

Allied:

29 Warhawks
5 H81-A3
19 Hurricane IIb Trop
2 Hurricane IIc Trop

7 Hudson IIIa

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1066
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 10:20:51 PM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

Mike,

this is one of the truly great AARs from which so many of us learn. How do you balance the attention to detail on the logistics with an appropriate level of attention to operations and tactics, or for that matter, strategy?

From another Mike


+1


_____________________________


(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 1067
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/1/2011 11:27:55 PM   
DivePac88


Posts: 3119
Joined: 10/9/2008
From: Somewhere in the South Pacific.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

Mike,

this is one of the truly great AARs from which so many of us learn. How do you balance the attention to detail on the logistics with an appropriate level of attention to operations and tactics, or for that matter, strategy?

From another Mike


+1



+2


_____________________________


When you see the Southern Cross, For the first time
You understand now, Why you came this way

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 1068
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/20/2011 2:05:43 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline 		13 Jun 42
Hi guys.  I got home from my Army school last weekend to find a turn waiting for me.  I was able to complete one turn before I had to head off to a conference (where I currently am).  I’ll be home Sunday afternoon and hopefully another turn will be waiting for me.  I’ll try to do another turn before I head off Tuesday morning to another conference.

Australia

Some Hudsons visited Broome from Pt. Hedland.  Six didn’t make it home.  My two Oscar chutai are getting some nice experience.

I took Fenton (the dot hex just NE of Katherine).  At a cost of 235 casualties, I killed 2523 Aussies and destroyed the 2/1 NAOU Det.  I’ll sit there for a day or two to allow supplies to catch up with the troops.

Burma

Things started with a night raid on Akyab by a Sentai of Sallys.  They destroyed 2 Warhawks on the ground and did light damage to the airfield.

Things really heated up when the sun came up.  Ted sent 6-7 bombing/sweep raids over Magwe.  His air force definitely took the brunt of the damage.  For a loss of 3 Zeros (2 KIA) and 7 Oscars (1 KIA and 3 WIA) I destroyed 17, 5 Hurricane IIbs, 2 H81-A3s, 6 Wellington Ics and a Blenheim IV.  My one Zero daitai that can upgrade to the A6M3 will be able to in about a week.  Hopefully, that’ll increase the kill ratio even more.

Other Stuff

Currently, the Shokaku is being upgraded at the Home Islands.  She’ll be finished around 22 June.  The other 5 CVs are at Truk.  I am going to send one CV and 4 DDs every 20 days to the Home Islands for upgrade.  This will allow me to complete all six CVs by the end of Sep 42 (assuming no need to counter any Allied attacks.  During this period, 4-5 CVs will be available at any time.  The Ryujo will accompany one of the carriers for upgrade.

Edit:

Sub War

Four midget subs attacked Vava'u unsuccessfully. Oh well, I'm out of midget subs for the time being.

The only redeeming thing that happened was the the I-18 (one of the midget sub carriers) put a torpedo into the loaded TK Mobilegas (weird name). She sank.

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 1/20/2011 2:09:21 AM >

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to DivePac88)
Post #: 1069
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/20/2011 2:50:03 AM   
Cribtop


Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline 		I think that TK's name is a cute way of saying "Mobile Gas."

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1070
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/21/2011 12:36:56 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		Mike,

Any chance for some economy screenshots?  Interested to see how you are moving resources/fuel around.  You had a thorough plan at the beginning ... now 6 months later have you been able to keep to it?  Or have there been some adjustments due to situational changes?

How do you move resources/fuel from the SRA to the HI?  overland to Pt. Arthur?  Of ship it from Singers?

Thanks!

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Cribtop)
Post #: 1071
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 1/21/2011 10:37:05 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DivePac88


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cribtop


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

Mike,

this is one of the truly great AARs from which so many of us learn. How do you balance the attention to detail on the logistics with an appropriate level of attention to operations and tactics, or for that matter, strategy?

From another Mike


+1



+2



+3 !!!

Mac

< Message edited by Mac Linehan -- 2/6/2011 10:08:55 PM >

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to DivePac88)
Post #: 1072
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 2/6/2011 10:07:48 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline 		oops - duplicate post....

< Message edited by Mac Linehan -- 2/6/2011 10:08:17 PM >

_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to DivePac88)
Post #: 1073
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 3/17/2011 1:33:24 AM   
Hanzberger


Posts: 921
Joined: 4/26/2006
From: SE Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Mike why did you pick scen 1 (instead of 2) and why did you pick PDU off? Just picked up on your thread and will be following.

_____________________________

Planning for #17 Ironman Tier2

Japan AC wire chart here
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?

(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 1074
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 6/2/2011 12:57:48 AM   
SuluSea


Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline 		I hope all is well Mike, I miss your AAR updates and your contributions to the forum. Thanks!

_____________________________

"There’s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.” ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to Hanzberger)
Post #: 1075
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 6/2/2011 2:48:58 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline 		Hear, hear!  

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to SuluSea)
Post #: 1076
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 6/18/2011 10:41:01 PM   
pompack


Posts: 2582
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: University Park, Texas
Status: offline 		me too

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 1077
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 7/15/2011 6:43:28 PM   
madflava13


Posts: 1530
Joined: 2/7/2001
From: Alexandria, VA
Status: offline 		Would love to see this AAR come back - I'm planning a PBEM IJN first turn myself. I've never dabbled with the Japanese side before, so this thread has been amazingly helpful.

_____________________________

"The Paraguayan Air Force's request for spraying subsidies was not as Paraguayan as it were..."

(in reply to pompack)
Post #: 1078
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 7/15/2011 7:37:59 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline 		Would also like to see Mike back. This AAR and cap_and_gowns' were the most useful I have read.

< Message edited by Wirraway_Ace -- 7/15/2011 7:42:44 PM >

(in reply to madflava13)
Post #: 1079
RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 - 7/19/2011 9:18:19 AM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline 		Just popped in to say thanx.

About to start my first PBEM as japan and many helpful tips in this AAR.

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 1080
Page:   <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Here we go again! tc464 (A) vs. Mike (J) - No tc464 Page: <<   < prev  34 35 [36] 37 38   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859