Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 September (2nd part)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 September (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 5:40:31 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
My reading of the the a/c factories is that if you just create one device in one factory for R&D, and you finally get to produce the a/c, it will only be building '1' per month.

To maximise the R&D and to give a reasonable production schedule to begin with, I would try for at least 30 devices per factory. And convert multiple factories if really want the a/c.
With 30 devices in a factory, you will (hopefully) get the max R&D (3) per factory most of the time. Which would transalate to an advancement of a month every 34 days.
And then once R&D is finished, it should start producing one plane a day without any further adjustment.


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 661
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 5:47:05 AM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
I see it quite differently, largely because I switch R&D factories to the next factory in the upgrade stream before it goes to production. And it takes SO long for R&D to repair, that having 1 point of R&D coming per day a year or two earlier would clearly provide many more months of advancement.

The only caveat I can see, is that since R&D repairs quickly when the plane type is very near to production date, you could bump up the R&D factory size a month or two before that model is ready, cross your fingers and hope it gets fully repaired, and then switch it to the next model in the upgrade path. Viola you have 20+ factories giving you the chance of 2 (or 3 if this +1 bonus is in effect always?) R&D points per day for the rest of the game. That means a month of upgrade every two months with just ONE factory.



_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 662
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 5:55:35 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
[edit]
Removed incomplete formula.

< Message edited by michaelm -- 9/18/2011 1:42:29 AM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to FeurerKrieg)
Post #: 663
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 6:10:58 AM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
I'm sorry, but somewhere along the line you lost me.

If there are damaged R&D factories say 5(2) you will always get a point.
If there are NO damaged R&D factories 7(0) you will always get 2 points, 1 point because it is <20, + 1 point because it is fully repaired
If the factory is 0(7) you get zero points as nothing is repaired

So the sweet point for R&D factories would be a fully repaired 20 point factory. Because you would get 2 points for size, +1 for fully repaired for a maximum of 3 points

Is any of the above close to being correct?

(in reply to FeurerKrieg)
Post #: 664
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 6:37:02 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
[edit]
removed incomplete formula

< Message edited by michaelm -- 9/18/2011 1:44:45 AM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 665
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 7:41:28 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline
There's a problem setting LCU odjectives when lcu type filters are used.

For instance, selecting just Art in a list then picking one to change its objective followed by 'set all' to this objective does not just change the art but all units in the full list.

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 666
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 7:53:24 AM   
inqistor


Posts: 1813
Joined: 5/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

The maximum gain is 3 R&D per factory. The more devices in the factory, the higher chance of getting a '3'. If you had a factory with only 1 device, you would only get 1 R&D.
It is actually a random number (1 to number of devices) and then 1-19 = 1, 20-29 = 2, 30-39 = 3, etc, with it capped at 3.

However, I have gone back to the manual and it clearly states
"Aircraft or Engines with a production capacity that are not yet available will be researched. This may move up the availability of the new aircraft or engine. Whenever a plane/engine would have been produced, the new aircraft or engine will gain 1 development point. For every 100 development points the availability of the aircraft or engine may be moved up one month."

My reading of this would be that it was written based on the way a/c factories work for building a/c; ie R&D could be used with damaged factories. But R&D can't be used until all devices are repaired for a factory.

What is interesting is that this (the code and manual) was not changed from the original stock, so it must have been changed back then.

Hmm, interesting.
However that is not how factories production works. It is something around the line factory_size+rnd(30)/30 for daily production, so research is little different.

But that explains, why at 30 people gets best results. There is not possible wastage at 30, because maximum generated number is 3, however larger factories HAVE some benefits, as they can generate 3 points more frequently (but waste all points over 20).

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 667
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 9:01:11 AM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

In simple terms
(a) A factory will produce a random R&D between 0 and the number of devices in the factory ie 1 device = 0, 2 devices = 0,1, 3 devices =0,1,2, 4 devices = 0,1,2,3, 10 devices = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 etc.
(b) The random R&D is then divided by 10. Any random R&D of less than 10 will be '0', otherwise it will be the ten's component of the random R&D.
(c) If there are no damaged devices in factory (this is a given as there must be NO damaged ones present), add '1' to the number from (b).
(d) If the number from (c) exceeds 3, it is capped at '3'.

The number from (d) is added to the a/c development counter - this will be a number from 1 to 3 inclusive.
Once the counter exceeds 100, it moves the available date sooner by a month and resets the development counter.


Thanks. This makes more sense now. So yes, it would seem that 30 is the sweet spot, which means that most of my plans don't need to change after all.

_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 668
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 9:05:03 AM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
On second thought, I'm still not sure if 30 is better than 1 for R&D factories when considering the repair time involved. With a size 1, you will always get 0 for the random R&D plus the +1 bonus. With a size 30 you will get 1, 2 or 3 depending on the die roll, probably mostly 2 & 3. But if it takes 2 years to repair up to 30 then in that time the single point factory could have given you several months of advancement already.

Anyone else see it this way?

_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to FeurerKrieg)
Post #: 669
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 9:20:57 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris H

There's a problem setting LCU odjectives when lcu type filters are used.

For instance, selecting just Art in a list then picking one to change its objective followed by 'set all' to this objective does not just change the art but all units in the full list.

The 'Set all' from the LCU screen affects all units in the hex, not in the list. Designed that way from start.
Not sure if it could be done the other way.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 670
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 10:54:03 AM   
bk19@mweb.co.za

 

Posts: 258
Joined: 7/26/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

quote:

ORIGINAL: Numdydar

I'm sorry, but somewhere along the line you lost me.

1. If there are damaged R&D factories say 5(2) you will always get a point.
2.If there are NO damaged R&D factories 7(0) you will always get 2 points, 1 point because it is <20, + 1 point because it is fully repaired
3. If the factory is 0(7) you get zero points as nothing is repaired

4. So the sweet point for R&D factories would be a fully repaired 20 point factory. Because you would get 2 points for size, +1 for fully repaired for a maximum of 3 points

Is any of the above close to being correct?

1. Damaged factory = NO R&D.
2. 7(0) will produce 1 R&D - 0 because <10, +1 due to fully repaired.
3. Yes.
4. Not quite. 20(0) will give 0 or 1 for factory size, +1 for fully repaired. Total points will be 1 or 2 depending on how favorable the die is to you. 30 is a better sweet point in my opinion.

[edit]
Don't forget that there is a bug in the betas from p8 to q3 that allowed damaged factories to produce R&D.


Hi Michael,

I just wish to clarify a minor ambiguity.

With respect to the remark: 1. Damaged factory = NO R&D.

Are you actually saying that if there are any damaged R&D factories such as the example cited - 5(2), no R&D points will be received?

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 671
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 11:14:17 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
Correct.
R&D was originally designed (in WITP and AE) to apply once all damage was repaired.



_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to bk19@mweb.co.za)
Post #: 672
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 11:35:49 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

30 is a better sweet point in my opinion.


Good. That is consistent with my testing ... so my test results were accurate (at least to some degree).

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 673
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 2:56:23 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline
And my testing was obviously not lol.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 674
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 3:00:44 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
It appears that the bug I introduced in p8 has also caused me to report the wrong information here.

The fix in the coming q4 should correct this by putting it back to correct method based on production first, and then the other reported calculations.
One tiny '{}' in the wrong place has caused all this confusion.
Go figure

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 675
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 3:09:42 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

...
One tiny '{}' in the wrong place has caused all this confusion.
Go figure



Yeah, and the code is so tight, with small, concise functions and clear, well designed subroutines....

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 676
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 4:09:02 PM   
pompack


Posts: 2582
Joined: 2/8/2004
From: University Park, Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

My reading of the the a/c factories is that if you just create one device in one factory for R&D, and you finally get to produce the a/c, it will only be building '1' per month.

To maximise the R&D and to give a reasonable production schedule to begin with, I would try for at least 30 devices per factory. And convert multiple factories if really want the a/c.
With 30 devices in a factory, you will (hopefully) get the max R&D (3) per factory most of the time. Which would transalate to an advancement of a month every 34 days.
And then once R&D is finished, it should start producing one plane a day without any further adjustment.



But Michael, the more I look at this it looks like the sweet spot is 1(0) or X(0) if you start from existing sites.

If I have a 30(0) site I will " (hopefully) get the max R&D (3) per factory most of the time" or an advance of a month every 34 days. But if I have four 1(0) factories I will get an advance of a month every 25 days (4X1X25=100) every time. This tells me that if I want to accellerate an a/c I want to convert the LOWEST R&D factory sites and don't add anything to them in order to minimize the repair time.

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 677
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 4:18:35 PM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
Due to the bug I introduced in beta p8, my earlier premise is incorrect.

The best factory would be 30(0) to get at least 1 R&D a day. The initial R&D value per factory should be just as with normal a/c production.

The next beta q4 will fix this up and put it back to how it was/should be.


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to pompack)
Post #: 678
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 6:30:21 PM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Due to the bug I introduced in beta p8, my earlier premise is incorrect.

The best factory would be 30(0) to get at least 1 R&D a day. The initial R&D value per factory should be just as with normal a/c production.

The next beta q4 will fix this up and put it back to how it was/should be.



Okay - just saw this. So are you saying there is no +1 bonus for an undamaged factory after all? In other words, a size 1 factory only has a 1 in 30 chance of generating a point? If so, then clearly 30 is (as has been suspected all along) the ideal factory size to have.

Sorry for all the questions, I'm getting ready to start a game and I want to set my R&D factories correctly from the get go.

Thanks for your time spent enlightening us. :)

_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 679
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/17/2011 8:34:29 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Due to the bug I introduced in beta p8, my earlier premise is incorrect.

The best factory would be 30(0) to get at least 1 R&D a day. The initial R&D value per factory should be just as with normal a/c production.

The next beta q4 will fix this up and put it back to how it was/should be.


THANKS for finding and fixing this for us AND providing clear statements as to how it will work.

Great support!!!



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 680
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/18/2011 1:41:53 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Due to the bug I introduced in beta p8, my earlier premise is incorrect.

The best factory would be 30(0) to get at least 1 R&D a day. The initial R&D value per factory should be just as with normal a/c production.

The next beta q4 will fix this up and put it back to how it was/should be.



Okay - just saw this. So are you saying there is no +1 bonus for an undamaged factory after all? In other words, a size 1 factory only has a 1 in 30 chance of generating a point? If so, then clearly 30 is (as has been suspected all along) the ideal factory size to have.

Sorry for all the questions, I'm getting ready to start a game and I want to set my R&D factories correctly from the get go.

Thanks for your time spent enlightening us. :)

The '+1' is actually what gives you the 1 R&D.

Please refer to the post in this thread that shows the correct R&D sequence/formula.
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2908046&mpage=1&key=&#


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to FeurerKrieg)
Post #: 681
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 S... - 9/18/2011 9:29:03 AM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chris H

There's a problem setting LCU odjectives when lcu type filters are used.

For instance, selecting just Art in a list then picking one to change its objective followed by 'set all' to this objective does not just change the art but all units in the full list.

The 'Set all' from the LCU screen affects all units in the hex, not in the list. Designed that way from start.
Not sure if it could be done the other way.


Personnally I think it should affect only those visible in the list. What do others think?

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 682
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q4 updated 18 Se... - 9/18/2011 11:23:43 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
Fixed Restored fully repaired factory needed before R&D starts [MEM]
Fixed Removed incorrect DL addition for TF patrols [MEM]
Changed Updated RD totals to reflect actual R&D available for a/c and engines [MEM]
Fixed Not all dead group fragments being removed [MEM]
Tweak Changed 'Night ops' on group screen to BLUE to match group lists [MEM]
Tweak Add pool totals on mouse over for a/c and engines on IM [MEM]
Tweak Added some burning fires on land bombing screen for affect [MEM]
Tweak Added unit stacking cost on screen [MEM]


< Message edited by michaelm -- 9/19/2011 8:30:37 AM >


_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Chris21wen)
Post #: 683
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q4 updated 18 Se... - 9/18/2011 1:46:25 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Fixed Restored fully repaired factory needed before R&D starts [MEM]
Fixed Removed incorrect DL addition for TF patrols [MEM]
Changed Updated RD totals to reflect actual R&D available for a/c and engines [MEM]
Fixed Not all dead group fragments being removed [MEM]
Tweak Changed 'Night ops' on group screen to BLUE to match group lists [MEM]
Tweak Add pool totals on mouse over for a/c and engines on IM [MEM]
Tweak Added some burning fires on land bombing screen for affect [MEM]



Thanks Michael. Great Support.



_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 684
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/18/2011 5:15:33 PM   
Pascal_slith


Posts: 1651
Joined: 8/20/2003
From: back in Commiefornia
Status: offline
Thanks again michaelm. Your weekly updates (now q4) are great.

I thought, though, that you had resolved the appearance of restricted air units at an off-map base by allowing an HQ change at that point? My Dutch air units are arriving at Aden fully restricted (HQ is appearing in white).... Is this WAD as they can't go anywhere?

_____________________________

So much WitP and so little time to play.... :-(


(in reply to michaelm75au)
Post #: 685
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/18/2011 5:28:53 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
The last thing I need is more fires!

(in reply to Pascal_slith)
Post #: 686
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/18/2011 5:31:41 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
If it was done before Q4, I missed it. But I love the new feature of being able to see the "Stacking Cost" for each ground unit under the Troop and Cargo Load in the far left column. It will help both players when it comes to placing them or invading an island and atoll.

KUDOS!!

_____________________________


(in reply to Pascal_slith)
Post #: 687
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/19/2011 1:21:37 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline
Hey guys going on vacation.  Just installed the game on my GFUs laptop can someone send me the link or copy of teh Q2 beta. TY.  Oh and don't tellt he GFU that I did this.

doc

Edit: found it.

< Message edited by DOCUP -- 9/19/2011 1:58:44 AM >

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 688
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/19/2011 8:27:35 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Pascal

Thanks again michaelm. Your weekly updates (now q4) are great.

I thought, though, that you had resolved the appearance of restricted air units at an off-map base by allowing an HQ change at that point? My Dutch air units are arriving at Aden fully restricted (HQ is appearing in white).... Is this WAD as they can't go anywhere?


There seems to be a fine line to be drawn here. I have done work on handling army units being returned, but haven't touched on groups yet.
It maybe that groups that are permanently restricted wont be able to be rebuild. This would be in keeping with why groups start out restricted - to be kept in locale their in. So such groups that can't be returned to a national base would stay off map in queue or not allowed to be rebuilt if destroyed.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to Pascal_slith)
Post #: 689
RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108p3 updated 10 Ju... - 9/19/2011 8:28:12 AM   
michaelm75au


Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

If it was done before Q4, I missed it. But I love the new feature of being able to see the "Stacking Cost" for each ground unit under the Troop and Cargo Load in the far left column. It will help both players when it comes to placing them or invading an island and atoll.

KUDOS!!


Added in q4 by request

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 690
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> RE: Patch 06 - Public Beta - Build 1108q3a updated 13 September (2nd part) Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.906