Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/4/2011 3:37:54 PM   
FredSanford3

 

Posts: 567
Joined: 6/23/2007
Status: offline
Why does the Rumanian Airforce keep stealing my airplanes? It's August 8, 1941, and the Luftwaffe would love to upgrade the Stuka gruppen to JU-87D's, but they keep send the D's to Romania, who now has 2x as many JU-87D's as the Luftwaffe. Is this historical?

Same thing with my JU-88's, and JU-52's. My units could use the replacements, but they keep getting sent to Romania. And to make things worse, the Rumanian squadron's don't seem to want to change planes on their own, even squadrons at 25% strength. So I've got to spend the AP's to swap out airframes if I want those aircraft in action.

WAD? 1.05.37 btw.
Post #: 1
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/4/2011 4:46:28 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
The system seems to want to export aircraft ASAP to meet the maximum number to be exported. I'm not sure how this could be changed without ruining the export system. Ideally, exports would happen on a certain turn, but they don't currently and I'm not sure if it's possible to do so.

_____________________________

SSG tester
WitE Alpha tester
Panzer Corps Beta tester
Unity of Command scenario designer

(in reply to FredSanford3)
Post #: 2
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/4/2011 5:26:58 PM   
heliodorus04


Posts: 1647
Joined: 11/1/2008
From: Nashville TN
Status: offline
This part of the game shouldn't be hard to model, I wouldn't think.
The algorithm should be based on the need of units in the field, and exports shouldn't be happening unless the pool has a number of airframes in excess of the need by a certain amount.

In the long run, if WitE is going to be better balanced, the exporting of equipment should ultimately be removed.  Over a 41-45 campaign, you want Germans to have all the stuff they can make.  When elements can be used by Germany and the minors both, putting minors behind the equipment is a waste.  Germany has enough handicaps in the production macro game.


_____________________________

Fall 2021-Playing: Stalingrad'42 (GMT); Advanced Squad Leader,
Reading: Masters of the Air (GREAT BOOK!)
Rulebooks: ASL (always ASL), Middle-Earth Strategy Battle Game
Painting: WHFB Lizardmen leaders

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 3
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/4/2011 5:28:47 PM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline
Make exporting airframes a free choice for the axis player.. I can imagine you want to export obsolete airframes to replace the crap axis allies equipment...

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to heliodorus04)
Post #: 4
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/4/2011 7:09:09 PM   
Denniss

 

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline
What about using the editor and delay the availability date of the Romanian aircraft to some months after the german date (or scenario start date depending on scenario used) ?
And yes, Germany should have a specific pool of these aircraft and tanks before exporting them, the pool should be higher if the german source aircraft has not reached its end date, the pool should be lower after reaching the end date. End date reached + not in use by units = no pool required to export?

(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 5
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/5/2011 1:32:41 AM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
Germany had good reason to export equipment to its allies - make them more effective in the field & also support them politically as well.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to Denniss)
Post #: 6
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/5/2011 5:06:51 AM   
aspqrz02

 

Posts: 1024
Joined: 7/20/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paullus99

Germany had good reason to export equipment to its allies - make them more effective in the field & also support them politically as well.


Both of those may have been good ideas.

Sadly, Germany exported weapons for neither of them.

They exported weapons purely and simply for money, at high markups and in limited amounts ... they had absolutely no interest whatsoever in boosting allied military power (well, their leaders didn't).

Phil

_____________________________

Author, Space Opera (FGU); RBB #1 (FASA); Road to Armageddon; Farm, Forge and Steam; Orbis Mundi; Displaced (PGD)
----------------------------------------------
Email: aspqrz@tpg.com.au

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 7
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/7/2011 5:26:53 PM   
von altair


Posts: 316
Joined: 4/27/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: aspqrz
Sadly, Germany exported weapons for neither of them.

They exported weapons purely and simply for money, at high markups and in limited amounts ... they had absolutely no interest whatsoever in boosting allied military power (well, their leaders didn't).

Phil


This is not actually true. Atleast the Germany sent a lot of AT weaponry, ammunitation and even some Stugs to the Finland at 1944 while Soviets were doing a massive concentrated attack against "Finnish Mannerheim line" at Karelia. Finland didin't pay a dime from them at that time.

_____________________________

"An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur?"

"Do you not know, my son, with how little wisdom the world is governed?"

-Axel Oxenstierna

(in reply to aspqrz02)
Post #: 8
RE: Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? - 11/7/2011 6:36:20 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
I think it's fair to say that the Germans made equipment sales and transfers in what they perceived to be their own best interests. That's not unique to the Nazis; after all, it was DeGaulle who famously said that "France has no friends, only interests".

The Germans gave away equipment to the Finns, because they sensed the Finns were waivering, and desperately needed them to stay in the war. Similar motivations were at play for equipment sales to Romania; it wasn't the money, it was the fact that they needed the Romanians to stay in the war, and equipment transfers were part of the price Germany paid for good relations.

The Germans, after all, were building a coalition against the Russians, and were aware of the diplomacy at play in coaxing greater Romanian, Finnish, and Hungarian involvement. If you want a coalition, you don't deliberately screw your coalition partners. The Germans were at least somewhat aware of this.

All 3 allies though also watched their back, because Nazi diplomatic promises certainly couldn't be trusted at face value. Their duplicity was well known.



_____________________________


(in reply to von altair)
Post #: 9
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Rumanian Airforce higher priority than Luftwaffe? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.359