byron13
Posts: 1589
Joined: 7/27/2001 Status: offline
|
Hmmm. Let's see. Where to begin? First, let me ask Sabre how one posts pictures. I have a great picture that I'm sure he, especially, will enjoy. I can have it scanned - but then what? Jo, it's kind of hard to describe Tammy Baker. She and her husband, Jim, were television evangelists. They were on television every Sunday preaching the gospel - kind of like the Cav - and asking for money. She was was horridly ugly and wore a pound of makeup; he was a goofy little guy that looked plastic. They made a ton of money, admitted to drug and alcohol abuse and adultery, and he went to jail for something - probably some kind of fraud related to the money they raised. She started her own television program in Orlando, Florida, whilst Jimmy wasted in jail. Seems like she started making money and divorced him while he was still in jail. Anyway, they were a couple that gave religion a real bad name, and they were the butt of many jokes. Kind of like the Cav. Jealous? Nay. My response is merely typical of someone who is tired of another that constantly clucks about something that ain't worth a cluck. My response would be the same to someone who lived in a place like . . . like . . . . well, let's say Kansas, who constantly talks ad nauseum about how great Kansas is. I'm sure all people in Kansas stick together and believe Kansas is a great place to live. But it's just a place. Many people would rather not live in Kansas, have made a conscious choice NOT to live there, and would certainly grow weary of two Kansans yapping about how great it is. I like the Cav and am glad they're there. The sound of their tanks blowing up helps the real muscle find and fix the enemy so they can be destroyed. Somebody's got to do it and, like any intelligent army, ours assigns the KP washouts to the Cav so that, when they are creamed in the first six minutes of the war, nothing of importance will have been lost and the best and brightest remain to win the war. I guess it's a form of natural selection: having the Cav ensures that the weakest gene pool is eliminated leaving the best genes to propogate. In my experience, the Cav genes are unlikely to propogate anyway, since they generally try and procreate with sheep. The U.S. Army tries to keep them in the field as much as possible because they're such an embarassment when they're in town. We give them spurs to play with (despite the high cost of treating self-inflicted spur injuries) and allocate them crosssed sabres, which is really a poorly disguised "X" to mark them as rejects - not that they've ever figured that out. But every country has this lower form of life. In the Middle East, they're generally found in prison or begging; in more civilized countries, they're generally in some kind of social institution where nurses try and teach them not to drool. America, not favoring socially subsidized dithering like this, has once again made the most efficient use of its resources, exiles these outcasts to foreign lands so that they are someone else's bother, and uses them as inexpensive cannon fodder. If you remember the Cuban Boat Lift of 1980 when Castro sent his criminals to America, you'll understand what I mean - it's the same concept. ;) The old rivalries never die, do they?
|