Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE Page: <<   < prev  167 168 [169] 170 171   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:37:32 AM   
pat.casey

 

Posts: 393
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jeffk3510

Im sure he is a good guy GJ....just seems like whenever something doesnt go his way he asks for a HR and or a beta change....thats my observation....he got caught with his pants down. You did NOTHING wrong


Agree ... he abused the leaky cap to murder your CVEs and you manned up and moved on.
Absolutely no reason there should be a HR change now because he lost a few hundred fighters to a feint.

In my book that's not abusive, that's good play.

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 5041
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:52:41 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Com'on guys. We clarified. I'm perfectly happy with the new HR. Matter closed. Let's move over cos we have Japan top invade and conquer...we don't have time for these chats

However...at Tokyo there are still 2300 fighters, 1800 bombers and 600 aux (probably bombers)...so we've just scratched the paint.

Loadings (the real one!) just started...it will take us at least 3 fully turns to load everything...and i need to study a way to keep my ships as safe as possible!

Consider that only IJNAF was involved in this turn...the IJAAF is still there, intact...with thousands of Franks and Peggies(T)....

(in reply to pat.casey)
Post #: 5042
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:25:41 AM   
cwDeici

 

Posts: 70
Joined: 12/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
Again...one last time...believe me: Rader is a good one


Definitely, he seems like a sterling guy, I don't think he is whinging, I just happen to agree with you on this one.
I think the new HR is well-balanced, at least when and if naval strikes can be prioritized.

He does seem to ask for HRs more often, so maybe there are some HRs you'd like to ask him for as well?

< Message edited by cwDeici -- 1/7/2012 5:52:30 AM >

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5043
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 9:36:07 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

Com'on guys. We clarified. I'm perfectly happy with the new HR. Matter closed. Let's move over cos we have Japan top invade and conquer...we don't have time for these chats

However...at Tokyo there are still 2300 fighters, 1800 bombers and 600 aux (probably bombers)...so we've just scratched the paint.

Loadings (the real one!) just started...it will take us at least 3 fully turns to load everything...and i need to study a way to keep my ships as safe as possible!

Consider that only IJNAF was involved in this turn...the IJAAF is still there, intact...with thousands of Franks and Peggies(T)....


Ever thought of going into politics?

Yes, the problem is not solved yet, is it? But based on this trial run, your CAP provided good cover. Kamis might change the equation some. I just think you're going to take some losses. You're invading the heart of Japan. You should take some losses. But either way this could break the back of the Japanese airforces. Maybe spreading it out over more days is an idea, giving fewer targets and more chances for the IJ to impale itself on your CAP, but actually invading with enough first to keep a hold while you trickle in.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5044
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 10:29:17 AM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
We keep on loading...the fleet is huge but even so the ships i gathered are just enough to get aboard the first wave....
I'm trying to optimize my TFs, giving to each of them enough empty "bonus ships" to get all the soldiers on the beach in one single turn...hard task, believe me!

At Hachinoe he has now placed several CD guns units.... my BBs aren't able to penetrate the barrage of fire created by all those guns and my bombers, are taking severe losses to the incredible amount of flak he managed to get there...
Losses Obvert? Oh i know...i will take tremendous losses...both by his CD guns and by his planes...i know...but hey! This is a war and you cannot hope to get in an out without a scar or two

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Aug 23, 44

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Hachinohe at 118,55 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

98 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
     BB Queen Elizabeth, Shell hits 7
     BB Valiant, Shell hits 1
     CA Exeter

Japanese ground losses:
     47 casualties reported
        Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
        Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 10 disabled
        Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



Combined 8th SNLF  firing at BB Queen Elizabeth
BB Queen Elizabeth firing at Combined 8th SNLF
Walrus II acting as spotter for BB Valiant
3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion firing at BB Valiant
BB Valiant firing at 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion
Walrus II acting as spotter for CA Exeter
CA Exeter firing at 116th Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Hachinohe at 118,55 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

99 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
     BB Washington, Shell hits 2
     BC Renown, Shell hits 2
     CA Louisville
     CA Portland

Japanese ground losses:
     52 casualties reported
        Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
        Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 14 disabled
        Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
     Guns lost 23 (2 destroyed, 21 disabled)



OS2U-3 Kingfisher acting as spotter for BB Washington
Wake Coastal Gun Battalion firing at BB Washington
BB Washington firing at Wake Coastal Gun Battalion
Combined 8th SNLF  firing at BC Renown
BC Renown firing at Combined 8th SNLF
OS2U-3 Kingfisher acting as spotter for CA Louisville
CA Louisville firing at 33rd Division
CA Portland firing at 116th Division


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Kure 7th SNLF, at 118,55 (Hachinohe)

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 23 minutes


Allied aircraft
     Liberator B.III x 3
     Liberator B.VI x 42
     Mosquito FB.VI x 15
     Wellington B.X x 15
     B-24D Liberator x 14
     B-24D1 Liberator x 19
     B-24J Liberator x 139
     B-25D1 Mitchell x 35
     B-25H Mitchell x 57
     B-25J1 Mitchell x 15
     B-29-1 Superfort x 152
     P-38L Lightning x 22
     PB4Y-1 Liberator x 23
     PBJ-1D Mitchell x 30
     PV-1 Ventura x 12


Allied aircraft losses
     Liberator B.III: 2 damaged
     Liberator B.VI: 12 damaged
     Wellington B.X: 2 damaged
     B-24D Liberator: 5 damaged
     B-24D1 Liberator: 2 damaged
     B-24J Liberator: 15 damaged
     B-24J Liberator: 1 destroyed by flak
     B-25D1 Mitchell: 5 damaged
     B-25H Mitchell: 5 damaged
     B-25H Mitchell: 1 destroyed by flak
     B-25J1 Mitchell: 1 damaged
     B-29-1 Superfort: 32 damaged
     B-29-1 Superfort: 2 destroyed by flak
     PB4Y-1 Liberator: 3 damaged
     PBJ-1D Mitchell: 7 damaged
     PV-1 Ventura: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
     533 casualties reported
        Squads: 2 destroyed, 15 disabled
        Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 159 disabled
        Engineers: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
     Vehicles lost 57 (14 destroyed, 43 disabled)


 
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 4th Guards Division ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 33rd Division ...
Also attacking Wake Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 116th Division ...
Also attacking 86th Division ...
Also attacking 93rd Division ...
Also attacking 52nd Division ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 36th Division ...
Also attacking 53rd Division ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 32nd Division ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 86th Division ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking Wake Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking 53rd Division ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 86th Division ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...

 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Aug 24, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 2nd Base Force, at 118,55 (Hachinohe)

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 23 minutes


Allied aircraft
     Liberator B.III x 12
     Liberator B.VI x 28
     Wellington B.X x 15
     B-24D Liberator x 14
     B-24D1 Liberator x 20
     B-24J Liberator x 126
     B-25D1 Mitchell x 45
     B-25H Mitchell x 58
     B-25J1 Mitchell x 15
     B-29-1 Superfort x 136
     P-38L Lightning x 11
     FM-2 Wildcat x 18
     F4U-1 Corsair x 13
     PB4Y-1 Liberator x 34
     PBJ-1D Mitchell x 44
     PV-1 Ventura x 23


Allied aircraft losses
     Liberator B.III: 5 damaged
     Liberator B.VI: 9 damaged
     Wellington B.X: 7 damaged
     B-24D Liberator: 5 damaged
     B-24D1 Liberator: 6 damaged
     B-24J Liberator: 56 damaged
     B-24J Liberator: 1 destroyed by flak
     B-25D1 Mitchell: 16 damaged
     B-25D1 Mitchell: 1 destroyed by flak
     B-25H Mitchell: 12 damaged
     B-25H Mitchell: 1 destroyed by flak
     B-25J1 Mitchell: 2 damaged
     B-29-1 Superfort: 37 damaged
     B-29-1 Superfort: 1 destroyed by flak
     PB4Y-1 Liberator: 4 damaged
     PBJ-1D Mitchell: 9 damaged
     PBJ-1D Mitchell: 1 destroyed by flak
     PV-1 Ventura: 6 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
     2050 casualties reported
        Squads: 2 destroyed, 50 disabled
        Non Combat: 5 destroyed, 192 disabled
        Engineers: 1 destroyed, 28 disabled
     Guns lost 43 (2 destroyed, 41 disabled)
     Vehicles lost 4 (3 destroyed, 1 disabled)

 
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking Wake Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 4th Guards Division ...
Also attacking 33rd Division ...
Also attacking 116th Division ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking 86th Division ...
Also attacking 36th Division ...
Also attacking 93rd Division ...
Also attacking 52nd Division ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 53rd Division ...
Also attacking 69th Ind.Mixed Brigade ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 11th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 1st Tank Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking Northeast Area Fleet ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd Mobile Infantry Regiment ...
Also attacking 151st AA Regiment ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 25th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 4th Guards Division ...
Also attacking 116th Division ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking 52nd Division ...
Also attacking 69th Ind.Mixed Brigade ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 25th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 14th Base Force ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking 36th Division ...
Also attacking 93rd Division ...
Also attacking 5th Depot Division ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 69th Ind.Mixed Brigade ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 11th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 151st AA Regiment ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 25th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking 3rd IJN Special Coastal Gun Battalion ...
Also attacking 13th Base Force ...
Also attacking 12th Base Force ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking Kure 7th SNLF ...
Also attacking 4th Guards Division ...
Also attacking 116th Division ...
Also attacking 72nd Division ...
Also attacking 52nd Division ...
Also attacking 69th Ind.Mixed Brigade ...
Also attacking 31st Special Base Force ...
Also attacking 2nd Base Force ...
Also attacking Combined 8th SNLF  ...
Also attacking 25th Ind.Mixed Regiment ...
Also attacking 7th Base Force ...



...as you can see we are going to face a powerfull enemy...well dug in in trenches (probably 6 forts at least) and with a very good combination of different forces...

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 5045
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:24:33 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
I'm getting pretty worried about all those CD guns....Rader managed to concentrate a lot of firepower on the beaches at Hachinoe...

I will try to make my TFs as big as possible (100 ships) so to concentrate all the firepower of my limited supporting ships (BBs, CAs, LCI (G)s etc...)

I'm also bringing with me some CD guns too (i fear that if the invasion fails my guys will be tormented by japanese BB bombardments) and some base forces equipped with radars...wanna have radars on the beach...in the hope that radar will help coordinate the CAP when the ships will be gone...

North Pacific HQ (9 hexes of range) will be placed at Hakkodate, 100 prepped for Hachinoe. In place we'll have an amphib HQ, an Army HQ and a Corp HQ for the first wave... should be enough for what concerns HQ bonuses...


(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5046
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:29:42 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
By my count, depending on health of units, I'd say 12000-13000 AV there.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5047
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:33:27 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

By my count, depending on health of units, I'd say 12000-13000 AV there.



So much?? I had said less than 9000... well, i want to believe the gurus of land combat are right...AVs don't count much late in the war cause it's the firepower that really matters....

however i'm scared like hell...but Alea Iacta Est...and there's nothing i can do about it now...

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 5048
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:35:06 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

I'm getting pretty worried about all those CD guns....Rader managed to concentrate a lot of firepower on the beaches at Hachinoe...

They showed up after the feint, maybe a quick feint to another destination might pack them into strategic mode for a couple of days. Hard to do now but some, anything might help

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 5049
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:37:33 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline
How many AV in your first wave?

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5050
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:39:02 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

quote:

I'm getting pretty worried about all those CD guns....Rader managed to concentrate a lot of firepower on the beaches at Hachinoe...

They showed up after the feint, maybe a quick feint to another destination might pack them into strategic mode for a couple of days. Hard to do now but some, anything might help


Not another one...i don't wanna strecth the thing too much (does it make any meaning to you in english?)...i've done it...now it's time to face my destiny...doesn anybody have any experience about a landing in front of all those CD guns? Is it doable provided the right support in terms of surface ships?

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 5051
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:39:37 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

How many AV in your first wave?


more or less 6,000 but with a huge % of armour...

(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 5052
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:40:34 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
My first wave just needs to hold the ground for some days...i'm not asking for the moon...but it will all depends on how much distrupted they will be once ashore...

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5053
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:42:36 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5054
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 1:46:37 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline
Thanks. This could be a close run thing.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5055
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 2:16:58 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
This is the count I get. Not sure how much a Depot Division has, and I thikn all of those base forces are 30 AV, but I've never played late game so not sure if they are the same there.

Not sure he'll be able to knock you back with these, but with 6+ forts it could be hard to break through quickly, and who knows what else will come. better now though than later with the reinforcements he'll get in the next half year, plus the far flung troops probably still on their way back to the HI.
-------------------------------------------------

Division - 450 x 20 = 9,000

Depot Div - 350? x 2 = 700

Mixed Brigade - 210 x 4 = 840

Mixed Rgt - 125 x 7 = 875

SNLF - 60 x 11 = 660

Base Force - 30 x 60 = 1800

-----------------------------

Total AV - 13,875

+ 11 x 50 = 550

PS - The two lists from the air raids are different. This is from the lower one. Looked at the top and found another 11 Tank Rgts!

< Message edited by obvert -- 1/7/2012 2:21:52 PM >

(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 5056
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 2:51:53 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
well...can't say i'm not scared to land in front of that army...

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 5057
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 3:37:18 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
..doesn anybody have any experience about a landing in front of all those CD guns? Is it doable provided the right support in terms of surface ships?


Not directly comparable, but in Marianas Scenario, Saipan has significant CD guns. Bombard with BB's before and on the day of landing (I presume you are doing that). Port attacks by air (presume you are doing that too). The damn things will keep firing until port damage is into the 80's at least. Every landing TF needs a BB to absorb fire and suppress the guns. High land rating CO of the amphibious taffy. Use APA's and LSI's and LCI's for the infantry, LST's and LSD's for the armor and arty.

The APA's will reliably unload troops in one day if loaded to 70% of their troop load capacity (you may be able to do more packign but have not tried it). The LCI's and LCT's can be packed to their rated capacity. Put at least a dozen LCI(R) in each group.


Add 2 medium sized cloves minced garlic, oregano and three or four Tokyo Bay leaves and simmer over high heat for 2 days.


It is the two day turn that is the problem. After day 1, the BB's will be out of main gun ammo and everything above the main deck will be bent or burning. The LCI(R)'s will be out of ammo. Inevitably, some APA's or other landing ships will have been hit or will still have 3 x 2 1/2 truck aboard and the AI will want to stay and finsih unloading. Also, the supply unload from the APA's after the troop unload may not be done on day 1.

To counter this problem, you could turn on "troop load only" on the APA's and tank-bearing LST's and then have dedicated AKA's and LST's will supply ONLY in the mix. The AI may then send the amphib taffy back to port after day 1. You could also load LCT's with supply only and no escorts and have them arrive on day 2. They will be murdered but the penalty is low. I used this to get supply ashore at Saipan with success.

I would also suggest staging a fresh BB bombardment taffy to arrive on day 2.

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5058
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:03:31 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
Just to be clear: I have no idea what Rader has there and due to recent events I won't even speculate.

What I will just say though is that if the IJA has double the AV then it CAN defeat an amphibious invasion even into 1945 ( when the firepower disparity is even greater ). Before someone claims I'm cheating or drawing from something in Rader's thread I'll just say that I know this ONLY because I've defeated an Allied amphibious invasion comprising just under 1,200 AV ( before landing ) with a defending force which eventually measured 1800 AV around Okinawa. My initial 1,000 AV destroyed some 300 AV as he landed and he never got more than 900 AV functioning on the base. Aerial bombing to disrupt his ground forces combined with repeated attacks eventually forced the surrender of the Allied forces.

There are obvious implications of this maths ( from another similar game ) for your game. I give no suggestions as to how you should proceed. I'm just pointing out my personal experience from a game in which I had to face Allied amphibious invasions.

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 5059
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:05:00 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
I Landed at Fukadoma once in downfall.  I had to go through the Tsushima with a bunch of 40CM CD gun's.  The invasion work, I cut Japan in half but I got messed up.  Sank 2 old BB's couple of CA's and any aka hit by a single shell evaporated.  Took it in the days but it was tough going.  I did notice that the big guns really want to dual with the big ships so if you have an old BB in your invasion task force it will draw a lot of attention.  I believe big port air attacks suppress these guns to some extent so what ever you can spare, including dive bombers and TBM's might want to run port attacks.  Can't confirm this though.

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 5060
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:06:05 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Thanks Cap Mandrake!
Actually the 2 days turn has also some good aspects... cause the enemy is usually slowed down in his reaction...but you're right about CD guns and BB ammos...that is a big issue!

My BB guns are almost useless against that concentration of CD guns...same goes for my bombers against those AAs... but i'll try to keep on pounding the place.

Unfortunately my TFs aren't composed only by APAs...i only have 50 APAs so i have to use everything i have...xAPs included...

It's gonna be really bloody

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 5061
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:06:46 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Just to be clear: I have no idea what Rader has there and due to recent events I won't even speculate.

What I will just say though is that if the IJA has double the AV then it CAN defeat an amphibious invasion even into 1945 ( when the firepower disparity is even greater ). Before someone claims I'm cheating or drawing from something in Rader's thread I'll just say that I know this ONLY because I've defeated an Allied amphibious invasion comprising just under 1,200 AV ( before landing ) with a defending force which eventually measured 1800 AV around Okinawa. My initial 1,000 AV destroyed some 300 AV as he landed and he never got more than 900 AV functioning on the base. Aerial bombing to disrupt his ground forces combined with repeated attacks eventually forced the surrender of the Allied forces.

There are obvious implications of this maths ( from another similar game ) for your game. I give no suggestions as to how you should proceed. I'm just pointing out my personal experience from a game in which I had to face Allied amphibious invasions.


and might I add ... turned the tables and took back Naha ...

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 5062
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:16:45 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Just to be clear: I have no idea what Rader has there and due to recent events I won't even speculate.

What I will just say though is that if the IJA has double the AV then it CAN defeat an amphibious invasion even into 1945 ( when the firepower disparity is even greater ). Before someone claims I'm cheating or drawing from something in Rader's thread I'll just say that I know this ONLY because I've defeated an Allied amphibious invasion comprising just under 1,200 AV ( before landing ) with a defending force which eventually measured 1800 AV around Okinawa. My initial 1,000 AV destroyed some 300 AV as he landed and he never got more than 900 AV functioning on the base. Aerial bombing to disrupt his ground forces combined with repeated attacks eventually forced the surrender of the Allied forces.

There are obvious implications of this maths ( from another similar game ) for your game. I give no suggestions as to how you should proceed. I'm just pointing out my personal experience from a game in which I had to face Allied amphibious invasions.



Nemo, i'm sorry but i still don't understand your "tone"...your last message here in this AAR was pretty criptic and you never came back to explain what was happening.
Did i say anything wrong?

Anyway...i know what you've done there...i've tried to study that campaign... i know i have very tiny % of success here...but i think it's worth and fun trying.
I have no other options at the moment strategically speaking and i don't wanna keep on strat bombing...let's see how it goes...

(in reply to Nemo121)
Post #: 5063
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:18:02 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth

I Landed at Fukadoma once in downfall.  I had to go through the Tsushima with a bunch of 40CM CD gun's.  The invasion work, I cut Japan in half but I got messed up.  Sank 2 old BB's couple of CA's and any aka hit by a single shell evaporated.  Took it in the days but it was tough going.  I did notice that the big guns really want to dual with the big ships so if you have an old BB in your invasion task force it will draw a lot of attention.  I believe big port air attacks suppress these guns to some extent so what ever you can spare, including dive bombers and TBM's might want to run port attacks.  Can't confirm this though.


Yes, i'm adding 6 old BBs to the invasions and a lot of DDs and CAs...hopefully they will absorb the bulk of CD guns ammos...

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 5064
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 5:52:33 PM   
princep01

 

Posts: 943
Joined: 8/7/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline

Aboard USS New Jersey, 160+ miles east of some unpronounceable Japanese ville:

Ser Greyjoy, as to you not understanding Nemo's "tone"....not to worry. I am certain you are not the source of his "tone". Nemo is a person who prizes his integrity and it has been bruised more than once in these forums. He bristles easily as a result whenever there is even a question that someone might challenge it.

However, as we all know, he knows this game as well as anyone, if not better. It is a wise man that listens carefully to his advise on strategy and tactics. He is saying the invasion is likely to fail. Funny that...seems several have tried to discourage this frontal assault to no avail. But, the Gereagle (you) has chosen its course. So....to glory and that your name will never be forgotten!

Now...my 2cents on the feint/CAP trap......it is war. Cpt Mandrake said it about as well as it could be stated. princepBolton goes on record as a +1 to Mandrake's comments and that you did nothing wrong. If a house rule resolves it...good.

Now...let's go sink something.

< Message edited by princep01 -- 1/7/2012 5:53:37 PM >

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 5065
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 7:11:01 PM   
Nemo121


Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline
GJ, No, nothing you've said at all. Just someone with an agenda, a lack of moral fibre, a large dollop of paranoia and an equally large failure of common sense elsewhere. Forget about it and focus on your game - which appears to be reaching an interesting point in time ( based solely on what you are saying in this thread ).


Princep, GJ,
Just to be clear though. I've not said the invasion will fail. I've given no advice or indication as to my assessment of its chance of success either way.

I've simply pointed out a datum point from another game which GJ may wish to consider in his own, independent, considerations. I've indicated that I believe that the datum point is applicable but I haven't gone into any detail outlining any of my own detailed conclusions from my experience in a similar situation.

Basically I've just said - "You may want to read x where the IJA drove the US off the beaches and draw your own conclusions". I've not given any analysis or advice.

< Message edited by Nemo121 -- 1/7/2012 7:16:40 PM >


_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to princep01)
Post #: 5066
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 7:21:39 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
20 Jap Divisions....4 long tons of Emperor Brand Kool-aide mix, plenty of fresh water and lovely mixing bowls...what could POSSIBLY go wrong.

Great entertainment.

(in reply to pat.casey)
Post #: 5067
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 9:32:52 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Well, good luck, you have bigger cajones than me. I don't think I would try it.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 5068
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 9:44:01 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Given GJ's past, maybe Kagoshima is the real target!

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 5069
RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE - 1/7/2012 10:36:41 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Well, good luck, you have bigger cajones than me. I don't think I would try it.

Rader has some good stuff there, he also has some mega-crap depot divisions. If Rader does not throw him out before the first wave he has trouble. What was in that second wave??????? Yeah, 4 USMC divisions. Like I said, I think it will be a problem getting ashore. but if GJ takes that port and keeps his CV's, Rader should bring a pen to Tokyo bay whilst we shop for a different AAR

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 5070
Page:   <<   < prev  167 168 [169] 170 171   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: HAIRY TO THE BONE Page: <<   < prev  167 168 [169] 170 171   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.328